As a horror nut I first discovered Peter Jackson when Dead Alive was released on VHS tape back in the early 90s. After viewing that first film I knew Jackson was destined to become one of the great filmmakers. I immediately saw his other works such as the Oscar nominated Heavenly Creatures and Meet the Feebles. When his first Hollywood film, The Frighteners, was going to be released I thought that the entire world was going to discover him then. But I was dead wrong because that film tanked. But...
Gnar said:
is it wrong to say that the only Peter Jackson films I have seen are Heavenly Creatures and the Frighteners (Now out on DVD Special addition)
Absolutely not. But I do recommend you watch his twisted early stuff. As gross as they can be, they are extremely fun to watch!!! Especially MEET THE FEEBLES!
Excellent interview and a major inspiration for me and others to perservere in our careers!
Missy got me The Frighteners Director's Cut DVD (which was previously onlu available on Laserdisc!) for Christmas. I would have, however, liked more Q&A about Brain Dead and Bad Taste.
6
Idjit
HOPEFUL
I'm lost
DEC 08, 2005 12:49 PM
Gnar said:
is it wrong to say that the only Peter Jackson films I have seen are Heavenly Creatures and the Frighteners (Now out on DVD Special addition)
Yes. Dead Alive/Braindead is fucking awesome. Second best Zombie flick.
It is quite amazing how many people over seas have actually seen peter jackson films and I don't just mean lord of the rings heavenly creatures of freightners . Bad Yaste is a great film though and I so need to see meet the feebles again sometime .
It's just a movie. lol. But Peter IS a great film maker. As a person that has watched every minute of the appendices on the LOTR EE dvds (more than once) I understand his reasoning behind wanting to keep the crew together. And that part paid off - Kong LOOKS great. But it's not his best film. Even though I love the LOTR films dearly (read the books my entire life) I still think Heavenly Creatures is his best film. I'm not sure he can ever "top" the spectacle of LOTR...in fact, I hope he doesn't try. Something in between his early films and the more recent blockbusters would be great. Nice interview...but Pete's a pretty easy interview, really. Kong is good, but in no way is it perfect or genious or whatever superlative you want to throw at it. It's just a good escapist/adventure/romance movie.
And Peter is a really nice guy - I wrote to him just after the first LOTR, just telling him how I'd been following his career since 'Bad Taste' (the funniest sci-fi horror of all time bar-none), and he wrote back to me, making direct references to things I had said in my letter. Sent me a signed picture too, which was nice of him. Peter Jackson is so much better than Spielberg could ever dream of.
I think what would have been interesting if Jackson had taken another route for the King Kong Movie and had Kong take a a big shit while hanging out at the empire state... so I could have called that fiilm a big peice of crap!!!
courtneyriot
STAFF
Los Angeles, CA
DEC 08, 2005 06:00 AM