Anheuser-Busch, brewers of American beers such as Natural Light, Michelob, Busch, and Budweiser, was shocked, absolutely shocked to find out that irresponsible ruffians were using the Budweiser promotional game "Bud Pong" with alcohol instead of water!
The No. 1 U.S. brewer has been promoting Bud Pong competitions since July, supplying tables, balls and glasses to wholesalers across the United States.
Players on one team try to sink a ball into another team's liquid-filled cups. If successful, the opposing team must drink.
Anheuser-Busch says the game's instructions called for water to be consumed during play, not beer, which is the company's main product.
"It has come to our attention that despite our explicit guidelines, there may have been instances where this promotion was not carried out in the manner it was intended," Anheuser-Busch spokeswoman Francine Katz said in a statement Tuesday.
Katz says the promotion was meant to provide a fun activity at bars.
"However as a company that has invested more than $500 million to promote responsible consumption among adults and to discourage abuse, we believe it is important that our intentions with Bud Pong not be misperceived. While we will continue to bring interactive promotions to bars and taverns for those of legal drinking age, we are ending Bud Pong."
How dare these idiots play a brewery-branded game at a bar that serves said brewery's products while consuming alcohol! It's absolutely inconceivable how one could come to the conclusion that beer would be an acceptable substitute for water in such a situation!
Personally, I'm appalled at the stupidity of those who chose to drink Budweiser products in direct opposition to the published rules of the game. How ignorant! How uncouth! How... brainwashed by marketing! Oh... wait...
I'm just disgusted that anyone would drink budweiser, unless of course they're drinking the czech budweiser-budvar, which I believe actually qualifies as beer (in contrat to the american counterpart).
astrobouy said:
I'm just disgusted that anyone would drink budweiser, unless of course they're drinking the czech budweiser-budvar, which I believe actually qualifies as beer (in contrat to the american counterpart).
I like bud, sorry. I drink it to get drunk, not as a status symbol. You must have a very low disgust threshold.
astrobouy said:
I'm just disgusted that anyone would drink budweiser, unless of course they're drinking the czech budweiser-budvar, which I believe actually qualifies as beer (in contrat to the american counterpart).
I like bud, sorry. I drink it to get drunk, not as a status symbol. You must have a very low disgust threshold.
astrobouy said:
I'm just disgusted that anyone would drink budweiser, unless of course they're drinking the czech budweiser-budvar, which I believe actually qualifies as beer (in contrat to the american counterpart).
I like bud, sorry. I drink it to get drunk, not as a status symbol. You must have a very low disgust threshold.
Bud or Guiness, nothing else.
Bud gets you drunk?
Unless Bud is my old friend from college that always had an open tab at the local bar, I can't see how Bud would get anyone drunk...
I know we're not supposed to get all judgemental and stuff on sg, but that's just weird.
Nah. Bud & Guiness are actually pretty close. I used to think guiness was heavy beer until I discovered Russian Imperial Stouts. Now Guiness is just something wet to drink at bars that don't have much of a selection. It really has no taste.
But I understand why people don't like big beers. They're heavy as shit, fairly high in alcohol content, and really not something cool and refreashing. They're fucking expensive too.
I know we're not supposed to get all judgemental and stuff on sg, but that's just weird.
Nah. Bud & Guiness are actually pretty close. I used to think guiness was heavy beer until I discovered Russian Imperial Stouts. Now Guiness is just something wet to drink at bars that don't have much of a selection. It really has no taste.
But I understand why people don't like big beers. They're heavy as shit, fairly high in alcohol content, and really not something cool and refreashing. They're fucking expensive too.
Exactly. Bud actually has more alcohol by volume than Guinness. Guinness, all things considered, is a very light beer. Of course, people put down Bud all the time, but if you're looking for something to drink that's not heavy, there's nothing better.
Plus, Bud has more alcohol than Bass, Sam Adams, Anchor Steam, McKewans Scotch (as well as Guinness).
PointBlank said:
Exactly. Bud actually has more alcohol by volume than Guinness. Guinness, all things considered, is a very light beer.
I didn't mean the alchohol content as much as I meant that the tastes and textures are very different. I'm a Guinness drinker and all the Bud and Bud-esque drinkers I know make a gross face when they see me drinking the black stuff, that's why it seems an odd couplet to me.
PointBlank said:
Exactly. Bud actually has more alcohol by volume than Guinness. Guinness, all things considered, is a very light beer.
I didn't mean the alchohol content as much as I meant that the tastes and textures are very different. I'm a Guinness drinker and all the Bud and Bud-esque drinkers I know make a gross face when they see me drinking the black stuff, that's why it seems an odd couplet to me.
I think that's why i switch between the two. A little variety. All those other craft brews taste the same to me: too heavy and hoppy. I can have one of them on occasion, but for a night of drinking, I like to back up the Turkey with something crisp.
PointBlank said:
Exactly. Bud actually has more alcohol by volume than Guinness. Guinness, all things considered, is a very light beer.
I didn't mean the alchohol content as much as I meant that the tastes and textures are very different. I'm a Guinness drinker and all the Bud and Bud-esque drinkers I know make a gross face when they see me drinking the black stuff, that's why it seems an odd couplet to me.
The texture is what I like about Guinness and other stouts - the lack of carbination. English bitters like Buddingon's and Tetley's are like that too. It just makes them smoother and easier to throw down.
Corporate indignation is a weird thing - it can't be real indignation because it's so illogical to get upset over that thing, so it's just the corporation's way of telling you to stop doing something. We have these color printers at work, for instance, that we use to print up colorful account summaries. Since they're there, we sometimes use them for other things. Then one day, our manager was on a group call in which someone in higher managment expressed their shock and disgust that we would ever even think to use those printers for anything except the one thing. We figured that what they meant is that they just wanted us to decrease our usage of them for other things, but they didn't know how to enforce it aside from oddly-placed shame.
Shal
Los Angeles, CA
October 2002
OCT 19, 2005 11:21 PM