TOPICS:
OCT 17, 2005 02:04 PM
OCT 17, 2005 02:09 PM
OCT 17, 2005 02:10 PM
OneArmedScissor said:
This actually happened in my town, I mean I am from Sweden and this particular story happened in my town.
Well, that clears that mystery up. 
OCT 17, 2005 05:08 PM
thestral
Manassas, VA
August 2005
OCT 17, 2005 07:55 PM
OCT 17, 2005 08:09 PM
OCT 17, 2005 08:26 PM
OCT 17, 2005 10:34 PM
OCT 17, 2005 11:18 PM
OCT 18, 2005 09:08 AM
Thats absolutely fucking disgraceful 
OCT 18, 2005 09:26 AM
OCT 18, 2005 10:16 AM
ThatKid said:
Did you know that the word Gullible isn't in the dictionary?
why no, i'll go check!
OCT 18, 2005 04:53 PM
ive found my calling you people are genius
Thank you!
MarginWalker2002
San Diego, CA
April 2004
OCT 18, 2005 05:09 PM
lastpenguin
I'm lost
June 2003
OCT 18, 2005 05:22 PM
OCT 18, 2005 05:30 PM
tensix said:
If anything, the other woman should be making child support payments, not that guy. That's just an extra shitty thing to do. It's kind of like getting a research grant to build something, hurting yourself with it, then suing whoever gave you the money to build it in the first place. At least we can look forward to some funny ads on television...
Imagine, if you will, a TV set. A man appears on the screen sitting behind a desk and wearing stylish suit.
"Are you stressed? Does work take time that you could be spending on such important social events as having children and watching wrestling?
Well then sue your boss!
The great thing about this world is that you can sue pretty much anyone for pretty much anything and you'll probably win... or at least get a large settlement.
At the law firm of Dnanna & Sons, we specialize in dealing with large damage claims and can teach you how falling down and howling like a sissy can result in large damage awards from your employer--We can even teach you how to throw yourself in front of a bus and pretend to be injured! Hey, that's why they pay for insurance.
So call the law firm of Dnanna & Sons now at 1-800-I-SUE-YOU and get ready for a life of luxury!"
While I don't agree with the ruling, it is not based on nothing or allowing people to go sue-crazy for any old thing.
The ruling handed down basically stated that the opinion of the court was that the future of the child was more important than the financial future of the father.
I know I know, "but think of the children!!!!111eleventyone" is getting a little old, but this is one of the cases where the supreme court takes into consideration the values of our society at this point in history. And by those guidelines, whether you agree with them or not, our society values the future of a child more than the future of an adult based on the arbitrary age of 18 (or in some states 21 if they go to college 
).
And that is that, the final ruling according to the SCOTUS: children > you.
TheRedBaron
Cambridge, MA
November 2003
OCT 18, 2005 05:39 PM
MAR 10, 2006 03:36 PM
MAR 10, 2006 04:15 PM
MAR 10, 2006 04:23 PM
Lily said:
This is why people need to either go through agencies or sign statements.
With every supposedly consensual sexual encounter? More work for us lawyers I guess.
MAR 10, 2006 05:01 PM
MAR 10, 2006 05:03 PM
Dead_Ringer said:
Lily said:
This is why people need to either go through agencies or sign statements.
With every supposedly consensual sexual encounter? More work for us lawyers I guess.
That reminds me, Ringer. I'm faxing over a consent statement...
FunkySkunk
Gainesville, FL
July 2004
OCT 17, 2005 01:52 PM