A radio competion promised "100 grand" to the winner. Norreasha Gill won by listening to the station for a couple of hours and being the tenth person to call in. She is sueing the station because the "100 grand" isn't cash, it's a Nestle candy bar.
Before her family went to sleep that night, Gill says, she promised her children - ages 1, 5 and 11 - that they'd have a minivan, a shopping spree, a savings account and a home with a back yard.
"What hurts me is they were going to get me in front of my children, all dressed up, and hand me a candy bar, after all those promises I made to them," she told the Lexington Herald-Leader. "You just don't do that to people."
The radio station have offered her $5000. She wants the rest, and thinks that she has a case.
Experts said the radio station could face action by the Federal Communications Commission, which licenses radio stations.
FCC regulations say contest descriptions can't be false or deceptive and that stations must conduct contests as advertised. Stations in two other states have been fined for contests that told listeners they'd won cash prizes without specifying they were in the Italian or Turkish lira, not the U.S. dollar.
I hope the radio station gives her a substantial amount of cash.
I wish I could have seen her face when she found out she got fucked over by a lame joke.
I'm a terrible person, but that would have made me feel good for an hour or two.
Her fault for assuming the station meant cash. It's a dirty trick and all, and I probably would have fallen for it too, but still, unless they said specifically "One hundred thousand dollars", I say she's shit out of luck.
"What hurts me is they were going to get me in front of my children, all dressed up, and hand me a candy bar, after all those promises I made to them," she told the Lexington Herald-Leader. "You just don't do that to people."
And the real lessons of the story, lost on her it seems, is that you don't make promises without knowing for certain you can back it up. (This is the same lesson people should learn before accepting credit cards/loans).
Another lesson being that nothing in life is actually free.
That is pretty fucked up. Total humiliation and disappointment at the hands of radio djs (who are basically the lowest scum on earth if you ask me) just for a joke that isn't even funny.
DireChocobo said:
Her fault for assuming the station meant cash. It's a dirty trick and all, and I probably would have fallen for it too, but still, unless they said specifically "One hundred thousand dollars", I say she's shit out of luck.
Gimme a break. If someone tells you won a contest for "a hundred grand", you aren't going to think you won a fucking candy bar.
"What hurts me is they were going to get me in front of my children, all dressed up, and hand me a candy bar, after all those promises I made to them," she told the Lexington Herald-Leader. "You just don't do that to people."
And the real lessons of the story, lost on her it seems, is that you don't make promises without knowing for certain you can back it up. (This is the same lesson people should learn before accepting credit cards/loans).
Another lesson being that nothing in life is actually free.
[Edited on Jun 23, 2005 7:10PM]
You know, when she wins this lawsuit you're going to be saying that the real lesson is that you shouldn't trick people.
DireChocobo said:
Her fault for assuming the station meant cash. It's a dirty trick and all, and I probably would have fallen for it too, but still, unless they said specifically "One hundred thousand dollars", I say she's shit out of luck.
Gimme a break. If someone tells you won a contest for "a hundred grand", you aren't going to think you won a fucking candy bar.
Thistle said:
You know, when she wins this lawsuit you're going to be saying that the real lesson is that you shouldn't trick people.
If she wins, I'll be shaking my head in disgust. While I think it might be nice to live in a world without tricksters, I do not believe it is realistic. Sometimes you just have to accept that you got tricked, put it on the list of "life experiences", and move on.
If she loses, some good will still come out of it. She, and hopefully her children, will have learned not to believe everything they are told. A very valuable lesson.
Thistle said:
You know, when she wins this lawsuit you're going to be saying that the real lesson is that you shouldn't trick people.
If she wins, I'll be shaking my head in disgust. While I think it might be nice to live in a world without tricksters, I do not believe it is realistic. Sometimes you just have to accept that you got tricked, put it on the list of "life experiences", and move on.
If she loses, some good will still come out of it. She, and hopefully her children, will have learned not to believe everything they are told. A very valuable lesson.
What part of "making a false or misleading claim in advertising or a contest is ILLEGAL" did you not understand?
I think she'llw in something for suingm but not the whole thing. BUt what the fuck? Is that a new trend, to purposely fuck withy people like that? What's the toy yoda? Society is all fucked when radio contest have to resort to stupid shit like 'ha, it's a candy bar' for what, ratings?
Lame. I'd think it would make the station lose ratings to be such dicks, but I guess asshole-ism is popular these days. Oh, wait, it always has been.
DireChocobo said:
Her fault for assuming the station meant cash. It's a dirty trick and all, and I probably would have fallen for it too, but still, unless they said specifically "One hundred thousand dollars", I say she's shit out of luck.
Gimme a break. If someone tells you won a contest for "a hundred grand", you aren't going to think you won a fucking candy bar.
Dude, I said I probably would have fallen for it too. Actually,I know I would have.
Reminds me of a few weeks ago here, a club listed Guns and Roses as an act for one weekend night. I wonder if that club is still there... I saw it in the paper, and was caught off guard by it myself, and didn't realize it until a station here was talking about it a few days before the supposed show. One of the DJ's caught that it was G-A-R, not G-N-R.
I say the Toy Yoda lady has no case either. If the DJ's didn't specifically say it was a car, or say it was a Camry, Celica, or whatever else, she's S.O.L. too. It's shitty, yes, but it's not against those FCC regulations, nor is it illegal.
DireChocobo said:
Her fault for assuming the station meant cash. It's a dirty trick and all, and I probably would have fallen for it too, but still, unless they said specifically "One hundred thousand dollars", I say she's shit out of luck.
Gee, with a keen legal mind like that I expect you'll be on the short list when Rehnquist retires.
Keith said:
What part of "making a false or misleading claim in advertising or a contest is ILLEGAL" did you not understand?
I guess I don't agree with the law as written, if giving a person exactly what was described in the contest rules is considered misleading.
I really don't feel sorry for grown adults who still believe that $100,000 might fall in to their lap for doing just about nothing. Hey, it could happen, but don't spend it til you have it.
DireChocobo said:
Her fault for assuming the station meant cash. It's a dirty trick and all, and I probably would have fallen for it too, but still, unless they said specifically "One hundred thousand dollars", I say she's shit out of luck.
Gimme a break. If someone tells you won a contest for "a hundred grand", you aren't going to think you won a fucking candy bar.
Dude, I said I probably would have fallen for it too. Actually,I know I would have.
Reminds me of a few weeks ago here, a club listed Guns and Roses as an act for one weekend night. I wonder if that club is still there... I saw it in the paper, and was caught off guard by it myself, and didn't realize it until a station here was talking about it a few days before the supposed show. One of the DJ's caught that it was G-A-R, not G-N-R.
I say the Toy Yoda lady has no case either. If the DJ's didn't specifically say it was a car, or say it was a Camry, Celica, or whatever else, she's S.O.L. too. It's shitty, yes, but it's not against those FCC regulations, nor is it illegal.
Except that it is against FCC regulations and it is illegal. Your law degree is from where exactly?
I really don't feel sorry for grown adults who still believe that $100,000 might fall in to their lap for doing just about nothing. Hey, it could happen, but don't spend it til you have it.
you know, that's kind of the point of radio station giveaways... something for nothing.
Keith said:
What part of "making a false or misleading claim in advertising or a contest is ILLEGAL" did you not understand?
I guess I don't agree with the law as written, if giving a person exactly what was described in the contest rules is considered misleading.
I really don't feel sorry for grown adults who still believe that $100,000 might fall in to their lap for doing just about nothing. Hey, it could happen, but don't spend it til you have it.
Well, I could spent about two hours explaining what thats a rather juvenile analysis, but lest just stick to the most important one. They have defrauded not just the winner, but their entire audience. This isn't about one person, this is about every single person who stayed listening to the station who wouldn't have were it not for the fraudulent and deceitful inducement. And what about the radio station's competitors losing market share and revenue?
The contest rules are not fucking available, this is deliberate. There is no way of checking the legal offer against the plain English meaning of the statement. This is fucking fraud.
DireChocobo said:
Her fault for assuming the station meant cash. It's a dirty trick and all, and I probably would have fallen for it too, but still, unless they said specifically "One hundred thousand dollars", I say she's shit out of luck.
Gimme a break. If someone tells you won a contest for "a hundred grand", you aren't going to think you won a fucking candy bar.
Dude, I said I probably would have fallen for it too. Actually,I know I would have.
Reminds me of a few weeks ago here, a club listed Guns and Roses as an act for one weekend night. I wonder if that club is still there... I saw it in the paper, and was caught off guard by it myself, and didn't realize it until a station here was talking about it a few days before the supposed show. One of the DJ's caught that it was G-A-R, not G-N-R.
I say the Toy Yoda lady has no case either. If the DJ's didn't specifically say it was a car, or say it was a Camry, Celica, or whatever else, she's S.O.L. too. It's shitty, yes, but it's not against those FCC regulations, nor is it illegal.
Except that it is against FCC regulations and it is illegal. Your law degree is from where exactly?
The National School of Common Sense. The station could have said "One Thousand Bucks", and given the woman 1000 male deer, and it would have been accurate to the description. Now, in all honesty, I didn't read the linked article, and if they did specify a cash prize, then fuck them for screwing her over like that. I agree with you that it was an asshole thing to do, but I also believe she got what was advertised. I've listened closely to a few Clear Channel nationwide contests lately (Not out of choice mind you, my coworkers listen to that shit), and they make quite a point to a) define the prize as being cash, and b) make it fully aware theres no way in hell you're going to win. They bait you by saying "gauranteed chance". Of course you have a "gauranteed chance" every Tom Dick and Harry out there has the same "gauranteed chance" just by having a pulse. But do one of you guys want to calculate the odds of the 25th nationwide caller having a GA drivers license number that matches the number they have? Because I sure as hell don't want to work that math. Everyone with the appropriate state I.D. has the "gauranteed chance" to win, but they won't "win".
But yeah, it's shitty radio, I agree with you there.
dem_z
United Kingdom
June 2004
JUN 23, 2005 01:18 PM