Lifestyle

TOPICS:

Previous

PAGE: 

1 ... 

365 | 366 | 367

 ... 954

Next

Previous

PAGE: 

1 | 2

Next

MisterSatan

MisterSatan

Portland, OR
August 2002

APR 05, 2005 09:02 PM

If you're ever inclined to marry your first cousin, there is an organization to help you out.

C.U.D.D.L.E. International, founded in 2002, is a privately funded organization dedicated to dispelling social prejudices and discriminating laws based on common myths about cousin marriages.

Goals

  • To continue extensive research on the issue of consanguinity
  • To produce educational materials for all walks of life
  • To bring about legislative reform in areas which do not currently allow cousin marriage
  • To provide a support network free from harassment
  • To provide referrals to legal and medical professionals
  • To provide scholarships to cousin-couples and their children


I don't know what's worse—their take on the Biblical perspective on "cousin-lovin" or the creepy sameness of the photos on the front page.

Deux

Deux

Oak Grove, KY
January 2003

APR 05, 2005 09:06 PM

Wow. Just... wow.

While I find the idea of inbreedind disturbing, it does make for amusing photo opportunities. Like the picture of the cousin-couple at the gates of Graceland in that site's photo slideshow. And the photo of the guy with the balding mullet. Priceless.

JohnClement

JohnClement

Silver Spring, MD
January 2004

APR 05, 2005 09:08 PM

From one of my journal entries:

Fun fact: Over the past 64 generations (since Roman times), the number of people whose genetic couplings were required to bring about the birth of you is 1,000,000,000,000,000,000. This number, though thousands of times bigger than the number of people who have ever lived, is accurate. How? incest, of course. Seriously, albeit possibly on a more removed level (ie: distant cousins, etc.) If you're dating someone from the same country and race, it is very likely that you two are related on some level.
This brought to you by A Short History of Nearly Everything

I'm not saying you should seek out relatives for mating purposes, but chances are you're already double dipping in the gene pool.

howdidigethere

howdidigethere

Oroville, CA
June 2004

APR 05, 2005 09:14 PM

there were couples that looked too much alike. thats effin weird. cuz they're cousins!

[Edited on Apr 05, 2005 9:15PM]

ioriyagami

ioriyagami

I'm lost
March 2005

APR 05, 2005 09:18 PM

Well, it IS a great way to save on wedding invitations tongue

Deux

Deux

Oak Grove, KY
January 2003

APR 05, 2005 09:22 PM

ioriyagami said:
Well, it IS a great way to save on wedding invitations tongue



And family reunion invitations, too.

yumchen

yumchen

Klamath Falls, OR
August 2002

APR 05, 2005 09:25 PM

What about Uncle/Niece relations? I lost my best friend that way frown

[Edited on Apr 05, 2005 by yumchen]

MrStitches

MrStitches

Brooklyn, NY
November 2003

APR 05, 2005 09:27 PM

A couple of cousins in my family tree got it on, and lived together until they died.
No kids, thank god.

ganzhimself

ganzhimself

Stevens Point, WI
November 2004

APR 05, 2005 09:30 PM

The fourth picture, the bald gentleman with the lady in pink on his lap... They look like borther and sister... That's just weird.

MisterSatan

MisterSatan

Portland, OR
August 2002

APR 05, 2005 09:34 PM

BillHaverchuck said:
From one of my journal entries:

Fun fact: Over the past 64 generations (since Roman times), the number of people whose genetic couplings were required to bring about the birth of you is 1,000,000,000,000,000,000. This number, though thousands of times bigger than the number of people who have ever lived, is accurate. How? incest, of course. Seriously, albeit possibly on a more removed level (ie: distant cousins, etc.) If you're dating someone from the same country and race, it is very likely that you two are related on some level.
This brought to you by A Short History of Nearly Everything

I'm not saying you should seek out relatives for mating purposes, but chances are you're already double dipping in the gene pool.


Well, mathematically, the above makes sense. But come on, man- first cousins?

Cigarette

Cigarette

Cleveland, OH
April 2004

APR 05, 2005 09:34 PM

BillHaverchuck said:
From one of my journal entries:

Fun fact: Over the past 64 generations (since Roman times),



Seems like such a low number, but I guess it's not if a generation is about 22 years. Seems like I should have had many, many more generations of grandfolks stretching back to Rome...

s5

s5

San Francisco, CA
OLD SKOOL

APR 05, 2005 09:43 PM

i think the point they're missing is that while two first cousins having children is low risk, if that trend keeps up for a generation or two (or more), the risk gets worse.

whatever makes people happy, but still, yuck.

JohnClement

JohnClement

Silver Spring, MD
January 2004

APR 05, 2005 09:50 PM

MisterSatan said:

BillHaverchuck said:
Blahbedy blahbedy


Well, mathematically, the above makes sense. But come on, man- first cousins?



Yeah, I know. I just love that book, and like to drop tidbits from it when they're applicable.

MisterSatan

MisterSatan

Portland, OR
August 2002

APR 05, 2005 09:52 PM

s5 said:
i think the point they're missing is that while two first cousins having children is low risk, if that trend keeps up for a generation or two (or more), the risk gets worse.

whatever makes people happy, but still, yuck.


That's basically what I was trying to say when I submitted the article.

*shudder*

thefreak

thefreak

NEWSWIRE

Gardner, MA

APR 05, 2005 09:52 PM

This is what happens when cousins marry:



*shudders*

Better than NAMBLA, I suppose.

-TM

beaky

beaky

Miami, FL
April 2003

APR 05, 2005 09:53 PM

Where did you think C.H.U.D. came from











NotJason

NotJason

Orono, ME
October 2004

APR 05, 2005 09:54 PM

i was recently told by a professor whom i trust that the consequences of incest are much much much less severe than they are commonly percieved to be. I don't know if this was just amongst cousins or if that's true about siblings and such too, but that would mean that the majority of the taboo is socially constructed, which wouldn't suprise me much.

Chitin

Chitin

New York, NY
December 2004

APR 05, 2005 09:57 PM

I'm my own grandpa.

HellboundLiberal

HellboundLiberal

Nashville, TN
August 2004

APR 05, 2005 10:06 PM

It reminds me of something out of Preacher by Garth Ennis.

thefreak

thefreak

NEWSWIRE

Gardner, MA

APR 05, 2005 10:47 PM

OMFG no...Arseface!!!

*just exposed his latent comic book geek*

Worst...thread...EVER.

-TM

pskank

pskank

Pittsburgh, PA
March 2005

APR 05, 2005 11:11 PM

aliens.

completely free of our genes. truly the next generation!

p-skank

HenryTMensch

HenryTMensch

New York, NY
December 2004

APR 05, 2005 11:48 PM

They don't eat or sleep or mow the lawn they just fuck their cousins all day long

HenryTMensch

HenryTMensch

New York, NY
December 2004

APR 05, 2005 11:52 PM

s5 said:
i think the point they're missing is that while two first cousins having children is low risk, if that trend keeps up for a generation or two (or more), the risk gets worse.

whatever makes people happy, but still, yuck.



This is a public health issue. It may make people happy not to wear their seatbelts or to take antibiotics needlessly. But it's my business when my insurance costs shoot through the roof and emergency rooms are packed because dipshits don't wear seatbelts. It's my business when overuse of antibiotics breeds strains of bacteria that are resistant to antibiotics. Just like cousin fucking is my business when the gene pool is filled to the brim with inbred people prone to genetic defects.

MisterSatan

MisterSatan

Portland, OR
August 2002

APR 06, 2005 12:00 AM

not_jason said:
i was recently told by a professor whom i trust that the consequences of incest are much much much less severe than they are commonly percieved to be. I don't know if this was just amongst cousins or if that's true about siblings and such too, but that would mean that the majority of the taboo is socially constructed, which wouldn't suprise me much.


Well, be it genetics or simply society, it's still taboo.

HenryTMensch

HenryTMensch

New York, NY
December 2004

APR 06, 2005 12:10 AM

MisterSatan said:

not_jason said:
i was recently told by a professor whom i trust that the consequences of incest are much much much less severe than they are commonly percieved to be. I don't know if this was just amongst cousins or if that's true about siblings and such too, but that would mean that the majority of the taboo is socially constructed, which wouldn't suprise me much.


Well, be it genetics or simply society, it's still taboo.


It's both. It's a social taboo that is driven by a biological/genetic issue. The incest taboo is one of the very few social norms that exists across virtually every culture. If you want evidence for the harm inbreeding does, you need look no further than the royal families of Europe which intermarried over many generations and eventually wound up with all kinds of fucked up hereditary / genetic illnesses as a result.

[Edited on Apr 06, 2005 by HenryTMensch]

Previous

PAGE: 

1 | 2

Next