Lifestyle

TOPICS:

Previous

PAGE: 

1 ... 

370 | 371 | 372

 ... 940

Next

Previous

PAGE: 

1 | 2

Next

fountainofdreams

fountainofdreams

Batavia, IL
January 2005

MAR 12, 2005 02:41 PM

theseeman said:
Wait the Jesuits kicked him out over promoting punishment? The jesuits? Didn't they used to kick alot of ass? I might be wrong here but I have an impression of Jesuits as Catholic shock troops. I guess times have changed.


400 years ago, yes they were catholic shock troops. now, they're probably the most liberal/philosophical arm of catholicism. they believe in seeing the world, and being educated, not accepting what is given you by the dogmatics of the church.

ThisIsWhoWeAre

ThisIsWhoWeAre

Oakland, CA
July 2004

MAR 12, 2005 02:45 PM

ashmanonar said:

theseeman said:
Wait the Jesuits kicked him out over promoting punishment? The jesuits? Didn't they used to kick alot of ass? I might be wrong here but I have an impression of Jesuits as Catholic shock troops. I guess times have changed.


400 years ago, yes they were catholic shock troops. now, they're probably the most liberal/philosophical arm of catholicism. they believe in seeing the world, and being educated, not accepting what is given you by the dogmatics of the church.


Yeah, the shock troop job has been passed on to....

fountainofdreams

fountainofdreams

Batavia, IL
January 2005

MAR 12, 2005 05:02 PM

ThisIsWhoWeAre said:

ashmanonar said:

theseeman said:
Wait the Jesuits kicked him out over promoting punishment? The jesuits? Didn't they used to kick alot of ass? I might be wrong here but I have an impression of Jesuits as Catholic shock troops. I guess times have changed.


400 years ago, yes they were catholic shock troops. now, they're probably the most liberal/philosophical arm of catholicism. they believe in seeing the world, and being educated, not accepting what is given you by the dogmatics of the church.


Yeah, the shock troop job has been passed on to....



BWAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHA!

that either frightens me or amuses me, i can't decide...

TheRevolutionary

TheRevolutionary

San Diego, CA
June 2004

MAR 12, 2005 05:11 PM

I don't like what you have to say, let me hit you.

SummaMentis

SummaMentis

Starkville, MS
March 2004

MAR 12, 2005 07:36 PM

it would have been so funny if he had been a corporal instead of a private!!!! hahahaha

WilliamIV

WilliamIV

I'm lost
January 2004

MAR 12, 2005 07:44 PM

I guess the adminstration doesn't realize how much fun and ex citing a public spanking can be! wink

Rabidnid

Rabidnid

Australia
May 2004

MAR 12, 2005 10:22 PM

ashmanonar said:

ThisIsWhoWeAre said:

ashmanonar said:

theseeman said:
Wait the Jesuits kicked him out over promoting punishment? The jesuits? Didn't they used to kick alot of ass? I might be wrong here but I have an impression of Jesuits as Catholic shock troops. I guess times have changed.


400 years ago, yes they were catholic shock troops. now, they're probably the most liberal/philosophical arm of catholicism. they believe in seeing the world, and being educated, not accepting what is given you by the dogmatics of the church.


Yeah, the shock troop job has been passed on to....



BWAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHA!

that either frightens me or amuses me, i can't decide...




The six boobs on the guy in the middle are what's causing the problem.

Rabidnid

Rabidnid

Australia
May 2004

MAR 12, 2005 10:23 PM

hulasboy said:

dogmatix1977 said:
I thought Catholic schools were really big on the ol' whacking stick? Or have times changed?

Anyway, freedom of speech, I always say. Private or public doesn't matter. Anytime I hear of a student being expelled because "their personal beliefs doesn't jive with the school's" I start to worry.



except that the school has a reputation to uphold as well. they don't want someone paddling kids with a big diploma on his wall from their school. They have a certain educational philosophy, and in order to protect their reputation they have to choose which students to pass and which students to drop.



Hummm, what he said.

FermatsEnigma

FermatsEnigma

USA
August 2004

MAR 13, 2005 04:11 AM

excerpted:

Le Moyne administrators may wish to review the statement of the American Association of University Professors (AAUP) that professors have ethical obligations towards their students.
Paragraph 2 of the AAUP’s Statement on Professional Ethics states:

As teachers, professors encourage the free pursuit of learning in their students.
They hold before them the best scholarly and ethical standards of their discipline.
Professors demonstrate respect for students as individuals and adhere to their
proper roles as intellectual guides and counselors. Professors make every
reasonable effort to foster honest academic conduct and to ensure that their
evaluations of students reflect each student’s true merit. They respect the
confidential nature of the relationship between professor and student. They avoid
any exploitation, harassment, or discriminatory treatment of students. They
acknowledge significant academic or scholarly assistance from them. They
protect their academic freedom.

The AAUP guidelines define academic freedom for nearly every institution of higher education in the country. By rejecting them, Le Moyne fails even to minimally fulfill its promise to its students to respect their academic freedom. McConnell’s dismissal indicates a complete failure on the part of Le Moyne to fulfill its duty of providing students the opportunity to freely pursue learning, as it apparently cannot even cope with a student who holds personal views that may differ from those of other students or of faculty members and administrators. Are the beliefs of Le Moyne’s education department so fragile that they will not survive dissent, or are they considered so inerrant that to question them is considered unacceptable? Colleges should welcome opposing points of view, not attempt to eliminate them. Le Moyne’s infringement upon McConnell’s academic freedom and freedom of conscience sends the message to the campus community that official censorship is acceptable and that those with controversial ideas should keep silent or risk being deemed a “mismatch” and summarily dismissed. If Le Moyne truly shares “the ideals of academic freedom found in American institutions of higher education,” students who hold differing viewpoints should be welcome to share their ideas openly. To use personal belief as a reason to dismiss a student is a formula for oppression, dogmatism, and intellectual stagnation.



If this were a student in the politcal science dept espousing beliefs like Ward Churchill you know most of you would be up in arms over this, This comes down to a fundamental right of academic freedom.

BigBlack81

BigBlack81

Atlanta, GA
November 2004

MAR 13, 2005 04:27 AM

This is interesting as I used to go to a private christian college here in Collegedale/Ooltewah and we had some of the most hardcore debates in class and out of class...but a lot of times we had to keep them on the hush-hush lest too many prying cloying eyes got a peek at what we were doing. I remember doing an essay on homosexuality for my Developmental Psych class and being very pro-gay as I was, and am, bisexual. The teacher, who later counseled me and became a good friend of mine, not only held my views in complete respect and esteem but offered them to the front of the class, with anonimity (Hey this WAS still a Christian school...) in place, as a voice of the opposition without ANY condemnation.

To me, education without freedom of expression and the responsibilites therin is not education, it's BRAIN WASHING. Period. The key is, does the thought and ideas behind educational processes at work infringe on the school's ability to teach freely? Or, another way, do the things we debate about in class impede our school's ability to teach fairly and openly?

Also, if Proverbs states that sparing a child the rod is hating them and the Jesuits are a CHRISTIAN school using the bible as one of their keystones of learning, isn't them expelling a student for talking about something IN the BIBLE nullifying their own position on a theological level?

Some things to think about...I know I will be. *sighs sadly*

VirtuallyLucid

VirtuallyLucid

Fresno, CA
December 2004

MAR 13, 2005 09:15 AM

Telepathboy said:
You know what the interesting thing is? "Spare the rod and spoil the child" isn't from the bible... it's from a poem by Samuel Butler. Seriously, look it up.

I mean, the bible says a few things about beating your kids... mostly in the book of Proverbs... but still. It's always amused me that the most commonly quoted bible phrase... is a poem.

"Love is a boy, by poets styled,
Then spare the rod and spoil the child"

He wrote it in... the late 1600's or so. It's actually a poem ridiculing Christianity... I think Puritans specifically.

*shrug*

-D



Just a note...try reading Proverbs 13:24
It's not like it comes outta thin air.

Not defending it, just saying it is in that book.
I'm not a bible-thumper, but I find religion (all religion) fascinating in its impact on culture.

Telepathboy

Telepathboy

Tacoma, WA
February 2005

MAR 13, 2005 04:21 PM

VirtuallyLucid said:

Just a note...try reading Proverbs 13:24
It's not like it comes outta thin air.

Not defending it, just saying it is in that book.
I'm not a bible-thumper, but I find religion (all religion) fascinating in its impact on culture.



... I know. Actually, in my very first post (the one you quoted) I mentioned Proverbs...

My point was merely that "Spare the rod..." is quoted as being a line from the bible, verbatim, and it's not. That's all.

-D

Telepathboy

Telepathboy

Tacoma, WA
February 2005

MAR 13, 2005 04:27 PM

Oh, and I'll elaborate. "Then spare the rod, and spoil the child" seems simple enough by itself, but when you add in the line preceding, it changes the entire meaning. If you take away the stylized metaphor, it basically says 'love isn't real, so go ahead and beat your kids'. Thus, the mocking of puritans.

I had something else to go there, but I can't remember what. Am I done now? Yeah.

-D

Previous

PAGE: 

1 | 2

Next