Lifestyle

TOPICS:

3/14/05

Previous

PAGE: 

1 ... 

374 | 375 | 376

 ... 944

Next

Previous

PAGE: 

1 | 2

Next

Christopher

Christopher

Portland, OR
November 2002

MAR 10, 2005 10:33 PM

In Bryan Singer’s upcoming Superman Returns, the role of Jor-El, Clark’s biological father, has been cast. While it may be a small role and not worth exploring if not for the person who was cast: Marlon Brando.

Much like Laurence Olivier's brief resurrection in "Sky Captain" last year, the late Marlon Brando will be appearing as Jor-El in "Superman Returns" which just began shooting here in Australia. As far as we can tell Brando will not be CGI, but rather Singer plans to use stock footage of Marlon Brando that was originally shot by "Superman" director Richard Donner for the first two films.

So much of Brando's work from the second one was left on the cutting room floor due to legal reasons that it's certainly possible they could be resurrected, the question is is the material of good enough quality to be usable.

This also gels with talk of Singer using items that are familiar to the first two films such as the design of the Fortress of Solitude and of Krypton. He has also mentioned that he will use part of the famous John Williams score.

JoshXXX

JoshXXX

Northborough, MA
March 2004

MAR 11, 2005 09:03 AM

I'll bet he'll be easier to work with this time around too, despite the thousand hours it's going to take to clean up the old footage so it's even par with todays standards and then stick him in the movie.

avalyn

avalyn

Utica, MI
March 2003

MAR 11, 2005 09:08 AM

Son of Jor-El, kneel before Zod!

threejane

threejane

San Francisco, CA
November 2004

MAR 11, 2005 09:10 AM

I'm fine with it, as long as they bring back Zod as Superman's quirky (read: alcoholic) but ultimately loveable uncle.

threejane

threejane

San Francisco, CA
November 2004

MAR 11, 2005 09:11 AM

avalyn said:
Son of Jor-El, kneel before Zod!

Why you gotta go and beat me to the Zod reference? Pshaw wink

InLikeFlynn

InLikeFlynn

Portland, OR
December 2004

MAR 11, 2005 09:13 AM

Goddamn this is exciting.

Greenwolfman

Greenwolfman

Park Ridge, IL
January 2004

MAR 11, 2005 09:21 AM

Why do they have to resurect my least favorite thing from the original movie.

Greenwolfman

Greenwolfman

Park Ridge, IL
January 2004

MAR 11, 2005 09:21 AM

Why do they have to resurect my least favorite thing from the original movie.

Lotusmonger

Lotusmonger

Chicago, IL
May 2004

MAR 11, 2005 09:30 AM

yes, but can they digitally make Margot Kidder appear sane?

Lit_the_Filter

Lit_the_Filter

Tacoma, WA
August 2004

MAR 11, 2005 10:09 AM

This is so fucking lame.

Wren

Wren

SUICIDEGIRL

Minnesota, USA

MAR 11, 2005 10:47 AM

Sounds pointless and expensive.

JoshXXX

JoshXXX

Northborough, MA
March 2004

MAR 11, 2005 10:59 AM

Lotusmonger said:
yes, but can they digitally make Margot Kidder appear sane?



Excuse me, I forgot my purse...

jovia

jovia

Seattle, WA
September 2004

MAR 11, 2005 11:19 AM

if marlon brando hadn't given everyone the finger for the last fifteen years of his life, this would be a worthwhile tribute.

ah well. it'll be fun to see it.

zenFish

zenFish

Vancouver, BC
August 2004

MAR 11, 2005 11:26 AM

Should be good too see, i'll wait till it's out to judge it.

Cigarette

Cigarette

Cleveland, OH
April 2004

MAR 11, 2005 11:50 AM

Any way one can get Marlon Brando into any more movies is alright by me. STELLLLLLLLLAAAAAAAAA

benizdead

benizdead

United Kingdom
February 2003

MAR 11, 2005 12:36 PM

so there isn't actually one living actor who could do this instead?

robosagogo

robosagogo

State College, PA
September 2004

MAR 11, 2005 12:43 PM

Fuckers, taking work away from good, decent necromancers and voodoo practitioners.

Cigarette

Cigarette

Cleveland, OH
April 2004

MAR 11, 2005 01:15 PM

benizdead said:
so there isn't actually one living actor who could do this instead?



No.

fentopal

fentopal

Denver, CO
July 2003

MAR 11, 2005 01:16 PM

I understand Singer wants to pay homage to the orignal movies -- but they sucked. I'd rather he start fresh, especially since Brando's pronunciation of everything was hilariously awful -- like he forgot there were vowels.

JoshXXX

JoshXXX

Northborough, MA
March 2004

MAR 11, 2005 02:09 PM

fentopal said:
I understand Singer wants to pay homage to the orignal movies -- but they sucked. I'd rather he start fresh, especially since Brando's pronunciation of everything was hilariously awful -- like he forgot there were vowels.




If by original movies, you mean 3 and 4, then yes, they sucked. But how can you say that Superman 2 sucked? HOW?!?!

ChocolateJesus

ChocolateJesus

I'm lost
January 2005

MAR 11, 2005 02:35 PM

So is this Superman a restart of the franchise like the new Batman, or is it a continuation?

loper_just_loper

loper_just_loper

Broken Arrow, OK
January 2005

MAR 11, 2005 06:11 PM

JoshXXX said:

Lotusmonger said:
yes, but can they digitally make Margot Kidder appear sane?



Excuse me, I forgot my purse...



LMAO! Family Guy XD

tridon4life

tridon4life

Canada
December 2003

MAR 11, 2005 07:18 PM

Isn't this the same technology they used to complete "The Crow"?

jennytruant

jennytruant

Costa Mesa, CA
February 2005

MAR 12, 2005 07:11 AM

*gets all geeky* Its better if I don't keep talking here

EvanX

EvanX

Grand Rapids, MI
June 2003

MAR 12, 2005 07:22 AM

I think the big question really is - Why the fuck are they making another Superman movie in the first place? confused

Previous

PAGE: 

1 | 2

Next