Lifestyle

TOPICS:

12/6/04

Previous

PAGE: 

1 ... 

455 | 456 | 457

 ... 954

Next

Christopher

Christopher

Portland, OR
November 2002

DEC 06, 2004 03:35 AM

Dominatricies sometimes speak about putting their submissive's into something called a “mind space” where the bottom’s mind can be completely reprogrammed. For instance, one dominatrix said that she used to break down a bottom to work through a childhood trauma he kept reliving. For another submissive, the dominatrix would reprogram him to feel more confident following a dehumanizing divorce. But in one specific case, mind space was used on black man to work through his deep-seated racist views of other black people, as well as other invocations of race as a part of the S&M scene.

While race play may seem horrifying, its practice is causing heated debates within the leather community.

Race play is considered on the edge of edgy sex, but workshops on the subject are becoming standard fare at kinky conferences as people like Williams become comfortable with publicly speaking about it. Like any practice making its way into public conversations, the workshops include everything from personal testimonials to theories on why people of color are getting aroused by what some would see as just racism. Like any controversial sexual activity, race play has its critics. In May, the title of a workshop at a BDSM conference had to be changed after protest over the original name, "Nigger Play: Free at Last." Williams herself has been the subject of several e-mails from people of color who, while enjoying BDSM themselves, accuse her of self-hate and recommend she enter therapy. […]

Mike Bond, who declined a phone interview and answered questions by e-mail, is a masochist. He is a black man and emphatic that race play "is not a message about all of black kind." He doesn't suggest that all black folks enjoy what he does, but he says, "I have been floored when people have criticized me by saying [that] not everyone agrees with my fetish. So what? Not everyone likes cheese. "

During his workshop, Bond told the audience about his own history. He first considered race play when a partner asked if it was humiliating for him as a black man to bow before her, a white woman. He hadn't thought about it before. "But if that made it more embarrassing, " he said, "then I was all for it." […]

As arousing as that scene might be for some, it is downright repulsive for others. Racism was institutionalized as social, economic and legal practices, in part, through rape and the white domination of black sexuality. Chupoo, who is a black woman and declined to give her last name, says it point blank: "I can't do race play because I have people in my family who had to submit to that, where they had no choices. It's too close to home for American black people." Race play makes her think about her grandmother who had to sleep with her employer, a doctor, so that her children could have healthcare.

Chupoo is not anti-BDSM. In fact, for seven years, she's been a submissive in a master-slave relationship with a black man. So, she's delighted, for example, when in an erotic context, he calls her a "bitch." "I can accept other people are able to rise above their sexism," she says, adding, "The race thing is really a lot deeper. I guess it's easier for me to deal – he understands that we have a partnership ... I feel like my master respects me. I cannot imagine feeling that with someone around race play.”


When entering into a critique of these practices, it's difficult to define the differences between an individual's right to be in an BDSM relationship and taking part in a situation that perpetuates hate. It's very hard to play with hate as a function of power, especially in a BDSM setting. But, given the sure power behind race play, deploying race in service of sexuality and pleasure undermines the very notion of an individual's right to have that pleasure by removing the humanity from the scene. While a submissive might be a maggot, or a worm, or dirt, their is an underlying assumption that they are still human. Racism blurs that line to a point where it's very hard to see where the play stops and where the hate begins.

swingkitten

swingkitten

Portland, OR
OLD SKOOL

DEC 06, 2004 04:06 AM

Interesting article.

Fenchurch

Fenchurch

SUICIDEGIRL

Texas, USA

DEC 06, 2004 05:16 AM

Very.

hermetica

hermetica

Cook Islands
January 2004

DEC 06, 2004 06:10 AM

So what youre saying is that a sub can be called a worm or a piece of shit and is still seen as human but if a race-related epithet is used, that ceases to be the case???? Bullshit. Perhaps we should leave those who like to play the edge to their own happy devices ? Who are you or anyone else for that matter, to say whats acceptable in the realm of sexual and bdsm fantasy? In my former life as a Pro/lifestyle Dom/switch, I met and played with lots of edge players who played very 'politically questionable' games and fantasies.. rape/abduction, incest, etc. Its like trying to create some imaginary and arbitrary line as to what is 'sane' and what isnt. I know race is one of the most politically sensitiveissues in society today, but that's part of the thrill I would think.Its something like how blood play and radical body mods were 15 years ago-taboo, edgy, totally unacceptable to mainstream politcally correct society. Of course thats not to say that race play would necessarily gain the unprecedented popularity of the piercing/ body mod scene; I think it will remain edgy, but it comes from a similar place.
If you dont like it, dont do it..

Matvey

Matvey

Mount Pleasant, MI
November 2004

DEC 06, 2004 06:17 AM

I have to agree with hermetica. To put it simply, the last line in her post says it all.
"If you dont like it, dont do it.."

randomcharacters

randomcharacters

I'm lost
August 2004

DEC 06, 2004 06:27 AM


Mike Bond ... says, "I have been floored when people have criticized me by saying [that] not everyone agrees with my fetish. So what? Not everyone likes cheese. "


This is officially my new favorite arguement ever.

Snottlebocket

Snottlebocket

Netherlands
March 2004

DEC 06, 2004 06:42 AM

considering that bdsm is usually based on mutual respect (i thought) i always assumed that raceplay was just a game like any other that ends when people return to their normal lives.

Morgan

Morgan

SUICIDEGIRL

Illinois, USA

DEC 06, 2004 07:12 AM

That's really interesting, and talks about something I didn't know. Thanks for posting it, christopher!

Flux

Flux

SUICIDEGIRL

Georgia, USA

DEC 06, 2004 07:40 AM

An equivalent argument would be that because slavery and abuse of others has existed with all people, ever, BDSM is propagating these horrific experiences of the past and is wrong in all circumstances.

Race play seems a little bit odd to me, but if it's sane and consensual and if it helps people work through psychological issues having to do with race, what the fuck is wrong with it?

Horrifying? Hardly.

dem_z

dem_z

United Kingdom
June 2004

DEC 06, 2004 07:45 AM

Lots of fantasies seem weird and repulsive to many people. Some of that repulsion can be rationalized better than others, but that does not make it correct.

What's the problem so long as it's consensual and doesn't involve children?

dem_z

dem_z

United Kingdom
June 2004

DEC 06, 2004 07:46 AM

Also, this kind of BDSM isn't even illegal in the UK, so there's other stuff which is scarier.

RockZombie

RockZombie

Denver, CO
December 2003

DEC 06, 2004 07:52 AM

randomcharacters said:


Mike Bond ... says, "I have been floored when people have criticized me by saying [that] not everyone agrees with my fetish. So what? Not everyone likes cheese. "


This is officially my new favorite arguement ever.


I'm putting it right up with "Just because I painted a couple houses, doesnen't make me a housepainter."

Shawna

shawna

Marquette, MI
April 2004

DEC 06, 2004 08:15 AM

The difference between race play and actual racism is that it's a choice on the part of the Sub, not an ingrained belief on the part of the Dom. Submissives have a lot more control over a BDSM situation than most people give them credit for.

Argene

Argene

Pittsburgh, PA
June 2004

DEC 06, 2004 10:13 AM

Shawna said:
The difference between race play and actual racism is that it's a choice on the part of the Sub, not an ingrained belief on the part of the Dom. Submissives have a lot more control over a BDSM situation than most people give them credit for.



I agree with the statement-that it is a consensual act between two or more people. Still....race play would be something I would never do.

[Edited on Dec 06, 2004 1:13PM]

Michael_DeSade

Michael_DeSade

Seattle, WA
OLD SKOOL

DEC 06, 2004 11:07 AM

christopher said:
When entering into a critique of these practices, it's difficult to define the differences between an individual's right to be in an BDSM relationship and taking part in a situation that perpetuates hate. It's very hard to play with hate as a function of power, especially in a BDSM setting. But, given the sure power behind race play, deploying race in service of sexuality and pleasure undermines the very notion of an individual's right to have that pleasure by removing the humanity from the scene. While a submissive might be a maggot, or a worm, or dirt, their is an underlying assumption that they are still human. Racism blurs that line to a point where it's very hard to see where the play stops and where the hate begins.



I'm sorry, but this is complete crap. Associating a mental mind-fuck with ignorant prejudice could only be done by someone who has no fucking clue about BDSM; 'hate' has nothing to do with the dynamic. It's about physical, mental, and emotional sensations brought about by power exchange. It is about personal choice and personal responsibility, it's about sexual preference and sexual roles.

Racism is what made enslaving black people possible, and they had NO choice in the matter. Sexual slavery of the kind talked about in the article is a conscious choice, as is the humiliation. Linking the two is just as ignorant and prejudiced as linking skin color and crime rates.

ARRR!!!

swingkitten

swingkitten

Portland, OR
OLD SKOOL

DEC 06, 2004 11:27 AM

Sadistic_Bastard said:

christopher said:
When entering into a critique of these practices, it's difficult to define the differences between an individual's right to be in an BDSM relationship and taking part in a situation that perpetuates hate. It's very hard to play with hate as a function of power, especially in a BDSM setting. But, given the sure power behind race play, deploying race in service of sexuality and pleasure undermines the very notion of an individual's right to have that pleasure by removing the humanity from the scene. While a submissive might be a maggot, or a worm, or dirt, their is an underlying assumption that they are still human. Racism blurs that line to a point where it's very hard to see where the play stops and where the hate begins.



I'm sorry, but this is complete crap. Associating a mental mind-fuck with ignorant prejudice could only be done by someone who has no fucking clue about BDSM; 'hate' has nothing to do with the dynamic. It's about physical, mental, and emotional sensations brought about by power exchange. It is about personal choice and personal responsibility, it's about sexual preference and sexual roles.

Racism is what made enslaving black people possible, and they had NO choice in the matter. Sexual slavery of the kind talked about in the article is a conscious choice, as is the humiliation. Linking the two is just as ignorant and prejudiced as linking skin color and crime rates.

ARRR!!!



Well said.

Christopher

Christopher

Portland, OR
November 2002

DEC 06, 2004 02:49 PM

Sadistic_Bastard said:

christopher said:
When entering into a critique of these practices, it's difficult to define the differences between an individual's right to be in an BDSM relationship and taking part in a situation that perpetuates hate. It's very hard to play with hate as a function of power, especially in a BDSM setting. But, given the sure power behind race play, deploying race in service of sexuality and pleasure undermines the very notion of an individual's right to have that pleasure by removing the humanity from the scene. While a submissive might be a maggot, or a worm, or dirt, their is an underlying assumption that they are still human. Racism blurs that line to a point where it's very hard to see where the play stops and where the hate begins.



I'm sorry, but this is complete crap. Associating a mental mind-fuck with ignorant prejudice could only be done by someone who has no fucking clue about BDSM; 'hate' has nothing to do with the dynamic.

I agree with this (that is, everything but the crap part), but including race play into BDSM has the potential to be problematic. The power exchanges that occur in a scene are fluid and, while I agree with the right for people to engage in any scene that they want, there's something that gets appropriated in race play that has the potential to get out of hand very, very quickly. Perhaps it is a function of comfort on part of an observer, or rather why issues of race are brought up at all.


It's about physical, mental, and emotional sensations brought about by power exchange. It is about personal choice and personal responsibility, it's about sexual preference and sexual roles.

Again, I agree with this...



Racism is what made enslaving black people possible, and they had NO choice in the matter. Sexual slavery of the kind talked about in the article is a conscious choice, as is the humiliation. Linking the two is just as ignorant and prejudiced as linking skin color and crime rates.

Ok, this is were you lost me. I'm not linking sexual slavery with racial slavery: the scenes themselves play the slave narrative out. From the Article:

Race play is being enjoyed in the privacy of bedrooms and publicly at BDSM parties, and it's far from just black and white. It also includes "playing out" Nazi interrogations of Jews or Latino-on-black racism, and the players can be of any racial background and paired up in a number of ways (including a black man calling his black girlfriend a "nigger bitch"wink. White master seeking black slave, however, seems the more popular of the combinations.


I'm not saying that people don't have a right to explore this, or work through them in a BDSM scene, or to use it as a mindfuck. What I'm really interested in is the problematic issues that go into race play, or Nazi/Jew-interrogation play, or any other historic master/slave dynamic that is brought into a BDSM master/slave dynamic. This is not something that I want to take lightly, but rather highlight some of the issues that the leather community has with race play.

In addition, I think that those who do not understand the power elements that are part of leather play would think that BDSM scenes that have a Nazi torturing a Jew or a white woman calling a black man "nigger" would find the whole thing horrifying. But as Midori says in the article:

Take the woman who likes it when her boyfriend calls her a "slut," Midori says. Perhaps the woman internalized the idea that "good girls don't," but she enjoys her sexuality. Because the boyfriend sees her in all her complexity, Midori says, when he calls her a slut, "he is freeing her of the social expectations of having to be modest." That's different than having some stranger (and jerk) calling you a slut. The stranger doesn't see the full woman. It's similar with race play, Midori says. By focusing, for example, on a black man's body, while he's bound as a slave, she's bolstering his own perception of himself as strong and powerful. [...]

Her workshop demonstrations have included full auction scenes mimicking those of the Old South. In them, she is the plantation mistress inspecting a black man for "purchase." He's in shackles and "I slap him on his face and push him down on the ground, make him lick my shoes," she says, emphasizing that she only does the demonstration after the "psychological" talk.


Interesting across the board, something to think about, and to not dismiss as being "crap."


[Edited on Dec 06, 2004 by christopher]

AkiraLi

AkiraLi

Norristown, PA
March 2003

DEC 06, 2004 03:11 PM

This is one of the most interesting articles I have ever read on this site. It will be interesting to see where this discussion goes.

Muzencab

Muzencab

Federal Way, WA
November 2003

DEC 06, 2004 04:15 PM

A very good article indeed! Although I know some of the aspects of BDSM there is a vast amount that I dont know. Anybody who would like to post some core insites that would be very helpful.
A friend of mine has clued me in on some things others I had to research myself. Here is a good link. www.mcncirce.com I understand that some of the facets of the practice is not for everyone, so pick and choose as you will.
Personally I see race as just another facet to be explored.

Do as you will.

Leccy

Leccy

United Kingdom
September 2004

DEC 06, 2004 04:27 PM

Reading this reminded me of the thread where the some bloke was saying that Suicidegirls are being exploited.

The girls were pretty much unanimous in saying "Don't get angry on my behalf, this is my choice" and "I don't like men telling me how I should feel".

When I first read this post my reaction was Urghh, I don't like this..... Then I thought, why should I be offended on Mike Bonds behalf? I have no right.

I would hope that anyone wanting to participate in this would think about the emotional implications carefully beforehand; after that though, whatever floats your boat.

Shawna

shawna

Marquette, MI
April 2004

DEC 07, 2004 01:33 AM

tffny said:

Shawna said:
The difference between race play and actual racism is that it's a choice on the part of the Sub, not an ingrained belief on the part of the Dom. Submissives have a lot more control over a BDSM situation than most people give them credit for.



I agree with the statement-that it is a consensual act between two or more people. Still....race play would be something I would never do.

[Edited on Dec 06, 2004 1:13PM]



It is totally within your rights not to engage in a sexual activity that you do not feel comfortable doing... and as far as it's all concerned, I don't think I could engage in race-play myself... but I don't think other people shouldn't be allowed to.