Lifestyle

TOPICS:

Previous

PAGE: 

1 ... 

533 | 534 | 535

 ... 944

Next

Previous

PAGE: 

1 | 2 | 3 | 4

Next

clara

clara

MODERATOR

Baltimore, MD

JUL 03, 2004 12:57 AM

40spokes brought up an issue I've noticed in a number of threads about famous women. It often happens that in discussions of women who are rock stars, actors, politicians, and otherwise well known in the media people, women included, offer a criticism of the famous woman's looks rather than her career or publicly expressed viewpoints. Why do you suppose that is? Do you think that might be at odds with feminism? If you consider yourself a feminist (and by that I mean someone who believes in equal pay for equal work and so forth, not necessarily some of the more militant types) do you do this? Do you think it's wrong?

FrankMask

FrankMask

Saint Paul, MN
June 2003

JUL 03, 2004 12:59 AM

What do people usually say about famous guys?

clara

clara

MODERATOR

Baltimore, MD

JUL 03, 2004 01:01 AM

Frank said:
What do people usually say about famous guys?


I've noticed that most famous men only get criticisms of their looks when they're widely considered either very handsome (Johnny Depp) or very ugly (Keith Richards). Don't you think?

DrStinkypants

DrStinkypants

Saint Paul, MN
October 2002

JUL 03, 2004 01:07 AM

kind of depends i think. probably more so than men.
but for example when condoleeza rice was testifying for the 9/11 comission i didnt really hear anyhting about her looks, because she isnt unattractive. But take paula jones or someone and comments about appearences are going to be much more common.
i guess its basically the same, except (to generalize) women are held to a higher standard than men
my 2 cents

[did you have any specific case in mind?]

[Edited on Jul 03, 2004 by DrStinkypants]

Keith

Keith

Oklahoma City, OK
August 2002

JUL 03, 2004 01:08 AM

Clara said:

Frank said:
What do people usually say about famous guys?


I've noticed that most famous men only get criticisms of their looks when they're widely considered either very handsome (Johnny Depp) or very ugly (Keith Richards). Don't you think?



...or when they used to be handsome, and let themselves go to shit. (Alec Baldwin?)

It's hard to point to specifics, but it seems telling that the most famous/powerful/influential women seem to come in for the harshest criticism that has nothing to do with anything they've actually done, but with a perception of their appearance and personality, their parenting skills, their relationships, and their sexual orientation.

It's also telling that there have been about 10,000 threads about Courtney Love's drug problems, irresponsible motherhood, etc, but I've yet to see one negative comment here about Jeff Tweedy, the singer of Wilco, who is married and the father of two, about his recent struggles with drugs.

Who gets criticized? Madonna, Hillary Clinton, Courtney Love, Brody..
all women with successful careers, but also strong opinions and iconoclastic personalities. Rarely does anyone criticize their actual work, they just call them bitchy, shrill, or subtly imply that they may be lesbians (as if that's an insult, anyway). Much easier to call Hillary Clinton a bitch than to talk about what she's actually accomplished, which is quite a lot. Madonna gets called a whore, but she's the sole woman ever to occupy the upper stratosphere of fame -- where even famous people would whisper, as she enters a room, "Hey, that's Madonna." That sort of success doesn't happen by accident, nor by cheating in some way.

[Edited on Jul 03, 2004 by Keith]

googused

googused

Portland, OR
OLD SKOOL

JUL 03, 2004 01:10 AM

I bet Johnny Depp will look like Keith Richards some day.

TheFuckOffKid

TheFuckOffKid

NEWSWIRE

Australia

JUL 03, 2004 01:12 AM

Women get judged on their looks more than men do, I agree.

Complicated reasons for why that may be. I'm not really sure that I'm sure why... confused

clara

clara

MODERATOR

Baltimore, MD

JUL 03, 2004 01:14 AM

DrStinkypants said:
[did you have any specific case in mind?]


It was a thead (actually several threads) about The Distillers that brought the topic up in my mind, but your examples are interesting too. Does anyone remember that the coverage of Linda Tripp's plastic surgeries and makeovers seemed to get as much coverage as her part in a certain scandal?

Keith

Keith

Oklahoma City, OK
August 2002

JUL 03, 2004 01:16 AM

Clara said:

DrStinkypants said:
[did you have any specific case in mind?]


It was a thead (actually several threads) about The Distillers that brought the topic up in my mind, but your examples are interesting too. Does anyone remember that the coverage of Linda Tripp's plastic surgeries and makeovers seemed to get as much coverage as her part in a certain scandal?



I remember when the part of Linda Tripp on Saturday Night Live was played by John Goodman with a false nose. Also there was Will Ferrell playing Janet Reno... shocked

Coliwali

Coliwali

I'm lost
February 2003

JUL 03, 2004 01:16 AM

I think a disproportionate number of women are famous solely for their looks. To me it follows that if all a women has going for her is her appearance, than most criticisms of her will be based around her attractiveness. So, I don’t think that is sexist. What ever mechanism makes it so that most women are famous for their looks, is deeply sexist.

clara

clara

MODERATOR

Baltimore, MD

JUL 03, 2004 01:19 AM

Keith said:
I remember when the part of Linda Tripp on Saturday Night Live was played by John Goodman with a false nose. Also there was Will Ferrell playing Janet Reno... shocked


And I'm sure that was supposed to be funny because of the implied (ok, blatantly stated) insult of being manly women. So is it really not enough for a woman to be successful if she's not thin, attractive, and well dressed?

KungFuVooDoo

KungFuVooDoo

I'm lost
May 2004

JUL 03, 2004 01:20 AM

Do people talk about Gloria Steinem’s appearance for instance? Even thought I think she is very pretty, at least back in the day.

I think insults are stupid. When people attack a person and not the idea they are instantaneously transported to elementary school.

Whatever is obvious and damaging is the target, whether it is race, gender, or stereotype.

Absolutely, you have a point in society’s emphasis on female appearance and when the mud starts’ flying in the playground appearance is attacked first, because what can you say back? “I am pretty, I am.”

I always just stare back and think, yep that was stupid.

delusion

delusion

Santa Barbara, CA
March 2004

JUL 03, 2004 01:23 AM

well, the fact that there are pictures of naked girls splashed all over the site does set the tone for the sexualization of women wouldn't you say?

creative_slacker

creative_slacker

New Windsor, MD
April 2004

JUL 03, 2004 01:24 AM

What I find offensive: women claiming feminism only to promote media glitzed girl roles... ie. The Spice Girls, girl power my ass. They just re-enforced the idea that women are judged solely on their looks and not their ideas. Not to mention the Brittany Spears and Christina Agularias (how ever you spell her name) these are the feminist role models a generation of women are basing their feminist standards on because the media calls them powerful influential women!!!

clara

clara

MODERATOR

Baltimore, MD

JUL 03, 2004 01:25 AM

Coliwali said:
I think a disproportionate number of women are famous solely for their looks. To me it follows that if all a women has going for her is her appearance, than most criticisms of her will be based around her attractiveness. So, I don’t think that is sexist. What ever mechanism makes it so that most women are famous for their looks, is deeply sexist.


I sort of agree with you, but there are thousands if not millions of attractive women who aren't famous and a number of women who are famous that don't seem to be widely perceived as beautiful. That leads me to wonder if it's rather unfair to think that most women who become famous do so because of their appearance. Obviously fashion models and many actresses get their jobs because of their looks because that's the main job requirement for those professions, but what about politicians, artists, musicians? Do we shortchange those women by assuming that they only achieved success because someone thought they were hot? Did they really become famous only because someone thought they were hot?

clara

clara

MODERATOR

Baltimore, MD

JUL 03, 2004 01:27 AM

delusion said:
well, the fact that there are pictures of naked girls splashed all over the site does set the tone for the sexualization of women wouldn't you say?


But it doesn't only happen here. I'd say that it happens here no more than it happens in other media outlets.

delusion

delusion

Santa Barbara, CA
March 2004

JUL 03, 2004 01:28 AM

Clara said:

Keith said:
I remember when the part of Linda Tripp on Saturday Night Live was played by John Goodman with a false nose. Also there was Will Ferrell playing Janet Reno... shocked


And I'm sure that was supposed to be funny because of the implied (ok, blatantly stated) insult of being manly women. So is it really not enough for a woman to be successful if she's not thin, attractive, and well dressed?


SNL is a comedy show. they make fun of everyone's appearance. male celebrities aren't spared from parody. i don't really think that those kinds of jokes are meant to be interpreted as suggestions that the person is somehow "not enough" or undeserving of their success.

Koleeta

Koleeta

Los Angeles, CA
May 2003

JUL 03, 2004 01:30 AM

I think a lot of the time women (and men also) are judged by their appearance because it's somthing easier to draw a conclusion on. If those women have a message it would take more effort for the avg. citizen to find out what the message is (reading the article) than to just look at her picture.

Perhaps talking about someone's appearance is an easier way to say you were "discussing" someone and sound like you are into the current events, which is a laugh.


I do think that men and women should not be judged based on their gender, afterall discriminating because of gender is as ridiculous as being racist. I guess by your definition, Clara, I would be a feminist. I might have done it before but I think I do it more with males. Which is terrible, yes, I know. For example, if someone mentions David Beckham I'll immediately think "he's hot" but I've never watched him play nor do I know any statistics of his game. I don't know if that's is the kind of thing you were talking about or not, but I think the same thing that happens to women also happens to men.

DrStinkypants

DrStinkypants

Saint Paul, MN
October 2002

JUL 03, 2004 01:31 AM

Clara said:

DrStinkypants said:
[did you have any specific case in mind?]


It was a thead (actually several threads) about The Distillers that brought the topic up in my mind, but your examples are interesting too. Does anyone remember that the coverage of Linda Tripp's plastic surgeries and makeovers seemed to get as much coverage as her part in a certain scandal?




Thats the thread i figured sparked this. In that thread i think it was a little different because the topic was something like "celebrity A is good looking", and then it devolves into a "yes she is/no she isnt" argument. What i mean is, sexual attraction was originally the topic of the thread, it wasnt diverted from something else.
Now, why it was the topic, instead of her talent is something else to think about. Also, i do see a lot more "female celebrity A is hot" threads than "male celebrity A is hot" threads, which is sort of interesting. I know we are all here for the pretty girls, but if i remember correctly the majority of members are female.

delusion

delusion

Santa Barbara, CA
March 2004

JUL 03, 2004 01:36 AM

Clara said:

delusion said:
well, the fact that there are pictures of naked girls splashed all over the site does set the tone for the sexualization of women wouldn't you say?


But it doesn't only happen here. I'd say that it happens here no more than it happens in other media outlets.


women are sexualized in every medium because they are sexualized in society. so, i dont disagree there. i just think that to expect otherwise on a porn site may be a little unrealistic. not that that serves to justify it, because i don't agree with it at all. but, i am not surprised.

clara

clara

MODERATOR

Baltimore, MD

JUL 03, 2004 01:39 AM

DrStinkypants said:
Thats the thread i figured sparked this. In that thread i think it was a little different because the topic was something like "celebrity A is good looking", and then it devolves into a "yes she is/no she isnt" argument. What i mean is, sexual attraction was originally the topic of the thread, it wasnt diverted from something else.


The thing is that it's not just one thread about her. I've noticed that nearly every thread about The Distillers, even ones that start off with a comment about a new album or whatever, have a huge number of replies of the "she's hot" or "she's ugly" type with some posts that are actually related to the band's music. And it's not just Brody, either. How many threads about Courtney Love and/or Hole that started off either about music or about her parenting abilities also turn to "she's hot" or "she's ugly?"

DrStinkypants

DrStinkypants

Saint Paul, MN
October 2002

JUL 03, 2004 01:39 AM

delusion said:
well, the fact that there are pictures of naked girls splashed all over the site does set the tone for the sexualization of women wouldn't you say?



by sexualize you mean that we are making them sexual where they otherwise wouldnt be?
All people are sexual arent they?

Koleeta

Koleeta

Los Angeles, CA
May 2003

JUL 03, 2004 01:41 AM

Clara said:
Obviously fashion models and many actresses get their jobs because of their looks because that's the main job requirement for those professions, but what about politicians, artists, musicians? Do we shortchange those women by assuming that they only achieved success because someone thought they were hot? Did they really become famous only because someone thought they were hot?



Unfortunately, I think looks is a major part of the music industry too. A lot of pop musicians have to have the right "look" if they want to succeed.

clara

clara

MODERATOR

Baltimore, MD

JUL 03, 2004 01:41 AM

delusion said:
women are sexualized in every medium because they are sexualized in society. so, i dont disagree there. i just think that to expect otherwise on a porn site may be a little unrealistic. not that that serves to justify it, because i don't agree with it at all. but, i am not surprised.


It was something I saw here that sparked my interest in this topic, but it's certainly not limited to the goings on of SG. Feel free to expand if you like.

DrStinkypants

DrStinkypants

Saint Paul, MN
October 2002

JUL 03, 2004 01:45 AM

Clara said:
The thing is that it's not just one thread about her. I've noticed that nearly every thread about The Distillers, even ones that start off with a comment about a new album or whatever, have a huge number of replies of the "she's hot" or "she's ugly" type with some posts that are actually related to the band's music. And it's not just Brody, either. How many threads about Courtney Love and/or Hole that started off either about music or about her parenting abilities also turn to "she's hot" or "she's ugly?"



Thats a good point.
I dont know what it is about courtney love and SG. i dont think there has been a courtney love thread that has gotten past the first page without something terrible being written about her.
i guess i would have to say that its due to 1) its the easiest thing to say about someone (human nature i guess) and 2) women are sort of expected to be good looking, more so than men

Previous

PAGE: 

1 | 2 | 3 | 4

Next