endlessben said:
She's pretty much dispised and sickening to a majority of people? Except to the few people who claim to ''know'' her, she's seemingly unlikable.

where's the question here? and from what I'm seeing most in here are stand up kinds of people who aren't hating on someone because they have no personal reference.
Man, you sure have alot of negativity towards people you don't know.Hopefully you'll get less insecure as you get older.Don't hate so much son! It's unbecoming of you.
So I take it ,it's the cock in the video!
[Edited on Apr 24, 2004 by 40spokes]

[Edited on Apr 25, 2004 by 40spokes]

endlessben

Grand Rapids, MI

November 2003

APR 24, 2004 02:41 PM

I've met the girl. She's a bitch.

40spokes

I'm lost

March 2004

APR 24, 2004 02:42 PM

endlessben said:
I've met the girl. She's a bitch.

riiiiight..............I had no clue that the "Simple Life 2" was being filmed at U of Michigan.

[Edited on Apr 24, 2004 by 40spokes]

endlessben

Grand Rapids, MI

November 2003

APR 24, 2004 02:49 PM

I didn't question if you had met her or not. Though I highly doubt you have.

Sophie_Sass

Los Angeles, CA

October 2003

APR 24, 2004 03:07 PM

s5 said:

Cherie said:
Second, if you WILLINGLY CONSENT to being videotaped while having sex with someone, then you have to assume that its most likely going to be seen by people you don't want seeing it. It was a stupid, stupid move on her part.

you clearly don't understand how media works. even if you willingly consent to being videotaped, you still have to go the extra step of giving someone explicit permission to exploit or profit from that videotape. it's exactly why we have model release contracts over here in SG land, and exactly why places like MTV blur out the faces of people who appear in front of a camera but haven't signed a release form.

you may call her stupid, but why are you so unwilling to place the responsibility on the shoulders of the guy who breached her trust and violated the law, all in one go?

in your world, it's okay to be a sleazy asshole who profits off of people without their consent, but as soon as a woman shows up in public wearing a skimpy dress, she's a "trashy whore". sounds like feminism still has a lot of work to do.

I think I love you.

Cherie

Providence, RI

October 2002

APR 25, 2004 12:01 PM

done.

[Edited on Apr 25, 2004 by Cherie]

Helter

Chester, PA

OLD SKOOL

APR 25, 2004 12:13 PM

Cherie said:
She goes out all the time with barely any clothes on, and no panties on, flashing her vag and tits to newspapers all the time. Even if its not intentional, if you saw your vagina in a paper ONE TIME, one would think that you would stop going out of the house without undergarments on. So wah wah wah to her that people are seeing her naked now. She's practically naked most of the time anyways. She has no class. Zip. Zero. NONE. I don't feel bad for people with no class who do stupid shit.

I'm not going to read this entire thread, so maybe this is redundant, but if you're basing this off of that picture of a pantie-less Hilton getting out ot a car that's been in circulation, you should know that it's a fake.

apologees

Antarctica

February 2003

APR 25, 2004 12:17 PM

40spokes said:

endlessben said:
I've met the girl. She's a bitch.

riiiiight..............I had no clue that the "Simple Life 2" was being filmed at U of Michigan.

[Edited on Apr 24, 2004 by 40spokes]

i dont know her, but i dont like her because she is rich. i don't know you, but i don't like you because you were mean to cherie.

Helter

Chester, PA

OLD SKOOL

APR 25, 2004 12:18 PM

Cherie said:

I NEVER CALLED HER A WHORE. So you all really need to check your facts before charging at me with judgements on shit I didn't say.

But on page two you said

Cherie said:
I think she is a classless, trashy whore and that is my opinion.

So, how do you rectify that?

(so I lied, I was sucked in).

Cherie

Providence, RI

October 2002

APR 25, 2004 12:21 PM

forget it.

Morgan

SUICIDEGIRL

Illinois, USA

APR 25, 2004 12:23 PM

No one here is attacking you. They're disagreeing with your opinion.

Flannery

Havertown, PA

March 2004

APR 25, 2004 12:37 PM

Cherie said:

40spokes said:
First off she can't financially profit off the tapes since a lawsuit has been established against the distribution.The only way she can profit is winnings off the lawsuit.

She is set to inherit BILLIONS OF DOLLARS for doing NOTHING, so I really could care less if she gets money out of it.

Just because she's rich (and by most opinion unjustifiably so) doesn't mean she gives up her right to protect herself / seek restitution for damages....

I hope she gets her money.

PAGE:

1 | 2 | 3 | 4

BOARDS:

TOPICS:

NEWS: Paris Hilton Tape Get Official Release

40spokes

I'm lost

March 2004

APR 24, 2004 02:40 PM

endlessben

Grand Rapids, MI

November 2003

APR 24, 2004 02:41 PM

40spokes

I'm lost

March 2004

APR 24, 2004 02:42 PM

endlessben

Grand Rapids, MI

November 2003

APR 24, 2004 02:49 PM

Sophie_Sass

Los Angeles, CA

October 2003

APR 24, 2004 03:07 PM

Cherie

Providence, RI

October 2002

APR 25, 2004 12:01 PM

Helter

Chester, PA

OLD SKOOL

APR 25, 2004 12:13 PM

apologees

Antarctica

February 2003

APR 25, 2004 12:17 PM

Helter

Chester, PA

OLD SKOOL

APR 25, 2004 12:18 PM

Cherie

Providence, RI

October 2002

APR 25, 2004 12:21 PM

Morgan

SUICIDEGIRL

Illinois, USA

APR 25, 2004 12:23 PM

Flannery

Havertown, PA

March 2004

APR 25, 2004 12:37 PM