NEWS: Modest Solutions To Voter Suppression

Fuckoff kid...lets do this....I've tried to keep this somewhat civil...actually i think i have. Your comments prove opposite of your "guarantees". I dont know what your age is, but obviously you have the wisdom and mentality of a mother fucking child. If you wanna trade insults with this fucking blowhard.....then bring it on you son of a bitch. You can take your sorry ass guarantees and stick them in your grey pubic haired pussy, low bread ignorant mother fucker! I don't listen to limbaugh and i have no idea who this other fucker is. And what the fuck are you talking about before white people got here? My family came from germany 300 years ago LEGALLY! By the way kid....if you smarter and wiser and more educated than me (see previous guarantees), then why don't you check your fucking spelling and grammat?! Stupid mother fucker! I WAS enjoying this exchange with C but then you ignorant mother fuckersmm wanna insult me and piss me off. Its called a fuckin search engine, you dumbasses. Type in a sentence.....wait for. 0002 seconds for thousands of results.....look at them......read them if you can, if not, have someone read them to you. Coyote.....the country music equals suicide was reported approximately a year ago by a radio station......106.5 the end (wend), in reference to your profile about country making you sad....it was an attempt at a joke......my apologies for trying to keep this friendly. Senior position fuck face? I wasnt aware that we worked together or that you had more seniority than me. I can easily tell from your eloquent words that you think way more of yourself than you should. You're the blowhard in this conversation, save yourself some embarrassment and walk the fuck away. Point blank....maybe you didn't read previous post. A genious comment was made that identification wasn't required by law to purchase alcohol or tobacco......ok...what the fuck ever. With the exception lf coyote.....lemme bring in my southern here....ya'll some stupid mother fuckers!

Grammar......not grammat! FUCK! of all the damn words to misspell! Baha!

mee-oww!

I think you're confused. I never mentioned white people.

And I never wanted to trade insults with you. I'm just telling you that I'm smarter than you, better informed than you, and so on and so forth. You can't string a sentence together, and you can't argue your way out of a wet paper bag.

I agree. But it's hard to maintain that approach when someone's only strategy for coping with disagreement is to be insulting (and incoherent).

Er, i was the one who made that comment. And I'm right. You do not need an ID to legally purchase alcohol. In fact, I did that just the other day--bought a beer without producing an ID! Of course, some stores/bars may require an ID for someone they think is too young, but you. do. not. need. one. legally.

Now that is genious!

...you may remember me from such educational posts as "What the everloving fuck?: Glenn Beck's Rise to Prominence."

Today, I'd like to take a moment to discuss research and conspiracy theories. Research is one of those tricky words that has actual meaning. And, as I told students every semester, looking up shit on Google ain't research. Google does not vet sites; Google lists them as either the most popular or the sites that bought the most ad-space. (Santorum)

So, yes, in .02 seconds, you can get 6,000,000 hits on any given topic. But, of those 6,000,000 hits, 5,999,998 are full of crap made up by people who call themselves "experts" (but nobody else would). And those other two sites are buried somewhere in the middle, deep where nobody is going to get to.

You can get better results with Google:Scholar, but even then, it's still Google. And Google has less reliability than Wikipedia (pause for shocked gasps).

So, no, doing a Google search isn't "research."

Now, conspiracy theories. I cannot claim that there have never been conspiracies. I don't have that information. But I can say that conspiracies, like the idea of 9/11 being an inside job because of how the buildings fell, just aren't credible. The logistics alone of getting such a thing to happen are mind-boggling, particularly when the whole thing has to be kept secret. You have to trust every person in on the job, every person who might witness the job, their families, their friends, their kids' friends...and trust that none of them are going to be greedy enough to keep evidence and strike up a book deal. And, no, just killing them doesn't work; people notice when folks disappear.

(This post has been brought to you by Eggs and Coffee. And an Apple)

You know what I found on Google? I found out that the president actually didn't apologize to terrorists. I found out that countless studies have shown no significant incidence of in-person voter fraud. I also found out that shouting "RESEARCH!" a lot isn't actually research, and that people don't believe me if I don't cite my sources. You know what else I found out about on Google?

Fucking paragraph breaks.

THAT was your biggest concern with what you'd written above?!

People are giving you a hard time because you aren't backing up anything you say with any kinds of actual facts or legitimate research. You're also not making any kind of a coherent argument, which doesn't help either.

Since you're not putting in the effort, why should anyone else? Respect works both ways. You're in your mid- 40s and should know this by now.

If you post a coherent argument backed up by links to legitimate sources you'll get real replies rather than derision and dismissal. Those replies may disagree with you and you may need to defend your position but things will be more civil.

TL;DR: don't act like a troll and you won't be treated like one.

http://dailycaller.com/2012/10/10/new-okeefe-video-obama-campaign-staffer-caught-helping-activist-vote-twice/

No comments from now on...only sources...would that work for you? And yes, you do have to prove your age if questioned, your argument is not valid in any way

Your source is O'Keefe, your argument is now completely invalid.

Jesus fucking Christ, really?

Hard-hitting, incriminating stuff, and totally not at all edited I'm sure.

When did "rational independent" become the new preferred label for "asshole conservative who believes in psychotic conspiracy theories"?