Lifestyle

TOPICS:

Previous

PAGE: 

1 ... 

8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12

 ... 954

Next

Previous

PAGE: 

1 | 2

Next

CoyoteMike

CoyoteMike

Iowa City, IA
May 2006

SEP 01, 2012 05:38 PM

IceBack0317 said:

Coyotemike said:
"Agree to disagree" only works when there are two valid points of view being debated. When one side has nothing more than faked numbers and Death Panel lies, it is not a valid point of view; it is simply wrong.



It works when people see things two different ways. And the faked numbers are real numbers. All I've heard here is rhetoric with not one ioda of it cited. The pie chart was dated. I've cited up to date numbers from reliable sources. So I'm upheld by validity.



The chart wasn't healthcare. You said we should agree to disagree about Obamacare. That isn't possible with someone who talks about death panels.

motorfirebox

motorfirebox

Pittsburgh, PA
March 2004

SEP 01, 2012 06:05 PM

IceBack0317 said:
Chrysler was bailed out too.


Yes, that's my point. The runaway success of Chrysler--which one bid on one fleet does not add to or subtract from--shows that bailing out the auto industry wasn't a bad idea.

IceBack0317 said:
We're obviously polar opposites on the healthcare plan so I'm going to propose we just agree to disagree. I'm going to dig deeper into IPAB, I'm pretty uncomfortable when I'm on line with Sarah Palin but honestly how the fuck am I supposed to delve into 2,000 pages of lawyerly rhetoric and fully comprehend it? I can say from what all I've heard the side I'm taking seems to hold more water to me. Extreme? Yes. But it's designed for extreme situations.


You don't need to dig through 2,000 pages of lawyerly rhetoric, just the two or three pages that outline the IPAB, its functions, and its limitations. Let me quote the most relevant text:

The proposal shall not include any recommendation to ration health care, raise revenues or Medicare beneficiary premiums under section 1818, 1818A, or 1839, increase Medicare beneficiary cost-sharing (including deductibles, coinsurance, and copayments), or otherwise restrict benefits or modify eligibility criteria.


The proposal being discussed is any proposal made by the IPAB regarding cutting costs.

IceBack0317 said:
On a "progressive" board I'm wrong and on a conservative board I'm right.
My perspective comes from that no, I'm not rich. January to April I had 4 days off working 12 hours day. I'm a hand in the field. I earn every dime I make and I can't write 1 penny off. I pay 28% of my hard, really hard earned dollars in taxes, I'm not on the downward slope. Imagine getting a third of your money pulled away and Obama wants to raise that more. But it also comes to that I believe in the constitution and seeing Obama kick it's legs out pisses me off. I swore an oath to uphold it with my blood. And I wouldn't have brought it up insultingly if it wasn't for these rib jabs I've been taking while trying to have a deliberate, factual, decent discussion.


No, on a conservative board nobody confronts you with the facts when you say things that are provably incorrect.

I pay a whopping 1.1% less of my income than you do. And I do it while I'm supporting a brother who is currently in the hospital, dealing with a disease that's going to kill him in 5-10 years if I can't find a way to get him covered by some really insanely good health insurance. And when I say "supporting", I'm not speaking figuratively. He is literally too sick to hold down a job. You served your country? Good for you--I mean that, good for you. But it doesn't score a whole lot of points over me, because I served as well. And nothing in any oath I swore prevents me from fully supporting the Affordable Care Act, because it was rule constitutional by the Supreme Court.

You cannot have a factual discussion if you're not willing to check your facts. And the state of conservatism in the US, at this point, is such that pretty much anything that comes out of it right now can be conclusively refuted with a simple google search. And that's not even touching the vile hatred that's been coming out of the right for the past decade. You don't like getting picked on for being conservative? Try being told that your friends ought to be put in concentration camps or killed by the government. Try hearing that--and try to keep your cool when the people who say such things are praised for it by their peers.

MisterSatan

MisterSatan

Portland, OR
August 2002

SEP 01, 2012 06:33 PM

Well, that escalated rather quickly.

tatpiercelover

tatpiercelover

Anaheim, CA
July 2012

SEP 01, 2012 06:43 PM

Hey everyone calm down. It does not matter who is in charge the general public is going to get screwed either way. All of you are just fighting over who is going to do it and how hard. Obamacare isn't bad for what it is doing, it is bad because of the things that kick in after it is ten years old and Obama is long gone. This is why it always looks like the republicans spend more. When the democrats are in charge they pass laws that look peachy up front and cost loads of money after they are gone. It is always easier to make a mess than it is to clean it up. Just so you know I do not support either side. But since there is no third party strong enough to win I choose the republicans.

TheFuckOffKid

TheFuckOffKid

NEWSWIRE

Australia

SEP 01, 2012 10:44 PM

IceBack0317 said:
By the way, Clinton's economy was just a coincidence that he was in during the tech boom. It had nothing to do with his fiscal policy.



Funniest fucking thing in this thread so far.

TheFuckOffKid

TheFuckOffKid

NEWSWIRE

Australia

SEP 01, 2012 10:46 PM

tatpiercelover said:
This is why it always looks like the republicans spend more. When the democrats are in charge they pass laws that look peachy up front and cost loads of money after they are gone. It is always easier to make a mess than it is to clean it up.



Yeah, that fucking Clinton's "Invade Iraq After I Leave Office While Also Cutting Taxes" bill. What an arsehole he was. Poor Bush copped all the flak.

IceBack0317

IceBack0317

Spring, TX
September 2012

SEP 02, 2012 11:12 AM

Chrysler was also bought out by Fiat and the Italians turned it around, but whatever, that point is getting old.

Yes IPAB is going to cut costs and no, they aren't going to sit there with 2,000,000 manilla folders with a picture paper clipped inside the top flap, their medical papers inside and 2 stamps that say "live" or "die." Medicare reimbursements are predicted to drop 30% this year, then if medicare spending exceeds 1% of the growth of our GDP they are there to cut spending with no oversight, cuts that will be in the billions or trillions of dollars and I'm being told nothing will change in anyone's healthcare whatsoever when providers are going to shoulder a larger premium after they are already hurting due to low reimbursements. People will be turned away at most doors or told their treatment can no longer be facilitated unless doctors are willing to take the hit out of their own pockets.

I've supported almost all of my posts with cited material and it's all easy to find. I'm not trying to bolster statements with inflammatory, shock mongering words like "death panels." I've decided fates both ways. It doesn't shock me and in the reality of this world it's not shocking. But life shouldn't be held in the balance based on a paycheck and a government's inability to properly reform the ability of every citizen to receive cost efficient, secure medical treatment when we have the power to do it properly. Don't shove down my throat a rushed together set of reforms that are cumbersome and blatantly not going to fix the problem then create even more committees that don't have oversight and tell me it's fucking peachy. Premiums will still be going up. Now you have to pay for it.

If you need better health insurance there are oil field offices in the Pittsburgh area. PA has a lot of gas that needs to be extracted and you don't have to do it in the middle of nowhere like every else. If you are willing to swing a hammer, work a rig and freeze a little go be a hand for a year or 2. Full benefits and you'll make enough to get a good policy on the side. Look into Schlumberger, Weatherford, Halliburton, Pioneer, Marathon, Universal, Cheyenne and Chesapeake just to start.

Being a Vet doesn't give me brownie points and I don't want it to. I'm paying back my service into the tax pool so I don't owe anyone a thing and no one owes me a thing. But I do feel that the constitution has been stepped on and the ideals which the founding fathers wanted this country to be guided by are now considered extremist. Not just by this administration, it's all been pounded into dust over the last 70 years. That was just further demonstrated when the Supreme Court found a way, in the face of Obama's thinly veiled threats, to make it constitutional by stating it could be considered a tax. Since now the constitution can be ripped up in the open, it's pretty frustrating.

Everything I've said has been factually supported or as factual as possible when in the case it was based on hypothetical situations. And you think I get fumed about being "picked on" because I'm a conservative? This is the first time because I don't have the size or demeanor to get picked on. And your friends get called crazy? I am most likely on a watch list for the simple fact that I'm a combat veteran with skillsets that have me on a map and pinboard, ron paul supporter, support OWS and a gun owner. After everything I've done for them I'm supposed to be suppressed and imprisoned without due trial. But I'm not mad. It's what I expect.

WelfareHamster

WelfareHamster

I'm lost
April 2012

SEP 02, 2012 12:13 PM

These lies about Canada's system are quite intriguing. Well done, SG for posting this liberal partisan drivel.

Reality:

Obamacare is exorbitantly expensive.

We don't have any money.

We don't have any money.

You partisan douche-tards who point to the other side and yell "It's all your party's fault"- You need to get a grip on reality. Republicans and Democrats arguably have an equal hand of getting us into this mess. Like half of you guys are a bunch of MSNBC-watching fucking idiots. Wake up.

J24U

J24U

Danvers, MA
February 2006

SEP 02, 2012 12:28 PM

And they say there's no civil discourse anymore...

CoyoteMike

CoyoteMike

Iowa City, IA
May 2006

SEP 02, 2012 12:34 PM

WelfareHamster said:
These lies about Canada's system are quite intriguing. Well done, SG for posting this liberal partisan drivel.

Reality:

Obamacare is exorbitantly expensive.

We don't have any money.

We don't have any money.

You partisan douche-tards who point to the other side and yell "It's all your party's fault"- You need to get a grip on reality. Republicans and Democrats arguably have an equal hand of getting us into this mess. Like half of you guys are a bunch of MSNBC-watching fucking idiots. Wake up.



Nothing like a rant-y cop-out. It is the height of intellectual dishonesty to say "it is everybody's fault we're in this mess" because it is simply not true.

MisterSatan

MisterSatan

Portland, OR
August 2002

SEP 02, 2012 03:00 PM

IceBack0317 said:
Everything I've said has been factually supported or as factual as possible when in the case it was based on hypothetical situations. And you think I get fumed about being "picked on" because I'm a conservative? This is the first time because I don't have the size or demeanor to get picked on. And your friends get called crazy? I am most likely on a watch list for the simple fact that I'm a combat veteran with skillsets that have me on a map and pinboard, ron paul supporter, support OWS and a gun owner. After everything I've done for them I'm supposed to be suppressed and imprisoned without due trial. But I'm not mad. It's what I expect.



I really don't understand anything beyond "hypothetical situations" in this paragraph. Can you explain?

motorfirebox

motorfirebox

Pittsburgh, PA
March 2004

SEP 02, 2012 04:14 PM

IceBack0317 said:
Chrysler was also bought out by Fiat and the Italians turned it around, but whatever, that point is getting old.


I'm not sure what that has to do with my point.

IceBack0317 said:
Yes IPAB is going to cut costs and no, they aren't going to sit there with 2,000,000 manilla folders with a picture paper clipped inside the top flap, their medical papers inside and 2 stamps that say "live" or "die." Medicare reimbursements are predicted to drop 30% this year, then if medicare spending exceeds 1% of the growth of our GDP they are there to cut spending with no oversight, cuts that will be in the billions or trillions of dollars and I'm being told nothing will change in anyone's healthcare whatsoever when providers are going to shoulder a larger premium after they are already hurting due to low reimbursements. People will be turned away at most doors or told their treatment can no longer be facilitated unless doctors are willing to take the hit out of their own pockets.


Yes, "no oversight" aside from, y'know, Congress. Nothing in the acceleration of the IPAB's activities gives it a way to get around their built-in prohibition on reducing healthcare quality or coverage. They're simply being allowed to not reduce healthcare quality or coverage sooner rather than later.

IceBack0317 said:
I've supported almost all of my posts with cited material and it's all easy to find. I'm not trying to bolster statements with inflammatory, shock mongering words like "death panels."


Yes, bully for you, you didn't say the words.

IceBack0317 said:
Being a Vet doesn't give me brownie points and I don't want it to. I'm paying back my service into the tax pool so I don't owe anyone a thing and no one owes me a thing. But I do feel that the constitution has been stepped on and the ideals which the founding fathers wanted this country to be guided by are now considered extremist. Not just by this administration, it's all been pounded into dust over the last 70 years. That was just further demonstrated when the Supreme Court found a way, in the face of Obama's thinly veiled threats, to make it constitutional by stating it could be considered a tax. Since now the constitution can be ripped up in the open, it's pretty frustrating.


That's what the Supreme Court does. If there's a way to interpret an existing law as being Constitutional, the SC generally tries to interpret it that way. As a tax, the penalty would be constitutional; therefore, the SC chose to define it as a tax. The only reason it wasn't called a tax in the first place is because the GOP screamed bloody murder about it.

Previous

PAGE: 

1 | 2

Next