Lifestyle

TOPICS:

3/10/04

Previous

PAGE: 

1 ... 

633 | 634 | 635

 ... 944

Next

Previous

PAGE: 

1 | 2

Next

princessleah

princessleah

New York, NY
February 2004

MAR 10, 2004 08:33 AM

Apparently, the underage boob flashing and girl-on-girl action in the famous Girls Gone Wild series is considered by a court of law to be good clean family fun!

A videotape of an underage girl exposing her breasts is not child pornography, a judge decided Tuesday in a criminal case against the producer of the "Girls Gone Wild" video series.

Cash

Cash

USA
OLD SKOOL

MAR 10, 2004 08:44 AM

What was the basis for the decision? Was it because the girl was in public and had no reasonable expectation of privacy? Did it have anything to do with liberal public nudity laws? Isn't it legal for women to be topless in NYC?

I'd just be interested to hear the reasoning behind the decision.

As far as I'm concerned, selling footage of an exposed minor should have some kind of penalty.

princessleah

princessleah

New York, NY
February 2004

MAR 10, 2004 08:48 AM

Did you read the article?

Cash

Cash

USA
OLD SKOOL

MAR 10, 2004 08:54 AM

princessleah said:
Did you read the article?



ha-ha. That would probably be a good idea. Pay no attention to the jackass behind the curtain blush

Cash

Cash

USA
OLD SKOOL

MAR 10, 2004 08:57 AM


Florida's child pornography law makes the depiction of "sexual conduct" illegal and defines that term to include physical contact. There was no physical contact in the video.



So, any sicko with a camera can take nude pictures of a kid in Florida just as long as there's no contact?

WuvMonki

wuvmonki

Brooklyn, NY
April 2003

MAR 10, 2004 08:57 AM

Cash said:
Isn't it legal for women to be topless in NYC?



It is legal.

loveooo aaa

Twwly

Twwly

SUICIDEGIRL

Ontario, Canada

MAR 10, 2004 09:13 AM

I'm sorry, I love boobs as much as the next person...but I do think there should be repercussions about the minors boobs. If for nothing more than to be legally consistant. They're minors. It's not family fun. It's exploitation. The end.

The defendants claimed the girls lied about their age... Yeah. Duh.

BoxOfficePoison

BoxOfficePoison

Portland, OR
June 2003

MAR 10, 2004 09:15 AM

Cash said:
What was the basis for the decision? Was it because the girl was in public and had no reasonable expectation of privacy? Did it have anything to do with liberal public nudity laws? Isn't it legal for women to be topless in NYC?



Yep, comes from a fairly liberal interpration of a law that was passed about breast feeding, now it's legal to show boobie on NYC streets.

Scopitone

Scopitone

Irvine, CA
OLD SKOOL

MAR 10, 2004 09:42 AM

puke puke puke

Aya

Aya

SUICIDEGIRL

Alberta, Canada

MAR 10, 2004 09:50 AM

I'm so goddamn sick of exploitation of minors - it doesn't the fuck matter that they consented or lied - THEY'RE FUCKING MINORS!

*sigh*

dvsskunk

dvsskunk

Westminster, CO
December 2003

MAR 10, 2004 10:16 AM

Hey look if the dirty hooker wants to flash her tits for some stranger to broadcast and sell then let her blackeyed

jason

jason

USA
August 2002

MAR 10, 2004 10:19 AM

they should be home doing homework or squeezing lemons at hot dog on a stick. not running around drunk flashing their underage tits. throw the parents in jail.

SupremePizzaMan

SupremePizzaMan

Seattle, WA
September 2003

MAR 10, 2004 10:19 AM

New slogan..

Girls Gone Wild: because going out with the bad boy in town just isn't enough to get back at your dad.

fiendish

fiendish

USA
December 2002

MAR 10, 2004 10:20 AM

Being the sexual nature/ content of the dvds I would say this is a problem.

Morgan

Morgan

SUICIDEGIRL

Illinois, USA

MAR 10, 2004 10:34 AM

jason said:
they should be home doing homework or squeezing lemons at hot dog on a stick. not running around drunk flashing their underage tits. throw the parents in jail.



For once, I agree with jason. What the hell is going on in their families if these girls are doing this volutarily?

And yeah, the fact that they "consented" shouldn't matter here. They are MINORS.

BukkakeGod

BukkakeGod

Congers, NY
August 2003

MAR 10, 2004 10:43 AM

well according to this chart the age of consent in Florida is 16. therefor i would assume that most of the girls are atleast that age. dunno tho, they dont say their age specifically in any of the films, maybe they do in the edited out parts but those might be destroyed, so theres no proof for or against this trial.

jason

jason

USA
August 2002

MAR 10, 2004 10:43 AM

Morgan said:
For once, I agree with jason.


*falls from chair*

obsidity

obsidity

Berkeley, CA
May 2003

MAR 10, 2004 11:05 AM

Morgan said:

jason said:
they should be home doing homework or squeezing lemons at hot dog on a stick. not running around drunk flashing their underage tits. throw the parents in jail.


For once, I agree with jason. What the hell is going on in their families if these girls are doing this volutarily?
And yeah, the fact that they "consented" shouldn't matter here. They are MINORS.


In a country that sells thongs for 10 year olds, I'm not surprised that young girls would think this is a fun thing to do.

_mike_

_mike_

San Diego, CA
November 2002

MAR 10, 2004 11:12 AM

Also if the girls legaly misrepresented themselves as adults , they makers of the video arent as at fault as everyone would like to think . If you try to get a tattoo in california and you misrepresent yourself as 18 ( sign consent form and show false id ) , you are also breaking the law and can be held liable .

UnnecessaryZ

unnecessaryz

Astoria, NY
July 2003

MAR 10, 2004 11:15 AM

wuvmonki said:

Cash said:
Isn't it legal for women to be topless in NYC?



It is legal.

loveooo aaa



Too bad no one takes advantage of that, you bunch of wimps.

jason

jason

USA
August 2002

MAR 10, 2004 11:20 AM

UnnecessaryZ said:
Too bad no one takes advantage of that, you bunch of wimps.


i house-sat on central park west one summer. walked through the sheeps meadow almost everyday. plenty of chicks take advantage of this.
eeek

troglodyte

troglodyte

Victoria, BC
May 2003

MAR 10, 2004 11:20 AM

UnnecessaryZ said:
Too bad no one takes advantage of that, you bunch of wimps.



Show me your tits, I'll show you mine.

LightbulbJack

LightbulbJack

Lansing, MI
December 2003

MAR 10, 2004 02:33 PM

First off, I agree that minors shouldn’t be taped or photographed in this way. Second, I don’t know much about this case. What I’m curious about is, did they know that she was under age, or did they find out after they were sued?

lil_tuffy

lil_tuffy

MODERATOR

San Francisco, CA

MAR 10, 2004 02:45 PM

I don't understand the draw of these videos to begin with. Last friday, I saw one for the first time. I think it was called "Girls Gone XXXtra Wild."

The whole thing seemed to take place at Lake Havasu and consisted of very vry drunk people getting naked and man-handled by about 6,000 beer guts. There were so many guys surrounding the girls you couldn't really see anything.

My favorite part was the 'Penis Patrol" and I guess this segment was for the ladies viewing or homosexual men that really dig homophobic pigs. Anyway, watching a bunch of guys trying to get hard after drinking dozens of Bud Lights was pretty funny. The frustration on their faces was priceless. "Why my dick no hard?" they seemed to say. Of course, their friends were near by to pour cold beer on them too.

The water at lake havasu looks really cloudy.

Anyway, there was nothing even remotely erotic in the whole video. It was just sad.

Lil_Tuffy

solecize

solecize

Huntsville, AL
December 2003

MAR 10, 2004 02:48 PM

Did anyone stop to think that telling a female of any age that she CAN'T take off her top in public is sexual discrimination? So boys can run around with their shirts off and get rowdy, but women can't? There is no age limit (or any other limits) to showing man-boobs, you can even see them on broadcast T.V.

Previous

PAGE: 

1 | 2

Next