Coyotemike said:
This article is such bullshit. I thought the blog was headed in a better direction, but seeing this pile of utter crap is very disappointing.
I didn't mind seeing your articles in the newswire, CMike.
I think the real issue here is sheer lack of communication about how each person views the relationship.
I have a friend (with benefits) and we both just laid our cards on the table at the beginning. No promises, no mistaken beliefs of where this was heading and we're still friends even after I called an end to the benefits part.
What is really troubling about this article is that in today's climate of equality the onus is still on men? Really? Every fucked up thing men do women do too. I've been on both ends of that stick, so please, none of this 'holier than thou' attitude.
The most important thing that has been overlooked: it's nice to be reminded that someone is thinking about you; even it's only 3 words, some people don't even have that.
I suggest next time you write an article like this get a broader information base than just your friends.
sooo... just stop communicating all together? All stop doing it when they do. Ladies, promise to stop sending the "Hheeyyyy, what u doing!?" texts, and we'll stop e-maintaining you. Deal?
There are plenty of writings which use pronouns interchangeably. Addressing only the gender of the roles in an E-maintenance relationship is needed, but not the main subject. I mean seriously, this is basic shit.
That being said, an E-Maintainer is obviously a juggler of contacts, who practices their craft regularly. If the people you interact with are not on your level, then it's probably a good idea to reconsider further interaction.
I would also like to congratulate you on using words above a Jr. High level. I started reading this and I was initially surprised. First of all I am not a fan of lumping one scenario between what sounds like a some what idiotic person and another not-so-bright person into a situation and judging a whole group of people based on this. Therefore I don't really have any desire to answer any of your inquires about this situation.
However, I do have some advice for you. Stop
(I apologize for any typos I am on my phone and autocorrect is a bitch).
This is really weird. It sounds like people just touching base with each other. Not everything is some big game. It's the text equivalent of friending someone on fb because you don't want to call but you don't want to lose touch forever. Basically e-maintaining just sounds like a new word for 'having aquaintences'. Just goes to show that if there isn't a problem people will create one.
Seriously?! Everything I would/could say about this article has already been said.
This is at least the second or third article I've seen promoted on SG that has been openly sexist, badly researched, and unashamedly passing elitist and misguided opinions off as facts. If I read another one, I swear to Christ I'm cancelling my account. Sort it out.
But when you write articles about how it's only men doing it and how wrong it is, it puts the attractive women in your life at ease and more likely to bring their problems and attention to you in the future.
Oddly enough, the first time I heard of doing something like this ("maintenance", without the e-) was a woman doing it to a man. And it was fictional. Ann on Parks and Rec was "saving" her friend Justin in case things with Mark (and Andy before him) didn't work out.
Mantis said:
This is really weird. It sounds like people just touching base with each other. Not everything is some big game. It's the text equivalent of friending someone on fb because you don't want to call but you don't want to lose touch forever. Basically e-maintaining just sounds like a new word for 'having aquaintences'. Just goes to show that if there isn't a problem people will create one.
I want to thank you for this but then I might want to read your blog and that could lead to some e-maintaining so I think I'll pass.
Mantis said:
This is really weird. It sounds like people just touching base with each other. Not everything is some big game. It's the text equivalent of friending someone on fb because you don't want to call but you don't want to lose touch forever. Basically e-maintaining just sounds like a new word for 'having aquaintences'. Just goes to show that if there isn't a problem people will create one.
I want to thank you for this but then I might want to read your blog and that could lead to some e-maintaining so I think I'll pass.
"Ack! He hasn't called/texted/Facebooked me in a week? Do you think he hates me??"
You could just fucking ask him. Texts work both ways, and initiating a conversation is not a gender-specific ability. Why is this even a thing? It's not like you're being physically (or even really emotionally/mentally) harmed. You are doing it to yourself by playing a passive role in a "relationship" and then getting all pissy when you aren't getting your way.
Not really sure why anyone should listen to a dude on feminism whose blog freaturesads for "Filipina Singles" (featuring the appropriate bathing suit pictures, of course). Much less a dude who presumes to tell women "how it is."
PointBlank said:
Not really sure why anyone should listen to a dude on feminism whose blog freaturesads for "Filipina Singles" (featuring the appropriate bathing suit pictures, of course). Much less a dude who presumes to tell women "how it is."
Ha. I meant to check him out but forgot. Pretty funny though.
baudot
Oakland, CA
February 2004
NOV 04, 2011 06:11 PM