TOPICS:
APR 20, 2009 08:19 AM
APR 20, 2009 09:13 AM
APR 20, 2009 10:35 AM
Paisley
USA
September 2006
APR 20, 2009 10:53 AM
APR 20, 2009 10:58 AM
Most amazing set ever. Even better than the film 
Although the film would have been millions better if Radiohead had actually done the score.
APR 20, 2009 11:18 AM
APR 20, 2009 11:22 AM
APR 20, 2009 02:59 PM
APR 20, 2009 04:25 PM
APR 20, 2009 06:31 PM
Love the DVD hidden intro. And AMAZING set. But they already knew that! 
APR 20, 2009 07:35 PM
APR 21, 2009 05:41 AM
APR 21, 2009 09:54 AM
APR 21, 2009 10:35 AM
nicole_powers said:
Young_Gershwin said:
Actually, Edward Norton's character is never named. He is "The Narrator". The set is totally sweet though.
from Wikipedia:
on the DVD commentary featuring the author and screenwriter, Palahniuk refers to the narrator as "Jack". A more distinct hint of the narrator's name can be seen in the movie during the office scene with his boss, as the narrator refers to himself as "Jack" ("I am Jack's total lack of surprise".
That was explained in the book a bit differently (reading old Readers Digests in the basement of the Paper Street house). Odd.
From the book itself:
In the oldest magazines, there's a series of articles where organs in the human body talk about themselves in the first person: I am Jane's Uterus.
I am Joe's Prostate.
No kidding, and Tyler comes to the kitchen table with his hickies and no shirt and says, blah, blah, blah, blah, he met Marla Singer last night and they had sex.
Hearing this, I am totally Joe's Gallbladder.
In the book it was Joe, in the movie it was Jack. Nowhere in the book was it implied that Joe (or Jack) was The Narrator's name. However, I can see how it'd be convenient shorthand (even for Chuck Palahniuk) to refer to Ed Norton's character as "Jack."
APR 21, 2009 12:11 PM
APR 21, 2009 10:15 PM
Shalome said:
nicole_powers said:
Young_Gershwin said:
Actually, Edward Norton's character is never named. He is "The Narrator". The set is totally sweet though.
from Wikipedia:
on the DVD commentary featuring the author and screenwriter, Palahniuk refers to the narrator as "Jack". A more distinct hint of the narrator's name can be seen in the movie during the office scene with his boss, as the narrator refers to himself as "Jack" ("I am Jack's total lack of surprise".
That was explained in the book a bit differently (reading old Readers Digests in the basement of the Paper Street house). Odd.
From the book itself:
In the oldest magazines, there's a series of articles where organs in the human body talk about themselves in the first person: I am Jane's Uterus.
I am Joe's Prostate.
No kidding, and Tyler comes to the kitchen table with his hickies and no shirt and says, blah, blah, blah, blah, he met Marla Singer last night and they had sex.
Hearing this, I am totally Joe's Gallbladder.
In the book it was Joe, in the movie it was Jack. Nowhere in the book was it implied that Joe (or Jack) was The Narrator's name. However, I can see how it'd be convenient shorthand (even for Chuck Palahniuk) to refer to Ed Norton's character as "Jack."
Real Spoilers:
Wonderful set. I hope I get to see many, many more from Cherry.
APR 21, 2009 10:21 PM
Double post? It's the site telling me, "You can say that again!"
Also, I would love to see more of these cult classic tributes, more often. But only so long as they were made as as well as this and it didn't get all played out, you know, lose it's freshness. The fair use clause for education and journalistic purposes should apply.
APR 21, 2009 11:47 PM
APR 22, 2009 08:00 AM
APR 22, 2009 08:16 AM
APR 22, 2009 01:36 PM
APR 23, 2009 02:20 AM
APR 28, 2009 03:27 AM
Absolutely stunning set. 
nicole_powers
NEWSWIRE
I'm lost
APR 14, 2009 05:16 PM