Lifestyle

TOPICS:

12/23/08

Previous

PAGE: 

1 ... 

77 | 78 | 79 | 80 | 81

 ... 954

Next

Previous

PAGE: 

1 | 2 | 3 | 4

Next

gdarklighter

gdarklighter

San Diego, CA
August 2005

DEC 02, 2008 10:57 PM

beaky said:

DaysGoneBye said:
STILL no Mac version? Damn.



that's what I say... what gives!!


Having spent a fair amount of time exploring their developer documentation, I'd say "what gives" is that they're doing it right instead of going the quick and dirty route.

willam9

willam9

Philadelphia, PA
January 2008

DEC 06, 2008 03:54 PM

i've been using chrome for two months and it beats the eff outta ie and firefox for pretty much everything i use it for. i'm not a tech heavy kinda person though so most of my interwebbing is just watching movies to kill time or logging into journal services for research/school stuff...but i have to say that both ie and firefox always took forever and crashed all the time compared to chrome.

malkav11

malkav11

Saint Paul, MN
July 2003

DEC 07, 2008 12:52 AM

I really miss two things when I use Chrome - ad block, and being able to turn off autospellchecking. If they had those things, there would be no reason for me to ever go back to Firefox.

As it is, I still don't go back to Firefox much, but there's some level of temptation there.

_kungfoo_

_kungfoo_

Los Angeles, CA
April 2005

DEC 11, 2008 11:28 PM

I'm not impressed by Chrome. Mozilla managed to release Firefox for all three platforms at the same time but the mighty Google could only handle Windows?

gdarklighter

gdarklighter

San Diego, CA
August 2005

DEC 11, 2008 11:49 PM

_kungfoo_ said:
I'm not impressed by Chrome. Mozilla managed to release Firefox for all three platforms at the same time but the mighty Google could only handle Windows?


The way a company chooses to release a product on multiple platforms is really only a comment on that company's development strategies, not on the product itself. From what I gather, Google's first priority was to get some serious testing done on their engine, which meant getting it to as many users as possible as quickly as possible, which meant Windows.

And Firefox didn't launch simultaneously on all three platforms. The first Mac version was 0.6. They released for OS/2 before the Mac, which is an even bigger shock, given that much of the code was based upon the Mozilla browser, which was available on the Mac.

_kungfoo_

_kungfoo_

Los Angeles, CA
April 2005

DEC 12, 2008 12:28 AM

gdarklighter said:

_kungfoo_ said:
I'm not impressed by Chrome. Mozilla managed to release Firefox for all three platforms at the same time but the mighty Google could only handle Windows?


The way a company chooses to release a product on multiple platforms is really only a comment on that company's development strategies, not on the product itself. From what I gather, Google's first priority was to get some serious testing done on their engine, which meant getting it to as many users as possible as quickly as possible, which meant Windows.

And Firefox didn't launch simultaneously on all three platforms. The first Mac version was 0.6. They released for OS/2 before the Mac, which is an even bigger shock, given that much of the code was based upon the Mozilla browser, which was available on the Mac.



Fair enough, but I was referring to Firefox 3.

gdarklighter

gdarklighter

San Diego, CA
August 2005

DEC 12, 2008 07:18 AM

_kungfoo_ said:

gdarklighter said:

_kungfoo_ said:
I'm not impressed by Chrome. Mozilla managed to release Firefox for all three platforms at the same time but the mighty Google could only handle Windows?


The way a company chooses to release a product on multiple platforms is really only a comment on that company's development strategies, not on the product itself. From what I gather, Google's first priority was to get some serious testing done on their engine, which meant getting it to as many users as possible as quickly as possible, which meant Windows.

And Firefox didn't launch simultaneously on all three platforms. The first Mac version was 0.6. They released for OS/2 before the Mac, which is an even bigger shock, given that much of the code was based upon the Mozilla browser, which was available on the Mac.



Fair enough, but I was referring to Firefox 3.


That's not a fair comparison. Firefox was already a well-established cross-platform project with a sizable developer community by the time version 3 began development.

Quirky

Quirky

Birmingham, AL
October 2005

DEC 12, 2008 07:20 AM

Chrome still sucks.

Previous

PAGE: 

1 | 2 | 3 | 4

Next