Lifestyle

TOPICS:

2/5/08

Daniel Robert Epstein: Sepultura

2/5/08

NEWS: Super Bowl Sunday: A Preview [3]

2/5/08

NEWS: How Much for a Mint Condition Kucinich?

2/5/08

Erotic Art Community.

2/4/08

NEWS: SuicideGirls Visits Set of "Repo!: The Genetic Opera" Part II

2/3/08

NEWS: What's Zo Wearing? January 27, 2008 [3]

2/3/08

Barry Yourgrau: Strawberry Pie

2/2/08

NEWS: Fun Children's Film Makes a Grave Miscalculation [7]

2/2/08

NEWS: The Buttocks are Not a Sexual Organ: ABC and the FCC [2]

2/2/08

Hotmail Help Please!

2/1/08

NEWS: Not the Brightest Bulbs in the Box [3]

1/31/08

Daniel Robert Epstein: Terry Gilliam

1/31/08

NEWS: I Won't Say Va-Jay-Jay. You Can't Make Me. [5]

1/31/08

Daniel Robert Epstein: Mike Leigh

1/31/08

Daniel Robert Epstein: Janes Addiction

1/31/08

NEWS: Small Time Anchor, Big Time Problems [2]

1/31/08

Cloverfield [2]

1/30/08

Daniel Robert Epstein: Lawrence Bender

1/30/08

NEWS: Man, How'd The "Rambo" Trailer Get So Awesome [3]

1/29/08

Daniel Robert Epstein: Mike Allred

SpidersAndArrows

1/29/08

NEWS: Shit Happens [2]

1/29/08

directing yr dreams [2]

1/29/08

NEWS: What's Zo Wearing? January 13, 2008 [2]

1/29/08

ATTENTION NERDS [2]

1/28/08

Be My Wife / Be My Husband [11]

1/28/08

Old, Busted, and Lame [2]

1/28/08

She Blinded Me With Scientology [4]

1/28/08

Daniel Robert Epstein: Parker Posey

1/28/08

Daniel Robert Epstein: Wes Anderson

1/28/08

NEWS: Tom Cruise, Scientology and Me [3]

1/27/08

Fuck Cloverfield, did you catch the Star Trek trailer?! [2]

1/27/08

Burning CDs Using iTunes

1/27/08

NEWS: And Your Little Dog Toto, Too [2]

1/27/08

Ryan Stewart : Saw IV Director Darren Lynn Bousman

1/27/08

Daniel Robert Epstein: Johnny Knoxville

1/27/08

Aaron Detroit: Marilyn Manson

1/26/08

Daniel Robert Epstein: Dane Cook [2]

1/26/08

NEWS: Breaking News: Clowns are Fucking Terrifying [2]

1/26/08

Finally, A videogame for people like me.

BlastProcessing

1/26/08

December 07 Fetish Photography Contest: Vote Please! [2]

PAGE:

1 ...

21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25

... 888

Fuck Cloverfield, did you catch the Star Trek trailer?!

PAGE:

1 | 2

punk

Phoenix, AZ

January 2004

JAN 22, 2008 05:29 PM

Paramount Pictures put the teaser that was before Cloverfield online: here.

I'm totes excited - former/current Star Trek nerd FTW.

DevilsReject

Cleveland, OH

February 2007

JAN 22, 2008 05:32 PM

****NERD SQEAAAAAAAAAL*****

i wanna see more!

d20

San Francisco, CA

September 2003

JAN 22, 2008 05:33 PM

it's pretty much going to be a one way trip to the bone zone, yeah.

punk

Phoenix, AZ

January 2004

JAN 22, 2008 05:34 PM

d20 said:
it's pretty much going to be a one way trip to the bone zone, yeah.

I've been vertical since I watched it last night.

Ladie

SUICIDEGIRL

California, USA

JAN 22, 2008 05:37 PM

BEST PART OF THE MOVIE.

My friends nearly disowned me I was so excited over it.

noahfence

Buffalo, NY

February 2006

JAN 22, 2008 05:43 PM

I wish that after the atrocity which was the Star Wars prequels (not to mention Enterprise) that Paramount would have thought twice before ruining the Trek franchise for a cheap buck. At least I know that I can block it out of my memory and pretend it never existed after I see it. I only hope enough Trek fans will still exist to keep the franchise going after this one bombs.

punk

Phoenix, AZ

January 2004

JAN 22, 2008 05:46 PM

noahfence said:
I wish that after the atrocity which was the Star Wars prequels (not to mention Enterprise) that Paramount would have thought twice before ruining the Trek franchise for a cheap buck. At least I know that I can block it out of my memory and pretend it never existed after I see it. I only hope enough Trek fans will still exist to keep the franchise going after this one bombs.

Get the fuck out of here!

DevilsReject

Cleveland, OH

February 2007

JAN 22, 2008 05:47 PM

noahfence said:
I wish that after the atrocity which was the Star Wars prequels (not to mention Enterprise) that Paramount would have thought twice before ruining the Trek franchise for a cheap buck. At least I know that I can block it out of my memory and pretend it never existed after I see it. I only hope enough Trek fans will still exist to keep the franchise going after this one bombs.

what the hell do you care, according to you we won't even see it because a black hole is going to consume the earth in May of 08. This doesn't come out until december

BlastProcessing

Knoxville, TN

OLD SKOOL

JAN 22, 2008 05:47 PM

noahfence said:
I wish that after the atrocity which was the Star Wars prequels (not to mention Enterprise) that Paramount would have thought twice before ruining the Trek franchise for a cheap buck. At least I know that I can block it out of my memory and pretend it never existed after I see it. I only hope enough Trek fans will still exist to keep the franchise going after this one bombs.

What is it with you and evidence-bereft doomsaying?

malkav11

Saint Paul, MN

July 2003

JAN 22, 2008 05:49 PM

Y'all must be some serious Trekkies to get that excited about a bit of welding footage.

I mean, I would love for this to be good, but there hasn't been good Trek since DS9. (Maaaaybe Voyager, or parts thereof.) And this doesn't show anything meaningful in making a value judgment.

punk

Phoenix, AZ

January 2004

JAN 22, 2008 05:50 PM

I swear to God if you guys turn my The New Star Trek Trailer is Wonderful thread into a noahfence thread, I will shove spatulas up your brown eyes. Not the handle-end.

_Margot_

Santa Monica, CA

December 2007

JAN 22, 2008 06:04 PM

I cannot wait. Seriously. I think I just squealed a bit louder than I should have.

magpieboy

Seattle, WA

June 2004

JAN 22, 2008 06:12 PM

punk said:
I swear to God if you guys turn my The New Star Trek Trailer is Wonderful thread into a noahfence thread, I will shove spatulas up your brown eyes. Not the handle-end.

I heard they're contracting with Lucasfilms.

Muahahahahahahahahahahahaha-

ahahahahahahahaahahah!!!

punk

Phoenix, AZ

January 2004

JAN 22, 2008 06:14 PM

malkav11 said:
Y'all must be some serious Trekkies to get that excited about a bit of welding footage.

I mean, I would love for this to be good, but there hasn't been good Trek since DS9. (Maaaaybe Voyager, or parts thereof.) And this doesn't show anything meaningful in making a value judgment.

It offers a glimpse at the movie's atmosphere - very important in my opinion. I could really geek out at this point about the state of Earth at this point in the Star Trek time line, but I'll save it for later.

noahfence

Buffalo, NY

February 2006

JAN 22, 2008 06:14 PM

Can anyone seriously blame me for thinking that a movie starring the original crew played by different actors is total blasphemy?

This goes beyond Star Wars.

We're talking about Star fucking Trek here. I almost needed therapy after enduring Enterprise. I don't care how hard this new movie tries, I just don't see it topping the performance of the original cast. Their portrayal of the characters is what we identify with as much as the characters themselves.

And how far back before ToS is this supposed to be set anyway? Chekov is supposedly in it, yet he didn't come on board the Enterprise until later in the series. Continuity problems ftl?

DevilsReject

Cleveland, OH

February 2007

JAN 22, 2008 06:15 PM

jtemperance

Chicago, IL

January 2004

JAN 22, 2008 06:22 PM

DevilsReject said:

noahfence said:
I wish that after the atrocity which was the Star Wars prequels (not to mention Enterprise) that Paramount would have thought twice before ruining the Trek franchise for a cheap buck. At least I know that I can block it out of my memory and pretend it never existed after I see it. I only hope enough Trek fans will still exist to keep the franchise going after this one bombs.

what the hell do you care, according to you we won't even see it because a black hole is going to consume the earth in May of 08. This doesn't come out until december

I wanted to say that!

noahfence

Buffalo, NY

February 2006

JAN 22, 2008 06:25 PM

DevilsReject said:

http://picard.ytmnd.com/

BlastProcessing

Knoxville, TN

OLD SKOOL

JAN 22, 2008 06:43 PM

noahfence said:
Can anyone seriously blame me for thinking that a movie starring the original crew played by different actors is total blasphemy?

This goes beyond Star Wars.

We're talking about Star fucking Trek here. I almost needed therapy after enduring Enterprise. I don't care how hard this new movie tries, I just don't see it topping the performance of the original cast. Their portrayal of the characters is what we identify with as much as the characters themselves.

And how far back before ToS is this supposed to be set anyway? Chekov is supposedly in it, yet he didn't come on board the Enterprise until later in the series. Continuity problems ftl?

What is it with you and evidence-bereft doomsaying?

noahfence

Buffalo, NY

February 2006

JAN 22, 2008 06:58 PM

BlastProcessing said:

noahfence said:
Can anyone seriously blame me for thinking that a movie starring the original crew played by different actors is total blasphemy?

This goes beyond Star Wars.

We're talking about Star fucking Trek here. I almost needed therapy after enduring Enterprise. I don't care how hard this new movie tries, I just don't see it topping the performance of the original cast. Their portrayal of the characters is what we identify with as much as the characters themselves.

And how far back before ToS is this supposed to be set anyway? Chekov is supposedly in it, yet he didn't come on board the Enterprise until later in the series. Continuity problems ftl?

What is it with you and evidence-bereft doomsaying?

Evidence-bereft? Any real Trekkie knows the odd number curse.

Bastardo

Boston, MA

January 2005

JAN 22, 2008 07:06 PM

noahfence said:

BlastProcessing said:

noahfence said:
Can anyone seriously blame me for thinking that a movie starring the original crew played by different actors is total blasphemy?

This goes beyond Star Wars.

We're talking about Star fucking Trek here. I almost needed therapy after enduring Enterprise. I don't care how hard this new movie tries, I just don't see it topping the performance of the original cast. Their portrayal of the characters is what we identify with as much as the characters themselves.

And how far back before ToS is this supposed to be set anyway? Chekov is supposedly in it, yet he didn't come on board the Enterprise until later in the series. Continuity problems ftl?

What is it with you and evidence-bereft doomsaying?

Evidence-bereft? Any real Trekkie knows the odd number curse.

Dude, May is the fifth month! Coincidence?!?!?!
WAKE UP AMERICA!

zenFish

Calgary, AB

August 2004

JAN 22, 2008 07:10 PM

Like the trailer, but going to want to see some actual footage as well.

Still on the fence, but so far, suspense built is showing good things.

lil_tuffy

MODERATOR

San Francisco, CA

JAN 22, 2008 07:48 PM

I paid $89 for me and holly to see the Star Trek Experience in Vegas but we got so frikkin motion sick on the Klingon Encounter we didn't even get to see the Borg one!

And the Romulan Ale turned my shit turn green. Like bright green.

punk

Phoenix, AZ

January 2004

JAN 22, 2008 07:55 PM

lil_tuffy said:
And the Romulan Ale turned my shit turn green. Like bright green.

So what you're saying is that it worked.

ElizaTheTroll

Australia

January 2006

JAN 22, 2008 10:30 PM

noahfence said:

BlastProcessing said:

noahfence said:
Can anyone seriously blame me for thinking that a movie starring the original crew played by different actors is total blasphemy?

This goes beyond Star Wars.

We're talking about Star fucking Trek here. I almost needed therapy after enduring Enterprise. I don't care how hard this new movie tries, I just don't see it topping the performance of the original cast. Their portrayal of the characters is what we identify with as much as the characters themselves.

And how far back before ToS is this supposed to be set anyway? Chekov is supposedly in it, yet he didn't come on board the Enterprise until later in the series. Continuity problems ftl?

What is it with you and evidence-bereft doomsaying?

Evidence-bereft? Any real Trekkie knows the odd number curse.

Does not fit with the data anymore since Nemesis came out. My money's on the odd digit-sum theory now.

PAGE:

1 | 2