Good CHRIST, Go see this movie, if you haven't already!
PT Anderson has pretty much proven himself as legitimately powerful filmmaker with this one. It's beautiful, it's dark, it's difficult, and it's the closest thing to beating "No Country For Old Men" as the most important film of the year.
And of course; Daniel Day-Lewis is an acting GOD - no man can drool and spit or be equally frail or dangerous, or even grow a bitchin' mustache like DDL.
Those are indeed great. Although I'm starting to feel like I'm the only one who didn't like this movie.
A) It felt like a largely disconnected series of vignettes, only loosely forming anything resembling a narrative. I really find that frustrating. Now, I guess this isn't terribly new for Anderson (I think Boogie Nights was similarly structured and I don't remember anything about Magnolia except the rain of frogs, but I think it may have been also). But I think I was able to handle it in those movies because interesting things were happening to interesting people. I didn't like anyone at all in this movie and, well...
B) I found significant portions of it to be extremely tedious and drawn out. That whole silent opening twenty minutes or so, for example. I was actually fighting sleep not long before
C) I found Eli to be pretty consistently overacted and Plainview sometimes.
D) I'm pretty sure I missed a lot of subtlety. This would be entirely my fault, of course. For example, I read one discussion where people were talking about the
scene where Henry and Plainview go swimming, and pointing out that that scene is when Plainview realizes that Henry isn't really his brother.
I totally missed this, and was wondering why the camera lingered even when seemingly nothing was happening.
That said, there were some really good scenes, particularly those at the end of the movie in Plainview's mansion. So I don't claim it's a bad movie, just didn't like it.
I saw "No Country for Old Men" right afterwards and was entranced.
malkav11 said:
Those are indeed great. Although I'm starting to feel like I'm the only one who didn't like this movie.
A) It felt like a largely disconnected series of vignettes, only loosely forming anything resembling a narrative. I really find that frustrating. Now, I guess this isn't terribly new for Anderson (I think Boogie Nights was similarly structured and I don't remember anything about Magnolia except the rain of frogs, but I think it may have been also). But I think I was able to handle it in those movies because interesting things were happening to interesting people. I didn't like anyone at all in this movie and, well...
B) I found significant portions of it to be extremely tedious and drawn out. That whole silent opening twenty minutes or so, for example. I was actually fighting sleep not long before
C) I found Eli to be pretty consistently overacted and Plainview sometimes.
D) I'm pretty sure I missed a lot of subtlety. This would be entirely my fault, of course. For example, I read one discussion where people were talking about the
scene where Henry and Plainview go swimming, and pointing out that that scene is when Plainview realizes that Henry isn't really his brother.
I totally missed this, and was wondering why the camera lingered even when seemingly nothing was happening.
That said, there were some really good scenes, particularly those at the end of the movie in Plainview's mansion. So I don't claim it's a bad movie, just didn't like it.
I saw "No Country for Old Men" right afterwards and was entranced.
I can understand a lot of what you're saying. I suspect that PT Anderson may do a longer cut on the DVD. The opening, i felt, was to show just how determined Plainview really is. And I think the film takes its time because that's what people of that era would've done.
And seeing that and NCFOM in a day is amazing, isn't it?
plasticfangs
Portland, OR
OLD SKOOL
JAN 18, 2008 03:52 PM