Lifestyle

TOPICS:

Previous

PAGE: 

1 ... 

88 | 89 | 90 | 91 | 92

 ... 940

Next

Previous

PAGE: 

1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6

 ... 9

Next

Hunter

Hunter

SUICIDEGIRL

New York, USA

NOV 10, 2007 05:18 PM

What would it be like to live in a world with no TV or movies? How would boring people escape pre-sex conversation? How would dysfunctional families avoid making eye contact at dinner? Holy Jesus, how would we entertain ourselves while waiting to be finished with this burdensome thing called life?

The Writers Guild of America may force us to answer these awful questions soon. I must admit, at first I didn't give a shit about their little strike. Though I am fascinated with pop culture as a phenomenon, I don't own a television and I rarely see Hollywood movies, preferring instead to occupy myself with the time-tested art of looking shifty in bars in the hopes that boys will talk to me. The average working writer in Hollywood makes about $200,000 a year, making it tough for most of us unwashed, underpaid magazine-and-blog hoi palloi to feel any sympathy, not to mention people who actually labor for a living. And I'd venture to say that in the absence of TV, the world would go on. Everyone would eventually go back to entertaining themselves in the manner of the ancient cave peoples: taking peyote and staring at the clouds, making crude drawings of animals, praying to terrifying gods to smite their enemies, attending swinger parties, humping rocks, inventing fire, etc.

But then I read a little bit more about it, and realized it's a situation that affects more than just Hollywood writers and TV-addicts. Exhibit A: this email written by Dale Alexander, who works as a grip on The Office, discussing the strike's far-reaching ramifications (via the LA Times):


Our show was shut down and we were all laid off this week. I’ve been watching the news since the WGA strike was announced and I have yet to see any coverage dedicated to the effect that this strike will have on the below the line employees.

I respect the WGA’s position. They probably do deserve a larger percentage of profit participation, but a lengthy strike will affect more than just the writers and studios. On my show we had 14 writers. There were also 2 cameramen, 2 camera assistants, 4 hair stylists, 4 makeup artists, 7 wardrobe people, 4 grips, 4 electricians, 2 craft service, 4 props people, 6 construction, 1 medic, 3 art department, 5 set dressers, 3 sound men, 3 stand-ins, 2 set PAs, 4 assistant directors, 1 DGA trainee, 1 unit manager, 6 production office personnel, 3 casting people, 4 writers assistants, 1 script supervisor, 2 editors, 2 editors assistants, 3 post production personnel, 1 facilities manager, 8 drivers, 2 location managers, 3 accountants, 4 caterers and a producer who’s not a writer. All 102 of us are now out of work.

I have been in the motion picture business for 33 years and have survived three major strikes. None of which have been by any of the below the line unions. During the 1988 WGA strike many of my friends lost their homes, cars and even spouses. Many actors are publicly backing the writers, some have even said that they would find a way to help pay bills for the striking writers. When the networks run out of new shows and they air repeats the writers will be paid residuals. The lowest paid writer in television makes roughly twice the salary than the below the line crewmember makes. Everyone should be paid their fair share, but does it have to be at the expense of the other 90% of the crew members. Nobody ever recoups from a strike, lost wages are just that, lost.

We all know that the strike will be resolved. Eventually both sides will return to the bargaining table and make a deal. The only uncertainty is how many of our houses, livelihoods, college educations and retirement funds will pay for it.



Who are the assholes here? On the one hand, already-wealthy writers are being babies about their salaries at the expense of much poorer and less whiny people's jobs. In my best Veruca Salt voice:
"But I want TWO million dollars! One million just isn't enough to purchase all the hookers, blow, tigers, sharks, tiger-sharks, and assorted luxuries I require! How am I to live? (weeping a little) What will become of me?"

On the other hand, studios are insanely greedy and evil. Despite being the creative backbone of the biz, writers get only a small fraction of the profits that actors, producers, and executives enjoy in this multi-billion dollar industry. As most writers know, it's harder for genius to flow without a little green motivation involved.

Networks are behaving in a typically asinine way. NBC has pulled the nastiest shit so far; in an effort to guilt Jay Leno into crossing the picket line to return to his post as host of The Tonight Show, they have threatened to fire all non-writing staff if the strike continues and Leno does not return. This is akin to putting a gun to a dog's head and saying "If you do not let us continue to take advantage of people, Jay Leno, we will fucking shoot this adorable puppy and it will be all your fault. WHY ARE YOU KILLING THIS PUPPY, JAY LENO? WHY?!" Seriously, fuck those guys.

Beloved daytime pixie Ellen Degeneres has been getting a lot of shit from WGA for writing her own material and continuing to do her show, but in light of the aforementioned factors involved, I don't think anyone can really judge her for this choice. Plus, I highly doubt the presence of Ellen on daytime television is going to make or break the deal for either side.

I'm not going to propose a solution, because this is a shitty situation all around. However, I'd encourage the writers and studios to take a long hard look at history; the writers' strike of 1988 was pretty much a lose-lose scenario for everyone involved. Evil head honchos and cranky funny-makers had best bang their heads together fast and hard, because they are only headed for disaster.

And as for the rest of us, in the immortal words of my mother, "Read a fucking book." Or hump some rocks, or go to a bar and look shifty, or have a meaningful conversation with someone. Whatever.

Rafi

Rafi

Santa Monica, CA
January 2003

NOV 10, 2007 08:04 PM

This article is extremely misinformed about the lifestyle and salary of the vast, vast majority of Hollywood writers. And this is coming from a producer.

SignalNoise

SignalNoise

USA
February 2004

NOV 10, 2007 08:09 PM

I fail to understand why if writers worked hard to build a strong union - they should accept shitty deals from producers? I suppose that writers busted their ass to unionize..... why should they not benefit from it?

Similarly, do we really want to apply the metric "your choice will have an unintended consequence that hurts someone so you're an asshole" to these kinds (or any) choices? It seems like a pretty paralyzing fucking stance.

Ridley

Ridley

SUICIDEGIRL

California, USA

NOV 10, 2007 08:12 PM

hahahah apparently they didn't read This article in which it explained what the news is going to say about the money writers make.

While I know it's not taking sides, I do have to agree with Rafi on the fact that the writer is misinformed on the salary that the majority of writers in the industry get.

UrizenSpeaks

UrizenSpeaks

Los Angeles, CA
May 2004

NOV 10, 2007 08:14 PM

This average figure for writer income includes those who are paid millions for one script. The salary of the average writer (not the average salary of all writers) is roughly that of a high school teacher.

emotedcreations

emotedcreations

Germany
July 2006

NOV 10, 2007 08:19 PM

shocked

Wookiewho

Wookiewho

Los Angeles, CA
February 2004

NOV 10, 2007 08:24 PM

Most shows have 7 to 24 "producers" on them, and 90% of them are writers. It is in almost very wrtiers deal (and directors and some actors) deals to get a producer credit.
The "producers" in this strike are really the studios. They are using this as an excuse to clean house.
As Rafi said the majority of writers in Hollywood don't make anywhere near $200,000 dollars a year. Residual checks get smaller and smaller.
The show I am on is goin gto go down in about a week or so. So there will be another 120 people out of work.
And it effects the restaurants, cleaners, bars, and trickles into almost all facets of the economy. But the "prodcuers" and stuidos still will figure out a way to make money off this.
It sucks for everyone.

Tinyhobo

Tinyhobo

Boulder City, NV
December 2006

NOV 10, 2007 08:26 PM

creativename said:
hahahah apparently they didn't read This article in which it explained what the news is going to say about the money writers make.

While I know it's not taking sides, I do have to agree with Rafi on the fact that the writer is misinformed on the salary that the majority of writers in the industry get.



seriously.

ericwine

ericwine

Charlotte Hall, MD
January 2007

NOV 10, 2007 08:44 PM

The $200,000 average figure may be correct, but it's skewed by the relatively small number of high earners. The median salary of a writer is somewhere in the $50,000 to $60,000 range - not bad, but not great when you consider that (1) most writers live in the New York City area or southern California (places where the cost of living is relatively high) and (2) the entertainment business is very fickle, so there's no guarantee a writer will make a consistent salary. It's very possible that a writer could've made a nice pile of dough, say $500,000, in 2004, and not made a dime (other than residuals) since. That's why residuals are so important.
Hopefully, this will get resolved quickly, so everyone, including crew, can go back to work without worrying about where their next paycheck is coming from. But I'm not counting on it, because the studios seem to have their heads up their asses.

And I can't wait to see FearTheReaper's reaction to this article.

Subrosa

Subrosa

San Francisco, CA
July 2004

NOV 10, 2007 08:45 PM

Yes. It's really the multimillionaire writers that are driving this strike. Totally. You completely nailed it.

Hunter said:
Whatever.



Indeed.

Subrosa

Subrosa

San Francisco, CA
July 2004

NOV 10, 2007 08:48 PM

Fucking Edit button!

Cigarette

Cigarette

Cleveland, OH
April 2004

NOV 10, 2007 08:51 PM

gcash056

gcash056

Orlando, FL
October 2004

NOV 10, 2007 08:56 PM

Who are these people? What is this strike thing? I don't watch this sort of idiotic TV, and I don't really care. They all suck. If they put the entire staff of NBC, CBS, ABC, and especially Fox on a raft in the North Atlantic and sank it, I would be overjoyed.

And I mean from the top exec to the kid running errands for the caterer.

Get a REAL JOB, people!

I do have to applaud Ellen for having the creativity and guts to do her own material, but otherwise this doesn't register on the Giveafuckometer.

Cigarette

Cigarette

Cleveland, OH
April 2004

NOV 10, 2007 08:58 PM

gcash056 said:
Who are these people? What is this strike thing? I don't watch this sort of idiotic TV, and I don't really care. They all suck. If they put the entire staff of NBC, CBS, ABC, and especially Fox on a raft in the North Atlantic and sank it, I would be overjoyed.

And I mean from the top exec to the kid running errands for the caterer.

Get a REAL JOB, people!

I do have to applaud Ellen for having the creativity and guts to do her own material, but otherwise this doesn't register on the Giveafuckometer.



For someone who doesn't care, you sure have some strong feelings on the matter.

Hunter

Hunter

SUICIDEGIRL

New York, USA

NOV 10, 2007 09:03 PM

So, I checked to see if anyone had written about this topic yet, and I guess I didn't go far back enough. After reading FTR's post, I stand corrected about the lifestyle of most writers...even though the "poorest" still make twice as much as an editorial assistant at a magazine, i.e. me...also, I was clearly exaggerating for comic effect!
And guess what? I still have a point. The below the line workers who are being affected by this make less than the writers and have pretty much no say in whatever happens from this point on. It's a more complex issue than the evil executives vs. the taken-advantage-of writers. I did some research and tried to show it from all sides, to the best of my abilities, with some trademark snark because I don't really like TV all that much.
Plus, I got my statistics from the New York Times. If you think they're wrong, you can take it up with them.

legionnaire

legionnaire

Belgium
November 2003

NOV 10, 2007 09:03 PM

I'm really tired of reading media coverage (regardless of the source) that constantly portrays any protesting union as being a bunch of pampered babies whining for something extra. It's practically become a cliche at this point. The fact is, unions pretty much never want to go on strike - it's the last resort at the bargaining table, and it doesn't directly help the unions or their members. But when the other side is being intransigent it's sometimes the only option available to the unions and the only way to make management realize that they're serious about their demands.

Believe it or not, strong unions are good for all working people. Think about the long term repercussions of collective bargaining action before pooh-poohing union members as spoiled brats.

Cigarette

Cigarette

Cleveland, OH
April 2004

NOV 10, 2007 09:15 PM

Meanwhile, Local One strikes in New York. Incidentally, Local One is New York's chapter of the same union of below the line employees that are being laid off in Hollywood.

MrStitches

MrStitches

Brooklyn, NY
November 2003

NOV 10, 2007 09:15 PM

Hunter said:

Plus, I got my statistics from the New York Times. If you think they're wrong, you can take it up with them.




No one is saying that the average salary isn't $200, 000 a year. What they are saying is that the average is completely meaningless when the highest paid writers' salaries are so ridiculously high, that even though there are only a handful of them they skew the average significantly, and that number of $200,000 is basically meaningless.

Tinyhobo

Tinyhobo

Boulder City, NV
December 2006

NOV 10, 2007 09:17 PM

gcash056 said:
Who are these people? What is this strike thing? I don't watch this sort of idiotic TV, and I don't really care. They all suck. If they put the entire staff of NBC, CBS, ABC, and especially Fox on a raft in the North Atlantic and sank it, I would be overjoyed.

And I mean from the top exec to the kid running errands for the caterer.

Get a REAL JOB, people!

I do have to applaud Ellen for having the creativity and guts to do her own material, but otherwise this doesn't register on the Giveafuckometer.


wait...so being a writer is not a "real" job?

dingoes8

dingoes8

Milwaukee, WI
March 2004

NOV 10, 2007 09:18 PM

That guy does have a point that a lengthy strike would hurt lots of people, but it's strange how people always blame the negative effects of a strike on the people striking, rather than the people responsible for the clearly unfair conditions that caused them to strike.

Cigarette

Cigarette

Cleveland, OH
April 2004

NOV 10, 2007 09:23 PM

dingoes8 said:
That guy does have a point that a lengthy strike would hurt lots of people, but it's strange how people always blame the negative effects of a strike on the people striking, rather than the clearly unfair conditions that caused them to strike.



The establishment is good at that. Eighty, a hundred years ago, mining companies convinced the government that gunning down women and children was part of the good fight to keep America strong and free!

Remember, what's good for General Motors is good for the country!

Uncognitive

Uncognitive

Brooklyn, NY
May 2003

NOV 10, 2007 09:33 PM

Tinyhobo said:

gcash056 said:
Who are these people? What is this strike thing? I don't watch this sort of idiotic TV, and I don't really care. They all suck. If they put the entire staff of NBC, CBS, ABC, and especially Fox on a raft in the North Atlantic and sank it, I would be overjoyed.

And I mean from the top exec to the kid running errands for the caterer.

Get a REAL JOB, people!

I do have to applaud Ellen for having the creativity and guts to do her own material, but otherwise this doesn't register on the Giveafuckometer.


wait...so being a writer is not a "real" job?



Of course not, it's a hobby. wink

BlastProcessing

BlastProcessing

USA
OLD SKOOL

NOV 10, 2007 09:39 PM

It may not be strictly on-topic, but I find self-proclaimed bike-riding linux geeks telling other people how to best spend their time to be unintentionally hilarious.

Tinyhobo

Tinyhobo

Boulder City, NV
December 2006

NOV 10, 2007 09:44 PM

Uncognitive said:

Tinyhobo said:

gcash056 said:
Who are these people? What is this strike thing? I don't watch this sort of idiotic TV, and I don't really care. They all suck. If they put the entire staff of NBC, CBS, ABC, and especially Fox on a raft in the North Atlantic and sank it, I would be overjoyed.

And I mean from the top exec to the kid running errands for the caterer.

Get a REAL JOB, people!

I do have to applaud Ellen for having the creativity and guts to do her own material, but otherwise this doesn't register on the Giveafuckometer.


wait...so being a writer is not a "real" job?



Of course not, it's a hobby. wink


deadlines, my friend.

mmagbee

mmagbee

Baton Rouge, LA
February 2004

NOV 10, 2007 09:44 PM

Like several of the previous comments stated, you are GROSSLY misinformed about the salary of the average writer in Hollywood. The average salary of a typical writer for a talk-show (late night, primetime, or daytime) is between $30,000 and $40,000 a year. That's not much considering the astronomical cost of living in California. And with the internet being a go-to place for many people to watch their favorite shows as well as web-exclusive content, these writers need to be paid for such endeavors.
In fact, behind-the-scenes workers such as grips, electricians, wardrobe, make-up, etc. sometimes end up making more than the writers do.
So for someone who doesn't watch much television or movies, you need to do a little more research on your subject before you start bandying about seemingly clever and sassy quips like writers needing more money to spend on drugs and hookers.

Previous

PAGE: 

1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6

 ... 9

Next