Lifestyle

TOPICS:

Previous

PAGE: 

1 ... 

90 | 91 | 92 | 93 | 94

 ... 940

Next

Previous

PAGE: 

1 ... 

4 | 5 | 6

Next

Evilgasm

Evilgasm

Netherlands
April 2007

OCT 23, 2007 04:14 AM

This is one of the most thought provoking threads I've read in a while.

Amagi82 said:
Regardless, safety nets are unnecessary and even harmful. The more we rely on a government to solve our problems, the more tyranny and oppression we will face. On top of that, government by its very nature cannot solve problems as well as we the people can, and in most cases, the simple involvement of government serves only the exasperate the problem.



Coming from a country that has a very well established (even overdeveloped by some standards) social security system I can say that the idea of a government provided safety net is not one that will lead to "tyranny and oppression". If anything I see more of this happening in the USA right now than could even be possible under Dutch law (the way it is at the moment... we have a few politicians here who have some very messed up ideas).

People do not cover each others backs as often as your philosophy seems to believe we would. That is the essential necessity of a government system. The need for a central organization to get the jobs done and provide the services society would not provide out of its own accord. Including, IMHO, providing people with enough means to feed themselves and their families when they are unable to do s themselves.

That this necissary system is one prone to corruption and abuse of power is a sad fact of life. I wish I knew a solution for that.



On a side note:

To all Americans: Please stop complaining about your gasoline prices. Here in The Netherlands we pay (at the current exchange rate) over $7.50 a gallon.

Hearing abou how little you have to pay depresses me. frown

oyaji said:

shapeshifter23 said:

He will probably cut me down as being some kind of bootlicker for saying this, but...

Am I the only one who thinks this guy
oyaji oughta be a politics columnist here at SG? This guy's blog comments have a level of informed intellect, succinct irony and withering sarcasm that outwrites at least a couple of the staff bloggers here (whose names I will refrain from mentioning)...




+1


[...] Plus, it's much easier to deconstruct than create something new. More fun, too, really.



+1



Oh, also, there are a lot of people on here who consider me to be an intolerable douchebag asshole.



+1 wink

Seriously though: Your comments (if sometimes a little inflammatory) are well thought out. The stuff that sparks debate. Exactly what a good political commentator should do.

Kudos for that.



Morgan said:
Some of you people are real assholes. Just so you know.





Heathen_Dave

Heathen_Dave

Birmingham, AL
July 2005

OCT 23, 2007 04:31 AM

Clidna said:
Also, what do cigarettes have to do with anything? Oh right, only poor trashy people smoke, and they buy cigarettes instead of condoms? confused



Nah, I just always compare the cost of things to smoking cigarettes when people complain about cost. Things that also work are getting starbucks before work, or seeing a movie every week.

Unless you are having a lot of sex, condoms are cheaper than all of those.

seraphicchaos

seraphicchaos

Lewistown, PA
January 2007

OCT 23, 2007 10:41 AM

StarBelliedBoy said:

Amagi82 said:

seraphicchaos said:
you might feel differently if you'd just lost your job and your house and had a kid to take care of. unless, of course, you'd prefer to have your child live on the streets and starve due to something that was not your fault in the first place.



This is one of the reasons why its important to save up money. My bank account is my safety net. Losing your job is much less of a concern if you have $20k sitting around for a rainy day, with no debt and limited expenses.



Most people would rather live their lives and enjoy them than build up several years worth (by their standards) of income.



as it stood, i was not making enough money to save up THAT much. i'd say a lot depends on WHERE you live just as much as HOW you live. at any rate, i personally would prefer to save money rather than live it up...because i know what happens when something unexpected happens and you don't have any money saved up. i just didn't have the option of saving money before. now i have that option, and you can bet i do.

seraphicchaos

seraphicchaos

Lewistown, PA
January 2007

OCT 23, 2007 11:08 AM

oyaji said:

Heathen_Dave said:

oyaji said:

attn_ho said:

Clidna said:

freshprncebelair said:
With the advent of birth control, it's possible to time out exactly when you want to have children.



Sure - assuming, of course, that you can afford it. And newsflash, sweetheart - BC isn't 100%. I certainly hope this isn't going to turn into the "not only should poor people never have chldren, but they should never have sex" style arguments. When you can't afford to go out and don't have any of the luxuries that most people take for granted, sex is about all you have to do.


actually bush just appointed a birth control czar who is anti birth control. so yes, we are at that point.



You also have to be educated on how to use birth control. I wonder what our interlocutors think about sex education. Hmmmmm.



My parents talked to me about sex when I was a kid around twelve or thirteen. They told me that it would be best if I waited until marriage to have sex because of the dangers associated with sex, but that if I didn't wait, to use protection and be cautious.

Holy shit. It's like my parents did a better job at it than the government would have.

This is not to say that I think sex ed. in schools is a bad idea; I just don't like the idea of the government being blamed for people not knowing how to use birth control. That is what mom and dad are for.

Blah. Maybe I should give up my responsibilities and join the American way of continuing adolescence into one's late 40s.



You're missing the point.

Not only is birth control expensive, but one has to be educated in how to use it. The people least likely to be educated in how to use it are the same people who are least likely to be able to afford it.

So some snot-nosed Will Smith worshiping dude coming in and saying "birth control makes it possible to time when you have kids" is idiotic because you have to have the wherewithal to get and use birth control, and not everyone has that. Just because your parents were educated and responsible to have such a conversation with you does not mean that every parents have these qualities.



and then we have the people who had no parents and were raised by .... ta dah! the government in the form of state-run institutions because they had no parents.

seraphicchaos

seraphicchaos

Lewistown, PA
January 2007

OCT 23, 2007 11:12 AM

Heathen_Dave said:

Clidna said:
Also, what do cigarettes have to do with anything? Oh right, only poor trashy people smoke, and they buy cigarettes instead of condoms? confused



Nah, I just always compare the cost of things to smoking cigarettes when people complain about cost. Things that also work are getting starbucks before work, or seeing a movie every week.

Unless you are having a lot of sex, condoms are cheaper than all of those.



what if you do none of those things? haha, i suppose you could always just steal your condoms from the local 7-11...well, anyway, off i go.

Clidna

Clidna

Canada
January 2005

OCT 23, 2007 10:33 PM

Heathen_Dave said:

Clidna said:
Also, what do cigarettes have to do with anything? Oh right, only poor trashy people smoke, and they buy cigarettes instead of condoms? confused



Nah, I just always compare the cost of things to smoking cigarettes when people complain about cost. Things that also work are getting starbucks before work, or seeing a movie every week.

Unless you are having a lot of sex, condoms are cheaper than all of those.



But it's a ridiculous comparison. Most people who are low on cash don't get Starbucks (or Tim Hortons, here in Canada wink) on a daily basis, or go to the movies, or buy cigarettes. Sure, there is always the odd jackass who smokes a pack a day and bitches that he has no money for food, but I don't think that is as nearly as common as some think.

Tallboy66

Tallboy66

Chicago, IL
January 2005

OCT 23, 2007 10:46 PM

Yes you can live on less and cook at home and save money, shopping at 7-11 may cost more but in order to save at the huge super big chains grocery stores you have to buy really big super huge quantities.

Ever go in to a Sam's club or Walmart of course you can buy 4 boxes of granola for $5 or ramen noodles mega jumbo pack of 25 for $6.50 but do you really want to eat granola, pasta, ramen for the next 2 weeks every day?

Eala

Eala

I'm lost
July 2007

OCT 25, 2007 04:23 AM

Tallboy66 said:
Yes you can live on less and cook at home and save money, shopping at 7-11 may cost more but in order to save at the huge super big chains grocery stores you have to buy really big super huge quantities.

Ever go in to a Sam's club or Walmart of course you can buy 4 boxes of granola for $5 or ramen noodles mega jumbo pack of 25 for $6.50 but do you really want to eat granola, pasta, ramen for the next 2 weeks every day?



Actually, I've done that often, so I can buy real groceries for my son. And everytime I do that, I'm grateful he's only 4, and doesn't eat much yet. I'm not bad with money, I don't have cable, my internet is free, I only have one phone line, I don't smoke, do drugs, my boyfriend pays for condoms, and I get a lot of help with gas money in exchange for giving people rides places I was going anyway, but I STILL don't make enough to feed us both healthy food. It happens. Not all the people who are in this situation are idiots - just the ones shopping at 7-11.
confused

Tallboy66

Tallboy66

Chicago, IL
January 2005

OCT 25, 2007 10:45 AM

Well the thing is if you have $20 bucks to last a week 7-11 wouldn't be you best bet for money usage but unless you want to buy 2-4 items at walmart/sams club and have 5 pounds of the exact same thing to eat for the next week puke I can totall understand going to 7-11.

I do the same thing. I know I could eat at home, make pancakes, have a soy burger and a baked potato but will opt for a sandwich or a restaraunt.


And how about that Social Security thing coming our way?

Too many boomers are going to retire and then too few workers are going to be contributing to SS so... I see 100's of dollars taken out of my checkevery month and then not only is it inadequate for the people who need it now it will probalby not even be there when I need it mad surreal .
Good thing I've got $1,100 in a 2% savings account to get me through the tough times and help me plan for my retirement. whatever

chryssi

chryssi

Slidell, LA
June 2006

OCT 25, 2007 01:17 PM

I know this doesn't relate to the cost of food or gas , but what about the rising cost of insurance? Every year our health and life insurance goes up. And we don't even use it that much. There have been times when I have begged him to drop my coverage just so we will have more money for the things we need.

We do not live an extravagant life, we have a mortgage, and one car note. The other is paid for. We are able to save some money, so we do have something for emergencies. But sometimes it is hard not to use that just to get through the month. Nothing else except the basic utilities. I stay home now because the cost of child care was eating my paycheck. He has to do extra work on top of the 60 hours a week he works at his job.

Sometimes I just don't know how we do it.

malkav11

malkav11

Saint Paul, MN
July 2003

OCT 25, 2007 02:43 PM

Tallboy66 said:
Well the thing is if you have $20 bucks to last a week 7-11 wouldn't be you best bet for money usage but unless you want to buy 2-4 items at walmart/sams club and have 5 pounds of the exact same thing to eat for the next week puke I can totall understand going to 7-11.



Well, sure, buying in extreme bulk is the *cheapest* way to get food, but it's really the sort of thing that's best suited to people with a bunch of cash, a vehicle of their own, and a lot of storage space. Plus a family, ideally.

Food is still substantially cheaper and more varied at a regular grocery store, or the grocery section of stores like Target and (sigh) Wal-Mart, than it is at a 7-11 or other convenience store.

StarBelliedBoy

StarBelliedBoy

Philadelphia, PA
December 2003

OCT 25, 2007 03:23 PM

Tallboy66 said:
Well the thing is if you have $20 bucks to last a week 7-11 wouldn't be you best bet for money usage but unless you want to buy 2-4 items at walmart/sams club and have 5 pounds of the exact same thing to eat for the next week puke I can totall understand going to 7-11.



Where you shop for food is not a binary between convenience stores and bulk warehouses. Supermarkets are right in the middle and that's why most people shop at them.

Clidna

Clidna

Canada
January 2005

OCT 25, 2007 07:41 PM

Clidna said:

MrStitches said:

NoPantsDave said:
Shopping at places like 7-11 for groceries seems a bit counterproductive to me. They usually jack the prices up a bit. Seems like you could have more money to spend on food if you shopped at the least expensive place rather than the most convenient.



Yeah, groceries are really expensive there. I don't get that at all.



I think it typically has more to do with the lack of $$ - for those who can't afford transportation (ie. don't have a vehicle or just don't have gas $$), if you only have $15 or $20 to pick up some groceries, do you want to spend half of it on cab or busfare to get to the cheaper place? Or spend a little more at the 7/11 and get more food? The choice is pretty easy. If you have a larger amount of money with which to do your shopping, it's a little easier to go to the cheaper places.


Just a little reminder from earlier in the thread...

Tallboy66

Tallboy66

Chicago, IL
January 2005

OCT 25, 2007 10:30 PM

malkav11 said:

Tallboy66 said:
Well the thing is if you have $20 bucks to last a week 7-11 wouldn't be you best bet for money usage but unless you want to buy 2-4 items at walmart/sams club and have 5 pounds of the exact same thing to eat for the next week puke I can totall understand going to 7-11.



Well, sure, buying in extreme bulk is the *cheapest* way to get food, but it's really the sort of thing that's best suited to people with a bunch of cash, a vehicle of their own, and a lot of storage space. Plus a family, ideally.

Food is still substantially cheaper and more varied at a regular grocery store, or the grocery section of stores like Target and (sigh) Wal-Mart, than it is at a 7-11 or other convenience store.



True.
Maybe it's just my area I live in but even the local grocery store sells patio furniture, plants,etc... and I have to buy 10 for $10 , 4 for $4 etc...deals everywhere, it still is cheaper than 7-11 but in order to compete with cheap bulk "we have everything you don't need" stores they have to offer the same deals or raise prices.
If you don't buy the special deal then you get a higher price, so for me to pay $1.89 for one hot dog is a better use of my money than to pay $2.99 for 8 hotdogs and eat 2 then 3 weeks later throw 6 away with freezer burn.

Last thing.
The majority of my life I've been able to have maybe one meal at home if you count a granola bar (4 boxes for $4) or a bowl of oatmeal (2 for $3) as breakfast then I may get 2 meals in so to keep from going hungry it's fast food or stores like 7-11, or the old standby of PBJ and potato chips.

Now if I could only get a job at Whole Foods again and get some employee discounted food then... smile

Tallboy66

Tallboy66

Chicago, IL
January 2005

OCT 25, 2007 10:44 PM

Clidna said:

Clidna said:

MrStitches said:

NoPantsDave said:
Shopping at places like 7-11 for groceries seems a bit counterproductive to me. They usually jack the prices up a bit. Seems like you could have more money to spend on food if you shopped at the least expensive place rather than the most convenient.



Yeah, groceries are really expensive there. I don't get that at all.



I think it typically has more to do with the lack of $$ - for those who can't afford transportation (ie. don't have a vehicle or just don't have gas $$), if you only have $15 or $20 to pick up some groceries, do you want to spend half of it on cab or busfare to get to the cheaper place? Or spend a little more at the 7/11 and get more food? The choice is pretty easy. If you have a larger amount of money with which to do your shopping, it's a little easier to go to the cheaper places.


Just a little reminder from earlier in the thread...



Couple examples about that.
I live directly behind a strip mall with a grocery store in it, go West it's 6-7 MILES to the next store then of course there are 4 and a couple drug stores so where do you go at 11:30 after you 2nd shift job?
When I lived in Detroit the grocery store closed at 10 pm.

Not too mention the fact that it can take several hours JUST to get to the Grocery store and back using mass transportation to a decent, cheap grocery store for the people, myself included, that had/have no car in most cities.

edith

edith

France
April 2006

OCT 26, 2007 03:30 AM

Tallboy66 said:
Now if I could only get a job at Whole Foods again and get some employee discounted food then... smile



whole foods is crazy expensive even with the discount. the only people i know who feed their families from whole foods have $2000.00 a month to spend on groceries.

Tallboy66

Tallboy66

Chicago, IL
January 2005

OCT 26, 2007 10:22 AM

edith said:

Tallboy66 said:
Now if I could only get a job at Whole Foods again and get some employee discounted food then... smile



whole foods is crazy expensive even with the discount. the only people i know who feed their families from whole foods have $2000.00 a month to spend on groceries.



True but it is healthier, plus I'm tired of going to the store. buying apples that are a good price then taking it to work and guess what it's all soft and waaaaay past it's prime. so I spent .49 on an apple I threw away instead of .89 I could actually eat.

The stores get to write off the produce as a loss so it really makes no difference if they get good quality or not and fruit is something you can't really buy in bulk and keep for 2 weeks.

Mini rant unrelated to your comment.

SPOILERS! (Click to view)

also when I go grocery shopping I'm buying FOOD, not opening a checking acoount, signing up for 26 weeks of paper delivery,getting my hair cut, buying patio furniture, car parts or having to walk 1/4 mile to get to the groceries section and then stand in line for 20 minutes with someone in front in front of me who swears the 18 pairs of socks are supposed to be $1 each not $1.09 she has a coupon from a competitor.



RumpusParable

RumpusParable

Copperas Cove, TX
April 2003

NOV 04, 2007 01:25 AM

I do agree that there is a real issue for many here. But I think we do have to keep in mind that, while for many this is a harsh reality, for many who are considered or more often consider *themselves* to be having financial difficulties it is a spending habit issue.

I've lived on just about every level of the financial spectrum so far from homeless, no job, food when I could get it every few days to ultra-comfy. The only place I've (sadly, haha) not been is "rich" to any degree.

And I'm daily boggled by those I know who are "struggling"... who are doing Excellent for themselves.

The folks complaining about living paycheck to paycheck, but live in an apartment well above what they need to pay on rent for something big enough for them.

The family complaining that they can barely afford groceries but you find out the reason is that they don't want to buy rice, vegetables, beans and cook but rather buy everything single-serving and pre-packaged, costing them the same for one meal as would feed them for a two or more days.

The parent's on welfare and borrowing money from friends for their kid's diapers... but have cable tv & internet, a widescreen tv, xbox, psp, and a new car...

The single friend who is complaining they're broke when they make $30K a year while you live on less than $15k and have money to spare on frivolousness each month because you don't consider going out partying every weekend (and then some sometimes) a necessity of life.

The "parents" who only make enough to comfortably have and raise X number of children but actively choose to have more than that... over and over.

There are many, many people who are honestly having a terrible time with the way our economy is going. Wages being less than what is needed, prices climbing upward... And this desperately NEEDS to change.

But... *shrugs* Maybe my experiences are skewed from dealing with so many military families over the past decade or so. I do admit that they tend to be some of the biggest offenders in the list of examples I gave above that I've seen repeatedly, over and over and over. But those examples haven't been rare for those civilian folks I've known, either.

It's likely also skewed because I *have* been up and down the financial scale a few times and now live well below what most folks think is an acceptable income but am living in what in reality I know is luxury because I've been at those worse levels before. Due to those times on the bottom end of the spectrum, I'm aware that most people's idea of "struggling to survive" is really "my preferred lifestyle is inhibited/unattainable". These are two very different things.

There are two groups being addressed in this same OP: The genuine Have-Nots and the Have-Not-What-I'd-Likes. The former need help and opportunities, the latter really shouldn't be compared to them.

RumpusParable

RumpusParable

Copperas Cove, TX
April 2003

NOV 04, 2007 01:37 AM

seraphicchaos said:
what if you do none of those things? haha, i suppose you could always just steal your condoms from the local 7-11...well, anyway, off i go.



You could go to your local health clinic or Planned Parenthood and get them for free or paying what you can if you can.

RumpusParable

RumpusParable

Copperas Cove, TX
April 2003

NOV 04, 2007 01:39 AM

Ugh, I just read more of this thread and realize I shouldn't have responded. It's gone beyond dumb in spots.

Morgan

Morgan

SUICIDEGIRL

Illinois, USA

NOV 04, 2007 08:20 AM

RumpusParable said:

seraphicchaos said:
what if you do none of those things? haha, i suppose you could always just steal your condoms from the local 7-11...well, anyway, off i go.



You could go to your local health clinic or Planned Parenthood and get them for free or paying what you can if you can.



If there's one nearby, or they have hours that you can manage. My local clinic is only open when I'm at work, and my local Planned Parenthood is far enough away that many lower-income people would probably have a very hard time getting there.

Just sayin'.

RumpusParable

RumpusParable

Copperas Cove, TX
April 2003

NOV 04, 2007 08:28 AM

I admit, as with all people, my experience shapes my world view. Walking and hitching 7 miles rather than going without condoms was a trade-off I was willing to accept. And going without sex when BC wasn't an option.

Morgan

Morgan

SUICIDEGIRL

Illinois, USA

NOV 04, 2007 10:32 AM

RumpusParable said:
I admit, as with all people, my experience shapes my world view. Walking and hitching 7 miles rather than going without condoms was a trade-off I was willing to accept. And going without sex when BC wasn't an option.



Hitching in many cities would likely just get you killed. Hardly worth it for free birth control.

Previous

PAGE: 

1 ... 

4 | 5 | 6

Next