Aeryka said:
no amount of exercise and diet will reinflate sagging boobs or unstretch and retighten stretched stomach muscles and skin. dependant on age, genetics, health, and overall size some woman just stretch better than others and can regain their prepregnancy bodies. with all the sacrafice and work that mothers go through if technology allows them to have sex with the lights on again then so be it. if this is what they need to put the oomph back in themselves and their lives then so be it. however being healthy before and after pregnancy is a better way to reduce postpregnancy body problems. lets not forget the postpreggo problems that are internal that exercise cannot fix such as incontinence because of lost muscle tone, decreased sexual enjoyment because of more lost muscle tone. since women are having families later in life when their bodies are not at their fertile prime we will most likley see this more and more.
Actually, lost muscle tone can always be regained. The incontinence issue, if it is a result of lost muscle tone, the doctor will tell you how to regain it. If it is a result of the bladder dropping, which is somewhat common after multiple births, then you will often need surgery to rectify it, because it will only get worse if left alone.
As for decreased sexual enjoyment, it's all about the Kegals! They will tighten you up better than any surgery.
Here's the thing that gets me though... are they necessarily doing it to be Hollywood pretty? Or is it an attempt to get their pre-pregnancy body back? I can't imagine that every mother is going to be happy with scarring and changes in their physical appearance. Maybe some of them just want to go back to what they view as "normal".
But the reason they view it as normal is because they see women on TV and in the movies look exactly the way they did before, after having given birth. When do you ever see a woman on television look like she's still six months pregnant right after giving birth? That's normal. When do you see these women still looking chubby a couple weeks later? That's normal. An average woman's body takes about a year to completely recover from pregnancy and birth. On TV and in the movies, it takes about 5 minutes. It is completely unrealistic.
I don't think you give your fellow women enough credit. I think most of us know that t.v. and movies are not real. What FreakPirate
means by "normal" is what the woman's body looked like "normally" i.e. before she was pregnant.
I totally agree that pregnancy and childbirth are beautiful, wonderful things. I just don't understand why women feel the need to completely define themselves by having children. Are we not worthy of respect until we have children? Are we not still women after we have children? We just become "momma" and nothing else? If a woman sees her stretch marks as anything less than beautiful, miracle tree roots of life then she must have been brainwashed by "Hollywood"?
There is nothing wrong with women not wanting to see their bodies destroyed by childbearing (if that's what she feels it has done). I don't think it means that she loves her children or being a mother any less. It's true that these surgical procedures can be dangerous, but so is childbirth. Would you say that a woman shouldn't have a second child because she could die and leave the first child motherless? After all she didn't "need" the second child.
Women really need to lighten up when it comes to judging each others motivations and whatnot.
Of course I didn't mean to make it sound like all women were brainless idiots who want to look like Rachel on Friends. But whether or not anyone wants to admit it, there are many women out there who buy into the Hollywood stereotype as to what is considered pretty. And I said earlier, you don't have to like your stretchmarks, let alone see them as "beautiful, miracle tree roots of life". But you do have to deal with them. And I don't believe I said anywhere that women define themselves by having children, and that once you do, you become Momma and nothing else.
Of course nobody wants to lose the body they had before pregnancy. I've never disputed that. But, again, you have to deal with it.The risks from surgery are much higher than from having another child (in Canada, 1 in 25,000 women die in or soon after childbirth, whereas 1 in 5,000 die during or soon after liposuction, and 1 in 2,500 during or soon after abdominoplasty). So your 5 times more likely to die during lipo, or 10 times more likely during a tummy tuck.
For the record, I do know people who have had cosmetic surgery, and I don't judge them for it. I just wouldn't do it personally, and if a friend asked me, "Do you think I should?" I would say no, because the risks are too high for my comfort level. But, again, that's me. Other people obviously have different levels of comfort.
Evilgasm said:
Cosmetic surgery will always be a moral conundrum... How valuable is beauty?
Tough question to answer. Though I believe the answer will be different for every person.
It doesn't matter if you are a man or a woman. If the "disfigurement" or "imperfection" you want to correct is cause by child birth, and accident, or it is just something you were born with. It comes down to what you want to do with your body. Yes, social ideals and standards do play a part; but only if you are willing to give in to them.
The real issue here isn't about societies standards of beauty. It is about every individuals standard of self respect. More people need to be (as Bitch_PhD obviously is ) proud of themselves and their bodies instead of subcoming to the idiotic standards of beauty magazines.
i believe it's not as easy for a man to understand what it's like to be a woman in america, and to be expected to live under such impossible standards of beauty, and to have people comment on your weight when you're 5'5" and weigh over 120 lbs like you're some sort of obese freak. everyone is entitled to an opinion, but i believe that i have a tremendous amount of confidence, yet it doesn't stop from making me feeling bad when i open up a victoria's secret catalogue.
Salura said:
i believe it's not as easy for a man to understand what it's like to be a woman in america, and to be expected to live under such impossible standards of beauty, and to have people comment on your weight when you're 5'5" and weigh over 120 lbs like you're some sort of obese freak.
I agree with all of this, but I also think the societal standards of beauty for men are becoming more ridiculous as well. Cases of men with poor body image are increasing, so in some cases I think men can understand.
Clidna said:
Of course I didn't mean to make it sound like all women were brainless idiots who want to look like Rachel on Friends. But whether or not anyone wants to admit it, there are many women out there who buy into the Hollywood stereotype as to what is considered pretty. And I said earlier, you don't have to like your stretchmarks, let alone see them as "beautiful, miracle tree roots of life". But you do have to deal with them. And I don't believe I said anywhere that women define themselves by having children, and that once you do, you become Momma and nothing else.
Of course nobody wants to lose the body they had before pregnancy. I've never disputed that. But, again, you have to deal with it.The risks from surgery are much higher than from having another child (in Canada, 1 in 25,000 women die in or soon after childbirth, whereas 1 in 5,000 die during or soon after liposuction, and 1 in 2,500 during or soon after abdominoplasty). So your 5 times more likely to die during lipo, or 10 times more likely during a tummy tuck.
For the record, I do know people who have had cosmetic surgery, and I don't judge them for it. I just wouldn't do it personally, and if a friend asked me, "Do you think I should?" I would say no, because the risks are too high for my comfort level. But, again, that's me. Other people obviously have different levels of comfort.
Okay, So what about when in 10, 20, 30 years that these surgeries become safer. The statistics show that you are just as likely to die during/after childbirth as you would any type of abdominal cosmetic surgery... does your opinion change?
Are we really mad at the RISK involved as much as the pure vanity involved?
But I agree with you on a lot, there is nothing wrong with feeling comfortable with your body. Lord knows low self confidence can be one of the most detrimental things to a person. Maybe we're not all striving for perfect beauty, but I think all of us will always want to look in the mirror and go "Not bad at all, if I do say so myself"
These women are the victims of an incurable illness known as being "human." The symptoms include dissatisfaction with one's self and the overwhelming, driving urge to be something greater than what they are. There will always be new pills, creams, and surgeries but there will never be a cure for the human condition. The gnawing desire to be desirable, attractive, and youthful has been a part of human culture since our distant ancestors first grunted at the Moon and wondered what it was. This isn't the result of some insidious "beauty culture" being jammed down our throats. The beauty culture is the result of our own insidious basic instincts.
You ever wonder why peacocks have such large tails and bright, colorful bodies?
There's nothing wrong in wanting to look good and feel good about your body, but defiantly not at the expense of your life. People are finding the easy way out of things, no matter the price. Eat right and exercise, there are plenty of sites on the net that give you guides to what you can do to get your "girlish" figure back.
My mom had me and my brother, 2 years apart, and found time to work out. I'll you something, shes a sexy bitch without taking pills or doing any type of surgery.
Those are really bad cases, but you don't know. When they were pregnant they could have used it as an excuse to eat all of the wrong things, do no exercise and be lazy; thus gain so much weight that would have not have happened naturally.
Then when you lose the weight you'll have all of that stretched out skin.
Ecpecially if you were older...
Evilgasm said:
Cosmetic surgery will always be a moral conundrum... How valuable is beauty?
Tough question to answer. Though I believe the answer will be different for every person.
It doesn't matter if you are a man or a woman. If the "disfigurement" or "imperfection" you want to correct is cause by child birth, and accident, or it is just something you were born with. It comes down to what you want to do with your body. Yes, social ideals and standards do play a part; but only if you are willing to give in to them.
The real issue here isn't about societies standards of beauty. It is about every individuals standard of self respect. More people need to be (as Bitch_PhD obviously is ) proud of themselves and their bodies instead of subcoming to the idiotic standards of beauty magazines.
i believe it's not as easy for a man to understand what it's like to be a woman in america, and to be expected to live under such impossible standards of beauty, and to have people comment on your weight when you're 5'5" and weigh over 120 lbs like you're some sort of obese freak. everyone is entitled to an opinion, but i believe that i have a tremendous amount of confidence, yet it doesn't stop from making me feeling bad when i open up a victoria's secret catalogue.
I think you and I are actually in agreement Salura, we've just chosen to express it in different words.
It certainly is much tougher for women to deal with issues of beauty. The sheer amount of media exposure/pressure is, as you rightly put it, insane. But as KilledByLenore said, the problem does exist for men as well. Oh, and on a tangent, this certainly is not only a problem "in america". It truly is a global issue. Though it may take different forms in different parts of the world. A good example even made FTR's weekly roundup a while back.
Anyone who tells you that 5'5"/120lbs even comes close to obese is themselves a complete freak. One in need of a serious reality check (and most likely a good slap!). I know it's hard not to be pressured by the standards society and the media uphold. No matter how insane and genuinely impossible they are. I think Baz Luhrman said it best:
"Don't read beauty magazines, they will only make you feel ugly!"
The erotic nature of a wife's body is one of the principal elements of attraction in marriage. When a husband ceases to see his wife as a woman, and begins to see her as "the mother of his children," a negative trend has begun in his mind that can only subvert his erotic interest.
Also absurd.
In our lizard brains, at the deepest level of psychoanalytic urge, the essence of a woman's appeal to a man is his desire to be reborn through her. When you're in touch with that, and with the woman who fully evokes it, there's nothing more erotic than awareness of her life-giving, nurturing aspects sensed in the totality of her being.
Fuckin' hot. (Literally.)
To separate the notions of woman/wife/mother as is suggested is a bit off.
With due respect to his office, I feel the good Rabbi reveals only his personal neuroses.
Clidna said:
Of course I didn't mean to make it sound like all women were brainless idiots who want to look like Rachel on Friends. But whether or not anyone wants to admit it, there are many women out there who buy into the Hollywood stereotype as to what is considered pretty. And I said earlier, you don't have to like your stretchmarks, let alone see them as "beautiful, miracle tree roots of life". But you do have to deal with them. And I don't believe I said anywhere that women define themselves by having children, and that once you do, you become Momma and nothing else.
Of course nobody wants to lose the body they had before pregnancy. I've never disputed that. But, again, you have to deal with it.The risks from surgery are much higher than from having another child (in Canada, 1 in 25,000 women die in or soon after childbirth, whereas 1 in 5,000 die during or soon after liposuction, and 1 in 2,500 during or soon after abdominoplasty). So your 5 times more likely to die during lipo, or 10 times more likely during a tummy tuck.
For the record, I do know people who have had cosmetic surgery, and I don't judge them for it. I just wouldn't do it personally, and if a friend asked me, "Do you think I should?" I would say no, because the risks are too high for my comfort level. But, again, that's me. Other people obviously have different levels of comfort.
Okay, So what about when in 10, 20, 30 years that these surgeries become safer. The statistics show that you are just as likely to die during/after childbirth as you would any type of abdominal cosmetic surgery... does your opinion change?
Are we really mad at the RISK involved as much as the pure vanity involved?
But I agree with you on a lot, there is nothing wrong with feeling comfortable with your body. Lord knows low self confidence can be one of the most detrimental things to a person. Maybe we're not all striving for perfect beauty, but I think all of us will always want to look in the mirror and go "Not bad at all, if I do say so myself"
That's a really good question actually... it made me stop and think about it, and you are right - it's not just the risk involved that bothers me, it's the risk involved for something as superficial as looking good. I honestly didn't realize it until I read your post and thought it over.
I think about the sheer number of women I know that are trying to diet, trying to get skinny, not because it is healthier for them, but just because they want to look "better". Most of them aren't even overweight (by medical standards), but they just aren't happy with themselves because they don't have a tiny waist accentuated by a big rack. And I'm just as guilty of it myself. I went through a few weeks not long ago where I felt absolutely horrible about how I looked, until my husband figured it out and said, "Why the hell are you so worried about it? You just had a baby 2 months ago, lighten up on yourself!" But I felt like every time I went somewhere, people were looking at me and thinking, "God, why doesn't she lose weight? She looks so fat." In all fairness to myself, I think I was going through a bit of post-partum depression, so that probably didn't help.
It's sad that so many women are affected by such ridiculous notions of what we are "supposed" to look like.
Clidna
Canada
January 2005
OCT 05, 2007 11:29 PM