TOPICS:
SEP 22, 2007 08:36 PM
TheFuckOffKid said:
Brownmiller is fundamentally stupid (ideologically blinkered, if you prefer) by asserting that all such experiences are akin to rape-like events. (Today's "admiring glance" is tomorrow's physical attack.)
Maybe we should gouge out everybody's eyes and then this wouldn't be an issue ![]()
cowboybert said:
I am also sure that every woman has been in a situation, i.e., professional meeting, etc. when she is there as an equal but nonverbal communications from the men are aimed at putting her in her place as a potential fuck toy only.
Actually, you would be wrong. I have never been in that kind of situation.
SEP 22, 2007 11:01 PM
Like I said this thread has gotten WAY off topic from the drunken hook up, oops I didn't want to have sex, maybe, I'm not sure I was drunk to a guy looking at a girls boobs and thinking she's hot and her thinking it's visual rape
.
Women want power just like men do and when you have power you hold it over them and MAKE them do things by force which is part of the definition of rape so by women having power over men is the same thing as men having power over women.
Can't we just all get along?
SEP 22, 2007 11:26 PM
Tallboy66 said:
Women want power just like men do and when you have power you hold it over them and MAKE them do things by force which is part of the definition of rape so by women having power over men is the same thing as men having power over women.
This isn't helping.

edith
France
April 2006
SEP 23, 2007 01:31 AM
Clidna said:
cowboybert said:
I am also sure that every woman has been in a situation, i.e., professional meeting, etc. when she is there as an equal but nonverbal communications from the men are aimed at putting her in her place as a potential fuck toy only.
Actually, you would be wrong. I have never been in that kind of situation.
no shit..me either. scary these 50 year old men "arguing with girls half their age" on here would assume things like this.
i've just hung around modern day open minded types my entire life and know i've been very, very lucky. i have never met males in real life like some of you are describing. if someone seemed like a preditory creepy guy nobody went near him. he was shunned by girls and guys alike. i've led guys on, passed out in their beds, gotten incredibly drunk and still never had anyone push me beyond my own set physical bounderies.
almost everyone i know grew up with "free to be you and me" so maybe that's why.
all of you should have grown up listening to this
SEP 23, 2007 12:03 PM
edith said:
Clidna said:
cowboybert said:
I am also sure that every woman has been in a situation, i.e., professional meeting, etc. when she is there as an equal but nonverbal communications from the men are aimed at putting her in her place as a potential fuck toy only.
Actually, you would be wrong. I have never been in that kind of situation.
no shit..me either. scary these 50 year old men "arguing with girls half their age" on here would assume things like this.
i've just hung around modern day open minded types my entire life and know i've been very, very lucky. i have never met males in real life like some of you are describing. if someone seemed like a preditory creepy guy nobody went near him. he was shunned by girls and guys alike. i've led guys on, passed out in their beds, gotten incredibly drunk and still never had anyone push me beyond my own set physical bounderies.
almost everyone i know grew up with "free to be you and me" so maybe that's why.
all of you should have grown up listening to this
In spite of my elderly creepiness, i'll say one more thing. Some of the women here seem to be attacking me for what I take to be a pro-female statement. But it takes all kinds. Any woman who I've ever talked with about this, usually in an academic setting, have told me stories about this being a not uncommon experience. Often with bosses, supervisors, professors etc.
SEP 23, 2007 12:33 PM
All I have to say is:
1. Obviously I don't agree with Brownmiller's statement, and no, I don't think being attracted to someone is creepy. However, considering some of the things that Tallboy66 has said in this thread, I think it was reasonable for me to assume he was more the "stare at boobs while drooling slightly" type.
2. I've experienced what cowboybert is talking about. I'm sure not all women have, but I'm willing to bet that many women have.
3. Tallboy66 is basically a douche.
SEP 23, 2007 05:00 PM
Morgan said:
All I have to say is:
1. Obviously I don't agree with Brownmiller's statement, and no, I don't think being attracted to someone is creepy. However, considering some of the things that Tallboy66 has said in this thread, I think it was reasonable for me to assume he was more the "stare at boobs while drooling slightly" type.
2. I've experienced what cowboybert is talking about. I'm sure not all women have, but I'm willing to bet that many women have.
3. Tallboy66 is basically a douche.
Thanks, so what are you doing this weekend.
SEP 23, 2007 08:37 PM
RileyStClair said:
itwashardlylovex said:
I also think that it is every woman's responsibility when she i drinking to be 100% sure she will not be put in a situation where rape could occur. If a girl is drunk enough to black out, it's a situation where a rape would very likely occur. Either:
a) don't drink oneself into oblivion (or at least not to a drunken stupor), publicly.
b) be sure to have a girlfriend watching out for you, and keeping you from doing something you might regret.
It's so easy to stay home and get wasted if you know that's what you want to do, or have just a couple drinks and go out and meet guys while still having your head on your shoulders.
Sometimes, the girls have to admit that they put themselves in the situation, and anyone is going to take advantage of that.
I know two girls that this has happened to, and it's clear to see that it's a product of their behavior and their drinking habits. Not that I don't feel sorry for them, or wish it didn't happen. I also believe that it's rape. But it's something that would have been completely avoided, were they responsible. Responsibility starts with what the girl imbibes. If a girl gives up responsibility for herself than how can she expect any man to be responsible for her?
Is it wrong? Yes. Is it rape? Yes. Should it be punished? Maybe so. Could most of it be prevented? Absolutely. And I think the victims should wake up every day and take partial responsibility for it, and hopefully learn a lesson. And yet too many of these girls don't.
i'm going to go after the low-hanging fruit here, but i can't resist.
um, should it be punished--maybe? seriously? it's' rape, why shouldn't it be punished?
clearly there are tactics women can use when going out on the town to avoid some sticky situations, but requiring women to stay sober or stay home is completely unfair. what part of "getting drunk does not give someone else a license to fuck you" do you not understand?
sure, it may not be the most sensible thing to go out without friends to watch your back, get wasted and go home with a guy, but the victim's irresponsibility in no way negates the rapists's culpability.
if i leave my door unlocked and someone walks in and steals my television, no one's going to tell me that it was totally cool for them to take something they knew didn't belong to them. obviously what they did was wrong. i was also a retard for leaving my door unlocked, but that's a separate issue.
To be a proper analogy, you would have to not just leave your front door unlocked, you have to leave it WIDE FUCKING OPEN. I'd take your TV too. While I was at it, I might trash some stuff. And everybody would think about doing it-- true, not everyone would act on it, but everyone would secretly want to. You can't deny people's basic instincts.
SEP 23, 2007 08:40 PM
Clidna said:
One last thing that I'd like to get off my chest. Why is it that if a female is intoxicated, she loses the ability to make an informed decision, but if a man is intoxicated, he's expected to be able to? A man and a woman are out drinking; they go back to his/her place, stuff happens... in the morning, the woman can say he raped her, because she was too drunk to give consent - he should have said no. But if they were approximately equally intoxicated, why is the male party held responsible? He wasn't any more able to make a clear decision than she was. If anyone has a good explanation for this, I'm open to hearing it.
RESPECT. This is why this is "grey rape"-- it is foolish and stupid and people need to be more responsible overall. Girls need to stop going around calling people rapists. It's going to make real, cut-and-dry rape cases much harder to convict. :\
SEP 24, 2007 08:39 AM
itwashardlylovex said:
Clidna said:
One last thing that I'd like to get off my chest. Why is it that if a female is intoxicated, she loses the ability to make an informed decision, but if a man is intoxicated, he's expected to be able to? A man and a woman are out drinking; they go back to his/her place, stuff happens... in the morning, the woman can say he raped her, because she was too drunk to give consent - he should have said no. But if they were approximately equally intoxicated, why is the male party held responsible? He wasn't any more able to make a clear decision than she was. If anyone has a good explanation for this, I'm open to hearing it.
RESPECT. This is why this is "grey rape"-- it is foolish and stupid and people need to be more responsible overall. Girls need to stop going around calling people rapists. It's going to make real, cut-and-dry rape cases much harder to convict. :\
Not only harder but I'd say it's hard enough for a woman to recall events and tell a room full of people without thinking someone is saying she may have cried wolf.
SEP 24, 2007 08:58 AM
itwashardlylovex said:
RESPECT. This is why this is "grey rape"-- it is foolish and stupid and people need to be more responsible overall. Girls need to stop going around calling people rapists. It's going to make real, cut-and-dry rape cases much harder to convict. :\
Define "real, cut-and-dry rape cases" for me.
SEP 24, 2007 10:31 AM
itwashardlylovex said:
RileyStClair said:
itwashardlylovex said:
I also think that it is every woman's responsibility when she i drinking to be 100% sure she will not be put in a situation where rape could occur. If a girl is drunk enough to black out, it's a situation where a rape would very likely occur. Either:
a) don't drink oneself into oblivion (or at least not to a drunken stupor), publicly.
b) be sure to have a girlfriend watching out for you, and keeping you from doing something you might regret.
It's so easy to stay home and get wasted if you know that's what you want to do, or have just a couple drinks and go out and meet guys while still having your head on your shoulders.
Sometimes, the girls have to admit that they put themselves in the situation, and anyone is going to take advantage of that.
I know two girls that this has happened to, and it's clear to see that it's a product of their behavior and their drinking habits. Not that I don't feel sorry for them, or wish it didn't happen. I also believe that it's rape. But it's something that would have been completely avoided, were they responsible. Responsibility starts with what the girl imbibes. If a girl gives up responsibility for herself than how can she expect any man to be responsible for her?
Is it wrong? Yes. Is it rape? Yes. Should it be punished? Maybe so. Could most of it be prevented? Absolutely. And I think the victims should wake up every day and take partial responsibility for it, and hopefully learn a lesson. And yet too many of these girls don't.
i'm going to go after the low-hanging fruit here, but i can't resist.
um, should it be punished--maybe? seriously? it's' rape, why shouldn't it be punished?
clearly there are tactics women can use when going out on the town to avoid some sticky situations, but requiring women to stay sober or stay home is completely unfair. what part of "getting drunk does not give someone else a license to fuck you" do you not understand?
sure, it may not be the most sensible thing to go out without friends to watch your back, get wasted and go home with a guy, but the victim's irresponsibility in no way negates the rapists's culpability.
if i leave my door unlocked and someone walks in and steals my television, no one's going to tell me that it was totally cool for them to take something they knew didn't belong to them. obviously what they did was wrong. i was also a retard for leaving my door unlocked, but that's a separate issue.
To be a proper analogy, you would have to not just leave your front door unlocked, you have to leave it WIDE FUCKING OPEN. I'd take your TV too. While I was at it, I might trash some stuff. And everybody would think about doing it-- true, not everyone would act on it, but everyone would secretly want to. You can't deny people's basic instincts.
dude, i don't know where you come from, but my neighbors actually DO leave their doors unlocked. i can't say i really have any desire to go checking for any open car doors on my street either to see whose stereo i can rip out either. i stopped shoplifting and putting firecrackers in mailboxes about ten years ago--i think my mindless destruction instincts are gone, sorry.
but to get to the point, if you really don't get how one person making a potentially irrational, reckless or otherwise poorly reasoned decision is ethically separate and distinct from another person deliberately taking advantage of that decision, i don't think i can help you.
SEP 24, 2007 02:11 PM
Uncognitive said:
itwashardlylovex said:
RESPECT. This is why this is "grey rape"-- it is foolish and stupid and people need to be more responsible overall. Girls need to stop going around calling people rapists. It's going to make real, cut-and-dry rape cases much harder to convict. :\
Define "real, cut-and-dry rape cases" for me.
I think a bare minimum would require that not everyone involved says "please fuck me".
SEP 24, 2007 08:58 PM
How about these women/men stop getting so wasted that they can't remember if they said "yes" or "no" and can maybe speak above a whisper or not go off with that sleazy person they JUST met at the bar. Just a thought.
SEP 24, 2007 10:05 PM
Honestly I think a lot of this is just going back to personal responsibility... it's funny how in one thread someone can rant about how little accountability we're given from the Bush administration but then not an hour later argue the point that a woman who makes the decision to get drunk and sleep with some random dude she's been raped.. why not call for her accountability? She's the one who made the decision to impede her own judgment by drinking too much.
If we take sex out of this picture, say the decision wasn't wether or not to sleep with a stranger, say a drunk girl thought it'd be a fun idea to climb a tree, fell from a high branch, and cracked her skull, did the tree assault her? Should this tree be cut down because it poses a hazard to drunken morons passing by? Sex is no different, if anyone, regardless of gender gets drunk and does something they regret the next day, it's their own fault.
And it goes both ways, I've gotten hammered and woken up next to girls I'd have never slept with if I was thinking clearly, but I wasn't raped, I was drunk and acting stupid. People that get scarred over things like this need to get taken off to a magical place made of rainbows, candy, and unicorns, because in the real world this shit happens, and it's not a matter for the legal system, it's a matter best solved by going home, taking a shower, brushing your teeth until their mouthtaint is gone, and submerging your genitals in bleach if the situation was really bad. Regardless, I was never forcefed my booze, and made whatever decisions I made through a haze of liquor, and that's my own damned fault. Maybe my stance comes from being raised Catholic, guilt's in my blood, but taking a little bit of personal responsibility really wouldn't kill anybody.
Hell, lets just push for legislation that just makes it punishable by death to have sex out of wedlock. That'll fix all of these problems for sure, and give our neocon overlords a new victory to gloat about.
SEP 25, 2007 12:46 AM
CancerSticker said:
...brushing your teeth until their mouthtaint is gone, and submerging your genitals in bleach if the situation was really bad.
Bahahahahahahahaha! ![]()
Regardless, I was never forcefed my booze, and made whatever decisions I made through a haze of liquor, and that's my own damned fault. Maybe my stance comes from being raised Catholic, guilt's in my blood, but taking a little bit of personal responsibility really wouldn't kill anybody.
+1 - I was not raised Catholic, but I was certainly raised to take responsibility for my own actions, and I'll certainly raise my own kids that way. I am bloody sick and tired of people blaming everyone else for their own stupid mistakes. And by this, I mean in every aspect of life, not just getting drunk and fucking people.
SEP 25, 2007 01:25 AM
I should probably clarify that I'm not arguing my morality is better because I was raised catholic, I've since lost the values but I've kept the guilt.

Quirky
Birmingham, AL
October 2005
SEP 25, 2007 05:19 AM
Morgan said:
All I have to say is:
1. Obviously I don't agree with Brownmiller's statement, and no, I don't think being attracted to someone is creepy. However, considering some of the things that Tallboy66 has said in this thread, I think it was reasonable for me to assume he was more the "stare at boobs while drooling slightly" type.
2. I've experienced what cowboybert is talking about. I'm sure not all women have, but I'm willing to bet that many women have.
3. Tallboy66 is basically a douche.
SEP 25, 2007 10:29 AM
_Poptard_ said:
Morgan said:
All I have to say is:
1. Obviously I don't agree with Brownmiller's statement, and no, I don't think being attracted to someone is creepy. However, considering some of the things that Tallboy66 has said in this thread, I think it was reasonable for me to assume he was more the "stare at boobs while drooling slightly" type.
2. I've experienced what cowboybert is talking about. I'm sure not all women have, but I'm willing to bet that many women have.
3. Tallboy66 is basically a douche.
I don't normally wear cologne but I'll try that.
I'm also going to start kicking puppy dogs, pinch babies, knock little old ladies down, speed through school zones...
SEP 26, 2007 12:47 PM
TheFuckOffKid said:
Vestril said:
Anthony Moniello, 24, a radio personality for ESPN, says, "I've had girls tell me 'I don't have sex on the first night.' And I say, 'That's fine, I respect that. Mind if I play with you a little bit?' A girl will say no, she doesn't mind, then she'll get so hot, she'll say, 'Let's do it.' That's the scariest part. Is it then my responsibility to say no?"
Yes. Welcome to the grownup world, where women and men are responsible for sex and for respecting their partner's expressed wishes.
Uh, what? If a girl says "let's do it" it's my responsibility to deny her? If a girl says she doesn't want to have sex with me and later changes her mind and wants to have sex with me, it's rape? You're really hard to take seriously.
Indeed.
There was nothing about the first indication of generalised non-consent that said that exceptions could never be made. Which one of our partner's wishes are we meant to be respecting? The original wishes or the apparently revised wishes?
Bitch_PhD said:
One male student at George Washington University, a senior, recounted to the student newspaper that he had woken up naked and drunk next to a girl he didn't know. His friends later told him that the girl had bought him drinks the night before and volunteered to take him home. He ended up feeling taken advantage of _ that he wouldn't have hooked up with her if he hadn't been so wasted.
Of course he felt taken advantage of: he was raped.
By my estimation, based on the information given, we simply cannot say that. There is no basis to claim that he said no and his "no" was ignored. There's no basis on which to assume he didn't participate enthusiastically at the time. He's woken with a lack of memory and no way of knowing what his own actions were at the time.
I'm not saying he wasn't raped. I'm pointing out that on the information available, we cannot determine that he was.
ACTUALLY, legally speaking he WAS raped. If you're drunk, and someone knows that and has sex with you anyway, it's rape. PERIOD. This happened to a close friend of mine recently, and he didn't know what to do. The sad truth is that it's VERY hard for a man to prove in a trial that he was raped by a woman. And it happens more than you might think.
SEP 26, 2007 02:04 PM
CancerSticker said:
If we take sex out of this picture, say the decision wasn't wether or not to sleep with a stranger, say a drunk girl thought it'd be a fun idea to climb a tree, fell from a high branch, and cracked her skull, did the tree assault her? Should this tree be cut down because it poses a hazard to drunken morons passing by? Sex is no different, if anyone, regardless of gender gets drunk and does something they regret the next day, it's their own fault.
I think the Logic Police are going to come get you for that one. It's a crime against rational thought.
SEP 26, 2007 02:06 PM
Uncognitive said:
itwashardlylovex said:
RESPECT. This is why this is "grey rape"-- it is foolish and stupid and people need to be more responsible overall. Girls need to stop going around calling people rapists. It's going to make real, cut-and-dry rape cases much harder to convict. :\
Define "real, cut-and-dry rape cases" for me.
Like when a tall, dark stranger in a trenchcoat yanks you into an alley in the middle of the night and ties your hands behind your back and forces himself on you. The only real kind of rape there is. Anything else is gray.
SEP 28, 2007 12:53 PM
itwashardlylovex said:
RileyStClair said:
itwashardlylovex said:
I also think that it is every woman's responsibility when she i drinking to be 100% sure she will not be put in a situation where rape could occur. If a girl is drunk enough to black out, it's a situation where a rape would very likely occur. Either:
a) don't drink oneself into oblivion (or at least not to a drunken stupor), publicly.
b) be sure to have a girlfriend watching out for you, and keeping you from doing something you might regret.
It's so easy to stay home and get wasted if you know that's what you want to do, or have just a couple drinks and go out and meet guys while still having your head on your shoulders.
Sometimes, the girls have to admit that they put themselves in the situation, and anyone is going to take advantage of that.
I know two girls that this has happened to, and it's clear to see that it's a product of their behavior and their drinking habits. Not that I don't feel sorry for them, or wish it didn't happen. I also believe that it's rape. But it's something that would have been completely avoided, were they responsible. Responsibility starts with what the girl imbibes. If a girl gives up responsibility for herself than how can she expect any man to be responsible for her?
Is it wrong? Yes. Is it rape? Yes. Should it be punished? Maybe so. Could most of it be prevented? Absolutely. And I think the victims should wake up every day and take partial responsibility for it, and hopefully learn a lesson. And yet too many of these girls don't.
i'm going to go after the low-hanging fruit here, but i can't resist.
um, should it be punished--maybe? seriously? it's' rape, why shouldn't it be punished?
clearly there are tactics women can use when going out on the town to avoid some sticky situations, but requiring women to stay sober or stay home is completely unfair. what part of "getting drunk does not give someone else a license to fuck you" do you not understand?
sure, it may not be the most sensible thing to go out without friends to watch your back, get wasted and go home with a guy, but the victim's irresponsibility in no way negates the rapists's culpability.
if i leave my door unlocked and someone walks in and steals my television, no one's going to tell me that it was totally cool for them to take something they knew didn't belong to them. obviously what they did was wrong. i was also a retard for leaving my door unlocked, but that's a separate issue.
To be a proper analogy, you would have to not just leave your front door unlocked, you have to leave it WIDE FUCKING OPEN. I'd take your TV too. While I was at it, I might trash some stuff. And everybody would think about doing it-- true, not everyone would act on it, but everyone would secretly want to. You can't deny people's basic instincts.
Um...NO. Leaving the door open would be equivalent to getting shitfaced drunk and being BUTT NAKED, bent over and spreading it. But nice try.
What the fuck is wrong with people? Making a bad choice certainly doesn't mean that a woman (or man, for that matter) "deserves it". And rape, by the way, is NOT a basic instinct. It's not even a matter of SEX. It is a crime of power and violence.
Thinking and doing are two separate issues. I know a lot of people who have REALLY wanted to have sex with someone, but that person was drunk. They thought about it, but they knew it would be wrong and didn't do it.
As for your analogy: Even if someone DOES "leave the door wide fucking open," you have no right to take things or trash the house. Decent people would tell the neighbor that their door is open, or even better close the door for them.
SEP 29, 2007 03:23 PM
So here is an honest question... I've got a story that I believe borders two of the stories that have been considered rape...
I'm a guy, and this is a true story....
I wake up, and my girlfriend (at the time) is on top of me, riding me. I say no. She says "but my mom is gone", I say meh and just give in... I think why deal with the argument... It's not something I would even feel comfortable talking about this early in the morning... etc... She rides me uncomfortably for a bit as I try to finish quickly like it's a beer chugging competition... I didn't want her on top of me first thing in the morning.
I've studied quite a bit of women's studies so I'm not trying to start an argument... I'd actually like to see some answers instead...
My knowledge suggests yes, this is rape. I say no, she keeps going... easy enough...
I give in just like many other women have done.
I'm not attempting to deprecate the traumatic experience it has been for any others, but it just didn't matter to me. I felt it was a bad way to start my day in all honesty
yes, i'm being completely serious here, i'm sure a few people are doubting me at this point based upon the assumptions of the typical male desires and whatnot...
However, this qualifies as a clear cut example of rape yes? I didn't want to have sex, I ended up having sex, even after saying no.
My question is this... Now what?
by definition, is it rape? yeah. would i have wanted to press charges? no. it was a shitty morning...
What would you do?














TheFuckOffKid
NEWSWIRE
Australia
SEP 22, 2007 08:13 PM