sebastian6 said:
I like how Bitch_Phd is nowhere to be seen on here now that she's been had for not checking her own facts. Lame.
Maybe she has other things to do than monitor her threads 24/7?
She's usually all over her threads when their premise isn't so blatantly negated by a little fact-checking. As far as these things go, her lack of presence is anomalous.
mellon said:
OhSo, the point isn't to score points. It's to prevent the spread of disinformation. You live in the world where the truth is less valuable and less cared for than toilet paper. Is that really what you want?
This is how the media works. This is why you see what you see on the glass teat. This is why our democracy is going down the toilet - there is so much disinformation that we wouldn't know the truth if it slapped us in the face like a dead fish (and, indeed, that is precisely what it feels like! :')
What about intent? Do you think she intentionally disinformed us? Cmon man...
A. Selling her cute native wars in a market somewhere.
B. Someone's grandma.
C. Probably poor.
D. A Nobel laureate.
Best Grammar award for SG Editor.
Do any of those answers address " who" ?
I'll take "B" and "D" for $1,000.
hum, but "B" nor "D" seem to address who the woman is, they might address what she is, but still leave me without a who.
B & D could be answers to both "who" and "what". They aren't as specific as "Rigoberta Menchú, someone's grandma" or "Rigoberta Menchú, a Nobel laureate", but they still answer at least part of the question.
mellon said:
OhSo, the point isn't to score points. It's to prevent the spread of disinformation. You live in the world where the truth is less valuable and less cared for than toilet paper. Is that really what you want?
This is how the media works. This is why you see what you see on the glass teat. This is why our democracy is going down the toilet - there is so much disinformation that we wouldn't know the truth if it slapped us in the face like a dead fish (and, indeed, that is precisely what it feels like! :')
What about intent? Do you think she intentionally disinformed us? Cmon man...
And points is everything. Everyone wants points.
Her intentions really have little to do with his point. Laziness and maliciousness would amount to the same thing in this case.
sebastian6 said:
I like how Bitch_Phd is nowhere to be seen on here now that she's been had for not checking her own facts. Lame.
Maybe she has other things to do than monitor her threads 24/7?
She's usually all over her threads when their premise isn't so blatantly negated by a little fact-checking. As far as these things go, her lack of presence is anomalous.
When I wrote that, it had only been 24 hours or so since the article was posted, and she hadn't posted anywhere on site since running the article itself.
It's hardly unreasonable to give someone a day or two, or until they post again somewhere else.
sebastian6 said:
I like how Bitch_Phd is nowhere to be seen on here now that she's been had for not checking her own facts. Lame.
Maybe she has other things to do than monitor her threads 24/7?
She's usually all over her threads when their premise isn't so blatantly negated by a little fact-checking. As far as these things go, her lack of presence is anomalous.
When I wrote that, it had only been 24 hours or so since the article was posted, and she hadn't posted anywhere on site since running the article itself.
It's hardly unreasonable to give someone a day or two, or until they post again somewhere else.
Chainlink
Key West, FL
August 2005
AUG 21, 2007 07:20 AM