Lifestyle

TOPICS:

Previous

PAGE: 

1 ... 

112 | 113 | 114

 ... 954

Next

Previous

PAGE: 

1 | 2 | 3 | 4

Next

Bitch_PhD

Bitch_PhD

I'm lost
February 2007

AUG 09, 2007 11:06 AM



Some things are just beyond . . . well, I can't even say what they're beyond.

A female airman says she faces a court-martial next month because she refused to testify against three male airmen she accused of rape.

The woman is charged with one count of committing indecent acts and one count of consuming alcohol as a minor. The defense says the charges involve the same men she accused of raping her.
...
The charges against her allege that she performed an indecent act on one of the men she accused while the other two watched, the defense says.

In her letter, the woman said she reported the attack and was given a medical examination. The three men were charged with rape, but the charges were dropped after she refused to testify, she said.

"The pressure of the judicial process was too much for me, and I felt like no one was looking out for my interests," the woman wrote.

The men received nonjudicial punishments and have been granted immunity for their testimony in the woman's trial, according to documents the defense provided.


The up side is that the story's been getting plenty of news coverage since the woman involved contacted Texas and North Carolina legislators, so probably the USAF will end up dropping the charges.

Hat tip to the Reclusive Leftist, who apparently has deeper wells of outrage than I'm capable of mustering.

Bitch_PhD suggests that their propensity to rape coworkers makes men unfit for military service. Not all men, of course, but only the ones who can prove that they're not potential rapists should be allowed to do these jobs.

LordHAlmighty

LordHAlmighty

Citrus Heights, CA
July 2007

AUG 09, 2007 04:29 PM

Bitch Doctor said...


only the ones who can prove that they're not potential rapists should be allowed to do these jobs



Well, since rape is legally defined as unwanted penile/vaginal intercourse, that DOES mean every man is a "potential rapist".

It's too bad the alleged victim did not pursue courtroom justice, because sadly that's the only way the alleged rapists would have been brought to justice. I know the legal proceedings for rape are exceptionally painful for all involved, but it just seems like it could be worse for her to file charges and then drop them...

MistressMissy

mistressmissy

Grand Rapids, MI
March 2003

AUG 09, 2007 04:35 PM

No...what's sad it she couldn't face seeing these men while recounting her story so she dropped the charges...but they are oh so willing to testify against her.
Oh but they won't be court-martialed for taking part in the indecent acts or giving a minor alcohol. They get immunity for testifying against the girl. That makes fucking loads of sense there!
Some people.

Morgan

Morgan

SUICIDEGIRL

Illinois, USA

AUG 09, 2007 04:38 PM

MistressMissy said:
No...what's sad it she couldn't face seeing these men while recounting her story so she dropped the charges...but they are oh so willing to testify against her.
Oh but they won't be court-martialed for taking part in the indecent acts or giving a minor alcohol. They get immunity for testifying against the girl. That makes fucking loads of sense there!
Some people.



This is one of those times where vigilante justice is really tempting.

unfiltrator

unfiltrator

San Francisco, CA
April 2004

AUG 09, 2007 04:40 PM

That shit got fucked up and some lawyers should get fired there.

Sydni

Sydni

SUICIDEGIRL

Washington, USA

AUG 09, 2007 04:43 PM

I could just be ignorant, but to me it seems like rape charges in the military have seemed to leave the womans integrity demolished and instead of feeling proud and relieved that they testified against their attackers, they are ridiculed.

I'm sure that there are cases that have been up to justice, but it could be that the military is just really unwilling to admit (and more willing to humiliate and shame the person filing charges) that they get rapists amongst their midsts too.

SockPuppet

SockPuppet

I'm lost
July 2006

AUG 09, 2007 04:50 PM

LordHAlmighty said:

Bitch_PhD said:
only the ones who can prove that they're not potential rapists should be allowed to do these jobs



Well, since rape is legally defined as unwanted penile/vaginal intercourse, that DOES mean every man is a "potential rapist".



That would be correct. Surely making war is important enough that this sort of behaviour shouldn't be allowed to interfere with it.

ogichida30

ogichida30

Concord, CA
September 2004

AUG 09, 2007 04:53 PM

Morgan said:

MistressMissy said:
No...what's sad it she couldn't face seeing these men while recounting her story so she dropped the charges...but they are oh so willing to testify against her.
Oh but they won't be court-martialed for taking part in the indecent acts or giving a minor alcohol. They get immunity for testifying against the girl. That makes fucking loads of sense there!
Some people.



This is one of those times where vigilante justice is really tempting.



Careful what you say, I made a similar comment some time ago and was crucified for being a violence pornographer. I said it about child molesters and rapists though.

mingol

mingol

Singapore
July 2005

AUG 09, 2007 04:53 PM

Christ, what a revolting story.

Also, I think it's really sad that she refused to testify because she "wanted to move on with her life." I would like to believe that seeing your rapists convicted and punished would be the best way to do that, and it's sort of awful that she didn't think, for whatever reason, that that was a realistic scenario.

Tiger_Fodder

Tiger_Fodder

Braintree, MA
June 2007

AUG 09, 2007 04:55 PM

I have no words for this.

Morgan

Morgan

SUICIDEGIRL

Illinois, USA

AUG 09, 2007 04:57 PM

mingol said:
Christ, what a revolting story.

Also, I think it's really sad that she refused to testify because she "wanted to move on with her life." I would like to believe that seeing your rapists convicted and punished would be the best way to do that, and it's sort of awful that she didn't think, for whatever reason, that that was a realistic scenario.



But it isn't a realistic scenario for many victims. Most cases do not result in a conviction, many convictions are pathetically short, and often the trial is just another trauma to pile onto whatever the victim has already experienced. Why WOULD she want to go through that, knowing that justice was an unlikely result of her efforts?

mingol

mingol

Singapore
July 2005

AUG 09, 2007 04:59 PM

Morgan said:

mingol said:
Christ, what a revolting story.

Also, I think it's really sad that she refused to testify because she "wanted to move on with her life." I would like to believe that seeing your rapists convicted and punished would be the best way to do that, and it's sort of awful that she didn't think, for whatever reason, that that was a realistic scenario.


But it isn't a realistic scenario for many victims. Most cases do not result in a conviction, many convictions are pathetically short, and often the trial is just another trauma to pile onto whatever the victim has already experienced. Why WOULD she want to go through that, knowing that justice was an unlikely result of her efforts?



Oh, I agree. I'm just saying that I think it's a very demoralizing state of affairs.

KingHELL

kinghell

Portland, OR
July 2003

AUG 09, 2007 05:34 PM

Jesus. Not to mention the fact that apparently female soldiers have died of dehydration because they didn't want to use the latrines alone at night, for fear of being raped by fellow soldiers.

This war keeps lookin' better and better, don't it?

Saraphine

Saraphine

SUICIDEGIRL

Pennsylvania, USA

AUG 09, 2007 05:35 PM

There was an article in Vanity Fair a few years ago about this sort of thing-- women get raped in the military and are then made to realize the fucking unheard of, unbelievably sick, never looked into consequences of actually going through with the prosecution. The article was compelling and extraordinarily sad. Did anyone read this article? I can't find it online

Bitch_PhD

Bitch_PhD

I'm lost
February 2007

AUG 09, 2007 05:37 PM

LordHAlmighty said:
Bitch Doctor said...


only the ones who can prove that they're not potential rapists should be allowed to do these jobs



Well, since rape is legally defined as unwanted penile/vaginal intercourse, that DOES mean every man is a "potential rapist".



Hey, I didn't say it.

capitalistfig

capitalistfig

Los Angeles, CA
November 2004

AUG 09, 2007 05:38 PM

http://www.fayobserver.com/article?id=269157


Dr. John Foubert, a Virginia-based rape prevention expert, reviewed the case and said the evidence supports Hernandez's allegation of rape.




http://www.airforcetimes.com/news/2007/08/airforce_rape_controversy_070808/


But then the three airmen and Hernandez were all referred for nonjudicial punishment on charges that they willingly participated in indecent acts.

The three other airmen accepted the Article 15, but Hernandez declined the Article 15 because, she said, she did not want to admit to indecent acts when, in fact, she was raped.

She instead requested trial by court martial.



From what I went around reading, it seems like the others agreed to the indecent acts charges and they were punished. I couldn't find any other story where it said they had 'immunity' from rape charges in the future.

It seems to be the case that the military has not tried to hide knowledge of this case, and for the sake of dealing out SOME 'justice,' they resorted to this. If there was any sort of punishment to be levied against the three men, she had to either carry forward with her case (which seems as though she would have won) or she had to be brought up on the same charges, as she was (albeit an unwilling one) a participant in the events.

While this case is quite distressing, it was and is within her power to make the choice between the two, sadly, extremely difficult options. The military, at no point, seemed to be refusing her the right to seek out justice against the people who wronged her.

csprewitt

csprewitt

Bloomfield, NJ
December 2004

AUG 09, 2007 06:08 PM

I don't understand this at all, not even a little bit. How can a human being do this to another human being? What happens that makes this possible? What is it that turns a smiling, happy child into the sort of creature that would think to do something like this? It's beyond me. I can't wrap my brain around it. That's a person. It's a PERSON. She's no different than you. What could possibly make this behavior acceptable in your mind?

I come from a horrible background, but for everything I've experienced, it would never occur to me that I could do something like this. I can't even stand to type it out, it's so awful.

Things like this make me feel incredibly alone in the world. I feel like I don't understand anyone or anything around me. I am incapable of making sense of this on any level.

ardour

ardour

Canada
March 2006

AUG 09, 2007 06:22 PM

Yeah, I hear ya. FTR posted a story about some guys who tried to dig up a young woman's body to have sex with it after seeing a hot picture of her in the obits. I just couldn't wrap my head around it. Some other poster said the same thing you are saying now... the feeling of not belonging in this world, not being able to comprehend how people could do that.

code_red

code_red

Portland, OR
July 2005

AUG 09, 2007 06:33 PM

That entire issue is bullshit. I am not saying she is lying, I am saying the USAF blatantly violated federal law. In accordance with the sexual assault policy reform in 2005, a SAVI (Sexual Assault and Violence Intervention) Representative is supposed to meet with her, assist, advise, and defend her in regards to the case. If no SAVI rep was assigned (and I cannot imagine a SAVI rep allowing this to happen) then its a violation of DoD policy. The convening authority is going to get their balls cut off. I hate it when mother fuckers do shit like this to victims. As if they haven't been through enough. mad

lavenir

lavenir

Turlock, CA
June 2007

AUG 09, 2007 06:43 PM

Bitch_PhD said:

LordHAlmighty said:
Bitch Doctor said...


only the ones who can prove that they're not potential rapists should be allowed to do these jobs



Well, since rape is legally defined as unwanted penile/vaginal intercourse, that DOES mean every man is a "potential rapist".



Hey, I didn't say it.

Unless he's impotent. Or he lost his penis in an accident. Or he doesn't have a particularly strong sex drive.

Isn't anyone here aware of the long marriage of rape and war? I'm not going to draw a universal principle here; I'm sure that there are plenty of servicepeople out there who are quite decent human beings. But I can't help but feel that there are a great number of people out there who can't separate the violence they experience on the battefield from the violence they perpetrate in rape.

I'm afraid that as long as we consider violent solutions to our societal problems "necessary," we're always going to have to rely on people who are willing to commit acts of violence to meet those ends. And, unfortunately, such occupations will draw certain individuals who cannot distinguish one type of violence from another. I'm not sure that one can come up with any system that will weed out all the bad apples, since, particularly in cases such as this one, the bad apples are more or less encouraged to keep on acting as they always have.

LordHAlmighty

LordHAlmighty

Citrus Heights, CA
July 2007

AUG 09, 2007 06:49 PM



AUG 09, 2007 05:37 PM



LordHAlmighty said:
Bitch Doctor said...




only the ones who can prove that they're not potential rapists should be allowed to do these jobs




Well, since rape is legally defined as unwanted penile/vaginal intercourse, that DOES mean every man is a "potential rapist".




Hey, I didn't say it.



My apologies... I see upon rereading that you only "suggested" it.



Sock puppet said...



That would be correct. Surely making war is important enough that this sort of behaviour shouldn't be allowed to interfere with it.




... some might say that rape & war/po-tay-to po-tah-to...

Isn't there also another - albeit distinctly unlikely - possibily here that maybe she wasn't raped, afterall? I know that's REALLY farfetched (and I'm not using sarcastic overtones here, nobody in their right mind would fake a rape report... but, if she wasn't in her right mind...) but it's happened before. What about the Duke incident?

Morgan

Morgan

SUICIDEGIRL

Illinois, USA

AUG 09, 2007 07:02 PM

lavenir said:
Hey, I didn't say it.

Unless he's impotent. Or he lost his penis in an accident. Or he doesn't have a particularly strong sex drive.


Just to clarify, both men and women can commit rape. And men who are impotent or who don't have strong sex drives can still rape.

Morgan

Morgan

SUICIDEGIRL

Illinois, USA

AUG 09, 2007 07:02 PM

lavenir said:
Unless he's impotent. Or he lost his penis in an accident. Or he doesn't have a particularly strong sex drive.



Just to clarify, both men and women can commit rape. And men who are impotent or who don't have strong sex drives can still rape.

ogichida30

ogichida30

Concord, CA
September 2004

AUG 09, 2007 07:43 PM

lavenir said:

Bitch_PhD said:

LordHAlmighty said:
Bitch Doctor said...


only the ones who can prove that they're not potential rapists should be allowed to do these jobs



Well, since rape is legally defined as unwanted penile/vaginal intercourse, that DOES mean every man is a "potential rapist".



Hey, I didn't say it.

Unless he's impotent. Or he lost his penis in an accident. Or he doesn't have a particularly strong sex drive.

Isn't anyone here aware of the long marriage of rape and war? I'm not going to draw a universal principle here; I'm sure that there are plenty of servicepeople out there who are quite decent human beings. But I can't help but feel that there are a great number of people out there who can't separate the violence they experience on the battefield from the violence they perpetrate in rape.

I'm afraid that as long as we consider violent solutions to our societal problems "necessary," we're always going to have to rely on people who are willing to commit acts of violence to meet those ends. And, unfortunately, such occupations will draw certain individuals who cannot distinguish one type of violence from another. I'm not sure that one can come up with any system that will weed out all the bad apples, since, particularly in cases such as this one, the bad apples are more or less encouraged to keep on acting as they always have.


My people have been a warrior culture for thousands of years. Our definitionof a warrior is far different than a typical soldier.
We were and still are to some extent taught that our duty, and our honor was to protect the people. Our soldiers also have a code of ethics they are taught. Whats happening right now is nobody wants to enlist, the standards are dropping, and more bad apples are slipping through the system. It's absolutely appaling to me that someone could even violate someone else in that manner. It doesnt make me feel alone, it infuriates me.

_Tab

_Tab

USA
September 2004

AUG 09, 2007 08:52 PM

csprewitt said:
I don't understand this at all, not even a little bit. How can a human being do this to another human being? What happens that makes this possible? What is it that turns a smiling, happy child into the sort of creature that would think to do something like this? It's beyond me. I can't wrap my brain around it. That's a person. It's a PERSON. She's no different than you. What could possibly make this behavior acceptable in your mind?

I come from a horrible background, but for everything I've experienced, it would never occur to me that I could do something like this. I can't even stand to type it out, it's so awful.

Things like this make me feel incredibly alone in the world. I feel like I don't understand anyone or anything around me. I am incapable of making sense of this on any level.



+1
And the fact the people get away with it is even worse.

Previous

PAGE: 

1 | 2 | 3 | 4

Next