But Elton also complained about the quality of music being released. He said: "In the early Seventies there were at least ten albums released every week that were fantastic. Now you're lucky to find ten albums a year of that quality."
And I think we all know why that is. Thanks for nothing, internet... you dick!
Oh really, Sir Elton? You say the music was much better when you were in your 20s and 30s? Well, I can't say I've ever heard that complaint from the old folks before.
Saraphine said:
All I have to say is that this article is hilarious.
Oh and to the guy above me-- um WHAT?
I was hoping the article had something to do with Barney.
And...he's gay! He's a fudge-packer, get it? Anal sex makes you full of feces! You didn't know that?
and you're reason number 7,675,848,351 for people to think TX is full of ignorant bigoted rejects... way to go.
Seriously...eat me raw with a side of ranch, k sweets? I know sarcasm doesn't really transfer well on the intertubes, but I'm pretty sure that the blatant sarcasm of my statement should be pretty well obvious.
rumpsummoner said:
Okay, this is actually starting to bug me. This is an article that loosely quotes another shitty article that is based on reading an article from the most recent "Interview" magazine in a way that makes Elton John look like a complete tool.
To the best of my knowledge, The Sun, the site I linked and based my commentary on, is the original source of the story. It was quoted as the source by numerous sites as well as the New York Times. If it was compiled from an "Interview," article, so be it, and feel free to post it. I doubt the quote "we should get rid of the internet for a few years" was followed by the statement "we should'nt get rid of the internet for a few years." And if it was, he's still a tool for saying it out loud, even once, to a reporter.
You're giving me way too much credit, making Elton NOT look like a tool would've been the more impressive feat.
He never said he wanted to get rid of the internet. He said that if the internet disappeared for a few years he thinks it would cause some of the best music that has ever come out. All the other quotes are taken out of context. He isn't anti-internet per se. He's just frustrated at the lack of good music coming out and he thinks that people need to get out more and interact. He thinks that most good music (and most other good things) came from people interacting.
Yes, we all know this. Everyone knows what he meant, he then went beyond that and made idiotic sweeping pronouncements. Getting rid of the internet for a few years is JUST as ridiculous and impractical as banishing it forever.
I think he is probably right. He doesn't speak in absolutes the way this article makes him out to. All the quotes are technically accurate; however they were always immediately followed by qualifiers or really good logic. There is always going to be the loner who creates a great record and he acknowledges that. He thinks though that as a general trend, people need to be together for real, socially, for the bulk of great things to occur. He commented on blogging by saying that if there were no internet then people would be in the streets trying to do something about this administration instead of sitting at home typing on a laptop about it.
Yes, the internet killed activism, absolutely. He really nailed it. The only thing stopping people from protesting right now... is the internet.
He has a lot of valid points. Unfortunately, the jackoff who wrote the article that this is based on read the Interview article and go mad because someone said his precious internet wasn't the solution to the worlds problems and went off on a wildly inaccurate tangent.
You give the writer shit for posting John's quotes, quotes you feel were taken out of context, and yet, in the same breath you feel comfortable ascribing this man childish, bitter motives based on... nothing?
I bet Bill Shatner's singing career would have skyrocketed if there'd been an itunes back in the day.
Or if you prefer Vulcan...
Now that's the kind of quality entertainment an internet free environment provided!
Too bad the genie's out of the bottle now. It's all downhill from here.
I would be willing to bet that Elton John has contributed more real art and beauty to this world than all of the combined people on this thread saying that he sucks.
jerseystreets said:
I would be willing to bet that Elton John has contributed more real art and beauty to this world than all of the combined people on this thread saying that he sucks.
figmentation said:
his point,
We're not interacting anymore, we all sit around and stare at our own screens.
(have you seen a lan party? kinda like that.)
It's the stuff scifi was made of 50 years ago.
I vote for limited computer use and more being outside playing.
Have you been outside lately? It's like a hundred and five degrees out there! A hundred and five! And there's this giant bright thing when I look up that hurts my eyes... So, yeah... Elton John better not touch my internet or I'll have to make him cry in his bright, shiny, girly pants...
mingol
Singapore
July 2005
AUG 03, 2007 07:58 AM