NEWS: Michael Savage Thinks Immigration Activists Should be Put Into… Captivity

OKAY double post because the edit window hates me...

As an avid listener of the "savage nation" let me add a few things.
1. You won't find credentials from a search of "Michael Savage" because that's not his real name.
2. He lives in west Marin county...yup, Marin.
3. He boats in San Fransisco Bay (HOW SAVAGE!!!)
4. This is his "dog" and the mascot of the "savage nation"

Don't believe me? click and scroll to bottom
5. One of my favorites (not mine)

Savage is simply bitterly angry about the "Divine Right" of white-males being actively destroyed by...well...people that don't use the term "conservative" as an excuse for being uninformed and over-opinionated.

Yes, I saw that covered in previous posts, but it deserves repeating because he has reprinted some of his old outdated and debunked books and replaced the author name with his fake name. He also removed the name of his co-author for the re-prints.

As for the rest, that's just a little bit of how full of pocket-rat-shit he is.

Simply the cost to "seal" the border would be to much for our debt ridden economy right now. Of course that doesn't stop Bush from trying anyway. I think the border should be based into different sectors and the state will take over the responsibility for any given sector. Instead of sending guard troops for deployments in Iraq they would be taking turns patrolling on the border. I think we should create way stations at every 25 to 50 miles of the border and the units would be in charge of the area in that sector via cameras and aerial patrols. At the moment a plan like this is still way to expensive overall I think our government needs to think about the way it is spending its money and decrease the debt.

+



+



+



= defaultx wet dream

lol nice!

I dunno...I could get some easy chuckles from that. All you need is a giant mechanical finger to press the bubble.

-TM

Last I heard he was still Jewish.

Rush at least seems to believe in most of what he's saying. Savage is on the Anne Coulter end of the scale. Even the true believers probably know he's not really behind everything he says, they just love hearing him have the nerve to say it.

Shock is part of the key here. Like Howard Stern, to an extent.

Once while I was driving through rural AZ and had nothing else to listen to, he went off on a tangent about what a great book (and movie) "The Lover" was. I thought I was in the fucking twilight zone. Savage rhapsodized for about ten minutes about how well written it was, yada yada yada. Luckily, nobody else in the audience had ever heard of it (or wouldn't own up to having seen the film) or some of them would've gone ballistic.

Because you are only allowed to listen to the communists on the CBC. And they have to be aboot 15% (or was that 20?) Canadian. Oh wait, that's just the music.

Oh man, I am stoked on that. Like my secratary and paralegal don't think i'm a pretentious enough dick as it is. I am so gonna use the logic that I am too awesome to not be a lawyer tomorrow at work

Our Rush fills me with far less rage.

My take? He's conservative, but the bulk of the show is schtick. He out-Coulters Coulter. And like her, people seem to lap it up even if THEY are reasonably sure he doesn't mean every last word of it.

As much as I disagree with Lush Rimjob/Rump Lunchbox, with his show along with the sometimes over-the-top hyperbole you'll sometimes get some intelligent political analyses along with the talking points. It can be interesting parsing what's spin and what's his real thoughts. That's what makes that show almost listenable.

With Savage/Weiner, it can be amusing for a minute or two just to see to which extreme he takes his diatribes. But unless you're the choir he's preaching to, it kind of falls flat after a minute or two. You know he doesn't believe it, because nobody'd be that wingnut whackjob. Nobody could believe all the stuff he spews.

Decreasing the national debt? Financial responsibility? Sounds good. Because that's a much more pressing concern than illegal immigration is.

I can't reason, with any logic, why the right wing has latched onto this issue so, other than race. I hate to cheapen the debate down to saying the anti-immigration types are reformed racists, but that always seems to be the root of their arguments, even if they won't admit (they claim the debate is about obeying the law, but that can't be true because there are far worst law breakers that a lot of conservatives tend to ignore).


O'Reilly actual admits it here. This isn't about the law to the majority of conservatives. It's about their fear that this country may not be a white majority in 10, 20 years (I don't think they really have to worry about the Christian part though). Though Bill, it's not exactly that we want or don't want "break down the white, christian, male power structure", at least not in the way he puts it. But we are just recognizing the reality of the situation. The majority of Americans will not be white, european decent here soon. And we don't look at immigrant as lower class cattle. They are people.

Illegal immigration is not a problem worthy of the attention it receives. Are there reforms needed? Yes. But there are far more worthy concerns we should be paying attention to currently.

I have to admit that, over the years, I've become disaffected with the practice, mainly because, as a means of influencing public policy, it bypasses reasoned debate and goes straight for emotional blackmail. Going on hunger strike (and sticking with it) demonstrates that you possess sufficient conviction regarding your cause to inflict severe physical discomfort, possibly even death, upon yourself if your demands are not met. What a hunger strike does not do is demonstrate that your position is correct (even though it may be). I'd go so far as to say that hunger strikes are merely the adult version of holding your breath until you turn blue in the face (and by "adult," I mean in the chronological sense, not necessarily in the emotional sense). Killing yourself to make your point beats killing other people, I suppose, but that's about all here is to be said for it.

Heh. Yeah. My * secretary and paralegal feel the same way. They're always like "Brosa! Why you gotta be such an awesomely pretentious dick!?" And stuff.

SPOILERS! (Click to view)

*nonexistent

Subrosa said:

egon said:
Oh man, I am stoked on that. Like my secratary and paralegal don't think i'm a pretentious enough dick as it is. I am so gonna use the logic that I am too awesome to not be a lawyer tomorrow at work

Heh. Yeah. My * secretary and paralegal feel the same way. They're always like "Brosa! Why you gotta be such an awesomely pretentious dick!?" And stuff.

SPOILERS! (Click to view)

*nonexistent

Dude, even your imaginary friends think you are a pretentious dick? That is fucking SAD.

The flick with Jane March?!?
I'm sure he enjoyed it for "artistic reasons".

this fred savage bitch should be depicted in an X-rated anime whare revolutionist robots to their countrys line up to anal arse the jack off until the J-pop out of him singing "let's get crunk" in japanese titled Tinshi soldier

Hey! Wonder years was a great show! Why you gotta harsh on Fred like that?!

Yawn.

Now Dan Savage - he'd be all over that.





I think.
I'm not sure that's even English.