Mockingbird said:
... Because there are videos and pictures online?
It's in the news.
is there any evidence of that? it sounds like a 'those crazy middle eastern people' comment.
well i am not sure if it was actually aired on tv there but you have to have seen/heard about some of those videos on the net anyway...
i feel its REALLY wrong to state that broadcasting beheadings on tv is a regular occurrence (or an acceptable practice, for that matter) in an entire region of the planet when that is most likely not the case at all.
Oh I'm sorry, I suppose it did sound a bit "blanket statement"-ish. I know it isn't common, it was just the only place I could think of torture on TV being well known.
LoveBump said:
I love how everyone on this site thinks they are so much smarter than everyone else. I was refering to Tags sorry if the correct terminology was not applied to my previous statements. I am clearly making a point how this site is censoring my comments, when I pay to be a member. If this was a free site fine, regulate the content, but it's not. I find alot of people on this site to be stuck up, and that they feel a sense of entitlement. Judge my opinion and the many that came before, and after.
No, we just think we're smarter than you. What you pay for, since you make such a big deal out of it, is monitoring of content by moderators. That is what you don't get on free sites. Moderators make sure it's a nice place to be, so other people will want to pay to be here too. If your tags were nice but spelled wrong, or nice but useless, then it just gums up the works.
Additionally, you pay to see pictures. Interraction on the site is a privilege that is depedent on your good behavior. They've not kept it a secret that being a dick will get that privilege revoked, so I don't understand this umbrage about "censorship." Should you be able to say whatever the hell you want because you paid to be here?
LoveBump said:
I love how everyone on this site thinks they are so much smarter than everyone else. I was refering to Tags sorry if the correct terminology was not applied to my previous statements. I am clearly making a point how this site is censoring my comments, when I pay to be a member. If this was a free site fine, regulate the content, but it's not. I find alot of people on this site to be stuck up, and that they feel a sense of entitlement. Judge my opinion and the many that came before, and after.
You pay like nine bucks to be a member, your monetary contribution hardly justifies you having any say in how the site works. The content here is regulated for a very good reason, and you're likely just butthurt because you posted something stupid and got called out on it.
LoveBump said:
Your welcome Tough guy, Your probably Emo, Shouldn't you be crying somewhere because somone made eye contact with you. You would never say shit to me face to face so don't act brave on the computer.
I can't imagine why you were ever banned from commenting. You seem so well adjusted and stable.
Eh, I don't see the big deal about this movie. It's a fairly low budget horror film with little advertising in the middle of a huge summer box office season and it'll most likely disappear from theaters within a couple weeks. Gone to DVD and pretty much forgotten.
These things have a way of working themselves out.
The description of the subplot meant to turn the audience against Cuthbert made me sick, as did the fact that while this particular critic watched the movie, the audience cheered. Ugh.
Arriving in theaters front-loaded with a controversial billboard campaign (depicting the "abduction," "confinement," "torture" and "termination" of its star) as well as a rare censure from the Motion Picture Association of America, "Captivity" the movie has been thoroughly eclipsed by "Captivity" the marketing.
Which is, of course, what the film's producers are probably hoping. Outrage, whether issuing from feminist groups or the writer-director Joss Whedon %u2014 who has likened the movie's trailer to a recent CNN report on the public stoning of a young Kurdish woman %u2014 only fans the opening-weekend grosses. By the time those heightened expectations are dashed (What? No chain saw?), the money is in and the sequel already in the works. There are no refunds on your innocence.
[...]
The person who ought to be most embarrassed by this airless dud is its director, Roland Joffé, a two-time Oscar nominee who in the space of just five years regressed from working with Tom Stoppard to associating with the kind of people who mix eyeball smoothies and force-feed them to defenseless women. To be fair to Mr. Joffé, however, the movie has reportedly undergone substantial alterations since its filming in Moscow in 2005. Perhaps he's as disgusted by the eyeballs as we are.
Despite the controversy, "Captivity" is no more than a desperate attempt to cling to the buzz of "Saw" before fans are distracted by the next shiny power tool. Like good sex, good horror requires mystery and imagination %u2014 you can give a villain a blender, brain damage and a closetful of slut-wear and he may still bore you to death. As for Ms. Cuthbert, having passed most of her time as Jack Bauer's daughter on "24" in one sort of confinement or another, she knows the victim ropes better than most. "Elisha's strength is in her fan base," says one of the film's producers. I just knew it had to be somewhere.
This whole side-argument some of you are having about "empowerment" is ridiculous. When people like Lovely are SGs, I don't know how you can say some of this shit to me with a straight face. This is a business, your cock is its commodity, it sells you ejaculation.
Mockingbird
Chicago, IL
January 2006
JUL 13, 2007 05:37 PM