Lifestyle

TOPICS:

Previous

PAGE: 

1 ... 

28 | 29 | 30 | 31 | 32

 ... 883

Next

Previous

PAGE: 

1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5

Next

TheFuckOffKid

TheFuckOffKid

NEWSWIRE

Australia

JUL 07, 2007 09:04 PM

joker_c said:
I'm curious if you believe cock fighting is not cruelty, exactly how do you explain it as not being cruel?



Because cocks in the wild totally strap on spurs to their little cock ankles and go three rounds with each other for the entertainment of watching humans.

It's, like, nature, man!

TheFuckOffKid

TheFuckOffKid

NEWSWIRE

Australia

JUL 08, 2007 05:23 AM

Charybdus said:
Look cocksucker, I am about sick of your cronies badmouthing me, my state, my point of view, and my level of intelligence.


I care about your hurt feelings about as much as you care for the cocks you like to see tear each other to shreds.

I have a Blah Blah Blah


Dayum, you is still dumb. Seriously, I don't give a leaping shit how smart you think you are. You're a cretin.

As far as my "argument" that you aren't from Louisiana, you are proving me absolutely correct assface. YOU don't live here. The law does not affect you. It affects me.



It affects the fucking birds. You fucking twerp.

Charybdus

Charybdus

Lafayette, LA
July 2006

JUL 08, 2007 05:50 AM

TheFuckOffKid said:

Charybdus said:
Look cocksucker, I am about sick of your cronies badmouthing me, my state, my point of view, and my level of intelligence.


I care about your hurt feelings about as much as you care for the cocks you like to see tear each other to shreds.

I have a Blah Blah Blah


Dayum, you is still dumb. Seriously, I don't give a leaping shit how smart you think you are. You're a cretin.

As far as my "argument" that you aren't from Louisiana, you are proving me absolutely correct assface. YOU don't live here. The law does not affect you. It affects me.



It affects the fucking birds. You fucking twerp.

Do you know the definiton of spurious, sphincter boy? And you are a "fucking bird" PETArd?

Excellent grammar BTW. "Dayum, you is still dumb." Yes, I "is" dumb.

Charybdus

Charybdus

Lafayette, LA
July 2006

JUL 08, 2007 05:54 AM

Charybdus said:

TheFuckOffKid said:

Charybdus said:
Look cocksucker, I am about sick of your cronies badmouthing me, my state, my point of view, and my level of intelligence.


I care about your hurt feelings about as much as you care for the cocks you like to see tear each other to shreds.

I have a Blah Blah Blah


Dayum, you is still dumb. Seriously, I don't give a leaping shit how smart you think you are. You're a cretin.

As far as my "argument" that you aren't from Louisiana, you are proving me absolutely correct assface. YOU don't live here. The law does not affect you. It affects me.



It affects the fucking birds. You fucking twerp.



Do you know the definiton of spurious, sphincter boy? And you are a "fucking bird" PETArd?

Excellent grammar BTW. "Dayum, you is still dumb." Yes, I "is" dumb.

I don't really give a flying throw at a rolling donut what YOUR ignorant Aussie ass thinks about my intelligence, there are five certifying bodies in my field that say I am just fine. Go back to the penal colony with the rest of the peckers.

TheFuckOffKid

TheFuckOffKid

NEWSWIRE

Australia

JUL 08, 2007 07:31 AM

Charybdus said:

TheFuckOffKid said:

Charybdus said:
Look cocksucker, I am about sick of your cronies badmouthing me, my state, my point of view, and my level of intelligence.


I care about your hurt feelings about as much as you care for the cocks you like to see tear each other to shreds.

I have a Blah Blah Blah


Dayum, you is still dumb. Seriously, I don't give a leaping shit how smart you think you are. You're a cretin.

As far as my "argument" that you aren't from Louisiana, you are proving me absolutely correct assface. YOU don't live here. The law does not affect you. It affects me.


It affects the fucking birds. You fucking twerp.



Do you know the definiton of spurious, sphincter boy? And you are a "fucking bird" PETArd?

Excellent grammar BTW. "Dayum, you is still dumb." Yes, I "is" dumb.

I don't really give a flying throw at a rolling donut what YOUR ignorant Aussie ass thinks about my intelligence, there are five certifying bodies in my field that say I am just fine. Go back to the penal colony with the rest of the peckers.



I'm glad you told me twice.

SPOILERS! (Click to view)
Dayum, you is still dumb. Louisiana certifies dumb, I s'pose.

RudieCantFail

RudieCantFail

Baton Rouge, LA
January 2006

JUL 08, 2007 07:40 AM

DhD_No_Pants

DhD_No_Pants

Katy, TX
May 2006

JUL 08, 2007 10:06 AM

Charybdus said:

DhD_PillowPants said:
I could put two stallions together and let them fight for my own amusement. I could put razors on their hooves to make it bloodier and deadlier. I mean, stallions naturally fight for dominance in the wild. But I don't. Mostly because I'm not a sick fuck, but also because no matter how 'natural' I'd like to claim it to be, you can bet your sweet ass that the SPCA would have me fined within an inch of my life, or put me in jail.

whatever

And I'm from East Texas. I hunt, fish, eat bloody red meat, and enjoy the rodeo. I'm not exactly on PETA's top ten list of favorite people. I'm sure a lot of people think that my lifestyle is borderline barbaric.

And as far as animals being 'chattel', you can get in more trouble in Texas for mistreating your dog or horse than for slapping your wife or kid around.



So because I think people have the right to train gamecocks I am a "sick fuck?" Seems like a personall attack to me. Maybe you should do a little research on the legal defintion of "chattel" because you made exactly the point I was trying to get across -- laws are fucked up then cruelty to an animal is more serious than wife-beating.



If you look carefully at what I typed, the sick fuck comment was in reference to making stallions fight with razors on their hooves.

Would making horses do that be ok? Or are roosters the only animal that should be used in such a way?

DhD_No_Pants

DhD_No_Pants

Katy, TX
May 2006

JUL 08, 2007 10:07 AM



If I don't get rid of the troll food pretty soon, it's going to go bad. And you know that stuff stinks when it starts to go south.

RudieCantFail

RudieCantFail

Baton Rouge, LA
January 2006

JUL 08, 2007 10:17 AM

DhD_PillowPants said:



If I don't get rid of the troll food pretty soon, it's going to go bad. And you know that stuff stinks when it starts to go south.



I've decided to start referring to internet trolls as gollums, because there are some trolls that are quite amiable, so I'd like to discontinue it's use as a derogatory. biggrin

Chainlink

Chainlink

Dickeyville, WI
August 2005

JUL 08, 2007 10:18 AM

*popcorn*

Stiles

Stiles

New York, NY
November 2002

JUL 08, 2007 10:39 AM

Charybdus said:

SPOILERS! (Click to view)

I don't see my arguments as spurious.

1) We also have dog races and horse races and turtle and cockroach races. This is also entertainment. Should we ban this too? After all, retired greyhounds are often euthanized.

2) Obviously, you would rather go down mooing with a spike in your head from an airgun than fighting. Good for you. I personally would like to kick a little ass on my way out.

3) Being a vegetarian is super-duper. Less footprint and all that. I am not. "You" as a vegetarian have no right to force me to subsist on green leafy things. I have canines. I like meat. Do what you want, but DO NOT TRAMPLE ON MY RIGHTS.

I THINK PEOPLE HAVE MORE VALUE THAN GAMECOCKS. I THINK PEOPLE HAVE MORE VALUE THAN ROCKS. I THINK PEOPLE HAVE MORE VALUE THAN ALL OTHER FORMS OF LIFE, EVEN CUTE FUZZY BUNNIES.

I guess that makes my argument spurious. Lah tee dah.

By the way, I think I could make arrangements to turn you in to chickenfeed if you'd like.

wink



How you managed to get a four year degree without being able to reason your way out of a wet paper bag is a mystery.

Your arguments are faulty:

You argure that people should be able to treat animals as cruelly as they wish since they are property. The state of Louisiana disagrees with you. Following your logic, bestiality is equally defensible.

You argue that local custom should not be commented on by outsiders, simply because they are outsiders. Following your logic, lynching is OK too.

You can't grasp the implications of the points you're making nor follow your own flawed logic to conclusion. Other posters in this thread can and have done so here.


Charybdus

Charybdus

Lafayette, LA
July 2006

JUL 08, 2007 02:24 PM

Stiles said:

Charybdus said:

SPOILERS! (Click to view)

I don't see my arguments as spurious.

1) We also have dog races and horse races and turtle and cockroach races. This is also entertainment. Should we ban this too? After all, retired greyhounds are often euthanized.

2) Obviously, you would rather go down mooing with a spike in your head from an airgun than fighting. Good for you. I personally would like to kick a little ass on my way out.

3) Being a vegetarian is super-duper. Less footprint and all that. I am not. "You" as a vegetarian have no right to force me to subsist on green leafy things. I have canines. I like meat. Do what you want, but DO NOT TRAMPLE ON MY RIGHTS.

I THINK PEOPLE HAVE MORE VALUE THAN GAMECOCKS. I THINK PEOPLE HAVE MORE VALUE THAN ROCKS. I THINK PEOPLE HAVE MORE VALUE THAN ALL OTHER FORMS OF LIFE, EVEN CUTE FUZZY BUNNIES.

I guess that makes my argument spurious. Lah tee dah.

By the way, I think I could make arrangements to turn you in to chickenfeed if you'd like.

wink



How you managed to get a four year degree without being able to reason your way out of a wet paper bag is a mystery.

Your arguments are faulty:

You argure that people should be able to treat animals as cruelly as they wish since they are property. The state of Louisiana disagrees with you. Following your logic, bestiality is equally defensible.

You argue that local custom should not be commented on by outsiders, simply because they are outsiders. Following your logic, lynching is OK too.

You can't grasp the implications of the points you're making nor follow your own flawed logic to conclusion. Other posters in this thread can and have done so here.




*yawn* OK here we go again.

1) Placing an animal in a fighting pit and raping one ARE NOT equivalent. You cannot force an animal to fight. You can force your penis inside an animal. Why is this so hard to comprehend?

2) Chickens are not humans. Because I might like to go out and bet on a cockfight Friday night DOES NOT mean I am dragging people behind my pickup Saturday. This is so idiotic I don't know how to even respond.


The problem here is not my reasoning -- its people misquoting and misinterpreting what I post.

Regardless, I am sick of this. If this is all you have to fight for, consider your battle won.
Huzzah!

Westley

Westley

Vatican City
April 2004

JUL 08, 2007 02:29 PM

Charybdus said:

SPOILERS! (Click to view)
Look cocksucker, I am about sick of your cronies badmouthing me, my state, my point of view, and my level of intelligence. I have a Bachelor's degree in Chemistry, I am working on my second Bachelor's in Chemical Engineering. I manage 14 technicians at work, know enviromental compliance issues for all 50 states, and daily sign off on reports yahoos like you wouldn't even comprehend how to certify. I had two years of Latin in LSMSA (a state magnet school) and two more years at the university. I am pretty sure my vocabulary is better than yours.

I never said your ignorant ass was a vegetarian. When I address someone, it is always a "reply," boy genius.

As far as my "argument" that you aren't from Louisiana, you are proving me absolutely correct assface. YOU don't live here. The law does not affect you. It affects me. Therefor, it is not really a concern for you. IS THAT TOO COMPLICATED FOR YOUR STUPID ASS??? Let me break it down for you. MY STATE = MY CONCERN. NOT YOUR STATE = NOT YOUR CONCERN.

Hope that clears things up for my adoring fans on this thread.

BTW, joker_c, WTF do you know about Bali that you assume they are so cruel? This thread has become rediculous... Somehow I am the ignorant ass redneck here? Hhheeeellllloooooo???


This post is so completely stupid that flagging it and having it removed would be letting you off the hook too easily.

TheFuckOffKid

TheFuckOffKid

NEWSWIRE

Australia

JUL 08, 2007 02:41 PM

Charybdus said:

Stiles said:
How you managed to get a four year degree without being able to reason your way out of a wet paper bag is a mystery.

Your arguments are faulty:

You argure that people should be able to treat animals as cruelly as they wish since they are property. The state of Louisiana disagrees with you. Following your logic, bestiality is equally defensible.

You argue that local custom should not be commented on by outsiders, simply because they are outsiders. Following your logic, lynching is OK too.

You can't grasp the implications of the points you're making nor follow your own flawed logic to conclusion. Other posters in this thread can and have done so here.




*yawn* OK here we go again.

1) Placing an animal in a fighting pit and raping one ARE NOT equivalent. You cannot force an animal to fight. You can force your penis inside an animal. Why is this so hard to comprehend?

2) Chickens are not humans. Because I might like to go out and bet on a cockfight Friday night DOES NOT mean I am dragging people behind my pickup Saturday. This is so idiotic I don't know how to even respond.



Let's see: your arguments are:-

1. Animals are chattel.

This argument does not distinguish between abusing animals for sport and abusing animals for sex.

Ding ding ding! Stiles wins!

2. You're not from Louisiana, I am, so fuck off.

This argument uses local interest and "tradition" to trump all other arguments. If lynching and/or dragging people behind your car was local tradition, this argument would make no distinction between that and cockfighting

Ding ding ding! Stiles wins!

SPOILERS! (Click to view)
Dayum, you is dumb!!!

Stiles

Stiles

New York, NY
November 2002

JUL 08, 2007 02:50 PM

Charybdus said:

1) Placing an animal in a fighting pit and raping one ARE NOT equivalent. You cannot force an animal to fight. You can force your penis inside an animal. Why is this so hard to comprehend?



Funny, I was thinking the same thing. According to your line of reasoning, they are both equally permissible because both involve purposely inflicting pain on animals solely for your entertainment.


2) Chickens are not humans. Because I might like to go out and bet on a cockfight Friday night DOES NOT mean I am dragging people behind my pickup Saturday. This is so idiotic I don't know how to even respond.



Again, you told other people repeatedly to stay out of long-accepted local pastimes, since we weren't from your area. Lynching was another cruel and inhuman local pastime widely accepted in the South for decades, even having some entertainment value for the crowds involved. Arguing that it is not a valid comparison because of the species involved misses the forest for the trees.

Again.


The problem here is not my reasoning -- its people misquoting and misinterpreting what I post.



Nobody has misquoted nor misinterpreted you. We understand exactly what you're saying, as sickening and wrongheaded as it is.


Regardless, I am sick of this. If this is all you have to fight for, consider your battle won.
Huzzah!



Does this mean you'll stop posting? Huzzah, indeed.


Edit: damn you, TFOK!

wink

TheFuckOffKid

TheFuckOffKid

NEWSWIRE

Australia

JUL 08, 2007 02:56 PM

Stiles said:
Edit: damn you, TFOK!

wink



Got your back, slowpoke.

mingol

mingol

Singapore
July 2005

JUL 08, 2007 02:56 PM

Westley said:

Charybdus said:

SPOILERS! (Click to view)
Look cocksucker, I am about sick of your cronies badmouthing me, my state, my point of view, and my level of intelligence. I have a Bachelor's degree in Chemistry, I am working on my second Bachelor's in Chemical Engineering. I manage 14 technicians at work, know enviromental compliance issues for all 50 states, and daily sign off on reports yahoos like you wouldn't even comprehend how to certify. I had two years of Latin in LSMSA (a state magnet school) and two more years at the university. I am pretty sure my vocabulary is better than yours.

I never said your ignorant ass was a vegetarian. When I address someone, it is always a "reply," boy genius.

As far as my "argument" that you aren't from Louisiana, you are proving me absolutely correct assface. YOU don't live here. The law does not affect you. It affects me. Therefor, it is not really a concern for you. IS THAT TOO COMPLICATED FOR YOUR STUPID ASS??? Let me break it down for you. MY STATE = MY CONCERN. NOT YOUR STATE = NOT YOUR CONCERN.

Hope that clears things up for my adoring fans on this thread.

BTW, joker_c, WTF do you know about Bali that you assume they are so cruel? This thread has become rediculous... Somehow I am the ignorant ass redneck here? Hhheeeellllloooooo???


Every one of your posts in this thread is so completely stupid that flagging them and having them removed would be letting you off the hook too easily.



Fixed.

Chainlink

Chainlink

Dickeyville, WI
August 2005

JUL 08, 2007 03:52 PM

Stiles said:

Nobody has misquoted nor misinterpreted you. We understand exactly what you're saying, as sickening and wrongheaded as it is.



WIN !

zoom image

Chainlink

Chainlink

Dickeyville, WI
August 2005

JUL 08, 2007 03:54 PM

Charybdus said:

1) Placing an animal in a fighting pit and raping one ARE NOT equivalent. You cannot force an animal to fight. You can force your penis inside an animal. Why is this so hard to comprehend?

2) Chickens are not humans. Because I might like to go out and bet on a cockfight Friday night DOES NOT mean I am dragging people behind my pickup Saturday. This is so idiotic I don't know how to even respond.


The problem here is not my reasoning -- its people misquoting and misinterpreting what I post.



joker_

joker_

Windsor, CA
October 2005

JUL 08, 2007 05:39 PM

Charybdus said:

Look cocksucker, I am about sick of your cronies badmouthing me, my state, my point of view, and my level of intelligence. I have a Bachelor's degree in Chemistry, I am working on my second Bachelor's in Chemical Engineering. I manage 14 technicians at work, know enviromental compliance issues for all 50 states, and daily sign off on reports yahoos like you wouldn't even comprehend how to certify. I had two years of Latin in LSMSA (a state magnet school) and two more years at the university. I am pretty sure my vocabulary is better than yours.

I never said your ignorant ass was a vegetarian. When I address someone, it is always a "reply," boy genius.

As far as my "argument" that you aren't from Louisiana, you are proving me absolutely correct assface. YOU don't live here. The law does not affect you. It affects me. Therefor, it is not really a concern for you. IS THAT TOO COMPLICATED FOR YOUR STUPID ASS??? Let me break it down for you. MY STATE = MY CONCERN. NOT YOUR STATE = NOT YOUR CONCERN.

Hope that clears things up for my adoring fans on this thread.

BTW, joker_c, WTF do you know about Bali that you assume they are so cruel? This thread has become rediculous... Somehow I am the ignorant ass redneck here? Hhheeeellllloooooo???



Actually, the Balinese definition of cruelty is more like yours. Cock fighting is acceptable behavior there. I'm not assuming they are cruel, I am stating those of them that participate in cock fighting are cruel. My definition of cruelty is not the Balinese definition or your definition. If you're having trouble understanding why enjoying cockfighting indicates that you are a cruel person(by the definition posted earlier that is the common one used in our society), I pity your educators.

I've talked to 12 year olds with no degree at all that have more adequate reasoning skills than yourself. Your sad attempts to justify your views using faulty logic are pathetic. Studying Latin with broken reasoning skills must have been especially challenging.

I noticed you were unable to answer the question.

I'm curious if you believe cock fighting is not cruelty, exactly how do you explain it as not being cruel?



I know, I know this forces you to think. It might be difficult at first, but you know so much more than all of us.
Please explain to us, how you enjoying the suffering of these animals is not a behavior that can be defined as cruelty?

Stop beating around the bush with semantics.

You can say your version of cruelty is "different" to every other persons version, but maybe you should start by redefining cruelty to us all?
Since a common definition isn't adequate for the special world that you appear to live in.

Westley

Westley

Vatican City
April 2004

JUL 08, 2007 06:57 PM

mingol said:

Westley said:

Charybdus said:

SPOILERS! (Click to view)
Look cocksucker, I am about sick of your cronies badmouthing me, my state, my point of view, and my level of intelligence. I have a Bachelor's degree in Chemistry, I am working on my second Bachelor's in Chemical Engineering. I manage 14 technicians at work, know enviromental compliance issues for all 50 states, and daily sign off on reports yahoos like you wouldn't even comprehend how to certify. I had two years of Latin in LSMSA (a state magnet school) and two more years at the university. I am pretty sure my vocabulary is better than yours.

I never said your ignorant ass was a vegetarian. When I address someone, it is always a "reply," boy genius.

As far as my "argument" that you aren't from Louisiana, you are proving me absolutely correct assface. YOU don't live here. The law does not affect you. It affects me. Therefor, it is not really a concern for you. IS THAT TOO COMPLICATED FOR YOUR STUPID ASS??? Let me break it down for you. MY STATE = MY CONCERN. NOT YOUR STATE = NOT YOUR CONCERN.

Hope that clears things up for my adoring fans on this thread.

BTW, joker_c, WTF do you know about Bali that you assume they are so cruel? This thread has become rediculous... Somehow I am the ignorant ass redneck here? Hhheeeellllloooooo???


Every one of your posts in this thread is so completely stupid that flagging them and having them removed would be letting you off the hook too easily.



Fixed.


Well, I'm not so sure the others were flag-worthy. Just stupid.

Jilla

Jilla

I'm lost
September 2007

OCT 09, 2007 04:36 PM

I can't stand the sick fucks that abuse animals.

I understand that yes, animals in the wild kill each other, but why FORCE a situation on an animal? Why make two angry, enraged animals on each other knowing that they will kill each other and WHY be the person to do it?

People who get pleasure from that are deranged and should just die.
I'm not a PETA fan, but I know right from wrong.

Previous

PAGE: 

1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5

Next