Fundamentalist Mormons in Utah and Arizona are pushing for the legalization of polygamy on religious grounds. Although the practice of marrying multiple wives was made illegal in 1890 when Utah was trying to become a State, Fundamentalist Mormons (who were excommunicated by the mainstream Mormon Church) believe the more wives a man has the easier it is to get into heaven. Adherents (an estimated 40, 000 fundamentalist Mormons practice polygamy illegally) see their struggle for legalization as something akin to the Civil Rights movement of the 1960s.
"It's like the work Martin Luther King did in relation with African Americans," he said, holding year-old Ava, one of his eight children, in the living room of his three-story home in Centennial Park, a dry, dusty Arizona town run by polygamists near the Utah border.
The push for legalization comes at an interesting time in light of the high-profile Presidential candidacy of Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney, a mainstream Mormon who has dismissed polygamy as bizarre. It was the founder of the Mormon Church, Joseph Smith, who first declared he had a revelation from God in 1843 instructing men to marry many wives to get the key to heaven but now mainstream Mormons disregard that particular item of religious dogma.
"I don't think the revelation that Joseph Smith received came from Christ," said John Llewellyn, a retired Salt Lake County policeman who once practiced polygamy but now campaigns against it. "I think it came from his Y (male) chromosome."
But the Fundamentalists see the issue as one of religious freedom
Polygamist advocate Anne Wilde said the church has the right to its beliefs, just as polygamists should be allowed their interpretation of Mormonism without persecution As consenting adults, which is the key, we ought to have that choice to live that lifestyle. We live it because of strong religious convictions," said Wilde, 71.
Despite the illegality of the practice officials say Mormon polygamists are hardly likely to face prosecution.
The attorneys general of Utah and Arizona said in separate interviews they had no intention of prosecuting polygamists unless they commit other crimes such as taking underage brides -- a practice authorities said was rampant in a Utah-Arizona border community run by Warren Jeffs before his arrest in August.
"We are not going to go out there and persecute people for their beliefs," said Arizona Attorney General Terry Goddard. Adds Utah Attorney General Mark Shurtleff: "We determined six or seven years ago that there was no way we could prosecute 10,000 polygamists and put the kids into foster care. There's no way that we have the money or the resources to do that."
Advocates of legalizing polygamy have a long view on their struggle and dont expect to see it happen in their lifetime. But considering the fact that there is a growing movement to legalize another form of nontraditional unions (same sex marriage), the day may eventually come when a Fundamentalist Mormon man can come home from work and tell all 12 of his legal adoring wives how his day went at the office.
I look forward to the day that I can come home from work, and tell all 12 of my adoring wives and all 12 of my adoring husbands how much I hate them all for not working and just sitting around all day screwing.
Of course by this time run on sentences will also be legal
I'm less worried about polygamy and more worried about the child abuse that accompanies the practice within Mormon Fundamentalism; marrying a third wife when she's 13 is horrifying, and should remain illegal.
Oh, and according to Smith's revelation, multiple wives, or "spiritual wifery", is required to gain entry into the Kingdom of God. Which is why the heads of the LDS continued to practice polygamy even after publicly denouncing it in the late 1800s.
aegies said:
I'm less worried about polygamy and more worried about the child abuse that accompanies the practice within Mormon Fundamentalism; marrying a third wife when she's 13 is horrifying, and should remain illegal.
Oh, and according to Smith's revelation, multiple wives, or "spiritual wifery", is required to gain entry into the Kingdom of God. Which is why the heads of the LDS continued to practice polygamy even after publicly denouncing it in the late 1800s.
I uh, I read a lot of books.
not really true. 'mainstream' mormons no longer practice pologamy as it is against the law of the land and have since it was denounced
I have no problem with polygamy. It is no less insane then monogamous marriage. Turning people into property is inherently flawed regardless of how many you own.
I would be more comfortable with the King analogy if blacks forced other blacks to... I dunno... be black or something... never mind, there is no good analogy involving King and Mormon splinter sect polygamy.
Aside from Smith just wanting to fuck around on his wife and trying to use God to get his way, the well-documented (young) daughter swapping among fundamentalist polygamy sects make their "struggle" more like religious advocated sexual abuse.
I wasn't aware "bizarre" was illegal, Mr. Romney. Frankly I'd expect to see this to become legal before same sex marriages, because at least they'd be making babies, right?
Considering how much of a mess a relationship between a couple can make of people, I'd hate to see what could happen to the emotional state of polygamists. But as long as women can have more than one husband too, and everyone's faithful to their own family, they're welcome to lie in the bed they make.
polygyny is way more "natural" than monogamy anyway. most cultures in the world practice it. Happily.
Like, Morgan said, why should we care who marries who as long as its consentual?
Odette said:
polygyny is way more "natural" than monogamy anyway. most cultures in the world practice it. Happily.
Like, Morgan said, why should we care who marries who as long as its consentual?
i can't believe i have a somewhat conservative viewpoint on this i suppose... i am quite likely close-minded but i picture it not being much of a choice for some of those women and them not being 'happy'. but i suppose choice is relative... not considering the cultural/religious pressures etc. i admit i am ignorant, who am i to say they don't enjoy fulfilling those roles...
cockzombie said:
what are you talking about? Why does Joseph Smith keep getting brought up...
Oh, come on zombie, Wake Up!
Mormon polygamy started with Joseph Smith. The current practitioners all refer back to Joseph Smith's writings for their spiritual justification and moral authority.
Relating present conditions to their origins is a very elementary exercise in logic, regardless of the topic.
aegies said:
I'm less worried about polygamy and more worried about the child abuse that accompanies the practice within Mormon Fundamentalism; marrying a third wife when she's 13 is horrifying, and should remain illegal.
Oh, and according to Smith's revelation, multiple wives, or "spiritual wifery", is required to gain entry into the Kingdom of God. Which is why the heads of the LDS continued to practice polygamy even after publicly denouncing it in the late 1800s.
I uh, I read a lot of books.
not really true. 'mainstream' mormons no longer practice pologamy as it is against the law of the land and have since it was denounced
Which I never denied. Mainstream Mormons are horrified by polygamy. But until early this century, and even after it was officially denounced by the Council of 12 and Brigham Young (I think it was Young, who had multiple wives, as a matter of fact), the powerful higher-ups within the church continued to practice spiritual wifery. And Joseph Smith was the first Mormon to have multiple wives. He made it clear to higher members of the church, and it was clear in the text of his revelation, that a man was morally obligated to have as many wives as possible, and that it was pretty much required to gain entrance to Heaven.
Solaris said:
... I picture it not being much of a choice for some of those women and them not being 'happy'. but i suppose choice is relative... not considering the cultural/religious pressures etc. i admit i am ignorant, who am i to say they don't enjoy fulfilling those roles...
Monogamous marriage is not that different. Society places expectations on people to get married. People really don't have much choice in getting married. We are conditioned to believe it is a positive step in one's life. Most of us fall in line, never questioning it. A lot of people do not even speak up when they they are unhappy in the marriage and those that do are shunned by society and look at as inferior or flawed. This is likely why polygamy is so unpopular because it does not fit into the expected behavior.
Polygamy is certainly more natural then monogamy because we are not a monogamous species. However no marriage is psychologically healthier then any amount of marriage.
Odette said:
polygyny is way more "natural" than monogamy anyway. most cultures in the world practice it. Happily.
Like, Morgan said, why should we care who marries who as long as its consentual?
i can't believe i have a somewhat conservative viewpoint on this i suppose... i am quite likely close-minded but i picture it not being much of a choice for some of those women and them not being 'happy'. but i suppose choice is relative... not considering the cultural/religious pressures etc. i admit i am ignorant, who am i to say they don't enjoy fulfilling those roles...
No, I know what you mean, and when it comes to certain religious sects I get uncomfortable about the subject as well. But what it comes down to is that it isn't my right to judge who is and isn't truly "happy". Many people get married now who aren't really happy with their choice, they just do it because it's expected. While I think that is sad, I have no reason or right to deny those people the right to marry, yes? Giving people equal rights also means giving them the right to make mistakes, and the right to do things we might not personally understand.
So I figure, yes, some women might not be truly happy in their poly marriages. But that doesn't make me want to ban poly marriages IN GENERAL. It just makes me wish people were wiser about their life choices. Then again, I wish that all the time.
I don't necessarily know how I feel about polygamy as a practice because I don't know how I feel about monogamy as a practice. I can't really differentiate between my own feelings and what may or may not be what someone else once told me should be my feelings. I want one wife, and I want her to have one husband, but whether or not that is "natural", I can't say. I'm more inclined to learn towards the belief that open sexual relationships are more in line with our biology but that our humanity desires a committed relationship. I wish I fucking knew.
But with regards to this story in specifics, fuck it, I don't understand why its illegal in the first place. We already have laws that say you can't marry or fuck underage girls. We have laws that you can't fuck unwilling girls (and I'm assuming you can't marry them, either). So why this law?
The most ironic thing of it all is that in all the discussions I've ever had on the topic, the most vehement attackers of polygamy are usually Christians of one form or another. They say that polygamy is unnatural, that it stands in opposition with the Bible-ordained institution of marriage, that it possibly breaks the Commandments. And yet almost every single dude in the Bible has at least two wives. Adam was the very first dude, and he had multiple wives. Solomon was such a good dude that God was like, "Play on, playa'." and gave him hundreds of wives and concubines as a reward. That guy was in bed with a different piece of trim every night from that moment until the day he died. What did God say? God said, "Verily, thou shalt take thy salty wenches, of which I have given you, and thou shalt take thy big titty bitches, and thy salacious rumpshakers, and thou shalt command them to get on all fours and build of themselves a human pyramid as a glorious monument to Va-Jay Jay, of which even the Lord thy God is fond."
Hafu said:
think this article forgot to mention that that most of these marriages are forced by the leaders of the church. inbreeding is common.
That'd depend on the sect.
I'd be more wont to support their right to marry as many folks as they wanted if it went both ways.
In other words, a woman could marry multiple men, as well.
What they generally have now is a situation where teenaged daughters are in demand, and teenaged sons are seen as competition. This leads to the "lost boys" scenarios.
Boys in their teens get driven off, and sometimes wind up as male prostitutes in SLC and elsewhere. Or taken off the town/compound to be sub-minimum under-the-table workers in the sect's off-premise businesses.
If you're interested learning more about fundamentalist Mormon and Christian polygamy, there's a good read to be found in the book "God's Brothel," by Andrea Moore-Emmett. It certainly has a anti-polygamist bent to it, but after you read a few of the stories, this won't come to any surprise to you.
evanharos
I'm lost
May 2007
JUN 12, 2007 02:41 PM