Lifestyle

TOPICS:

Previous

PAGE: 

1 ... 

123 | 124 | 125

 ... 954

Next

Previous

PAGE: 

1 | 2

Next

Chainlink

Chainlink

Key West, FL
August 2005

JUN 10, 2007 06:43 PM

Niobe said:

chainlink said:

Niobe said:

Thrasher said:

Niobe said:
I still don't know what movie you guys are talking about. I get this one mixed up with Total Recall. Is Arnold even in this one? confused



really?



Really. Or is this the one with Harrison Ford?



Yes. Thats the one !



I knew I would figure it out eventually. I don't think I have seen it, though. tongue



mmm, it is the old school goodness. A must see, no doubt, if you have any love of sci-fi at all.

trocc

trocc

Chicago, IL
March 2003

JUN 10, 2007 06:47 PM


attack ships on fire...

Chainlink

Chainlink

Key West, FL
August 2005

JUN 10, 2007 07:06 PM

trocc said:


attack ships on fire...



as much as I love that it should probably come with a little warning or a spoiler or something.

trocc

trocc

Chicago, IL
March 2003

JUN 10, 2007 07:18 PM

chainlink said:

trocc said:


attack ships on fire...



as much as I love that it should probably come with a little warning or a spoiler or something.


yeah, you're probably right. my bad. it just feels like something everyone should know and love already. wink

MrCrisp

MrCrisp

I'm lost
August 2004

JUN 10, 2007 07:27 PM

trocc said:


attack ships on fire...



god that scene makes me tear up every time. damn you!

oh yeah, and there are some of the flaws:

SPOILERS! (Click to view)
the dove flies up from a dark rainy scene into a clear blue sky.

there's a bunch of doves in the abandoned building, but how is this possible when all animals are dead and replaced with replicant animals? it's not really discussed extensively in the movie, but in the novel a find such as a single living dove, let alone a measly spider, would be a rare occurrence.

Cassiel

Cassiel

Aurora, CO
September 2004

JUN 11, 2007 12:32 PM

MrCrisp said:

trocc said:


attack ships on fire...



god that scene makes me tear up every time. damn you!

oh yeah, and there are some of the flaws:

SPOILERS! (Click to view)
the dove flies up from a dark rainy scene into a clear blue sky.

there's a bunch of doves in the abandoned building, but how is this possible when all animals are dead and replaced with replicant animals? it's not really discussed extensively in the movie, but in the novel a find such as a single living dove, let alone a measly spider, would be a rare occurrence.



only now do i tear up at that scene after viewing the film a thousand times

as for your 'flaws'

SPOILERS! (Click to view)

there are only two instances in the film before this that mention replicant animals (the owl and the snake)...this does not mean, within the universe of the film, that ALL animals are replicants

as for the dove flying off into the blue sky, that my friend, is called symbolism (and it is beautiful) and if you can't see that, then I am sad. That was his soul going off to a better place...yes, he wasn't a real human being, but he strived to be, and he deserved that final gorgeous moment

MrCrisp

MrCrisp

I'm lost
August 2004

JUN 11, 2007 02:15 PM

Cassiel said:

MrCrisp said:

trocc said:


attack ships on fire...



god that scene makes me tear up every time. damn you!

oh yeah, and there are some of the flaws:

SPOILERS! (Click to view)
the dove flies up from a dark rainy scene into a clear blue sky.

there's a bunch of doves in the abandoned building, but how is this possible when all animals are dead and replaced with replicant animals? it's not really discussed extensively in the movie, but in the novel a find such as a single living dove, let alone a measly spider, would be a rare occurrence.



only now do i tear up at that scene after viewing the film a thousand times

as for your 'flaws'

SPOILERS! (Click to view)

there are only two instances in the film before this that mention replicant animals (the owl and the snake)...this does not mean, within the universe of the film, that ALL animals are replicants

as for the dove flying off into the blue sky, that my friend, is called symbolism (and it is beautiful) and if you can't see that, then I am sad. That was his soul going off to a better place...yes, he wasn't a real human being, but he strived to be, and he deserved that final gorgeous moment



night leap of faith there. still the scene had that symbolism without the damn editing mistake. really. it did. anyways, there are plenty more editing and continuity errors. it's a flawed film, even ridley scott thinks so. still, it's one of my favorites and i can't wait for the new version.

Cassiel

Cassiel

Aurora, CO
September 2004

JUN 11, 2007 02:26 PM

MrCrisp said:

Cassiel said:

MrCrisp said:

trocc said:


attack ships on fire...



god that scene makes me tear up every time. damn you!

oh yeah, and there are some of the flaws:

SPOILERS! (Click to view)
the dove flies up from a dark rainy scene into a clear blue sky.

there's a bunch of doves in the abandoned building, but how is this possible when all animals are dead and replaced with replicant animals? it's not really discussed extensively in the movie, but in the novel a find such as a single living dove, let alone a measly spider, would be a rare occurrence.



only now do i tear up at that scene after viewing the film a thousand times

as for your 'flaws'

SPOILERS! (Click to view)

there are only two instances in the film before this that mention replicant animals (the owl and the snake)...this does not mean, within the universe of the film, that ALL animals are replicants

as for the dove flying off into the blue sky, that my friend, is called symbolism (and it is beautiful) and if you can't see that, then I am sad. That was his soul going off to a better place...yes, he wasn't a real human being, but he strived to be, and he deserved that final gorgeous moment



night leap of faith there. still the scene had that symbolism without the damn editing mistake. really. it did. anyways, there are plenty more editing and continuity errors. it's a flawed film, even ridley scott thinks so. still, it's one of my favorites and i can't wait for the new version.



i guess i'm more willing and able to forgive mistakes in film than most people, for the sake of being involved with the story (and for being in my chosen field).

MrCrisp

MrCrisp

I'm lost
August 2004

JUN 11, 2007 02:41 PM

Cassiel said:

MrCrisp said:

Cassiel said:

MrCrisp said:

trocc said:


attack ships on fire...



god that scene makes me tear up every time. damn you!

oh yeah, and there are some of the flaws:

SPOILERS! (Click to view)
the dove flies up from a dark rainy scene into a clear blue sky.

there's a bunch of doves in the abandoned building, but how is this possible when all animals are dead and replaced with replicant animals? it's not really discussed extensively in the movie, but in the novel a find such as a single living dove, let alone a measly spider, would be a rare occurrence.



only now do i tear up at that scene after viewing the film a thousand times

as for your 'flaws'

SPOILERS! (Click to view)

there are only two instances in the film before this that mention replicant animals (the owl and the snake)...this does not mean, within the universe of the film, that ALL animals are replicants

as for the dove flying off into the blue sky, that my friend, is called symbolism (and it is beautiful) and if you can't see that, then I am sad. That was his soul going off to a better place...yes, he wasn't a real human being, but he strived to be, and he deserved that final gorgeous moment



night leap of faith there. still the scene had that symbolism without the damn editing mistake. really. it did. anyways, there are plenty more editing and continuity errors. it's a flawed film, even ridley scott thinks so. still, it's one of my favorites and i can't wait for the new version.



i guess i'm more willing and able to forgive mistakes in film than most people, for the sake of being involved with the story (and for being in my chosen field).



oh believe me, i still get involved with the story, understand why all the scenes are shot the way they are, the symbolism, the point of it all. of course. it's just that watching the film so many times, it's not hard to miss all the mistakes. seriously, i'm only being realistic by admitting there are flaws to the film, it's not a criticism that's without warrant, but it also isn't in any way a pan of the movie. i'm a staunch defender of the film, especially the director's cut, but at least i'll admit that it could be better.

Cassiel

Cassiel

Aurora, CO
September 2004

JUN 11, 2007 03:01 PM

MrCrisp said:

Cassiel said:

MrCrisp said:

Cassiel said:

MrCrisp said:

trocc said:


attack ships on fire...



god that scene makes me tear up every time. damn you!

oh yeah, and there are some of the flaws:

SPOILERS! (Click to view)
the dove flies up from a dark rainy scene into a clear blue sky.

there's a bunch of doves in the abandoned building, but how is this possible when all animals are dead and replaced with replicant animals? it's not really discussed extensively in the movie, but in the novel a find such as a single living dove, let alone a measly spider, would be a rare occurrence.



only now do i tear up at that scene after viewing the film a thousand times

as for your 'flaws'

SPOILERS! (Click to view)

there are only two instances in the film before this that mention replicant animals (the owl and the snake)...this does not mean, within the universe of the film, that ALL animals are replicants

as for the dove flying off into the blue sky, that my friend, is called symbolism (and it is beautiful) and if you can't see that, then I am sad. That was his soul going off to a better place...yes, he wasn't a real human being, but he strived to be, and he deserved that final gorgeous moment



night leap of faith there. still the scene had that symbolism without the damn editing mistake. really. it did. anyways, there are plenty more editing and continuity errors. it's a flawed film, even ridley scott thinks so. still, it's one of my favorites and i can't wait for the new version.



i guess i'm more willing and able to forgive mistakes in film than most people, for the sake of being involved with the story (and for being in my chosen field).



oh believe me, i still get involved with the story, understand why all the scenes are shot the way they are, the symbolism, the point of it all. of course. it's just that watching the film so many times, it's not hard to miss all the mistakes. seriously, i'm only being realistic by admitting there are flaws to the film, it's not a criticism that's without warrant, but it also isn't in any way a pan of the movie. i'm a staunch defender of the film, especially the director's cut, but at least i'll admit that it could be better.



hunh. i acknowledge the flaws and all, but i disregard them always. i've blinded myself to them, i suppose, which could be a good or bad thing depending on the situation. blade runner will always be blade runner to me, regardless of the version or whatever else. it's a perfect film to me.

but yes, i am excited for the 25th anniversary release of it. i'm dying to see it in a proper theatre.

MrCrisp

MrCrisp

I'm lost
August 2004

JUN 21, 2007 04:11 PM

there's a trailer out for the new dvd/hd-dvd/blu-ray release!



love

SignalNoise

SignalNoise

USA
February 2004

JUN 21, 2007 04:21 PM

I love this movie, but I actually like the *original* cut - with the voice over. In my opinion, the voice over adds to the noir feel and improves the world building. I just Ford's delivery of it too - world weary and no nonsense.

MrCrisp

MrCrisp

I'm lost
August 2004

JUN 21, 2007 04:26 PM

SignalNoise said:
I love this movie, but I actually like the *original* cut - with the voice over. In my opinion, the voice over adds to the noir feel and improves the world building. I just Ford's delivery of it too - world weary and no nonsense.



or maybe even...robotic!

Chainlink

Chainlink

Key West, FL
August 2005

JUN 21, 2007 04:34 PM

MrCrisp said:

at least i'll admit that it could be better.





mydogfarted

mydogfarted

Oakland, NJ
June 2003

JUN 22, 2007 12:50 PM



Is this testing whether I'm a replicant or a lesbian, Mr. Deckard?

Previous

PAGE: 

1 | 2

Next