the dove flies up from a dark rainy scene into a clear blue sky.
there's a bunch of doves in the abandoned building, but how is this possible when all animals are dead and replaced with replicant animals? it's not really discussed extensively in the movie, but in the novel a find such as a single living dove, let alone a measly spider, would be a rare occurrence.
the dove flies up from a dark rainy scene into a clear blue sky.
there's a bunch of doves in the abandoned building, but how is this possible when all animals are dead and replaced with replicant animals? it's not really discussed extensively in the movie, but in the novel a find such as a single living dove, let alone a measly spider, would be a rare occurrence.
only now do i tear up at that scene after viewing the film a thousand times
there are only two instances in the film before this that mention replicant animals (the owl and the snake)...this does not mean, within the universe of the film, that ALL animals are replicants
as for the dove flying off into the blue sky, that my friend, is called symbolism (and it is beautiful) and if you can't see that, then I am sad. That was his soul going off to a better place...yes, he wasn't a real human being, but he strived to be, and he deserved that final gorgeous moment
the dove flies up from a dark rainy scene into a clear blue sky.
there's a bunch of doves in the abandoned building, but how is this possible when all animals are dead and replaced with replicant animals? it's not really discussed extensively in the movie, but in the novel a find such as a single living dove, let alone a measly spider, would be a rare occurrence.
only now do i tear up at that scene after viewing the film a thousand times
there are only two instances in the film before this that mention replicant animals (the owl and the snake)...this does not mean, within the universe of the film, that ALL animals are replicants
as for the dove flying off into the blue sky, that my friend, is called symbolism (and it is beautiful) and if you can't see that, then I am sad. That was his soul going off to a better place...yes, he wasn't a real human being, but he strived to be, and he deserved that final gorgeous moment
night leap of faith there. still the scene had that symbolism without the damn editing mistake. really. it did. anyways, there are plenty more editing and continuity errors. it's a flawed film, even ridley scott thinks so. still, it's one of my favorites and i can't wait for the new version.
the dove flies up from a dark rainy scene into a clear blue sky.
there's a bunch of doves in the abandoned building, but how is this possible when all animals are dead and replaced with replicant animals? it's not really discussed extensively in the movie, but in the novel a find such as a single living dove, let alone a measly spider, would be a rare occurrence.
only now do i tear up at that scene after viewing the film a thousand times
there are only two instances in the film before this that mention replicant animals (the owl and the snake)...this does not mean, within the universe of the film, that ALL animals are replicants
as for the dove flying off into the blue sky, that my friend, is called symbolism (and it is beautiful) and if you can't see that, then I am sad. That was his soul going off to a better place...yes, he wasn't a real human being, but he strived to be, and he deserved that final gorgeous moment
night leap of faith there. still the scene had that symbolism without the damn editing mistake. really. it did. anyways, there are plenty more editing and continuity errors. it's a flawed film, even ridley scott thinks so. still, it's one of my favorites and i can't wait for the new version.
i guess i'm more willing and able to forgive mistakes in film than most people, for the sake of being involved with the story (and for being in my chosen field).
the dove flies up from a dark rainy scene into a clear blue sky.
there's a bunch of doves in the abandoned building, but how is this possible when all animals are dead and replaced with replicant animals? it's not really discussed extensively in the movie, but in the novel a find such as a single living dove, let alone a measly spider, would be a rare occurrence.
only now do i tear up at that scene after viewing the film a thousand times
there are only two instances in the film before this that mention replicant animals (the owl and the snake)...this does not mean, within the universe of the film, that ALL animals are replicants
as for the dove flying off into the blue sky, that my friend, is called symbolism (and it is beautiful) and if you can't see that, then I am sad. That was his soul going off to a better place...yes, he wasn't a real human being, but he strived to be, and he deserved that final gorgeous moment
night leap of faith there. still the scene had that symbolism without the damn editing mistake. really. it did. anyways, there are plenty more editing and continuity errors. it's a flawed film, even ridley scott thinks so. still, it's one of my favorites and i can't wait for the new version.
i guess i'm more willing and able to forgive mistakes in film than most people, for the sake of being involved with the story (and for being in my chosen field).
oh believe me, i still get involved with the story, understand why all the scenes are shot the way they are, the symbolism, the point of it all. of course. it's just that watching the film so many times, it's not hard to miss all the mistakes. seriously, i'm only being realistic by admitting there are flaws to the film, it's not a criticism that's without warrant, but it also isn't in any way a pan of the movie. i'm a staunch defender of the film, especially the director's cut, but at least i'll admit that it could be better.
the dove flies up from a dark rainy scene into a clear blue sky.
there's a bunch of doves in the abandoned building, but how is this possible when all animals are dead and replaced with replicant animals? it's not really discussed extensively in the movie, but in the novel a find such as a single living dove, let alone a measly spider, would be a rare occurrence.
only now do i tear up at that scene after viewing the film a thousand times
there are only two instances in the film before this that mention replicant animals (the owl and the snake)...this does not mean, within the universe of the film, that ALL animals are replicants
as for the dove flying off into the blue sky, that my friend, is called symbolism (and it is beautiful) and if you can't see that, then I am sad. That was his soul going off to a better place...yes, he wasn't a real human being, but he strived to be, and he deserved that final gorgeous moment
night leap of faith there. still the scene had that symbolism without the damn editing mistake. really. it did. anyways, there are plenty more editing and continuity errors. it's a flawed film, even ridley scott thinks so. still, it's one of my favorites and i can't wait for the new version.
i guess i'm more willing and able to forgive mistakes in film than most people, for the sake of being involved with the story (and for being in my chosen field).
oh believe me, i still get involved with the story, understand why all the scenes are shot the way they are, the symbolism, the point of it all. of course. it's just that watching the film so many times, it's not hard to miss all the mistakes. seriously, i'm only being realistic by admitting there are flaws to the film, it's not a criticism that's without warrant, but it also isn't in any way a pan of the movie. i'm a staunch defender of the film, especially the director's cut, but at least i'll admit that it could be better.
hunh. i acknowledge the flaws and all, but i disregard them always. i've blinded myself to them, i suppose, which could be a good or bad thing depending on the situation. blade runner will always be blade runner to me, regardless of the version or whatever else. it's a perfect film to me.
but yes, i am excited for the 25th anniversary release of it. i'm dying to see it in a proper theatre.
I love this movie, but I actually like the *original* cut - with the voice over. In my opinion, the voice over adds to the noir feel and improves the world building. I just Ford's delivery of it too - world weary and no nonsense.
SignalNoise said:
I love this movie, but I actually like the *original* cut - with the voice over. In my opinion, the voice over adds to the noir feel and improves the world building. I just Ford's delivery of it too - world weary and no nonsense.
Chainlink
Key West, FL
August 2005
JUN 10, 2007 06:43 PM