Lifestyle

TOPICS:

Previous

PAGE: 

1 ... 

115 | 116 | 117

 ... 944

Next

Previous

PAGE: 

1 | 2 | 3

Next

SomethingStupid

SomethingStupid

North Hollywood, CA
March 2004

JUN 04, 2007 07:43 AM

brett54 said:
I'm starting feel like the avant garde one,

no piercings
no tatts
pink lungs

Just some un-authorized genital mutilation (though, I approve of the result).

Wouldn't you be a bit concerned it could all go "Pete Tong"?


We should start a club. I propose The Boring Brigade as a name.

FancyUltraFresh

FancyUltraFresh

Saint Louis, MO
May 2007

JUN 04, 2007 08:14 AM

Lufy said:
Okay....inner lip ("mouth" not "vaj") tattoos sounded like the most painful body-mod one could do to one's self....

....until this. Sticking a NEEDLE thick enough to inject collagen into your G-spot. Wow. I'd imagine that's a rarified breed that can do that.

I get nervy when I go to the dentist. blackeyed



i got my inner lip done as my first tattoo, two months after i turned 18. it really wasn't that bad, it was over in about 5 minutes and i was eating tacos for dinner about an hour later. i also have my hood pierced and all i really felt was a second or less of pain when he did it.

the thing about pain is that you have some control over it. while having a doctor shove a needle up my hoo-hah does SOUND scary, i'm willing to bet that if i took a few deep breaths and went over some mantras, i'd be totally fine.

it's not about the nerve endings and the brain responses. it's about how you decide to react to what you are feeling. so i say if you have the correct mindset, go for it!

Dru_Id

Dru_Id

Florence, SC
October 2006

JUN 04, 2007 08:49 AM

wouldn't this hurt ALOT, your talking about streaching one of the most senistive nerve clusters in the human body

Dru_Id

Dru_Id

Florence, SC
October 2006

JUN 04, 2007 08:50 AM

TedKoppel said:

brett54 said:
I'm starting feel like the avant garde one,

no piercings
no tatts
pink lungs

Just some un-authorized genital mutilation (though, I approve of the result).

Wouldn't you be a bit concerned it could all go "Pete Tong"?


We should start a club. I propose The Boring Brigade as a name.



+1

Cassiel

Cassiel

Aurora, CO
September 2004

JUN 04, 2007 09:24 AM

'aesthetic gynecology' sounds like something out of the film 'Dead Ringers'

RileyStClair

RileyStClair

Los Angeles, CA
September 2006

JUN 04, 2007 09:50 AM

Cassiel said:
'aesthetic gynecology' sounds like something out of the film 'Dead Ringers'



seriously
*shudder*

it's just an awful phrase, regardless of the results.

Cassiel

Cassiel

Aurora, CO
September 2004

JUN 04, 2007 09:55 AM

yourfashionwar said:

Cassiel said:
'aesthetic gynecology' sounds like something out of the film 'Dead Ringers'



seriously
*shudder*

it's just an awful phrase, regardless of the results.



yay, someone else has seen the film!

asdeputas

asdeputas

Uruguay
December 2006

JUN 04, 2007 10:11 AM

interesting.....

_Jordan_

_Jordan_

San Diego, CA
February 2007

JUN 04, 2007 10:16 AM

Subrosa said:

geo35 said:

stigmatamartyr13 said:
what a waste of money. for the record, anyone who gets this done is retarded. if you don't have the fucking energy to orgasm because you're too "busy" it may be time for a lifestyle change.

this is just lazy. "it takes to long to cum". well then maybe her husband needs to learn some new techniques. or buy a g-spot stimulating dildo for, i dunno, about $1750 dollars cheaper and teach your man how to use it.

plastic surgery for anything other than fixing some kind of horrible deformity or accident should be outlawed anyways. it's a quick fix for people who can't learn to love themselves for who they are, and no amount of surgery will fix that. first the tits, next it will be something else. talk about a disgusting level of vanity.



puke



I don't know about "outlawed," but yeah, these are good points. This procedure and the reasoning behind it sounds weird and/or goofy on sooooo many levels.




Yeah, people looking to improve their sex lives are STUPID! What assholes! whatever

Did it ever occur to you people that sexual dysfunction is a real problem for some people? And that just "learning some new techniques" or "changing your lifestyle" may not work for everyone?

Honestly, I'm a bit surprised that everyone here seems to be so against this idea. It's a simple, non-harmful, non-dangerous procedure with possibly far-reaching positive side effects. BURN IT!



+1 Damn those women for wanting sexual pleasure!

geo35

geo35

Minneapolis, MN
January 2003

JUN 04, 2007 10:19 AM

Subrosa said:

geo35 said:

stigmatamartyr13 said:
what a waste of money. for the record, anyone who gets this done is retarded. if you don't have the fucking energy to orgasm because you're too "busy" it may be time for a lifestyle change.

this is just lazy. "it takes to long to cum". well then maybe her husband needs to learn some new techniques. or buy a g-spot stimulating dildo for, i dunno, about $1750 dollars cheaper and teach your man how to use it.

plastic surgery for anything other than fixing some kind of horrible deformity or accident should be outlawed anyways. it's a quick fix for people who can't learn to love themselves for who they are, and no amount of surgery will fix that. first the tits, next it will be something else. talk about a disgusting level of vanity.



puke



I don't know about "outlawed," but yeah, these are good points. This procedure and the reasoning behind it sounds weird and/or goofy on sooooo many levels.




Yeah, people looking to improve their sex lives are STUPID! What assholes! whatever

Did it ever occur to you people that sexual dysfunction is a real problem for some people? And that just "learning some new techniques" or "changing your lifestyle" may not work for everyone?

Honestly, I'm a bit surprised that everyone here seems to be so against this idea. It's a simple, non-harmful, non-dangerous procedure with possibly far-reaching positive side effects. BURN IT!



Relax, counselor. Nobody said people who are looking to improve their sex lives are stupid assholes. Yes, we're aware that sexual dysfunction is a real problem and that pharmaceutical or surgical intervention is called for in some cases. It didn't sound to me like this was one of them.

I guess I just have a problem with runaway science. I bet most of us guys would agree that Hefner at age 80 dropping Viagra so that he can keep banging three 20-something girlfriends is definitely (to borrow your words) a "simple, non-harmful, non-dangerous procedure with far-reaching positive side effects" (for Hefner). Nonetheless, there's something about women in their 20's sleeping with 80-year-old guys that seems to me to be - as I stated in my original post - "kinda' weird and goofy." My point being that sometimes intervention is called for and sometimes it's just best to let nature run its course.

Trahern

Trahern

United Kingdom
March 2003

JUN 04, 2007 10:51 AM

Anyone who's watched the Doctor Who episode "The End of the World" knows where the whole plastic surgury thing will end up in five billion years...

KMatt

KMatt

Royal Oak, MI
February 2006

JUN 04, 2007 11:41 AM

I've had this done, highly recommended, 9/10.

Lufy

Lufy

Ithaca, NY
May 2004

JUN 04, 2007 12:29 PM

geo35 said:

Subrosa said:

Yeah, people looking to improve their sex lives are STUPID! What assholes! whatever

Did it ever occur to you people that sexual dysfunction is a real problem for some people? And that just "learning some new techniques" or "changing your lifestyle" may not work for everyone?

Honestly, I'm a bit surprised that everyone here seems to be so against this idea. It's a simple, non-harmful, non-dangerous procedure with possibly far-reaching positive side effects. BURN IT!



Relax, counselor. Nobody said people who are looking to improve their sex lives are stupid assholes. Yes, we're aware that sexual dysfunction is a real problem and that pharmaceutical or surgical intervention is called for in some cases. It didn't sound to me like this was one of them.

I guess I just have a problem with runaway science. [snip]



+1 to that last comment.

I think part of the discrepancy here is the difference between cause and effect. The "effect" is an inability to enjoy sex - and that's a serious problem, you're right. But what's the cause?

If the woman mentioned was some modern Frida Kahlo who needed the operation because of some horrible tragedy in her past and the procedure will fix it - then, hell yeah, sign her up if she wants to do it. Or if it's a woman with a physical deformity that prevents her from engaging in either meaningful or not-so-meaningful sexual contact - and this is the fix - I doubt you'll find too many people here who would say this procedure is a bad idea. I'm certainly not one of them.

But when you're using a medical procedure, (I don't care how minor it is, and that's not really the point, anyway) to correct what really is a lifestyle issue.......well, I'm sorry but I'm going to call "bullshit vanity masquerading as scientific progress" when I feel I see it.

In the above woman's case (Roberts) - I feel I see it.

metalmermaid

metalmermaid

Mojave, CA
April 2007

JUN 04, 2007 04:32 PM

And five years from now we're going to hear about how this is a linked to a new form of cunt cancer...
zoom image

Necia

Necia

San Francisco, CA
August 2005

JUN 04, 2007 04:37 PM

Zeriah said:
Sex isn't as simple as people seem to think it is...a lot of things effect your amount of pleasure.



Thank you.

To imply that this woman having a stressful life that wears her down and affects her sexual response isn't a valid reason to have something like this done is kind of bullshit. Also, in case no one noticed, this woman is a mother. The potential effects of giving birth on the pleasure derived from vaginal penetration or stimulation might have been lost on some here who don't have vaginas, but it wasn't lost on me. Your vagina changes after you give birth. True story.

The female orgasm is complicated. The G-spot orgasm is, like, triply so. For some people here to be saying that this woman is just lazy and has her priorities wrong is pretty shitty and ill-informed, especially when those people don't have vaginas. I'm not going to run around telling guys why they have a hard time getting off, or that the reason they can't stay hard because their priorities are wrong or whatever, because I don't have a cock. I wouldn't know firsthand how various things affect cocks, aside from what I'm told by cock owners. I defer to cock owners when it comes to how they experience sexual pleasure via the cock. Some of you cock owners ought to show a bit more deference to the woman in this article when it comes to how she experiences sex and sexual pleasure via her vagina, since she is a vagina owner and you are not.

Necia

Necia

San Francisco, CA
August 2005

JUN 04, 2007 04:49 PM

stigmatamartyr13 said:
what a waste of money. for the record, anyone who gets this done is retarded. if you don't have the fucking energy to orgasm because you're too "busy" it may be time for a lifestyle change.

this is just lazy. "it takes to long to cum". well then maybe her husband needs to learn some new techniques. or buy a g-spot stimulating dildo for, i dunno, about $1750 dollars cheaper and teach your man how to use it.



And how did I know when I read your comment and a response to it on Page 3, before seeing your profile pic, that you don't have a vagina? Do tell me if I'm wrong--I apologize wholeheartedly if I've made untrue assumptions based on your profile pic.

If I'm right, though, that is the height of arrogance. You don't even possess the same organs--how is it your place to tell someone she's ridiculous for doing something that will potentially enhance her ability to experience sexual pleasure when all you know about how she experiences sexual pleasure is incomplete secondhand info at the very, very best? Who are you to tell someone why her orgasmic equipment isn't functioning as she'd like it to when you (assumedly) don't have the same set of orgasmic equipment (and, assumedly, are not a doctor and have not spent years and years studying how said equipment works)? What do you know about the female orgasm, and what do you know about potential difficulties in achieving one? What qualifies you to know better than the owner of a vagina what's necessary or potentially useful for achieving pleasure from said vagina? Who are you to tell her that she's just too "lazy" or "retarded" to come?

Like I said: pretty fucking arrogant. I'm not saying that I think g-spot injections are necessarily an awesome idea; I'm not a doctor, and I don't know the potential effects. But I am saying that you are passing judgment from a place of absolutely zero authority or expertise here, and you ought to knock it off.

joker_

joker_

Minneapolis, MN
October 2005

JUN 04, 2007 05:43 PM

I surprised about the men posting negative responses to this. Like Necia has already pointed out we don't have Vaginas.
My opinion: If it helps a woman enjoy greater sexual pleasure, then they should go for it.

As for the ridiculous idea that a lifestyle change is what is needed?

She is a mother, she goes to school, she takes care of the kid. Chances are she is going to school for career advancement purposes, and after that she will still need to take care of the kid no matter how she changes her lifestyle in the immediate future. The woman wants to spend a little cash for what appears to be a relatively harmless procedure to have a little more sexual fun. I'm failing to see anything wrong with that.

You'd want her to do what exactly?

Moderncutthroat

Moderncutthroat

Philadelphia, PA
May 2006

JUN 04, 2007 06:55 PM

I am shocked but oddly intrigued.

BraveArt

BraveArt

Los Angeles, CA
February 2004

JUN 04, 2007 09:22 PM

geez people, adult humans can do whatever the fuck they want to their own sexual organs---pierce them, tattoo them, stretch them, hang barbells on them, cut them off, or paint them purple and run them up a fucking flag pole

(of course the flag pole would probably have to be on your own private property, or you are gonna get sued)

montestruc

montestruc

Houston, TX
June 2004

JUN 04, 2007 09:36 PM

Maybe an alternative material would last longer. Cartilage?, A mini saline implant?, Maybe a tantalum button. Those would be more work and longer recovery time but might well last a very long time.

I love science too love biggrin

bendingunit23

bendingunit23

Victoria, BC
April 2005

JUN 05, 2007 07:41 PM

I'm not entirely concinced that Karen Roberts isn't ______ suicide's real name.

Previous

PAGE: 

1 | 2 | 3

Next