NEWS: Who Wants to Get Their G-Spot Pierced?

We should start a club. I propose The Boring Brigade as a name.

i got my inner lip done as my first tattoo, two months after i turned 18. it really wasn't that bad, it was over in about 5 minutes and i was eating tacos for dinner about an hour later. i also have my hood pierced and all i really felt was a second or less of pain when he did it.

the thing about pain is that you have some control over it. while having a doctor shove a needle up my hoo-hah does SOUND scary, i'm willing to bet that if i took a few deep breaths and went over some mantras, i'd be totally fine.

it's not about the nerve endings and the brain responses. it's about how you decide to react to what you are feeling. so i say if you have the correct mindset, go for it!

wouldn't this hurt ALOT, your talking about streaching one of the most senistive nerve clusters in the human body

+1

'aesthetic gynecology' sounds like something out of the film 'Dead Ringers'

seriously
*shudder*

it's just an awful phrase, regardless of the results.

yay, someone else has seen the film!

interesting.....

+1 Damn those women for wanting sexual pleasure!

Relax, counselor. Nobody said people who are looking to improve their sex lives are stupid assholes. Yes, we're aware that sexual dysfunction is a real problem and that pharmaceutical or surgical intervention is called for in some cases. It didn't sound to me like this was one of them.

I guess I just have a problem with runaway science. I bet most of us guys would agree that Hefner at age 80 dropping Viagra so that he can keep banging three 20-something girlfriends is definitely (to borrow your words) a "simple, non-harmful, non-dangerous procedure with far-reaching positive side effects" (for Hefner). Nonetheless, there's something about women in their 20's sleeping with 80-year-old guys that seems to me to be - as I stated in my original post - "kinda' weird and goofy." My point being that sometimes intervention is called for and sometimes it's just best to let nature run its course.

Anyone who's watched the Doctor Who episode "The End of the World" knows where the whole plastic surgury thing will end up in five billion years...

I've had this done, highly recommended, 9/10.

+1 to that last comment.

I think part of the discrepancy here is the difference between cause and effect. The "effect" is an inability to enjoy sex - and that's a serious problem, you're right. But what's the cause?

If the woman mentioned was some modern Frida Kahlo who needed the operation because of some horrible tragedy in her past and the procedure will fix it - then, hell yeah, sign her up if she wants to do it. Or if it's a woman with a physical deformity that prevents her from engaging in either meaningful or not-so-meaningful sexual contact - and this is the fix - I doubt you'll find too many people here who would say this procedure is a bad idea. I'm certainly not one of them.

But when you're using a medical procedure, (I don't care how minor it is, and that's not really the point, anyway) to correct what really is a lifestyle issue.......well, I'm sorry but I'm going to call "bullshit vanity masquerading as scientific progress" when I feel I see it.

In the above woman's case (Roberts) - I feel I see it.

And five years from now we're going to hear about how this is a linked to a new form of cunt cancer...

Thank you.

To imply that this woman having a stressful life that wears her down and affects her sexual response isn't a valid reason to have something like this done is kind of bullshit. Also, in case no one noticed, this woman is a mother. The potential effects of giving birth on the pleasure derived from vaginal penetration or stimulation might have been lost on some here who don't have vaginas, but it wasn't lost on me. Your vagina changes after you give birth. True story.

The female orgasm is complicated. The G-spot orgasm is, like, triply so. For some people here to be saying that this woman is just lazy and has her priorities wrong is pretty shitty and ill-informed, especially when those people don't have vaginas. I'm not going to run around telling guys why they have a hard time getting off, or that the reason they can't stay hard because their priorities are wrong or whatever, because I don't have a cock. I wouldn't know firsthand how various things affect cocks, aside from what I'm told by cock owners. I defer to cock owners when it comes to how they experience sexual pleasure via the cock. Some of you cock owners ought to show a bit more deference to the woman in this article when it comes to how she experiences sex and sexual pleasure via her vagina, since she is a vagina owner and you are not.

And how did I know when I read your comment and a response to it on Page 3, before seeing your profile pic, that you don't have a vagina? Do tell me if I'm wrong--I apologize wholeheartedly if I've made untrue assumptions based on your profile pic.

If I'm right, though, that is the height of arrogance. You don't even possess the same organs--how is it your place to tell someone she's ridiculous for doing something that will potentially enhance her ability to experience sexual pleasure when all you know about how she experiences sexual pleasure is incomplete secondhand info at the very, very best? Who are you to tell someone why her orgasmic equipment isn't functioning as she'd like it to when you (assumedly) don't have the same set of orgasmic equipment (and, assumedly, are not a doctor and have not spent years and years studying how said equipment works)? What do you know about the female orgasm, and what do you know about potential difficulties in achieving one? What qualifies you to know better than the owner of a vagina what's necessary or potentially useful for achieving pleasure from said vagina? Who are you to tell her that she's just too "lazy" or "retarded" to come?

Like I said: pretty fucking arrogant. I'm not saying that I think g-spot injections are necessarily an awesome idea; I'm not a doctor, and I don't know the potential effects. But I am saying that you are passing judgment from a place of absolutely zero authority or expertise here, and you ought to knock it off.

I surprised about the men posting negative responses to this. Like Necia has already pointed out we don't have Vaginas.
My opinion: If it helps a woman enjoy greater sexual pleasure, then they should go for it.

As for the ridiculous idea that a lifestyle change is what is needed?

She is a mother, she goes to school, she takes care of the kid. Chances are she is going to school for career advancement purposes, and after that she will still need to take care of the kid no matter how she changes her lifestyle in the immediate future. The woman wants to spend a little cash for what appears to be a relatively harmless procedure to have a little more sexual fun. I'm failing to see anything wrong with that.

You'd want her to do what exactly?

I am shocked but oddly intrigued.

geez people, adult humans can do whatever the fuck they want to their own sexual organs---pierce them, tattoo them, stretch them, hang barbells on them, cut them off, or paint them purple and run them up a fucking flag pole

(of course the flag pole would probably have to be on your own private property, or you are gonna get sued)

Maybe an alternative material would last longer. Cartilage?, A mini saline implant?, Maybe a tantalum button. Those would be more work and longer recovery time but might well last a very long time.

I love science too

I'm not entirely concinced that Karen Roberts isn't ______ suicide's real name.