Juliana said:
I am lame because I am the only person here who feels sorry for both the inmate and the bird for having been separated. And after all that effort!
After all that birdie went through isn't only fair he decide where to stay? I thought the dog was man's best friend but then again I have an uncle that smuggled a drunk parrot across the border in his pocket maybe the bird was just having some drinks and Bam in the cooch it went
magpieboy said:
Parakeets are a subgroup of parrots. Budgerigars are actually Australian in origin, and thus not parakeets. They are however, still parrots of sorts.
Budgeriagars are parakeets. They are synonyms, but not mutually exclusive because parakeet also describes a few other parrots.
I wish the forum had a Vinn diagram widget; that would be fun!
Juliana said:
I am lame because I am the only person here who feels sorry for both the inmate and the bird for having been separated. And after all that effort!
Nope, you're not. I fully understand why a prison can't allow that, but I still feel sorry for they guy.
Juliana said:
I am lame because I am the only person here who feels sorry for both the inmate and the bird for having been separated. And after all that effort!
Nope, you're not. I fully understand why a prison can't allow that, but I still feel sorry for they guy.
You feel sorry for a druglord who sold heroin to kids and murdered a journalist, because he can't have his parrot ?
TheFox said:
I'm just curious as to why the inmates having pets (barring animal abuse) is a bad thing...?
I would believe the extra cost to tax payers, having to feed them and possibly hiring of people to clean up after them (assuming the prisioners don't do it) and maybe in the case of a riot, the last thing the guards need is the prisoners pets jumping in to.
d20
San Francisco, CA
September 2003
MAY 14, 2007 09:47 PM