Lifestyle

TOPICS:

Previous

PAGE: 

1 ... 

119 | 120 | 121

 ... 944

Next

Previous

PAGE: 

1 | 2

Next

Rahodeb

Rahodeb

Los Angeles, CA
March 2006

MAY 08, 2007 01:28 PM



A friend of mine walked into a 7-Eleven recently, eyed the tasty beverages, and then asked the guy behind the counter, "Do you have Cocaine?"

He just kind of looked at her funny. "Huh?" He asked.

"Cocaine," she repeated. "Do you carry Cocaine? It's a gosh-darned energy drink, mang."

Okay, so maybe she didn't say "gosh-darned," and she definitely didn't say "mang," but she was hard up for a liquid boost and Cocaine was the drink of the hour. Marketed as "liquid cocaine" and "speed in a can," and sold in at least twelve states since last August, the beverage has unsurprisingly ruffled some feathers. Now it's been pulled from stores due to "concerns about its name."

The Food and Drug Administration issued a warning letter last month that said Redux was illegally marketing the drink as a street drug alternative and a dietary supplement.

"Our goal is to literally flush Cocaine down the drain across the nation," said Connecticut Attorney General Richard Blumenthal, who announced the company's agreement with his state Monday. "Our main complaint about Cocaine is its name and marketing strategy seeking to glorify illegal drug use and exploit the allure of marketing 'Speed in a Can,' as it called the product."

Clegg Ivey, a partner in Redux Beverages, the company that produces Cocaine, thinks that the FDA et al are totally tweaking, and defends the product name and marketing strategy as "tongue-in-cheek."

"We like to think we have a great sense of humor," he said. "And our market, primarily folks from ages 20 to 30, they love the ideas, they love the name, they love the whole campaign. These are not drug users."

Yes, indeed. They love the ideas, the name, the campaign, the heart-racy fabulous jittery feeling that they can buzzbuzzbuzz through anything because they are 20 to 30-somethings who don't do drugs. Still, whether or not Cocaine drinkers are cocaine users isn't really the point, is it? It seems that this has become a hazy question of social responsibility and ethics, though not necessarily FDA rule breaking. Would a fashion line called "Heroin" inspire the same concern? A record label called "Crack Rock?"

"Of course, we intended for Cocaine energy drink to be a legal alternative the same way that celibacy is an alternative to premarital sex," Ivey said. "It's not the same thing and no one thinks it is. Our product doesn't have any cocaine in it. No one thinks that it does. We think it is most likely legal in the United States to ship our product."

Redux plans to sell the drink under a new name for the time being.

RileyStClair

RileyStClair

Los Angeles, CA
September 2006

MAY 08, 2007 04:08 PM

after hearing about how severely underfunded the FDA is, so that it can't even inspect much of what's coming in to american ports from overseas, it's not exactly comforting to hear they are using the few hard-earned tax dollars they do have to go after a marketing scheme.

such an incredibly small number of people would actually think the energy drink is made with blow (and what exactly would their damages be--the price of a can of the stuff that upon discovering its completely legal content they would have otherwise spent that three bucks on about four molecules of actual cocaine?)

when you consider how many pets were harmed by the recent pet food contamination incident and the potential for harmful food additives to get into the country's food supply and harm people (i.e. potentially everyone who EATS), doesn't it seem like protecting the like six absolute retards who would buy this drink thinking it had coke in it is just downright stupid?

Rahodeb

Rahodeb

Los Angeles, CA
March 2006

MAY 08, 2007 04:14 PM

not to mention they'd be being protected from, um, caffeine. wait, huh?

Aeryka

Aeryka

SUICIDEGIRL

Illinois, USA

MAY 08, 2007 04:15 PM

lol lets laugh at the fact that when Coca-Cola first came out it has coke in it. and now just cuz a drink has a name and doesnt even have it in it they all freak out.

im gonna go start a fashion line called Heroin now.

RileyStClair

RileyStClair

Los Angeles, CA
September 2006

MAY 08, 2007 04:18 PM

Helen_Jupiter said:
not to mention they'd be being protected from, um, caffeine. wait, huh?



yeah, wouldn't we rather have them hopped up on caffeine than coke anyway?

who's exactly losing something here?

"cocaine" is a powerful word. it's attention-grabbing. if i wanted to make an energy drink and call it "blood of virgins" would the FDA shut me down too because no virgins were actually harmed in the manufacturing process?

Aeryka

Aeryka

SUICIDEGIRL

Illinois, USA

MAY 08, 2007 04:20 PM

i would totally drink that.

whatcha drinkin?

the blood of virgins! mwahahahahaha! ::slurp sip:: tongue

MrStitches

MrStitches

Brooklyn, NY
November 2003

MAY 08, 2007 04:22 PM

I am pleased that my tax dollars pay for this shit. Seriously. It doesn't piss me off at all.

Cigarette

Cigarette

Cleveland, OH
April 2004

MAY 08, 2007 04:26 PM

Helen_Jupiter said:
It seems that this has become a hazy question of social responsibility and ethics, though not necessarily FDA rule breaking. Would a fashion line called "Heroin" inspire the same concern? A record label called "Crack Rock?"



How about a record label called Murder, Inc. or Death Row? Or a fashion line called "fcuk"?

RileyStClair

RileyStClair

Los Angeles, CA
September 2006

MAY 08, 2007 04:26 PM

Aeryka said:
i would totally drink that.



me too!
you wanna start a business?

AceT

AceT

Portland, OR
April 2004

MAY 08, 2007 04:27 PM

Wasn't this a story on the Daily Show a while back?

I think they should go after Coca-Cola next.

Roethke

Roethke

SUICIDEGIRL

California, USA

MAY 08, 2007 04:35 PM

I don't understand what law the FDA is using to yank it from the shelves.

dishonesty in advertising, maybe? Does anyone think that a cherry ever came anywhere near Cherry Coke?

RileyStClair

RileyStClair

Los Angeles, CA
September 2006

MAY 08, 2007 04:40 PM

Roethke said:
I don't understand what law the FDA is using to yank it from the shelves.

dishonesty in advertising, maybe? Does anyone think that a cherry ever came anywhere near Cherry Coke?



that's kind of what i'm wondering too. i'd like to see some official correspondence from the FDA citing to some regulation. helen asked me about it actually and i told her the only basis i could think of for objecting to the name would be some type of consumer protection law, like prohibiting deceptive advertising, but that doesn't seem to fly here, as i said above.

i know very little about FDA regulations, but i can't imagine what grounds the FDA would rely on here.

Cassiel

Cassiel

Aurora, CO
September 2004

MAY 08, 2007 04:44 PM

yourfashionwar said:

Aeryka said:
i would totally drink that.



me too!
you wanna start a business?



Making the ads would be a blast. Sign me up.

RileyStClair

RileyStClair

Los Angeles, CA
September 2006

MAY 08, 2007 04:47 PM

Cassiel said:

yourfashionwar said:

Aeryka said:
i would totally drink that.



me too!
you wanna start a business?



Making the ads would be a blast. Sign me up.



you can direct our commercials.

MetaTag

MetaTag

United Kingdom
September 2002

MAY 08, 2007 05:09 PM

Drug inspired drink names. How about Can of Piss? wink

dragonflower

dragonflower

Austin, TX
January 2007

MAY 08, 2007 05:56 PM

hey, i'm working on a beer by that name!! copyright, muthafukka! puke

Xadrick

Xadrick

Clayton, NC
April 2007

MAY 08, 2007 06:01 PM

While we're at it, I'm gonna start a band called Crystal Meth-od....oh.....


SHIT!


smile

hellointernet

hellointernet

Saint Petersburg, FL
March 2007

MAY 08, 2007 06:20 PM

Helen_Jupiter said:
Redux plans to sell the drink under a new name for the time being.



Whizz?
Chazz?
Fishscale?

SocietysPliers

SocietysPliers

Ocala, FL
October 2004

MAY 08, 2007 06:53 PM

yourfashionwar said:
after hearing about how severely underfunded the FDA is, so that it can't even inspect much of what's coming in to american ports from overseas, it's not exactly comforting to hear they are using the few hard-earned tax dollars they do have to go after a marketing scheme.

Exactly what I was thinking. A while back I'd seen a full-page article in the paper about the controversy and figured it wouldn't last, if it ever came out. I was right. Never even got to try it.

Now, that Blood of Virgins sounds intriguing. Let me now when you guys start it flowing.

SnakePlissken

SnakePlissken

Corvallis, OR
December 2002

MAY 08, 2007 06:56 PM

I prefer a good Dickens Cider.

TAFKASP

TAFKASP

Oakland, CA
June 2003

MAY 08, 2007 07:01 PM



SocietysPliers

SocietysPliers

Ocala, FL
October 2004

MAY 08, 2007 07:11 PM

Boom boom, ain't it great to be crazy?

SnakePlissken said:
I prefer a good

Dickens Cider
.

I love those Dickens Cider ads, but can't find the first one I ever heard, which was my favourite.

makebelieve

makebelieve

Clemmons, NC
February 2007

MAY 08, 2007 07:27 PM

haha as soon as I heard about this drink coming out I knew this would happen.

RileyStClair

RileyStClair

Los Angeles, CA
September 2006

MAY 08, 2007 07:52 PM

SocietysPliers said:

yourfashionwar said:
after hearing about how severely underfunded the FDA is, so that it can't even inspect much of what's coming in to american ports from overseas, it's not exactly comforting to hear they are using the few hard-earned tax dollars they do have to go after a marketing scheme.

Exactly what I was thinking. A while back I'd seen a full-page article in the paper about the controversy and figured it wouldn't last, if it ever came out. I was right. Never even got to try it.

Now, that Blood of Virgins sounds intriguing. Let me now when you guys start it flowing.



yeah, the main obstacle is finding some virgins in los angeles. we should incorporate in utah.

Cassiel

Cassiel

Aurora, CO
September 2004

MAY 08, 2007 07:53 PM

yourfashionwar said:

SocietysPliers said:

yourfashionwar said:
after hearing about how severely underfunded the FDA is, so that it can't even inspect much of what's coming in to american ports from overseas, it's not exactly comforting to hear they are using the few hard-earned tax dollars they do have to go after a marketing scheme.

Exactly what I was thinking. A while back I'd seen a full-page article in the paper about the controversy and figured it wouldn't last, if it ever came out. I was right. Never even got to try it.

Now, that Blood of Virgins sounds intriguing. Let me now when you guys start it flowing.



yeah, the main obstacle is finding some virgins in los angeles. we should incorporate in utah.



HEY-O!

Previous

PAGE: 

1 | 2

Next