NEWS: Stoners are Psychotic

Yeah, that's what it pretty much is boiling down to.

The long and the short of it is this. We live in a world of over 6 billion people. Research that Is based on 150 healthy, 15 unhealthy patients is not a credible number. Also this experiemnt lacks habitual repetition. The science community accepts that experimentation must be repeated over and over to establish a consistant trend. This experiemnt was only conducted once. Therefore its results should have not even been published, let alone been considered valid.
My next point would be to ask the sciencist to check his dealer...what does a lab tug monkey know about weed?...only that they want a strand with a good viable source of t.h.c This leads me to believe in part that they probably engineered their own test marijuana. It is beyond believable that they simply went to a dealer or police confiscation facitility and asked for some. I would also suspect being the tug monkeys they are, that they hydro grew a very mean strain of weed. I also believe that these same people in their spare time develop new food additives and preservatives for commercial food companies. Think of any story you have heard o fa chemist making their own cocaine..has this story ended with the line "They had the meanest, pure coke.."
I would also like to add that research conducted in Australia in 2006 discovered this information. That being scratched by your cat can give you a 0.1 percent chance of developing szechornia. The bacteria they carry on their claws is infact the same bacteria that if contracted in good dose can also degenerate the part of the brain that if such degeneration were to occur here, it would lead to the condition. The fact of the matter is that mental health is a greatly under funded research, and we still only know a very little about its causes and it effects and how to effectively treat it.
Also in australia in 2004 40 volunteers were asked to participate in an experiment. It involved half of them being asked to smoke marijuana each day for 2 weeks and after each session to preform a driving test under controlled conditions. The hypothesis of the researchers was to test whether marijuana affecedt users ability to operate a vechicle. They believed it would. They found that it was the opposite. This research was dismissed straight away on the grounds that it was not a large enough sample of people and that it lacked repetiton for a long enough period. Yet here we see a test preformed only once being held as credible.

It would help if they actually knew more about the brain... sad... receptors for the cannabinol found all throughout the brain, could have lit up the MRI, and for them to simply state that this particular region of the brain is specified for this or that..is just ludicris...like they really know... then maybe they'd choose to help us instead of mangle us with expensive pharmacueticals

What the hell's a tug monkey?

And why would being a research chemist preclude them from smoking weed? The Chairman of the Board of the third largest auto insurer in America is a total pothead. They're everywhere.

Tug monkeys. My big book of Totally Real Facts You Probably Shouldn't Question reliably informs me it's a sailor monkey with a stripy t shirt on.

Research chemists are usually drug tested on a regular basis. Pharmaceutical companies are a tad more wary of drug users than the auto insurance industry, for obvious reasons.

But if there's one group of people who know how to circumvent chemical tests, it's these guys.

You drink too much beer, you can't stop, and it fucks up yer life = alcoholic

You smoke too much pot, you can't stop, and it fucks up yer life = weed addict

(don't even front like you don't know a weed addict or two)

beer = legal

legal weed = a great idea

me = ex weed addict

this ex weed addict = don't regret the past nor wish to shut the door on it

Band name alert!

True. I used to be the guy who graded the whiz quizzes, and if I wanted to get around them, I could have.

Of course, when asked for advice on the surest way to pass one, I'd always reply with the truth:

If anything's likely to work, it's that.

Well you're certainly proof of that

MH as an insult? Well done. Now tell us how you feel about spazzers and mongers.

VILE WEED!!!!!!!!

Also, don't eat delicious treats that'e been dusted with poppy seeds.

Absolutely true. Myself, I doubted there would be enough of any opium-related substance in them, as they're not even made with seed of the opium poppy, but when we were testing out a bunch of myths (incidentally, the REAL Mythbusters later also proved this true) we found if you ate copius amounts of poppy seeds, you might test positve for opiates.

On a barely related note, mouthwash is NOT an excuse for a high blood alcohol content. I had a girl swish Scope around for a full minute an blow a breathalyzer, and while it registered too high to even calculate, 10 minutes later she blew a 0.0. It's because the breath test tests air coming up from the lubgs, not th mouth.

Oops, The air comes up from the lungs. The 'lubgs' paly no role in breath alcohol testing at this point.

The truth is that everyone has different chemistry going on in that brain of theirs. It's pointless for anyone to argue the SUBJECTIVE effects of chemicals, unless they can test every human on the planet.

Wingdings?

No it's not. That's the dumbest thing I've ever heard. And I saw High School Musical this weekend. A really bad production of it. So I know dumb.

Fuck off man.

uh, i think he was being sarcastic.

It keeps my boy happy and when I am in pain [I have neurological tourettes syndrom] it helps lessen the pain.

Gah! double posting, sorry!

just as she was likely being going for comic relief, perhaps related to caffeine puting its users on edge. Or perhaps the caffeine has her on edge.

Speaking of which: QUIT FUCKING WITH US COFFEE DRINKERS!!!!

*Smashes mug into TV which is airing a decaf commercial*