Lifestyle

TOPICS:

3/25/07
3/21/07
3/20/07

Previous

PAGE: 

1 ... 

58 | 59 | 60 | 61 | 62

 ... 882

Next

johnnyfu

johnnyfu

Hartford, CT
March 2003

MAR 21, 2007 09:37 AM





Normally, if a controversial international babillion dollar corporation is seeking to change the language, it would be cause for alarm. The idea smacks of corporate, Orwellian mind control tactics. Alarmist outcry seems justified.



But if it's McDonald's trying to rebrand the word McJob, I say fuck it. Go with it.



Currently, the word is defined by the Oxford English Dictionary, the Bible for word usage and coinage, as "an unstimulating, low-paid job with few prospects, esp. one created by the expansion of the service sector." The British branch of McDonald's is preparing a public petition to get the definition changed, continuing a year-old effort to change public perception of McEmployment. Similar actions were taken by their American corporate counterparts in 2003, to no avail.



According to the OED, the word was first used in print in 1986 by the Washington Post. Of course, it gained a lot of cultural currency when it was used in Douglas Coupland's 1991 debut novel, Generation X: Tales for an Accelerated Culture, a document that has aged about as well as a Roxette cassingle. As much as I honestly do like Coupland's writing, that initially over-praised book is so culturally irrelevant now it's fairly repellent. Thinking on it now, I'd like to throttle the book's rootless, culturally alienated characters and ask them how 9-11 affected their middle class ennui.



Is the term McJob as anachronistic as the rest of the book, though? I think so. A Nexis search for instances of the word "McJob" in news articles in the last two years revealed that while the word was often used in the OED sense, mostly it was used as short hard for jobs at fast food joints, most often at McDonald's. (A lot of articles were about Kevin Smith, which is interesting, but not surprising.)



There's no way to quantify how McJob or any other slang word is used colloquially. Still, I'm pretty sure the last time I heard the word come out of someone's mouth, 4 Non Blondes was playing on a top 40 radio station. I



The amateur cultural gatekeepers scurrying over Wikipedia apparently don't give a shit about the term either - much of the entry for McJob is a defense of burger flipping gigs, including quotes from former McDonald's CEO James Cantalupo.



We should let McDonald's have its stupid word. In return, we'll keep "burger flipping," "dead-end jobs" and the knowledge that working at McDonald's sucks.

BlastProcessing

BlastProcessing

USA
OLD SKOOL

MAR 21, 2007 10:04 AM

God forbid they actually change the parameters of McDonald's jobs so that they no longer fit the definition.

Tarqu1n

Tarqu1n

Bhutan
February 2005

MAR 21, 2007 10:31 AM

McDonalds has probably already paid to have the Wki entry changed to meet their corpotate expectations.

As for the term, railing against it as much as they like, their lawyers must realize that they can have no sway over language unless they start paying their burger flippers $20+ an hour.

That would change the meaning of the word pretty quick.

bardsatyr

bardsatyr

Morrisville, NC
November 2006

MAR 21, 2007 10:59 AM

Perhaps WalJob would be the modern equivalent though. I believe McJobs may actually pay more than some WalJobs... Plus, there doesn't seem to be a barrier into management for women with a McJob.

Sean

Sean

STAFF

Los Angeles, CA

MAR 21, 2007 12:40 PM

you think gen x didnt hold up, try reading shampoo planet again. yikes.

PointBlank

PointBlank

New York, NY
November 2004

MAR 21, 2007 12:54 PM

McDonald's wants the entry changed to:

McJob: [n], any exciting, fast-paced job with limitless growth staffed by charming young people and hip senior citizens. Example: How's my McJob? Why dadadadadahh I'm lovin' it!!

RileyStClair

RileyStClair

STAFF

Los Angeles, CA

MAR 21, 2007 12:55 PM

plus, everyone knows no one who works at mcdonald's speaks english anyway.

_DictionaryGirl_

_DictionaryGirl_

NEWSWIRE

San Diego, CA

MAR 21, 2007 01:13 PM

Douglas Coupland is like five different kinds of God.

Additionally, they can change the dictionary definition all they want, but until they get around to changing the quality-of-work conditions themselves, everyone will still know exactly what the fuck it means.

_DictionaryGirl_

_DictionaryGirl_

NEWSWIRE

San Diego, CA

MAR 21, 2007 01:14 PM

PointBlank said:

Example: How's my McJob? Why dadadadadahh I'm lovin' it!!



I just burst out laughing in the middle of the library.

NathanialBlood

NathanialBlood

United Kingdom
August 2006

MAR 21, 2007 01:30 PM

I think they actually get paid more than I do whatever

thefreak

thefreak

NEWSWIRE

Gardner, MA

MAR 21, 2007 02:43 PM

PointBlank said:
Example: How's my McJob? Why dadadadadahh I'm lovin' it!!


Dammit man, when are you not full of cheeky wit?

I mean that in all seriousness. I busted out laughing @this one.

-TM

AndersWolleck

AndersWolleck

Astoria, NY
February 2003

MAR 21, 2007 02:46 PM

Do you believe in magic?

poptard

poptard

United Kingdom
November 2003

MAR 21, 2007 02:56 PM

johnnyfu said:
We should let McDonald's have its stupid word. In return, we'll keep "burger flipping," "dead-end jobs" and the knowledge that working at McDonald's sucks.



i kinda liked it when i worked at mcdonalds

sure i got fat and i smelt after work, but i ate my weight in Mcnuggets and drunk so much coke it became a problem, but i was happy

sixtyfootqueenie

sixtyfootqueenie

Australia
January 2004

MAR 21, 2007 04:01 PM

I think gen x is still current. lost losers doing nothing with their lives...

I worship the man.

PointBlank

PointBlank

New York, NY
November 2004

MAR 21, 2007 05:30 PM

McDonalds' suggested new word?


The BK Toiler.



SPOILERS! (Click to view)
One thread, two jokes!! I give the people what they want!

swedrock

swedrock

Louisville, KY
October 2005

MAR 21, 2007 06:10 PM

If you look at from 30,000 feet it seems to me that the US has not much to offer for the future in jobs for a "middle class" that many of our parents had in the 50's and 60's. No corporation is creating it. There will always be a corporation that will feed at the bottom for what ever short time to scrape the last off. I'm beginning to wonder if we are not where it is at, economically........

Dru_Id

Dru_Id

Florence, SC
October 2006

MAR 21, 2007 08:17 PM


"Dictionaries are supposed to be paragons of accuracy. And in this case, they got it completely wrong," said Walt Riker, a McDonald's spokesman. "It's a complete disservice and incredibly demeaning to a terrific work force and a company that's been a jobs and opportunity machine for 50 years."



Arn't McJobs by definition Deamening lets see:

McJob:
"an unstimulating, low-paid job with few prospects, esp. one created by the expansion of the service sector."

Yea I think Demeaning would fit there also

I have a McJob and honistly id rather do Mike Rowe's laundry.

brett54

brett54

Australia
November 2004

MAR 21, 2007 08:43 PM

McFat
McTrans-fatty-acid
McCalorie

For the manufacturing sector,

Wu-Job
Li-Job
Chen-Job