Lifestyle

TOPICS:

4/24/07
4/21/07

Previous

PAGE: 

1 ... 

60 | 61 | 62 | 63 | 64

 ... 888

Next

Previous

PAGE: 

1 | 2 | 3

Next

NathanialBlood

NathanialBlood

United Kingdom
August 2006

FEB 27, 2007 03:11 AM

Necia said:

freshprncebelair said:
It's so we have something to look at while a woman is talking, duh!



If only we were so lucky when talking to you!



Look at his pants and then laugh biggrin

LordAuch

LordAuch

Los Angeles, CA
April 2005

FEB 28, 2007 09:49 PM

In most animals swollen breasts mean that the female is ready to mate, sort of a sign, I believe that humans are the only species that has constantly swollen breasts. Just a vestige of our animal pasts.

And thank dog for em!

ckdexterhaven

ckdexterhaven

Redding, CA
December 2005

APR 24, 2007 12:41 AM

breasts are so overrated. don't get me started.
ass FTW!!!

RudieCantFail

RudieCantFail

Intercourse, PA
January 2006

APR 24, 2007 01:11 AM

CKDexterHaven said:
breasts are so overrated. don't get me started.
ass FTW!!!



vagina > breasts+ass

That's my theory, anyways tongue

MisterEnrolled

MisterEnrolled

Birmingham, AL
October 2005

APR 24, 2007 04:38 AM

What does capitalisation of the direct object mean?

chikinhammr

chikinhammr

Orlando, FL
April 2006

APR 25, 2007 04:38 PM

wildswan said:
I'm highly disappointed that there are no actual photos of the anatomical feature in question.


I echo that sentiment.

GrateWhiteSmurf

GrateWhiteSmurf

Butler, PA
November 2006

APR 25, 2007 05:37 PM

The statement


tit-obsession is "only natural"


is total bunk. There have been plenty of tribal people who lived around the equator and have lived totally nude

I don't recall where, but I remember reading that one idea for why women have breasts is that the pre-hominid male chose a mate by looking at the females ass, like baboons bright red asses. As man became erect the ass was no longer at eye level, or close to eye level, but the breasts were, thus the females with larger breasts mated more. Thus breasts have no real evolutionary advantage, but they had no disadvantage either.

Truly I don't care why they're there, I'm just glad that they are.

BOOBIES!!

TheFuckOffKid

TheFuckOffKid

NEWSWIRE

Australia

APR 25, 2007 06:36 PM

GrateWhiteSmurf said:
The statement


tit-obsession is "only natural"


is total bunk. There have been plenty of tribal people who lived around the equator and have lived totally nude



That does not imply that "absence of tit-obsession is 'only natural'".

*headshake*

TheFuckOffKid

TheFuckOffKid

NEWSWIRE

Australia

APR 25, 2007 06:37 PM

crusnik said:
God put breast for a women not only to look them sexy or whatever...
it was there for breast feeding..............biggrin tongue



As pointed out earlier in this thread, that's not what breasts are for, it's what nipples are for.

Ask a few other mammals.

Previous

PAGE: 

1 | 2 | 3

Next