fpkk said:
I personally don't like them. I can see all the little tricks and stuff in the writing and in HPs case it bothers me because it's supposed to be subtle, or it's intended to be subtle and it's not (well, not to me anyway).
I can read something like Dan Brown on the other hand because it's about as subtle as crotchless panties and just as unashamed about it.
What the hell is supposed to be subtle about Harry Potter?
I refer you to all the stuff earlier in the thread about muggles being an analogy for people who have lost all sense of wonder... and the fact that it is a pretty classic hero myth that tries to play things a little differently but in pretty obvious ways... and it takes a tone to adults of 'this is what fiction for children was like way back when, remember?'
There are just things about Rowling's agenda that are not supposed to be overt about the stories but which kind of are.
To contrast a DB book is like someone going... "Look I ripped off all this neat shit from an alternative history book AND PUT IN CAR CHASES!" which is endearingly dumb.
fpkk
United Kingdom
June 2003
JUN 29, 2005 01:50 PM