ALL RIGHT WHO'S THE ASSHOLE?

you may find this simialr to another thread but.....
I just saw someone tagged a set as LUMPY BREAST IMPLANTS.
real fucking classy, does anyone know if there is a way to track who put the titles on the tags?
I hope they get the dreaded ZOT.
pretty fucking cheesey

Ding ding ding.

that really fuckin sucks.

I don't know who he is but, I hear he works under the code name "Tiny Penis."
There's been a lot of immature shit going on lately especially with new members who sign on and then start stupid threads only they could really appreciate. Sometimes when you open up the floodgates a little dirt gets in the water.

Whats the "9 month thing"?

you have to have been a member here for at least 9 months before you can flag posts to bring them to the attention of a moderator.

That is some bullshit right there.

Why let every dick in the join tagg pics anyway? I've noticed some real inappropriate shit too.
Staff or the SG or the photographer can't brainstorm enough tags themselves ?

Yeah, I saw that too. These tags (while a great idea) seem to be proving the old adage about anonymity and asshole-dom. I think the name of the person tagging should definitely be viewable.

I think that sounds reasonable. If your name is connected to it, you're (probably) not going to be a dickhead.

Some comments:
1. Is there a way to see who put the tag on? ie. put the members name next to the tag.
2. a LOT more girls are now medically altered (and photoshop'ed), some for the better, some for the worst - I remember the 1st set I saw which had a girl with implants (around the time there was a tie up with Playboy) - I didn't think that was for the best - the TAGS will end up having a critical edge - something all art has to live with (I'm not saying that the TAG is appropriate or not though, just that is what will happen in an open environment).
3. the TAGS should be clever, witty, a run of poetry - David Bowie gets lyrics by cutting up has diary pages, reaching into a hat and pulling out a phrase or two - I'd like to see the TAGS be what they were probably intended to be, an avant garde mish-mash of peoples comments.

We can't have it both ways.

That's what they were supposed to be?

I liked the thought of tags at first. If I feel like looking at pirate sets, I can pull all off them up at once.

But after I realized it was something members could do.... \

The 'best' tag I've see so far was "big breats". That and every single set has "tits" of "sexy" as a tag.

There's a thread on this already...

Oh! I just came across the set with the 'lumpy" comment. My guess is the same 'tard is responsible for it's other tags....

"un SG-like", "curtains", "the", "matches" and "carpet".

That mean and all over the map selection of comments should be reason enough to reconsider the tags. Or at least empose the 9 month rule.

that's just not cricket.

that thread seemed to be more about the application et all...they hadn't gotten to the crux of the biscut till later

I started this to vent at one this one thing, may sound excessive but I didn't want it to get lost in a thread that the person prolly wouldn't read anyways.This way I felt it was right there as a headline.

I just feel if you want cheesey porno where you can be rude there are a million places to go for that shit. One of the reasons I am a member here is because I eant to look at pics of sexy people, if they were getting mad rich(the models) maybe I'd say,meh. but they pretty much do it for little compensation and we all benifit. Add a jerk to the mix who has to type out his frusteration of being single and having a small cock, and people are going to pull his card.

I'm the Asshole.

I didn't however put any of those offensive tags on sets.

Though I did feel a wee bit guilty for putting "wet" on an underwater set. I just thought I'd give the pervies something to get excited about.

The term "negro" is about 40 years out of date, but it's hardly an ethnic slur. The United Negro College Fund still goes by that name.

Depends on the context and who's saying it, etc.

It's probably, by and large, not a great word to use.

On the other hand, the use of "colored" has come back, I think. NAACP always used it, but I've seen "people of color" and "women of color" a lot more lately. Hm.