i woke up to it on HERE

edited to add that it was the best thing in the world to wake and the first thing i see on my internet home page is Missy's beautiful face.

[Edited on Nov 06, 2005 by Alisa]

Dr_Bob

I'm lost

October 2005

NOV 06, 2005 07:08 AM

Yeah, We ran that article in the paper last night.

James

SUICIDEGIRL

USA

NOV 06, 2005 07:17 PM

to be honest im a bit nervous seeing my face on all of those news articles. makes my tummy a bit quesst. not sure if its a good or bad way yet.

Vixen

SUICIDEGIRL

I'm lost

NOV 06, 2005 07:22 PM

James said:
to be honest im a bit nervous seeing my face on all of those news articles. makes my tummy a bit quesst. not sure if its a good or bad way yet.

Well... at least you look as gorgeous as ever on them!!! ... and that's a fact!

CrazyWhiteGirl

Austin, TX

December 2004

NOV 06, 2005 07:31 PM

VitrioliCunt

I'm lost

March 2004

NOV 11, 2005 06:02 PM

bit late to say it, but i don't actually view that article as very positive about sg; it openly points out a negative element of the ipod thing - that videos can be downloaded by children, if they know how and so wish. what is good about that?

so a hypothetical, a worst case scenario if you will.

before ipod thing: an sg who is a proud and happy mother tries to express herself creatively in nakeed photographic sets, and through the course of doing so for sg, also does a video that gives the paying members an even more personable and intimate idea of the sg. sounds not bad right?

after ipod thing: an sg with sprogs finds that a video they happily did to be seen by the paying members of legal age, is now accessable to anyone who knows how to download it, including their child, and any child in the world with the ability. that's just great.

i don't have or want an ipod, but i've been told by people who have downloaded the videos that it is indeed the case that you can just download it anywhere and not have to be a member to do so.

i don't wish to sound theatrical or anything, but even if few people here care that archived girls are now downloadable, at least shouldn't new revenue projects like this be a no go if lil sprogs can be viewing them? in a legal if not moral sense.

so how is that good?

it undermines the members who join and pay, and are sposed to have a genuine interest in the ethos of this community,

it undermines any model who personally feels that they don't want people to think that she models for an irresponsible site that is accessible to minors (perhaps even their own children)

and it disrespectful to models who have chosen or have been forced to leave this site (who in both cases, it is at least accurate that they have terminated the suggestion that they are currently happy, willing and proud ambassadors of this site).

so please, correct me if i'm wrong, is it different now? do you have to go through rigorous checks of who you are to download them?

i love being proven totally wrong... but if you do chip in make sure you are right.

datsun

Richmond, CA

October 2004

NOV 11, 2005 06:10 PM

I got nothing - I was just gonna say that Missy looked cute in the picture.