TOPICS:
10/30/05
10/30/05
10/30/05
10/30/05
10/30/05
10/30/05
10/29/05
10/29/05
10/29/05
10/28/05
10/26/05
10/26/05
10/26/05
10/25/05
10/25/05
10/25/05
10/25/05
10/24/05
10/24/05
10/24/05
10/24/05
10/24/05
10/23/05
10/23/05
JohnClement
Silver Spring, MD
January 2004
OCT 28, 2005 11:11 AM
OCT 28, 2005 11:41 AM
damned_out_loud said:
Finch said:
EnfantTerrible said:
Why has nobody delt with the legal copyrighting ramifications, like I mentioned before?
He has a tattoo of a phrase that was someone else's invention and featured on copyrighted amterial.
Sean may feel as though his individuality was permantly damaged and seek legal action.
maybe.
[Edited on Oct 28, 2005 by EnfantTerrible]
you've got to be kidding me. 
in my opinion, those aren't even comparable.
OCT 28, 2005 04:43 PM
lol. i like the tattoo.
i'd give you a half-lifetime subscription. unfortunately, your life is more than half over (sorry to inform you), tho, so the point is moot.
EndedBen
Grand Rapids, MI
August 2004
OCT 28, 2005 10:59 AM