TOPICS:
OCT 23, 2005 12:34 PM
OCT 23, 2005 12:35 PM
Lhell
Dartmouth, NS
September 2005
OCT 23, 2005 12:35 PM
Thistle said:
check out the hopefuls group- there you will find an entire community of members who are interested in becoming SGs.
Oh really?? Thanks you! Guess I don't know my way around as well as I thought I did. 
OCT 23, 2005 05:34 PM
OCT 23, 2005 05:46 PM
Brie said:
An SG.
thanks.
my work here has already been done for me.
lilyk
I'm lost
December 2004
OCT 23, 2005 05:59 PM
Sitticus said:
I'm just curious how many, and seemingly what type of people that are on here from a day to day basis have actually tried to become one themselves. I know they get tons of applications a day, and yet, only somewhere between 1 and 3 new sets seem to go up per day... I don't know, maybe this is a dumb quesion, but I'm curious. 
well,
paul tsongas. but he didnt have the hips. nice tats though.
oh, and emanual lewis. but he didnt have good pic quality.
OCT 23, 2005 05:59 PM
Applied?
SG are created in a lab by a special team of scientists. 
OCT 23, 2005 06:04 PM
LuLuKiTTyFoo said:
Applied?
SG are created in a lab by a special team of scientists.
like 50 cent?
OCT 23, 2005 06:11 PM
OCT 23, 2005 06:18 PM
OCT 23, 2005 06:29 PM
OCT 23, 2005 06:33 PM
OCT 23, 2005 06:39 PM
Dubhglais said:
Rested said:
I would do it....but that whole tattoo thing....and of course the penis, has made me reluctant.
Kaziklu said:
I woke up this morning and I was still a male.. so I haven't applied.. but if I ever wake up and I'm a girl.. the second thing I would do is apply to be a SG
No problem guys, who wants to go first?
[Edited on Oct 24, 2005 by Dubhglais]
no for two reasons...
one the first thing I would do is shave unneed hair.
second ..boy should never be seen naked.. boy parts are ick
OCT 23, 2005 06:45 PM
Elijah said:
LuLuKiTTyFoo said:
Applied?
SG are created in a lab by a special team of scientists.
like 50 cent?
He's a scientist?
OCT 23, 2005 06:46 PM
Kaziklu said:
second ..boy should never be seen naked.. boy parts are ick
How can you expect anyone else to be into your body if you don't like it first?
OCT 23, 2005 06:49 PM
Kaziklu said:
no for two reasons...
one the first thing I would do is shave unneed hair.
second ..boy should never be seen naked.. boy parts are ick
YOUR OPINION IS WRONG.
OCT 23, 2005 06:53 PM
Elijah said:
LuLuKiTTyFoo said:
Applied?
SG are created in a lab by a special team of scientists.
like 50 cent?
bwahahaha!
OCT 23, 2005 06:57 PM
StephenDedalus said:
Kaziklu said:
no for two reasons...
one the first thing I would do is shave unneed hair.
second ..boy should never be seen naked.. boy parts are ick
YOUR OPINION IS WRONG.
Yeah...but I dont think I have the 'balls' for the part!
Wait wait...that sounded bad! 
OCT 23, 2005 07:00 PM
Rested said:
StephenDedalus said:
Kaziklu said:
no for two reasons...
one the first thing I would do is shave unneed hair.
second ..boy should never be seen naked.. boy parts are ick
YOUR OPINION IS WRONG.
Yeah...but I dont think I have the 'balls' for the part!
Wait wait...that sounded bad!
*Quoted before you have chance of editing*
OCT 23, 2005 07:01 PM
StephenDedalus said:
Kaziklu said:
no for two reasons...
one the first thing I would do is shave unneed hair.
second ..boy should never be seen naked.. boy parts are ick
YOUR OPINION IS WRONG.
yes but if I were to wake up a girl I'd shave of all that Scotich German Hair
and I'm fairly anti boy. (unless it's Johnny Depp or David Bowie *drool*) I just prefer girl parts in an artistic light. Boy parts are very useful for many things.. Peeing, sex, cherades, But not so fun to look at.. but that's just me.
And I'm of German, Scot/Irish. irish decent.. not italian/greek ick but it icky enough.
That being said. if I were a girl (even with my face) I would most likely want to do something like this. But I don't find boy artisticly beautiful (I should have qualified the statement a bit more)
Lhell
Dartmouth, NS
September 2005
OCT 23, 2005 12:32 PM