There are different form of Photoshop, as far as I know no boobs are being made bigger and no girl is being made skinnier, mostly it's scars like c-section scars, surgery or blemishes and correcting light, removing an outlet from a wall or stuff like that.
thats all i wanted to know because i was like none of these girls show any scars or anything it's like perfect skin tones and whatnot wish there was more originality in the pics but whatever just my opinion!
yeah to each his/her own but i would just preffer to see those things not like it's going to sway my judgement or anything people are beautiful in their own way but it's like when you see these girls on facebook with all sorts of sidways pics and slanted ones and you meet her in person and you're kind of like she looks nothing like her pictures ya feel me? more originality is all i am saying...
I don't see a problem in touching up certain things for a photo set. Personally, I think PS is kind of like makeup for photos. When done right and in moderate amounts there is nothing wrong with it. For example, if it's a close up shot of someones face and you remove a pimple that's what PS is for. Shopping an entire face until the texture is lost and it looks plastic-like is not a good use of PS. And like Thistle mentioned balancing the photos. It doesn't loose originality per each girl. Also, it's not very fair to compare the quality personal FB photos to professional published photo sets.
I have met well over 30 suicide girls and I have never once thought "dammit she looks nothing like her pictures" so I haven't seen that as an issue, I recognize all of my friends and acquaintances both in person and in their sets.
I also have allot of them on facebook and dude, we are human..we are not set-ready everyday (we shower, colour, pluck, primp, pick outfit, put on makeup pose util it hurts and THEN choose just around 30 of the best pics out of around 800 taken for that set)
My set prep can take hours, my everyday prep takes around 5-10 min and I wont hide that me just because I model..I like them both.
Unlike SG sets If we post a pic on facebook or walk around IRL we don't get payed for it, we don't do it to look sexy to members or with the intent that you should fap yourself silly to it.
MrNicola said:
yeah to each his/her own but i would just preffer to see those things not like it's going to sway my judgement or anything people are beautiful in their own way but it's like when you see these girls on facebook with all sorts of sidways pics and slanted ones and you meet her in person and you're kind of like she looks nothing like her pictures ya feel me? more originality is all i am saying...
I'm not sure originality is the word you're looking for. Maybe authenticity. You can't argue that models like Porphyria, Manko, and Vivid, to name a few, lack originality.
Even then I disagree, I don't think zits and wrinkles add to sets. Leaving that stuff in is distracting and discourages models who don't have naturally perfect skin.
MrNicola
North Olmsted, OH
October 2012
NOV 06, 2012 04:48 AM