Everything SG

TOPICS:

12/18/09
Locked

Previous

PAGE: 

1 ... 

10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14

 ... 319

Next

Previous

PAGE: 

1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6

 ... 11

Next

RENTny

RENTny

USA
November 2006

NOV 26, 2009 03:42 PM

So first off I want to say I'm a casual site user, but I joined like most everyone else because the idea of a site where people can be themselves and be original truly appealed to me and aside from the actual photos, the minds and thoughts on the site from the members and especially the SGs were fresh and open.

But over the past 2 years it has been interesting to read from SGs in particular how much the site has changed and maybe overall how much the site has driven away from its original intention toward something more conservative and reserved. From less risque sets, to obnoxious members tags and comments being allowed, to feelings of rejection for not fitting the mold, to changes in set acceptance percentages, to similar sets being accepted over and over again, to poor site design...and the girls and members who have the most fun here ultimately lose out as the original intention of the site seems to move further behind the curtain.

Read the SG blogs, and the boards and groups.

Dot's last blog is a good example of numerous sentiments echoed over and over in recent months.

I realize there are too many paying members that not everyone will be happy all the time. Granted. And I'm not suggesting a coup, but maybe the SGs on this site deserve a little more respect, and the members deserve to get what they paid for. I'd hate to think the site has literally become a picture hub where horny people download snap shots. I don't know how the SG community feels, the girls who put themselves out there not just in photos but emotionally, but I'd love to hear your thoughts. Maybe with enough input something may change for the better.

Of course if I'm way off, please say so also, maybe this viewpoint is only shared by a limited few.

Lotion

Lotion

Ontario, CA
April 2003

NOV 26, 2009 03:56 PM

By asking what's happened to "SG" do you mean that the you're suggesting the members of the community changed, the behavior of the members changed, the moderation policies of the moderators and staff changed, or the target demographic that are being advertised to and having members recruited from has changed?

The specific things that you've mentioned (minus the tags part) happened even before you joined. I would have to say it kindo happened right after I joined. That's right, bitches, I fucked SG up for everyone! biggrin

Rizzo

Rizzo

SUICIDEGIRL

Illinois, USA

NOV 26, 2009 04:49 PM

It's being overrun by Communists.

RENTny

RENTny

USA
November 2006

NOV 26, 2009 04:58 PM

All of the above beppo. Without a doubt. And if it changed that much since you joined then nothing seems to be stopping it. Like I said, there are too many members to make the small minority happy, but I wonder if the SGs feel the same way or they just accept it because the moderators and staff have this site on lockdown and what they say goes.

The SGs are the reason we're here...right, you'd think they'd look for their input to make this site as stellar as it can be. And a lot of the input isn't that positive. Maybe the SGs don't want to speak out, I can understand that, but the site is going to end up losing a lot of open minded, talented, and amazing girls.

Capote

Capote

Sao Tome And Principe
October 2007

NOV 26, 2009 05:10 PM


Rizzo said:
It's being overrun by Communists.



God damn Communists

noend

noend

USA
April 2006

NOV 27, 2009 01:34 AM

TheRue said:

Rizzo said:
It's being overrun by Communists.



God damn Communists



Commie bed-wetting types

h3ntie

h3ntie

USA
March 2009

NOV 27, 2009 01:44 AM

Rizzo said:
It's being overrun by Communists.



communists ruin everything

issue_

issue_

HOPEFUL

I'm lost

NOV 27, 2009 01:54 AM

RENTny said:


The SGs are the reason we're here....




WRONG!

i'm here for the peen shots in sg chat.

Luckie

Luckie

SUICIDEGIRL

United Kingdom

NOV 27, 2009 01:59 AM

RENTny said:
And I'm not suggesting a coup, but maybe the SGs on this site deserve a little more respect.



Thanks smile It's nice that at least someone thinks this. I agree with you.

I never understood the need to leave nasty feedback, comments or tags. There's no need for bitchyness on the site between anyone and I also have to stick up for the staff here because Rigel is a gem! Anytime we've got any problem, she's the superhero we call on and she's always there. She's a lovely lady and very helpful. Also, If there are offensive tags they get removed, etc etc.

I just dont see why people really feel the need to be so negative and offensive? if you dont like my set, click the big grey button that says 'not for me' thats what its there for instead of being jerky and leaving nasties as tags/comments. Were all human, what makes you think you're above any of us to talk down to us? same goes for the other way round.

I got 'Bad tattoos' left as a tag.....all I can say is, 'Each to their own'. I love my tattoos, I'm proud of them & I dont regret a single one. I can only feel sorry for people who comment negatively like this, because there's obviously some problem at home or with their upbringing thats programmed into them that negativity is okay. It's not. I'd hate to be that unhappy.

Don't get me wrong though, constructive criticism is fine.
Good job i'm not easily offended, just like most of the other girls aren't either.

My mum always taught me "if you havent got anything nice to say, dont say anything at all".

I just think everyone should smile more!
And FYI, most of my comments are on my (& I quote) 'beautiful, sexy tattoos' smile so tongue Mr Negative Tagger. Mwuhahaha biggrin

Smile people, SMILE.

xox

Did you know when your unhappy if you just force a smile, it actually has a positive effect and makes you happier!

Exning

Exning

SUICIDEGIRL

California, USA

NOV 27, 2009 02:52 AM

Adalae on her recent blog said it well

MrCrisp

MrCrisp

I'm lost
August 2004

NOV 27, 2009 04:26 AM

RENTny said:
the members deserve to get what they paid for.



Listen to this man! He paid for this site!

Cash

Cash

USA
OLD SKOOL

NOV 27, 2009 05:30 AM

RENTny said:
So first off I want to say I'm a casual site user, but I joined like most everyone else because the idea of a site where people can be themselves and be original truly appealed to me and aside from the actual photos, the minds and thoughts on the site from the members and especially the SGs were fresh and open.

But over the past 2 years it has been interesting to read from SGs in particular how much the site has changed and maybe overall how much the site has driven away from its original intention toward something more conservative and reserved. From less risque sets, to obnoxious members tags and comments being allowed, to feelings of rejection for not fitting the mold, to changes in set acceptance percentages, to similar sets being accepted over and over again, to poor site design...and the girls and members who have the most fun here ultimately lose out as the original intention of the site seems to move further behind the curtain.

Read the SG blogs, and the boards and groups.

Dot's last blog is a good example of numerous sentiments echoed over and over in recent months.

I realize there are too many paying members that not everyone will be happy all the time. Granted. And I'm not suggesting a coup, but maybe the SGs on this site deserve a little more respect, and the members deserve to get what they paid for. I'd hate to think the site has literally become a picture hub where horny people download snap shots. I don't know how the SG community feels, the girls who put themselves out there not just in photos but emotionally, but I'd love to hear your thoughts. Maybe with enough input something may change for the better.

Of course if I'm way off, please say so also, maybe this viewpoint is only shared by a limited few.




This is old news. Very, very old news. While what I'm about to say is completely sexist...and will probably offend more than a few people.....when you get more than two women together in a group...there's bound to be drama.

People have been saying "The site is changing...is used to be about the art" for roughly 7 years now. I've been a member of the site for like....8 years now...and everything you mentioned....is like the same skipping record of complaints....and yet the site has not only survived...but thrived.

As members....we get MORE then what we pay for. See how much $4 a month gets you anywhere else. Go look around at some of the "other" sites...and compare the quality of their content...and their membership fees to SG.

The experience of being a member of SG (which I have been for a long time) and/or working for SG (which I haven't, but know people who have) is not uniform. For every disgruntled member, model or employee you talk to.....there are a bunch more happy campers.

The people I've known and talked to who worked and/or modeled for SG for a long time...and were the happiest....were also the ones who were the most realistic & intelligent. They were the ones who had fun...and used the opportunity to take from it what they could.

This site is no different from real life....in the sense that there are crazies & normal people and everything else in between thrown into the mix together. You just have to sort out the bullshit to get to the real story. And just like social circles in real life.....if you look around and don't see the weirdo...you ARE the weirdo.

Luckie

Luckie

SUICIDEGIRL

United Kingdom

NOV 27, 2009 05:51 AM

Cash said:

SPOILERS! (Click to view)

RENTny said:
So first off I want to say I'm a casual site user, but I joined like most everyone else because the idea of a site where people can be themselves and be original truly appealed to me and aside from the actual photos, the minds and thoughts on the site from the members and especially the SGs were fresh and open.

But over the past 2 years it has been interesting to read from SGs in particular how much the site has changed and maybe overall how much the site has driven away from its original intention toward something more conservative and reserved. From less risque sets, to obnoxious members tags and comments being allowed, to feelings of rejection for not fitting the mold, to changes in set acceptance percentages, to similar sets being accepted over and over again, to poor site design...and the girls and members who have the most fun here ultimately lose out as the original intention of the site seems to move further behind the curtain.

Read the SG blogs, and the boards and groups.

Dot's last blog is a good example of numerous sentiments echoed over and over in recent months.

I realize there are too many paying members that not everyone will be happy all the time. Granted. And I'm not suggesting a coup, but maybe the SGs on this site deserve a little more respect, and the members deserve to get what they paid for. I'd hate to think the site has literally become a picture hub where horny people download snap shots. I don't know how the SG community feels, the girls who put themselves out there not just in photos but emotionally, but I'd love to hear your thoughts. Maybe with enough input something may change for the better.

Of course if I'm way off, please say so also, maybe this viewpoint is only shared by a limited few.




This is old news. Very, very old news. While what I'm about to say is completely sexist...and will probably offend more than a few people.....when you get more than two women together in a group...there's bound to be drama.

People have been saying "The site is changing...is used to be about the art" for roughly 7 years now. I've been a member of the site for like....8 years now...and everything you mentioned....is like the same skipping record of complaints....and yet the site has not only survived...but thrived.

As members....we get MORE then what we pay for. See how much $4 a month gets you anywhere else. Go look around at some of the "other" sites...and compare the quality of their content...and their membership fees to SG.

The experience of being a member of SG (which I have been for a long time) and/or working for SG (which I haven't, but know people who have) is not uniform. For every disgruntled member, model or employee you talk to.....there are a bunch more happy campers.

The people I've known and talked to who worked and/or modeled for SG for a long time...and were the happiest....were also the ones who were the most realistic & intelligent. They were the ones who had fun...and used the opportunity to take from it what they could.


.....This site is no different from real life....in the sense that there are crazies & normal people and everything else in between thrown into the mix together. You just have to sort out the bullshit to get to the real story. And just like social circles in real life.....if you look around and don't see the weirdo...you ARE the weirdo.



Everything you said was bang on smile Couldn't have put it better. I always feel sad when people slate SG (the whole site) or SG staff.
Like I said before, I've only had positive experiences with everyone (Staff/Model) and most members. And you werent offensive in the slightest in your post. Yeah theres going to be 'weirdos' which i've no probs with, just if they feel it's okay to be offensive, abusive or nastily negative to ANYONE. There's just no need.

It's nice that there are those of us who stand by SG and love it regardless of any minor hiccups that may occur from time to time, no matter if its members, SG's or staff to blame.
If people dont like the 'community' we only have ourselves to blame, WE ARE THE COMMUNITY! thats not staffs' fault!
If 'We' as members and SG's start posting more, talking more & joining in on threads more, then the community will thrive. So people should stop blaming others and start positive-posting!! smile

My only complaint is that the shop needs to expand !!! biggrin I'd love to see some more SG merch on the go. And yes, I have added merch Ideas in the appropriate thread!

xox

Dot

Dot

SUICIDEGIRL

California, USA

NOV 27, 2009 05:54 AM

I think the sour economic climate seems to have pushed SG into a direction as of late (and by that i mean the past 2 months or so) that it doesn't necessarily want to go in, but feels it has to to continue to survive. I don't think there are as many gambles taken with sets that get purchased these days due to declining memberships. Sets all pretty much follow the same formula and have a certain minimum comment count and "loved it" percentage while on their test run in member review prior to purchase these days. When MR first appeared I loved it because I felt that was a place I could put weird experimental sets and it didn't really matter if staff liked them necessarily-it mattered in the community alone liked them and there was no minimum really in the numbers game to get bought. But that's changed. MR is basically the new staff review now except all those sets are displayed for free first and staff gets to see what performs the best before they make an investment. Great for SG, not so great anymore for the girls here. Cash is certainly right that members have been crying "SINKING SHIP!!" here for years while SG has continued to exist, although I do think SG is in a more dire state that it's even been in as long for as i've been around for the aforementioned reasons. I think Dwam's recent archival over her brilliant, creative, unpurchased multi set with 1300+ comments in MR is a pretty good summary of what's not quite right here recently. just my 2c.

Luckie

Luckie

SUICIDEGIRL

United Kingdom

NOV 27, 2009 05:58 AM

Dot said:
I think Dwam's recent archival over her brilliant creative unpurchased multi set with 1300+ comments in MR is a pretty good summary of what's not quite right here recently. just my 2c.


I do have to agree with that.
xox

Scotty

Scotty

SUICIDEGIRL

Australia

NOV 27, 2009 06:28 AM

I agree with both Luckie and Dot, but unfortunately, I don't think there is much anyone, even staff, can do about it. I think their hands are tied. They can't put up more than 1 set a day, for 2 obvious reasons. The economic crisis, and the fact that more members like only 1 set a day. It really sucks, but there really isn't much staff can do about either of those things... unless I'm missing something.

Cash

Cash

USA
OLD SKOOL

NOV 27, 2009 06:50 AM

I disagree slightly with Dot about the sets all following the same formula. I'll only name the photogrpaher I'm complimenting....but Lorelei is a fucking great photographer. She does have a signature style. A lot of times I can look at a set and know she shot it. However...she's not formulaic or repetitive.

There are one or two photographers ( I said I wouldn't name names) who are very formulaic & repetitive. I find myself thinking "Okay...here comes the arched back, tilted head pose......followed by the lying down, shot from above pose....." no matter who the model is. To be fair....there are HUGELY popular & successful photogs who do the same thing. Think Arny Freytag & Stephen Wayda.

Where I do agree is that overall....SG seems to have gotten away from some of the more raw sets & models. I would like to see fewer Hot Topic Punks and more models like Marie.

Chika

Chika

SUICIDEGIRL

Saint Lucia

NOV 27, 2009 08:08 AM

I am sad SG is going this way frown

PointBlank

PointBlank

New York, NY
November 2004

NOV 27, 2009 08:53 AM

I could find threads from 2004 saying the exact same shit.

Things change. Some people are happy, some aren't. There was never a time when all the models, members and staff were happy with every aspect of the site.

It's also funny that people who have been members or SGs for 6 months are the first to mourn for some ideal past that didn't ever exist.

Anarchie_Mod

Anarchie_Mod

MODERATOR

United Kingdom

NOV 27, 2009 10:27 AM

RENTny said:
to obnoxious members tags and comments being allowed



They aren't allowed, but all the tags and comments on all the sets on the site are impossible to moderate. If you see something blatantly offensive, flag it, or send me the link/ a screen shot and I'll deal with it.

Vegas_

Vegas_

Australia
July 2008

NOV 27, 2009 10:46 AM

issue_ said:

RENTny said:


The SGs are the reason we're here....




WRONG!

i'm here for the peen shots in sg chat.



+1 ( Im here for the same reason as issue is )

lil_tuffy

lil_tuffy

MODERATOR

San Francisco, CA

NOV 27, 2009 10:52 AM

Anarchie_Mod said:

RENTny said:
to obnoxious members tags and comments being allowed



They aren't allowed, but all the tags and comments on all the sets on the site are impossible to moderate. If you see something blatantly offensive, flag it, or send me the link/ a screen shot and I'll deal with it.



Yes. I have since banned "bad tattoos" as a tag.


Auriga

Auriga

SUICIDEGIRL

I'm lost

NOV 27, 2009 10:58 AM

"Things change. Some people are happy, some aren't."

SPOILERS! (Click to view)

I don't know what SG was nor will I try to pretend I have any idea.
When the site was first created I was 11 years old. surreal

What I'm noticing though is a trend in members and SG's saying, well, typing that the site isn't what it used to be and that they aren't happy with where "it's going" or ideas of the like.
I personally notice a few changes since just joining the site in June.
But, I'm not mourning "mourn for some ideal past that didn't ever exist."
I like this website.

Sure the site may have changed but is it horrible? No.
Are there variety in the sets? Not always, but, yes, indeed.
Are there annoying members and rude tags/comments? Yes. But that's life.

We may not all look like certain SG's mentioned but I don't think that's such a bad thing.
There are all types of beauty, I see that here.
I like it.

"the site has driven away from its original intention toward something more conservative and reserved. From less risque sets, to obnoxious members tags and comments being allowed, to feelings of rejection for not fitting the mold, to changes in set acceptance percentages, to similar sets being accepted over and over again,"

This "mold" is what stirs confusion in me, though.
These feelings of rejection are felt by, well, every girl on here whose set is not well liked for some reason, and for some, I guess, not purchased.
I think instead of trying to fit a mold, girls are creating and submitting sets that they like.
I guess members will either like it or they won't.

I just hate the fact that, and I've mentioned this somewhere else before, that it's one thing to feel nervous about getting naked on the internet, but it's another to feel like X% of members will automatically dislike you because you're not ________ enough.



toothpickmoe

toothpickmoe

Los Angeles, CA
May 2004

NOV 27, 2009 11:03 AM

In regards to people being mean, let's not forget that this is the internet. Whether we like it or not, it has become acceptable by a large percentage of users to be perfectly horrific human beings when posting in any sort of forum. If you think SG is rough, spend some time on other sites with open forums. It's fucking brutal out there.

As has already been stated, this "change" sentiment is nothing new. One trick, and the one that most works for me, is to accept that things change. Things always change. Nothing will stop that. So instead of railing against something that will never stop, instead of fighting an unwinnable fight, one can accept and even enjoy the change that comes. I've made this point too many times to count, both online and in conversation.

And yes, no business has a 100% approval rating from either its employees or its customers. That's part of doing business; you piss people off sometimes. We're still paying $4 a month for pictures of beautiful naked women you can't find anywhere else, and that's a damn fine value. These hard economic times have hurt my ability to pay for any sort of porn (and let's please not have that debate here), so I appreciate that SG is providing me with a quality product for such a reasonable fee.

PS - Starting this thread is totally going to get you laid, dude. wink

issue_

issue_

HOPEFUL

I'm lost

NOV 27, 2009 11:15 AM

zoom image

Previous

PAGE: 

1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6

 ... 11

Next