TOPICS:
APR 08, 2009 04:51 AM
Sid said:
RizzoFord said:
Paisley said:
Alyk said:
I guess I'm probably the most active member of SG in Boston, and I open my home to members on an almost weekly basis. In fact, another member is visiting from Vancouver this week, and we had dinner this evening with a group of people from SG Boston. But it wasn't listed in SG Boston, because we're now real-life friends, and we no longer need to list our events in the group, because we've kind of transcended the group.
We are a "real-life community," we're just a community that happened to meet via a website.
Lots of you have made real-life communities, yeah, clearly. But it's work, and I, personally, don't have the time or drive to put that work in. Personally. Just me. I get it, guys, it's on me, I knew that to begin with. I'm just tryin' to put my point of view out there, because it seemed to me like I wasn't alone in it. Daaaaaaaang, y'all, chiiiilll.
Hopping on the T for a 10 minute ride across Boston is work?
Hell, I drive an hour and a half each way to hang out with Alyk and other SG folk.
Granted my boyfriend lives right outside of Boston so I'm usually in the area, but that's beside the point
To be fair, taking the T across Boston takes about an hour. At least it did for me, but then again I lived in Allston on the other side of the BU stops...
But yeah, I travel all over in order to meet SGs and members. Hell, I've flown 4 hours to hang out with the fabulous Alyk, cause I'd very much rather see her than my own family!
I've flown (in coach) 14hrs (for the first flight, the whole trip to get there took 30hrs) to see MartyD, MissShell, lowroller, Milli, speedway74, mellylou, traceelement, TheFuckOffKid, EyesOfATragedy, Allure, (I could continue, but you get the point) and stay at Helly and e1e's house for 3 weeks. Before staying in their home, I hadn't had any interaction with them outside of contact here on SG (mostly in chat.) Many of the above mentioned are some of my closest friends (e1e, for example, might as well be my brother.)
Also:
I'm engaged to be married to the woman of my dreams who, if (when) I have a child, it will be with her. I was first introduced to her and developed a crush on her based on our interaction on this site here (which, after we'd met in person snowballed into an intense love.) In fact I haven't had a girlfriend that I wasn't first introduced to on SG since I joined here.
The past few months have been really tough on me financially. SG members have helped me pay my rent for the past two. Obviously, if the situation was reversed, I'd do the same for them. If I need a ride somewhere or need help moving or, you name it, I know I can count on the members here to help me out. Because they're my friends, not because I'm a member.
After I'd been here just two months, no way would any of that have happened. I can't see how anyone would expect it to. I can't see why anyone would want it to. A relationship, be it platonic or romantic, is based on risk, trust, emotional investment, and just plain ol' fashion having experiences with them. The more of each, the stronger a relationship is said to be. Two months is barely enough time to go to two of my regional group's monthly drinks, and that's assuming that you find out about it right immediately after you join up and are able to make it.
Most importantly, if you're not willing to even go across town to hang out with someone, that's not really much a friendship is it?
I can only assume that folks who feel this way do so because they are looking for some type of shortcut and feel that interacting with someone through a website might have different rules than when interacting in person. That's hardly the case though. Just because you're interacting with someone through a website doesn't mean that impossible things are going to happen. The same rules that apply to relationships where the contact happens in person apply to those where the interaction happens on here.
In regards to the original post, all of the things you've described that you know and love about SG are still here. They just happen in different places now. Instead of happening on the main boards, the bulk of the meaningful interaction happens in the private groups now. You might not see it now, but it's still there, trust me. ![]()

Paisley
USA
September 2006
APR 08, 2009 06:35 AM
Some of you (though not you, Beppo) are being really hostile to me when I was just trying to present another perspective. I'm not whining, I'm just trying to explain. If I where whining, it'd be more like "zomg this site sux no one likes me
" Don't associate me with Mr. Hostile FrankMask up there, please. It's hard to get intonation on the internet, yeah, but I feel like y'all keep misinterpreting what I say to be way more uptight than I mean it to be (hence my earlier "chiiiiiiilll" ).
So if I can summarize what the last bajillion responders kept repeating:
You have to put in effort to make friends, this site is what you put into it, the opportunities are there, etc.
I think that's abundantly clear. I thought it was abundantly clear when I said it. Message: recieved. Super. Awesome. Thanks for clarifying. Got it. Cool. And I'm glad this site means so much to so many of you. I think the internet is a great tool in that way, opening up new venues for meeting like-minded people. Congratulations. Now if you don't mind, I'm going to go look at some hot chicks before my membership expires.
APR 08, 2009 08:52 AM
Paisley said:
Some of you (though not you, Beppo) are being really hostile to me when I was just trying to present another perspective. I'm not whining, I'm just trying to explain. If I where whining, it'd be more like "zomg this site sux no one likes me
So if I can summarize what the last bajillion responders kept repeating:
You have to put in effort to make friends, this site is what you put into it, the opportunities are there, etc.
I think that's abundantly clear. I thought it was abundantly clear when I said it. Message: recieved. Super. Awesome. Thanks for clarifying. Got it. Cool. And I'm glad this site means so much to so many of you. I think the internet is a great tool in that way, opening up new venues for meeting like-minded people. Congratulations. Now if you don't mind, I'm going to go look at some hot chicks before my membership expires.
I think this was the problem:
this isn't the sort of community I, personally, am looking for. It's a virtual community, albeit a strong one; I want a real-life community.
you said it's not real-life, people are telling you that it can be.
and since it's important to them, they're gonna defend it and can even get defensive. It's kinda obvious.
You like something, someone says it's bad, you're gonna defent it.. right?
APR 08, 2009 09:06 AM
oh my god, an opinion! let's jump on it and make it personal!

Paisley
USA
September 2006
APR 08, 2009 10:54 AM
I didn't say it's bad.
APR 08, 2009 12:34 PM
I sniggled about "cricket and haberdashery".
But anyway.
High fives for all!

![]()
APR 11, 2009 08:12 AM
Before this dies or gets locked I have to have my say:
Remember when I posted on that silly thread from the guy that complained about SG because none of the girls gave him their number?
Now this thread can die happy!

Mocha
New Orleans, LA
April 2006
APR 11, 2009 06:44 PM
i wish SG was as crappy as he described it, so i could do something productive with my time.
APR 11, 2009 09:45 PM
DevilsReject said:
I've made friends both in real life and people i only talk to on the innernets.
I belong to many social-networking sites, this is by far my favorite. Not because of the tits, labia (labi i?), and spread teh legz, but mostly because i continuously run across people, that aren't even in my regional group that i completely want to meet in real life, and i hope that one day i get the chance to.
I think the reason i continue to stay is the potential of more friendships happening. I would love to travel to Portland sometime to meet all the great people up there and possibly lose my manginity to MisterSatan or perhaps Atomicant. The same goes for Boston, LA, San Diego, and many other places. Hell Cash and i don't see eye to eye on everything, and i would still like to meet him sometime, just for the conversation we'd have. If i give up this site, i lose that potential. That and i generally have a good internet-experience reading things in my groups, owning groups and on the boards. I enjoy my time spent here, mostly because that's what i have made of it.
I didn't sit here and dwell on what wasn't working for me. I don't necessarily agree with everything SG does, but in the same note, it's not my responsibility to tell someone else how to run their business, i have enough trouble running my own. The day Missy and Sean private message me and ask me for my personal opinion is the day i start taking how it's run seriously, i don't ever see that happening.
I think SG has possibly hit it's peak, but i don't see it disappearing anytime soon even if it possibly is on the downside of it's popularity curve, there are enough people here that will keep it alive for a long time.
yes, yes and yes!!
APR 12, 2009 02:13 AM
Coyotemike said:
What exactly is supposed to change? Make it harder to join?
You must now pass the `I'm worth of visiting SG' exam as part of the membership application.
Question 1: Are you awesome enough to be on SG?
Question 2: Do you really think you're awesome enough?
Question 3: Have you been a member of SG for less than 5 years?
If you answer yes to any of these questions, you may not join.
I hate to beat the same drum (in a non gay way) but that third question IS relevant in the case of being a part of any site related groups. If you answer no to that, don't waste your time. I have literally been told that my opinion wasn't equal to any of the group owners friends opinions because of my time as a member. Sounds pretty intelligent, huh? Pastry/coffee chefs with power...lol.
APR 12, 2009 02:58 AM
FrankMask said:
As the number of Suicide Girls increased it became harder to grok each person as an individual.
Nudity is cheap, porn is free and universally available. The value wasn't in the nudity and it wasn't in the tattoos. It wasn't in the quality of the photography or the subjective aesthetic appeal of the individual women.
Instead, the value was in the interaction with approachable and unique individuals. Seeing a person as a symbol of sexuality, and interacting with them as an individual provided a unique product. Nudity and porn are available free, but the individual is lost entirely and replaced with a symbol. Being able to see the person as a symbol while interacting with them as an individual was a unique combination. When combined with the quality of discussion in the community forums and the capacity for community organization in the groups Suicide Girls possessed a clear value as a unique product.
As the number of SGs and members began to increase dramatically it became more difficult to interact with and approach individuals as individuals. The increase in membership correlated with an apparent decrease in quality of the community aspects, the forums especially. The rapidly increasing number of models made approaching any new model as a unique individual somewhat more difficult. Old models and friends began to drop out. Personal and professional issues between SG Inc., it's members, and it's models came into the public sphere, and the actions of the various groups involved undermined an important part of SGs advertising; that SG Inc. was actively creating a community that was concerned more with community, empowerment of women, and breaking down of objectifying, dehumanizing, or destructive sexual products than it was with the pursuit of profit for profits sake. With the understanding that their was no altruistic social justice motive to the business Suicidegirls immediately lost an important element of it's appeal.
The continual attrition of early Suicidegirls and members and the enormous influx of new Suicidegirls and Members rapidly changed the nature of the community at a pace that was difficult for some established members to follow. The appearance of many competeing alternaporn sites removed the monopoly of novelty. The emergence and wide adoption of social networking sites reduced the importance of the social networking aspect of suicidegirls.
In the end, the products offered by SG at cost could be found for free or at reduced cost in other venues, the community value was absent or severely diluted, and SG had lost the very valuable image of a progressive organization with a social justice and underground culture agenda that was advanced as being more important than profit. Ultimately, the product was no longer worth the price.
I think that you are over analyzing things
APR 12, 2009 03:04 AM
Morgan said:
SG has never claimed to be about social justice or about "breaking down objectifying" (I don't even know what that means). SG never said "we care more about saving the world and little puppies than we do about profit". It's a nude porn site, not a nonprofit.
+1
When I joined the site, SG claimed simply that it was about "gothic pin-up girls, punk, indie and emo chicks". I don't remember anything about saving the world and little puppies!! ![]()
APR 12, 2009 09:30 AM
D_FENS said:
Coyotemike said:
What exactly is supposed to change? Make it harder to join?
You must now pass the `I'm worth of visiting SG' exam as part of the membership application.
Question 1: Are you awesome enough to be on SG?
Question 2: Do you really think you're awesome enough?
Question 3: Have you been a member of SG for less than 5 years?
If you answer yes to any of these questions, you may not join.
I hate to beat the same drum (in a non gay way) but that third question IS relevant in the case of being a part of any site related groups. If you answer no to that, don't waste your time. I have literally been told that my opinion wasn't equal to any of the group owners friends opinions because of my time as a member. Sounds pretty intelligent, huh? Pastry/coffee chefs with power...lol.
There's a mighty big difference between five years and, what, how long have you been hear? Ten weeks? Eight? Regional groups involve things such as home addresses and phone numbers. There has to be some reasonable expectation of people in that group not being crazy for regional groups to function as they're supposed to. If you any Tom, Dick or John Wayne Gacy could get into a regional group, would you feel comfortable opening yr house to a party or offering to carpool with strangers? So they want to see you active on the site, keeping a blog, making comments, not being an asshole. You seem to be working on those first two, but really, when you have comments in yr blog like
Damn, you can't say shit on here without everyone tearing you apart word by word.
[...]
t's very elitist at times for a site that builds itself up as a fun "we're the crazy, free thinking, tattooed, pierced up, artist, nobody understands us" crowd.
It's been my experience that the whole SG ride I've taken has been a very elitist and snobbish ride through a nazi like regime.
I'll tell ya, the persecution complex becomes old hat really quick on SG. So cool out a little bit, don't be so negative.
Edit: Oh, one more thing...
I hate to beat the same drum (in a non gay way)
WTF?

Paisley
USA
September 2006
APR 12, 2009 10:09 AM
Tiger_Fodder said:
Before this dies or gets locked I have to have my say:
Remember when I posted on that silly thread from the guy that complained about SG because none of the girls gave him their number?
Now this thread can die happy!
Look what you've done. Now it's still going again.
APR 12, 2009 10:46 AM
Ladie said:
Next time, go with 2 girls 1 cup.
Dude, this totally got a better response. : )
APR 12, 2009 11:09 AM
Paisley said:
Tiger_Fodder said:
Before this dies or gets locked I have to have my say:
Remember when I posted on that silly thread from the guy that complained about SG because none of the girls gave him their number?
Now this thread can die happy!
Look what you've done. Now it's still going again.
Maybe I'm supposed to post on it twice. ![]()
APR 12, 2009 11:12 AM
Mr_Mocata said:
Morgan said:
SG has never claimed to be about social justice or about "breaking down objectifying" (I don't even know what that means). SG never said "we care more about saving the world and little puppies than we do about profit". It's a nude porn site, not a nonprofit.
+1
When I joined the site, SG claimed simply that it was about "gothic pin-up girls, punk, indie and emo chicks". I don't remember anything about saving the world and little puppies!! ![]()
It's implied. Everyone knows that gothic and emo chicks are all about saving the world, while punk and indies are all about the puppies.














Ring_finger
Lubbock, TX
December 2004
APR 08, 2009 04:43 AM