Goals for revising member review staff review

Sounds great, I think 1-4 should be most primary-- #5 and #6 I don't feel as if they are a huge issue. Do you mean increase waiting time between sets of the SAME hopeful in #3? Regardless I think #2 will DECREASE overall waiting time AND up the quality.

I like how everything is explicitly and clearly laid out in bulleted points - it's a great start!
I think this will help everyone a lot, reduce negativity and create a better sense of community.
Thanks staff!
AND thanks to everyone who weighed in, I think it's going to yield some positive results.

I'm all in favor of a flagging system for spam. I also like the idea of more separation between Hopefuls and SG's. More stringent standards for MR might also greatly decrease the number of Hopefuls in the future; with any luck it'll be the ones who don't actually participate in the community and are just looking for another myspace status upgrade that will disappear.

Sounds great to me.

Sounds awesome to me as well, especially accepting more sets through staff review.

When would this be implemented?

Most excellent Sean!

that all sounds wonderful. thanks in advance.

Fantastic.

I think this sounds great. Between stricter MR standards and more separation between SGs and hopefuls, there will be less of the "myspace" type girls that make non-SG members think that this site has really gone downhill.

This is the only addition I'd like to +1 on. Sean's list is great...looking forward to it.

Sounds like a plan; all good ideas, really. I like the idea of more surprises due to more sets coming through SR, and making more of a distinction between SGs and hopefuls. I think the latter, combined with being more selective about hopefuls sets that are accepted (the bar on quality really needs to be raised), will help make being a SG as special as it should be. there are many awesome sets on here, but that needs to be built on and increased, and shouted about. oh, and bring back themes!