How long between sets of Models?

I could see this if we were making them wait, like, three months in between sets. But really, a month between sets isn't all that limiting, even for the most prolific set-takers of SG.

Because their fans will always be there, while adding variety to the site can mean an even larger customer base that sticks around because there's actually someone who fits everyone's "types".

I guess I may be alone here, but I think that the girls who put out sets frequently (the ones I'm talking about, the high quality, constantly different and creative sets) ARE all different and illustrate a unique variety of models. I don't think that the most popular models here all look the same and all produce similar sets, by any means.

Once every 3 months is just ridiculous to me when the girls who have sets going up more frequently than that are producing the best sets, which can be seen by the response from members.

Agreed. Because, in the end, this waiting period we're all talking about, is widely related to the MR system...
1 month seems ok.

I know I am late but:

No waiting time!


Hot set, hot girl, hell YEAH.

I guess we'll have to agree to disagree (as usual ) when it comes to variety and creativity of sets. I think some models come up with excellent ideas, while some get sets accepted very frequently even if they're not particularly different from a set they've done before.

Either way, I think it adds to the variety of the site if there's a month-long waiting period between submitting sets. If the sets are so amazing that they'll be accepted anyway, they can submit through SR or wait the whopping four weeks, during which time another girl can get the chance to showcase her work.

Please also keep in mind that some girls are more popular than others for many different reasons. Their sets will always get a high comment count. Why not give some other girls (less well-known, newer, whatever) a chance to go up?

I don't think 1 month is limiting at all, but as I've said before there aren't really any SG's that are submitting sets more than once a month anyway.

I agree with a limit on hopefuls sets, I just don't think a limit for SG's is necessary, at this point anyway. And the suggestions of six weeks, three months, whatever, are ridiculous to me and similar to all of the other "NO FAIR" cries about various other things on the site.

It isn't fair, and it never will be fair.

What SG's are submitting more than one set a month as it is?

I really don't understand how you make this big argument and then talk about how we need a one month waiting time. The girls who are having sets go up frequently as it is are waiting a month, so there's nothing to talk about.

To be clear, I'm talking about SG's, not hopefuls, who I think should have a waiting period implemented.

If you think that the waiting period for SGs only needs to be one month, then I guess I will say what I've said already, which is, why is it necessary, because no SG has submitted multiple sets in a month.

Yup! I read it. Did you read it?

The initial post is Sean asking if there should be a mandatory waiting period, and what it should be. Lots of people are arguing for one and stating their reasons why. Why it should be six weeks, two months, three months, or why there shouldn't be one at all. These arguments paired with a "it should be one month" don't make any sense to me, because SG's aren't submitting sets more than once a month. Understand?

my suggestion of six weeks has nothing to do with me thinking the site is fair or not, it just seems like the standard wait time to go through the whole process of MR give or take a week or so. it was exactly 5 weeks from when i submitted my last MR set to the day it went live.

Makes sense to me. To re-phrase it really bluntly... since no SG is submitting more than a set a month and it seems to be generally accepted "unwritten code" already, why add to the existing list of hard-and-fast rules?

Also, I really don't see anything that could go wrong with a waiting period for hopefuls (save for maybe a few whines). It could really only go right, initiating a time period as a hard and fast rule so there's no confusion.

They are, but there is a lag time between when higher standards were made firm and when only those sets go up, because the queue's nearly two months long right now. (But that will get shorter because of the higher standards.)

I think I misunderstood part of the thread..

I could care less how often girls are submitting to member review, I do feel that it would benefit the models and the site to have somewhat of a waiting period as to how often they are purchased..that may be personal preference on my part though as I honestly feel it takes away from the excitement if I just saw a set from the same model a few weeks prior

I don't see how people can be upset to have a girl wait a month in between going live compared to what the wait used to be

but..if this thread is for how often girls can submit...who cares?
every day for all I care..it is definitely business for the site...way more nakedness than they could of dreamed of

come again?

Yeahhhh.. I dunno about that statement. If you've submitted a set to staff review any time recently, you'd realize that you don't even get a response from staff for a long time, simply because the queue is SOOOO backed up.

It's actually more functional and gets your sets up faster if you go through member review. If you're a hot girl that the members want to see more of, then the process speeds up.....

I know a few photographers who don't even bother submitting to staff any more because it's just too long of a wait.

ok lets be honest here.... a month waiting period is long enough to wait... and just to show people... i made 2 different sets in the same day... my photog worked on one... and i submitted it... i think it is great... i guess i will find out later... then he worked on the second and i submitted it... and it wont go up till a little more then a month later then the first.... so two sets done the same day.... are going up a month apart because of the quenche....so to me there is no reason a gilr should have to wait to submitt a set longer then a month becuase by the time it will go up it will be like 2 to 3 months later..... i just do not see a problem with the most succesful sgs making a set every month... they are keeping people coming back for more and keeping business good... i know i log in hoping to see a new set from even the most submitted models sets....so in my opinion the girls already do a good job of knowing how long to wait.... now if she was subbmitting a set every day then yes ok they should be told to hold off.... but waiting a month between sets gives the other variety of girls plenty of time to get sets in and to get noticed... it also gives hopefuls time to get theirs in in between.... i am not sure if i have seen a girl put two differnt sets up without at least a month in between..... so i dont see a problem with high quality sets getting submitted as often as the girls want.... i also think that this is what the site is about... letting the girl show her creative talents off.... the models love what they do and that is why they are here... to show some great sets and artistic abilities off to the world.... also i think when the form speciffically already states.... that a model can put up a set as often as she would like on mr there is really nothing that can be done unless this is changed.... it does say to wait if sending it in to staff but not mr....so really until this is changed nothing can really be done