Does member review get it right?

I've been thinking more about what those people said about curating a couple pages back, and I think it's true. It's like there is too much MR to keep up with, and I'd like to just see the best curated onto the front page without thinking that I have to do my part to find and comment and seek out and support the really good sets. I like the idea of people paying to have sets curated that represent the ideology and what have you of the company best. Oh well. I do like things about MR, too.

I agree, there is too much MR to keep up with. If I don't log in for a couple days, I can totally miss out on some really good sets and never find them. I guess this all goes with the fact that there's so many girls on the site now and people are doing more and more sets because not all of them get accepted

I agree... I think maybe a separation of the SGs and Hopefuls MR sets on a different little area on the front page could fix this (kinda like it was before). That way sets stay up longer. Thanks god staff review has started to accept sets again, I think that's my next avenue...

Which leads to the returning point that there should be a waiting time between set submition. Like. months.

I monitor the front page pretty closely and look at every set that goes live, and i still think MR gets it right. The sets going live on the front page, that have been in MR and still well deserving. It's just a pity there aren't enough hours in the day to put up ALL the deserving sets.

I think I'm slightly more nervous about the MR than I am the Staff review.
I think the nice surprise of staff picks is nicer.

Yes, me too.^ I don't think there's been too much that has gone live that I can argue with. There's just so much!

I think this thread is about the sets that actually make it to the front page.

One of the things that I think might be happening is that there are so many sets that people obviously can't look at them all, so they're commenting based on the thumbnails or a shot or two...so sets where the girl doesn't get naked or the set is uploaded wrong or there is no coherent story line end up doing fine.

I think it is great that so many girls have a platform to express themselves in MR. It was originally changed so girls could have their sets go live with out having to wait so long with their sets in the que. I greatly appreciate that aspect. I also feel that girls have the ability to be more creative and not follow any strict guidelines, as it was with Staff Picks.

I do feel that there are a lot of great sets that have been sitting in MR for a long time that I felt were great and should go live.

Then I see sets that look like crap in comparison that are getting a ton of great feedback in MR and will probably go live, and all I can do is scratch my head and wonder why.

I think that as far as what gets picked up to go front page from MR, there hasn't been much I can argue with, as I've said before.
Dice, as far as what you are saying about the sub par sets getting great feedback in MR, I have noticed some with lots of comments, but I also noticed that the percentage of "loved it's" on those same sets is pretty low in comparison..

I strongly agree with this. I recently considered doing a set with green screen and a lot of work and I just figured I couldn;t risk investing that much money. If creativity was recognised a little more, I think quite a few girls would take a few more risks and go a bit bigger, which would be great for everyone!