Everything SG

TOPICS:

6/28/06
6/28/06
6/26/06

Previous

PAGE: 

1 ... 

58 | 59 | 60 | 61 | 62

 ... 319

Next

Previous

PAGE: 

1 ... 

8 | 9 | 10

Next

GoatsGoToHell

GoatsGoToHell

USA
OLD SKOOL

SEP 10, 2002 07:06 PM

My 2 cents...even though the pot is getting pretty rich by now...

It's up to the girls to show what they feel comfortable showing... if I am not comfortable viewing something or find it distasteful...there are thumbnail photos and I can tell what photos I do not wish to view full sized and will skip over them.

I'm not real worried about the site turning "hardcore" if a girl or two wants to get a little more explicit than what the "norm" for the site is. I have no problem with finger insertion, but don't really think I'd enjoy anything actual object insertions...I'm sure I can find plenty of that other places if I really cared to look. But again it is up to the girls and what Missy and Spooky feel is right for the site.

We all had this same kind of talk when Roxy's first set went up and we worked through that. I don't think the site has turned raunchy since then like some seemed to fear.

If the sites norm changes so drastically in a way I do not like, I will not continue to be a memeber...it's not really that hard of a concept.

Anyways, to all the girls/missy/spooky, keep up the good work. To everyone...love one another, we're above petty fighting, I know we all are. smile

*hugs for all* yeah I'm a damn tree huggin hippie today...so bite me. wink

Morgan

Morgan

SUICIDEGIRL

Illinois, USA

SEP 10, 2002 07:07 PM

suiciety said:
P.S. I know that if a member harasses, insults or personally attacks a suicide girl that they will get kicked. What happens if it’s another suicide girl doing said activities? Just curious…



Well, for one thing, I think SGs are allowed to disagree and hell, even dislike each other. Yes, it's childish to fight on the boards, it can easily be taken to e-mail. But still...we're allowed to fight with each other sometimes, just as members are allowed to do.

Specific to last night's events, I don't think that can be translated as "attacking" or "harrassing". It's not as if it didn't go both ways, there were no "innocent victims"

Nihixul

Nihixul

I'm lost
OLD SKOOL

SEP 10, 2002 07:11 PM

" This site is laboring for the fuck machine. The feelings of the majority, while not always clear, will forever guide this site until its demise. "

I don't think this is *necessarily* true. I mean, if tomorrow 60% of people said they wanted to see spooky in an action shot with one of the girls, I don't think they would do it. I agree, SG will try new things and see what works, but people see the previews and think that is what they are getting. I don't think this site is going to lure a lot of people who will absolutely *demand* (ie - say they will leave if they don't get) harder material. No doubt, a lot of people (I assume including you and me) don't *mind* seeing that stuff, but at the same time, we like what we are currently getting, and have no problem venturing down other avenues to get the harder stuff.

I dunno. It's kinda like a seafood restaurant. Some people go there knowing it is a seafood place, but they still want steak. So, the restaurant offers a steak for those that want it, and that gets ordered from time to time, but the demand for the steak will almost certainly not cause the owners to expand the menu to include many kinds of steak, simply b/c the people wanting steak won't go there in the first place.

Anyhow, I could be totally wrong about that, but I don't think there will be a strong *demand* for harder material that will end up guiding this site down that path.

*shrug*

Brinstar

Brinstar

Chicago, IL
September 2002

SEP 10, 2002 07:12 PM

JustAnotherSupervillian: but the problem is, roxy was made to feel horrible over her set. i know she has purposely toned down a bit and is holding back because she wants to avoid going through that again. and that shoudnt have to happen, but i dont blame her, because people DID make a HUGE deal out of one harmless picture. and i think a few other girls are kind of afraid to try anything "more" than has already been done, for fear of the same drama being made over it. but then again i know a few girls who are going to try "more" anyway, so maybe that wil at least open it to those that do want to show more and wont have to be the first ones.

Morgan

Morgan

SUICIDEGIRL

Illinois, USA

SEP 10, 2002 07:13 PM

Oh, so is that all you think we are, Nihixul? Pieces of MEAT? wink

Nihixul

Nihixul

I'm lost
OLD SKOOL

SEP 10, 2002 07:15 PM

Morgan said:

... there were no "innocent victims"



but what about THE CHILDREN!?!?!

Would somebody please think about the CHILDREN!?!?!

biggrin

sorry, I just wanted to do that

Nihixul

Nihixul

I'm lost
OLD SKOOL

SEP 10, 2002 07:16 PM

Morgan said:
Oh, so is that all you think we are, Nihixul? Pieces of MEAT? wink



lol

I totally thought I accidentally said something like that for a second. I am such a doofus. *shame*

*hides*

Brinstar

Brinstar

Chicago, IL
September 2002

SEP 10, 2002 07:21 PM

Nihixul: the problem with trying to determine what an adult site contains by the previews is previous generally dont (or cant?) show the FULL content of the site, or the most graphic stuff. so most people see the tease shots and assume there is a bit harder stuff when you're a member (after all, if they show the hard stuff in all the previews, no one would join sites, they would just check out all the sites previews). i think perhaps erm... a site "description" written by missy or spooky on the HOME PAGE that discusses the philosophies behind the site might hep, but then that might scare some people off.

Nihixul

Nihixul

I'm lost
OLD SKOOL

SEP 10, 2002 07:28 PM

chapter_one_revisited said:
Nihixul: the problem with trying to determine what an adult site contains by the previews is previous generally dont (or cant?) show the FULL content of the site, or the most graphic stuff. so most people see the tease shots and assume there is a bit harder stuff when you're a member (after all, if they show the hard stuff in all the previews, no one would join sites, they would just check out all the sites previews). i think perhaps erm... a site "description" written by missy or spooky on the HOME PAGE that discusses the philosophies behind the site might hep, but then that might scare some people off.



hm. that's actually quite true. i think that, if this site philosophy issue does become a big deal (if it hasn't already), then they should indeed pen some sort of description, or perhaps just say the preview pictures are indicative of the style and level of the shoots. it might scare off some people, BUT i do think those numbers would be small. after all, if they didn't have such a description and the person joined anyway, then (assuming they were disappointed in the content) they would more than likely just cancel. interesting point, though.

Gwendolyn

Gwendolyn

SUICIDEGIRL

Indiana, USA

SEP 10, 2002 07:33 PM

DeathComesRipping said:

gutterstar said:

DeathComesRipping said:
Anybody see a bunny run through here?



I saw a pink one... it went that way! ---->



Thanks!

BTW, enough of this "one look at me..." stuff.



Am I slow? What's wrong with the "one look at me" comment I made? I didn't mean it in a bad way... I'm so confused. *heh* confused

suiciety

suiciety

I'm lost
OLD SKOOL

SEP 10, 2002 07:34 PM

Morgan said:

suiciety said:
P.S. I know that if a member harasses, insults or personally attacks a suicide girl that they will get kicked. What happens if it’s another suicide girl doing said activities? Just curious…



Well, for one thing, I think SGs are allowed to disagree and hell, even dislike each other. Yes, it's childish to fight on the boards, it can easily be taken to e-mail. But still...we're allowed to fight with each other sometimes, just as members are allowed to do.

Specific to last night's events, I don't think that can be translated as "attacking" or "harrassing". It's not as if it didn't go both ways, there were no "innocent victims"



This thread just got me curious. It wasn't in reference to anyone or anything. It was just a though I wanted an answer to. No names were referenced.

suiciety

suiciety

I'm lost
OLD SKOOL

SEP 10, 2002 09:13 PM

Nihixul said:
" This site is laboring for the fuck machine. The feelings of the majority, while not always clear, will forever guide this site until its demise. "

I don't think this is *necessarily* true. I mean, if tomorrow 60% of people said they wanted to see spooky in an action shot with one of the girls, I don't think they would do it. I agree, SG will try new things and see what works, but people see the previews and think that is what they are getting. I don't think this site is going to lure a lot of people who will absolutely *demand* (ie - say they will leave if they don't get) harder material. No doubt, a lot of people (I assume including you and me) don't *mind* seeing that stuff, but at the same time, we like what we are currently getting, and have no problem venturing down other avenues to get the harder stuff.

I dunno. It's kinda like a seafood restaurant. Some people go there knowing it is a seafood place, but they still want steak. So, the restaurant offers a steak for those that want it, and that gets ordered from time to time, but the demand for the steak will almost certainly not cause the owners to expand the menu to include many kinds of steak, simply b/c the people wanting steak won't go there in the first place.

Anyhow, I could be totally wrong about that, but I don't think there will be a strong *demand* for harder material that will end up guiding this site down that path.

*shrug*



There will always be someone who complains about the chicken that is served at a restaurant renowned for its sea food.

Gil

Gil

Salt Lake City, UT
OLD SKOOL

SEP 11, 2002 01:49 AM

Dia said:
Okay, this is a general question related to my last shoot, but really I was curious in general. What is this communities feeling towards SG's shooting penetration shots? Not CUM shots. I understand we don't want cum shots. But what about masturbation shots? Penetration/non-penetration/in general...?



i see nothing wrong with it
hey anything can be art... if done rite
alot of people get hung up on what's "art"
masturbation/penetration can be "artistic"
besides theres nothing wrong with a lil bump'n'grind
No wate
that din't come out right
what i ment was theres nothing wrong with mixing your art & your porn
thank you

Gil

Gil

Salt Lake City, UT
OLD SKOOL

SEP 11, 2002 01:50 AM

ok no more beer for me
good night

lifelikeweeds

lifelikeweeds

I'm lost
September 2002

SEP 13, 2002 01:53 AM

Jesus H fucking Melodramatic Christ

I didn't know anyone took anything here serious. Let alone be rude enough to flat out tell someone what they feel is appropriate for me to look at on this site.

Fucking melodrama.

As long as I'm here, you fucks that bitch and moan about how bad your life sucks, SHUT THE FUCK UP. Do something about it. Fuckwads.

Ahhhhh. Much better. Go about the bickering.

Dia

Dia

SUICIDEGIRL

Monaco

SEP 13, 2002 02:02 AM

Haha, totally. I have come to the grand decision that I shall no longer be in any way polite! This thread is essentially dead, but I like your profile picture too much to not say it. Plus, sticking stuff in orifices is fun. But, you aren't allowed to show that on SG's, bastard. I check your journal from time to time, for Lane is one of my heroes, right up there with Randall from Clerks.

Bickering is for people who are too lazy to just kick someone's teeth in. That usually will end girlish squabbles rather fast. One ducks out of threads when they bore the fuck out of them. Or when one realizes that they will continue on forever and ever and ever and ever only to become just that boring. I am not sure why I am ducking back in, I'm not, save that I thought you really nut-shelled things here for me and Goddamn it, people like ya.

I am going to masturbate with a handful of dirty q-tips now, thanks for the inspiration. Sometimes you ask a simple question and wind up with some manual in nothing but fucking Japanese and Swahili.

Melodrama is ugly, but violence, not that's fun! Pure, unadulterated shit-kicking.

Thread will die or I will kill it myself. I'll just end it by sitting on my scanner (and that would require a trip to Kinko's, all the more fun). Then there will BE no more argument. Then what will be done will be done.

FTW.

lifelikeweeds said:
Jesus H fucking Melodramatic Christ

I didn't know anyone took anything here serious. Let alone be rude enough to flat out tell someone what they feel is appropriate for me to look at on this site.

Fucking melodrama.

As long as I'm here, you fucks that bitch and moan about how bad your life sucks, SHUT THE FUCK UP. Do something about it. Fuckwads.

Ahhhhh. Much better. Go about the bickering.



lifelikeweeds

lifelikeweeds

I'm lost
September 2002

SEP 13, 2002 02:10 AM

Oh, I'd also like to point out,

that what Dia said back tthat girl in the Nirvana shirt was outstanding.

If you are happy with what you are doing, why the fuck do you care what the standard is? And what pressure is it you feel now?

Since DJ played with a shotgun, I haven't seemed to notice many more weapons.... Wow. She did something she wanted to do, and nothing changed! Wow! No DRAMA!

See how that works?

lifelikeweeds

lifelikeweeds

I'm lost
September 2002

SEP 13, 2002 02:13 AM

Oh my Dia. You flatter me. I'm going to go rape goldfish now and take photos.

Anyone know a site I can sell those pics to?

Gil

Gil

Salt Lake City, UT
OLD SKOOL

SEP 13, 2002 02:45 AM

yeah what he said!

Raziel666

Raziel666

Minot, ND
April 2006

JUN 24, 2006 09:31 PM

I do like SG the way it is.The women should always have the fainly say how their photos are to be.

Vanessa

Vanessa

SUICIDEGIRL

USA

JUN 24, 2006 10:02 PM

...once again...random thread necrophilia...surreal

Previous

PAGE: 

1 ... 

8 | 9 | 10

Next