Current Events

TOPICS:

Previous

PAGE: 

1 ... 

15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19

 ... 487

Next

Previous

PAGE: 

1 | 2

Next

Coyotemike

Coyotemike

USA
May 2006

FEB 10, 2011 12:18 PM

Not that people didn't already know this, but ...

Asked what most viewers and observers of Fox News would be surprised to learn about the controversial cable channel, a former insider from the world of Rupert Murdoch was quick with a response: “I don’t think people would believe it’s as concocted as it is; that stuff is just made up.”



Say it ain't so!!!

Indeed, a former Fox News employee who recently agreed to talk with Media Matters confirmed what critics have been saying for years about Murdoch’s cable channel. Namely, that Fox News is run as a purely partisan operation, virtually every news story is actively spun by the staff, its primary goal is to prop up Republicans and knock down Democrats, and that staffers at Fox News routinely operate without the slightest regard for fairness or fact checking.



My world . . . she ends!

No, this is not much of a serious news story. I'm just easily amused.

felony187

felony187

Denver, CO
June 2007

FEB 10, 2011 12:34 PM

What kind of spin will the no spin zone, spin?

Gringo

Gringo

Spokane, WA
May 2006

FEB 10, 2011 12:47 PM

Fox even states that it is "Fair and Balanced" and you aren't able to claim that until someone from the Fair and Balanced Advisory Board approves you. Also, one of their highly intelligent, diligent, respectful, and fact-checking journalists, Bill O'Reilly even uses the phrase, "No Spin Zone."

FACT.

SPOILERS! (Click to view)
In all seriousness, I'm surprised that there isn't some sort of media standards that would prevent them from making such false claims in the first place. It's almost as if there was a board meeting a couple of decades ago and someone said, "Hey, have you seen the shit that The Enquirer and The Sun are getting away with? ... "

felony187

felony187

Denver, CO
June 2007

FEB 10, 2011 12:50 PM

Gringo said:
Fox even states that it is "Fair and Balanced" and you aren't able to claim that until someone from the Fair and Balanced Advisory Board approves you. Also, one of their highly intelligent, diligent, respectful, and fact-checking journalists, Bill O'Reilly even uses the phrase, "No Spin Zone."

FACT.

SPOILERS! (Click to view)
In all seriousness, I'm surprised that there isn't some sort of media standards that would prevent them from making such false claims in the first place. It's almost as if there was a board meeting a couple of decades ago and someone said, "Hey, have you seen the shit that The Enquirer and The Sun are getting away with? ... "



The spin done been spun.

AcidEvangelist

AcidEvangelist

Minneapolis, MN
March 2004

FEB 10, 2011 01:22 PM

You mean like this?

felony187

felony187

Denver, CO
June 2007

FEB 10, 2011 03:09 PM

AcidEvangelist said:
You mean like this?



Now that's the spun getting spinned.
And getting seriously ass-fucked, that was their point, right?

XXJCBlackheartXX

XXJCBlackheartXX

Tucson, AZ
July 2008

FEB 11, 2011 11:30 AM

I am literally sick to my stomach watching Hanity... I just can't imagine how people believe this shit.... i will admit as an Independent MSNBC skews things and will twist things on occasion but at least they will be critical of other Democrat congressmen as well as the President...but fox news plain makes shit up and it is just hurts my brain people can't be this stupid...

ChrisSick

ChrisSick

Philadelphia, PA
March 2008

FEB 11, 2011 11:45 AM

Gringo said:
In all seriousness, I'm surprised that there isn't some sort of media standards that would prevent them from making such false claims in the first place. It's almost as if there was a board meeting a couple of decades ago and someone said, "Hey, have you seen the shit that The Enquirer and The Sun are getting away with? ... "



You mean like the Fairness Doctrine, which ensured (from '49 to '87) that giant corporations could profit from their news divisions provided they were willing to inform for the sake of public good & offer both sides to controversial issues so that the general public could be informed & knowledgeable & take part in a healthy discourse?

Yeah, Reagen kicked that shit to the curb by E.O. in '87 & every time anyone talks about bringing it back the Right-- which has & continues to benefit massively from its removal-- talks about government thought police & suppression of unpopular speech, despite the Doctrine obviously being an attempt to encourage rather than discourage unpopular speech. In the alternate reality that the modern/mainstream GOP currently inhabits, the market solves every thing & if your idea or speech isn't profitable, clearly you're not right & have no right to a forum outside of your local street corner, provided you can afford the megaphone.

IDGAS

IDGAS

Jackson Heights, NY
March 2004

FEB 11, 2011 11:50 AM

ChrisSick said:

Gringo said:
In all seriousness, I'm surprised that there isn't some sort of media standards that would prevent them from making such false claims in the first place. It's almost as if there was a board meeting a couple of decades ago and someone said, "Hey, have you seen the shit that The Enquirer and The Sun are getting away with? ... "



You mean like the Fairness Doctrine, which ensured (from '49 to '87) that giant corporations could profit from their news divisions provided they were willing to inform for the sake of public good & offer both sides to controversial issues so that the general public could be informed & knowledgeable & take part in a healthy discourse?

Yeah, Reagen kicked that shit to the curb by E.O. in '87 & every time anyone talks about bringing it back the Right-- which has & continues to benefit massively from its removal-- talks about government thought police & suppression of unpopular speech, despite the Doctrine obviously being an attempt to encourage rather than discourage unpopular speech. In the alternate reality that the modern/mainstream GOP currently inhabits, the market solves every thing & if your idea or speech isn't profitable, clearly you're not right & have no right to a forum outside of your local street corner, provided you can afford the megaphone.


The Fairness Doctrine would not have applied to cable companies it was only applicable for over-the-air broadcasters.

wildswan

wildswan

I'm lost
June 2006

FEB 11, 2011 11:54 AM

You're on a roll, buddy!

ChrisSick

ChrisSick

Philadelphia, PA
March 2008

FEB 11, 2011 11:58 AM

Good catch, IDGAS. My bad. There was some conversation over the last decade-- if I recall correctly-- about expanding the FCC's reach to cable networks due to their >80% market penetration*. Of course, there doesn't seem to be much actual legal standing for that, considering the FCC was founded to regulate the airwaves. Still, it would have an affect on the radio market, & Limbaugh & his mutated proteges (Beck, Ingham, Schelinsger [sp?], etc.) mostly made their bones on AM talk radio before being given cable platforms from which to lie from. Limbaugh himself only came up in the years following the removal of the Doctrine.

SPOILERS! (Click to view)
*I'm not sure I'd agree with expanding the FCC's regulation to cable, & I certainly don't agree with it based on this argument alone. I'm not even entirely sure that I like what the FCC is or does, in practice, although in theory I recognize the need for some regulatory oversight of broadcasting & media, it just seems like they should worry themselves more with the fact that something like seven corporations control ~90% of all media in this country than whether or not there's some nipple slippage going on during primetime.

IDGAS

IDGAS

Jackson Heights, NY
March 2004

FEB 11, 2011 12:21 PM

My big issue was the legal and regulatory changes made that set the stage for media consolidation. In the past there were limits on the number of television and radio stations that could be owned. As well as rules around owning newspapers and TV & Radio stations in the same market place.

cyanide81

cyanide81

I'm lost
August 2002

FEB 11, 2011 12:28 PM

zoom image

Lizabeth

Lizabeth

USA
January 2008

FEB 11, 2011 12:41 PM

So then just where exactly is Iraq?

ChrisSick

ChrisSick

Philadelphia, PA
March 2008

FEB 11, 2011 12:43 PM

Lizabeth said:
So then just where exactly is Iraq?



Iraq who? We don't know any Iraq. (Then they make with the shifty eyes before running for the door while comically shouting "eeeeeexxit, stage left!")

motorfirebox

motorfirebox

Pittsburgh, PA
March 2004

FEB 11, 2011 12:43 PM

Lizabeth said:
So then just where exactly is Iraq?


In in the Secret Egypt level. You have to jump over the second elevator and then run all the way past the end of the screen.

Coyotemike

Coyotemike

USA
May 2006

FEB 11, 2011 12:56 PM

motorfirebox said:

Lizabeth said:
So then just where exactly is Iraq?


In in the Secret Egypt level. You have to jump over the second elevator and then run all the way past the end of the screen.



Is that < < ^ ^ < > A ?

motorfirebox

motorfirebox

Pittsburgh, PA
March 2004

FEB 11, 2011 01:08 PM

No, that's how you access Fox's Strategic Fear Reserve. In times of peace and prosperity, Fox releases stored fear in order to prevent the inflation of actual freedom.

ChrisSick

ChrisSick

Philadelphia, PA
March 2008

FEB 11, 2011 01:14 PM

motorfirebox said:
No, that's how you access Fox's Strategic Fear Reserve. In times of peace and prosperity, Fox releases stored fear in order to prevent the inflation of actual freedom.



Awesome.

felony187

felony187

Denver, CO
June 2007

FEB 11, 2011 02:14 PM

Error

AcidEvangelist

AcidEvangelist

Minneapolis, MN
March 2004

FEB 17, 2011 11:55 AM

More bullshit: FoxNews "erroneously" aired footage of the 2010 CPAC Conference instead of the 2011 clip during a Ron Paul Interview:
Bill Hemmer is an editing douchebag

cowpunk3rd

cowpunk3rd

New Zealand
December 2005

FEB 20, 2011 11:17 PM

>Whatever<

motorfirebox

motorfirebox

Pittsburgh, PA
March 2004

FEB 20, 2011 11:24 PM

Drama

Drama

Columbus, OH
January 2003

FEB 20, 2011 11:30 PM

I watched Glenn Beck for 10 minutes today doing research for an article I'm writing for the SG news page and I seriously had to turn it off because he was such an unbelievable dirtbag and beyond stupid.

I try not to insult people for their opinions, I really try not to, but that guy is one step below functioning retarded.

suispud1

suispud1

Dallas, TX
January 2010

FEB 20, 2011 11:55 PM

While I'm not a fan of Fix (sic) News in general and Glenn Beck in particular, the notion that other mainstream media outlets are the paragons of unbiased journalistic integrity is beyond the pale in its ridiculousness, Objective journalism died years ago, Wipe them all out and start the fuck over.

It's like anything else. Let the people decide,

Previous

PAGE: 

1 | 2

Next