Mao Sugiyama, a self-described "asexual" from Tokyo, cooked up, seasoned and served his own genitalia to five diners at a swanky banquet in Japan last month, Calorie Lab reported.
In most cases, "asexual" is a word used to describe a person who is non-sexual. Sugiyama, however, embraces it as a way to show that he does not affiliate with either gender.
Sugiyama sparked a firestorm of interest on April 8 with one tweet:
"[Please retweet] I am offering my male genitals (full penis, testes, scrotum) as a meal for 100,000 yen …Will prepare and cook as the buyer requests, at his chosen location."
Just days after Sugiyama's 22nd birthday, the artist underwent elective genital-removal surgery, divvied up the severed penis shaft, testicles, and scrotal skin between five people, and garnished it with button mushrooms and Italian parsley.
On April 13, five of six diners who signed up for the $250-a-plate feast, sat down to dinner. The sixth person was a no-show.
The next day, an organizer posted a blog -- subsequently deleted -- containing pictures of the event. Images showed dozens of people who attended the event just to catch a glimpse of the rare treat.
The extra diners were served crocodile-based dishes while Sugiyama cooked up the exclusive meal.
The story went viral in Japan. Some showed even more interest, while others complained. But Calorie Lab called Japanese authorities, who deemed the banquet legal because there is no law against cannibalism in the country.
Mao Sugiyama, a self-described "asexual" from Tokyo, cooked up, seasoned and served his own genitalia to five diners at a swanky banquet in Japan last month, Calorie Lab reported.
In most cases, "asexual" is a word used to describe a person who is non-sexual. Sugiyama, however, embraces it as a way to show that he does not affiliate with either gender.
Sugiyama sparked a firestorm of interest on April 8 with one tweet:
"[Please retweet] I am offering my male genitals (full penis, testes, scrotum) as a meal for 100,000 yen …Will prepare and cook as the buyer requests, at his chosen location."
Just days after Sugiyama's 22nd birthday, the artist underwent elective genital-removal surgery, divvied up the severed penis shaft, testicles, and scrotal skin between five people, and garnished it with button mushrooms and Italian parsley.
On April 13, five of six diners who signed up for the $250-a-plate feast, sat down to dinner. The sixth person was a no-show.
The next day, an organizer posted a blog -- subsequently deleted -- containing pictures of the event. Images showed dozens of people who attended the event just to catch a glimpse of the rare treat.
The extra diners were served crocodile-based dishes while Sugiyama cooked up the exclusive meal.
The story went viral in Japan. Some showed even more interest, while others complained. But Calorie Lab called Japanese authorities, who deemed the banquet legal because there is no law against cannibalism in the country.
Damn, that's a guy dedicated to his craft. A little too dedicated. :/
I read a story years ago about a guy who cut off his own penis and through it at police. I've often heard of weapons being described as "being better than using your bare hands". That would be an instance of a weapon worse than using your bare hands....
Now that's a form of cannibalism I have no ethical qualms about. The chef is extreme, but I think it's very interesting. I don't think I could bring myself to eat the meal, but I wouldn't condemn those who did.
I actually have thought about having this sort of meal on more than a handful of occasions. Because I've had pig penis and other prepared forms of penis and it wasn't too shabby. I've known some people who were into more extreme forms of BME (google "Pain Olympics" and you'll have an idea the kind of stuff I'm talking about), and this story basically reminds me of that.
Otoki said:
Now that's a form of cannibalism I have no ethical qualms about. The chef is extreme, but I think it's very interesting. I don't think I could bring myself to eat the meal, but I wouldn't condemn those who did.
This is how I feel, too. I don't think I could eat it, but I think it's cool that Sugiyama felt comfortable making it public, and hopefully the cost of the meal was able to cover some of the expenses for the surgery.
I think it's douchey that even after Sugiyama has said they don't identify as any gender, Huffington Post continues to use gendered pronouns.
Psyche said:
I actually have thought about having this sort of meal on more than a handful of occasions. Because I've had pig penis and other prepared forms of penis and it wasn't too shabby. I've known some people who were into more extreme forms of BME (google "Pain Olympics" and you'll have an idea the kind of stuff I'm talking about), and this story basically reminds me of that.
I don't know if it's because I was vege for so long or what, but now that I'm eating meat again I just can't get worked up over what part of an animal I'm eating. If I'm comfortable eating a pig's ass, why wouldn't I be comfortable eating it's penis?
I think human is where I might draw the line, though.
Calico said:
I think it's douchey that even after Sugiyama has said they don't identify as any gender, Huffington Post continues to use gendered pronouns.
"They" is a plural pronoun, the word that you wanted is "it" (or if that is dehumanizing, the word that you wanted doesn't exist).
----------
As to the original article, First, I support this person's right to domain over his own body, however I would hope that his psychological well-being was evaluated before such a drastic surgery was undertaken. Second, it is pretty disgusting to pay large amounts of money to eat human flesh, but whatever. Third, I'm sure this is highly illegal and I hope this person doesn't get arrested.
Calico said:
I think it's douchey that even after Sugiyama has said they don't identify as any gender, Huffington Post continues to use gendered pronouns.
"They" is a plural pronoun, the word that you wanted is "it" (or if that is dehumanizing, the word that you wanted doesn't exist).
----------
As to the original article, First, I support this person's right to domain over his own body, however I would hope that his psychological well-being was evaluated before such a drastic surgery was undertaken. Second, it is pretty disgusting to pay large amounts of money to eat human flesh, but whatever. Third, I'm sure this is highly illegal and I hope this person doesn't get arrested.
Second, "Japanese authorities (...) deemed the banquet legal because there is no law against cannibalism in the country." (as per article quoted)
Half-arsed bullet points aside, I'm pretty impressed by such a creative use of surgical cast-offs. I see it as an outstanding performance art of extreme gender bending, in a society that facilitates such profound freedom of choice, in the day and age when most of us have lost basic liberties such as smoking a cigarette in a bar.
Calico said:
I think it's douchey that even after Sugiyama has said they don't identify as any gender, Huffington Post continues to use gendered pronouns.
"They" is a plural pronoun, the word that you wanted is "it" (or if that is dehumanizing, the word that you wanted doesn't exist).
Actually, there are lots of appropriate words. You might be surprised to find that the English language has a lot of words which exist, even if you don't personally know about them. 'E, zher, zir, mer and zhim are all examples of gender neutral pronouns, but since I wasn't able to ask this particular person about what they prefer, the singular 'they' seemed the most appropriate (thanks, Manko).
METOO said:
$1250 for your manhood? Now what for the rest of your life?
Since it's already been stated that the chef was having the surgery because they didn't want a penis, I doubt they see it as a great loss of 'manhood'. I don't think the only reason the chef had the surgery was to make money.
Manko said:
Second, "Japanese authorities (...) deemed the banquet legal because there is no law against cannibalism in the country." (as per article quoted)
Half-arsed bullet points aside, I'm pretty impressed by such a creative use of surgical cast-offs. I see it as an outstanding performance art of extreme gender bending, in a society that facilitates such profound freedom of choice, in the day and age when most of us have lost basic liberties such as smoking a cigarette in a bar.
Eh, if you live in Japanese society you HAVE choice, but IMO choosing things outside of the status quo often comes with a pretty big price, socially (or even financially, in some cases). When it comes to gender there is a lot of rigidness, and being openly gay is still rare. There is also far less freedom of choice in terms of social status, career choices and opportunities if you are a woman or an ethnic minority.
Regardless, I love that you called it "performance art of extreme gender bending", because it's just such a succinct way to describe it. I find his thought process about HIS asexuality/androgyny fascinating, and I think it's fabulous that he's not only bringing attention to the issue (many people don't think asexuals actually exist) but causing "audience participation" AND getting the operation (at least partly) paid for.
this story and some of the comments have suddenly made me feel a bit lightheaded.
do we really want to condone this as a way of making money? suppose i want to get some cash fast to visit my dying grandmother in hawaii....should i chop off my ear and serve it up to my neighbors if they are crazy enough to want to eat me?
I kind of agree with Manko and Otoki's take on the chef's actions, actually. But I wonder about the jokers who paid to eat the guy's junk. What the fuck was going through their minds?
I, too, wouldn't want to sever my body part, and especially not cook or eat it, much less to serve it to strangers. However I would like to think if I ever changed my mind, I should like to be ABLE to do it, as it's my own body and therefore my own sick business.
As it's been mentioned before, it doesn't sound like he did it to make money, it sounds more like exercising the freedom to do as you please with your own damn flesh. I'm not debating the morality and ethics of this stunt, because I think this person has full rights to do whatever they wish to their own body - much like I wouldn't debate somebody's right to a bad tattoo, an abortion, or suicide for that matter.
mingol said:
I kind of agree with Manko and Otoki's take on the chef's actions, actually. But I wonder about the jokers who paid to eat the guy's junk. What the fuck was going through their minds?
Some folks will do anything for a fresh experience.
yes, something consensual makes more sense to me than anything non-consensual... So consensual cannibalism bothers me way less than, say, rape. Is that really so extreme?
im not saying its as bad as rape. thats not my point. but i do find it very very disturbing. maybe because i was brought up thinking that eating people is wrong, unless maybe its a life or death situation, like the plot of the movie "Alive".
This just strikes me as a publicity stunt and very crass. Plus what if the people who ate the meal start thinking "hmm that was really exciting and delicious. we should offer money to desperately poor people so we can eat more human body parts!"
LEtranger said:
This just strikes me as a publicity stunt and very crass.
Oh, come on now. I share your revulsion, but do you really think this guy had his dick and balls chopped off purely for publicity? I can't believe that anyone is that desperate for 15 minutes of fame.
Calico said:
I think it's douchey that even after Sugiyama has said they don't identify as any gender, Huffington Post continues to use gendered pronouns.
"They" is a plural pronoun, the word that you wanted is "it" (or if that is dehumanizing, the word that you wanted doesn't exist).
Actually, there are lots of appropriate words. You might be surprised to find that the English language has a lot of words which exist, even if you don't personally know about them. 'E, zher, zir, mer and zhim are all examples of gender neutral pronouns, but since I wasn't able to ask this particular person about what they prefer, the singular 'they' seemed the most appropriate (thanks, Manko).
METOO said:
$1250 for your manhood? Now what for the rest of your life?
Since it's already been stated that the chef was having the surgery because they didn't want a penis, I doubt they see it as a great loss of 'manhood'. I don't think the only reason the chef had the surgery was to make money.
Yeah I guess if it's part of getting a sex change,but still.
khoos
HOPEFUL
Ottawa, ON
MAY 25, 2012 07:12 AM